NAMOEWASTE and HIGREEN, both in Environmental Services. Monthly data through 2026-10-30. Change the comparison →
Share price change since Sep '24, the first month all 2 have a price: NAMOEWASTE +78%, HIGREEN -39%.
Rebased at 2024-09. Monthly closes from each company's history.
Months with a missing value are left as gaps.
The share price return over 3 years, split into net profit growth, share count change and the change in P/E.
HIGREEN: share price fell 5% over 3 years: −122 pts from net profit growth, +147 pts from the P/E change, −29 pts from share count change.
Not shown for NAMOEWASTE: earnings were negative at one end of the window or there is not enough history.
Segments are percentage points of the price return: price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. These are the same numbers each company's own page shows.
Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its own sector peers that month. Darker is higher-ranked. Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).
Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value.
| Metric | NAMOEWASTE | HIGREEN |
|---|---|---|
| Share Price | ₹340.05 | ₹144.80 |
| Market Cap | ₹778 cr | ₹362 cr |
| P/E | 54.1x | 105.7x |
| P/B | 7.6x | 4.0x |
| P/S | 4.0x | 2.6x |
| ROCE | 21.0% | 10.0% |
| ROE | 14.0% | 3.8% |
| Revenue (TTM), indexed to 100 | ₹195 cr | ₹139 cr |
| Net Profit (TTM) | ₹14 cr | ₹3 cr |
| Debt / Equity | 0.0x | 0.7x |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 126d | 63d |
| Promoter holding | 69.0% | 71.9% |
| FII Holding | 0.1% | 0.2% |
| DII Holding | 1.4% | 0.0% |
| 12M momentum | 85.5% | -25.0% |
| Drawdown from Peak | 0.0% | -51.1% |
| Cash conversion (3Y) | -0.0x | 1.1x |
| Interest cover | 22.0x | 4.5x |
| Share Count Change (1Y) | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Volatility (1Y) | 57.1% | 62.1% |
Latest month in the data: 2026-10. Highlight marks the higher value, or the lower value for P/E, P/B, P/S, debt, working-capital days, share count change and volatility. It marks a number, not a better investment.
Comparison is descriptive and historical. Highlights mark the higher or lower value on a metric, not a better investment.