अApnaFunda

JINDAL POLY INVESTMENT & FIN (JPOLYINVST)

Finance · Investment Managers · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.81 / 100
Profitability 100Growth 44Balance sheet 100
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.57 / 100
Price 38Earnings 80FII/DII 52

Passes these screensQuality CompounderValue PickDebt-light & profitableBusiness ahead of price

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹931 latest close · −16.4% over the last 90 sessions

₹900₹1,000₹1,100Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹900₹1,000₹1,100Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹931 month-end · −10.0% over 12 months

₹900₹1,000₹1,100₹1,200Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹900₹1,000₹1,100₹1,200Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹931 month-end · +39.6% over 3 years

₹600₹800₹1,000₹1,200Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹600₹800₹1,000₹1,200Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹931 month-end · +2511.5% since Jan '19

₹0₹500₹1,000Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹0₹500₹1,000Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹842.70 to ₹1487.70 · 1-year volatility 46.3%

Was the rally earned?

-10%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 93 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 3.6x to 1.2x), which took 103 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +93 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+93 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −103 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−103 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: −10%−10%Share priceNet profit growth: +93 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+93ProfitP/E change: −103 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−103P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: −10%−10%Share price
Net profit growth+93 ptsNet profit rose about 167%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-103 ptsThe P/E fell from 3.6x to 1.2x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+40%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 125 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 2.5x to 1.2x), which took 86 points back.
  • The share count fell 44%.
Net profit growth: +58 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+58 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −86 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−86 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +68 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+68 ptsShare count changeShare price: +40%+40%Share priceNet profit growth: +58 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+58ProfitP/E change: −86 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−86P/EShare count change: +68 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+68SharesShare price: +40%+40%Share price
Net profit growth+58 ptsNet profit rose about 62%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-86 ptsThe P/E fell from 2.5x to 1.2x, which lowers the price.
Share count change+68 ptsShare count fell 44%, which lifts the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with HDFC ASSET MANAGEMENT CO

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-82.8%recovered 2021-09
1-year volatility46.3%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.803-year daily, correlation 0.31
Volume spikes9last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−25%−50%−75%2020202120222023202420252026−81.9% 0%−25%−50%−75%2020202220242026−81.9%
Largest drawdowns

-82.8% (2019-03 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2021-09)

-52.3% (2022-01 peak to 2022-05 low, recovered 2022-09)

-44.0% (2024-11 peak to 2025-03 low, recovered 2025-09)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-08-27: 6.1x the 50-day median, price -2.6% that day

2026-08-24: 14.2x the 50-day median, price -1.9% that day

2026-08-19: 11.9x the 50-day median, price -1.7% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

1.2xP/E todayNear its historic low
Against its own history7th percentile
CheapestMedian 2.5xDearest

Usual range 1.2x to 3.4x since 2019-01.

Against Finance1.2x vs 18.1x
This company
1.2x
Sector median
18.1x

93% below the Finance median.

1.1x9.4x17.7x26.0xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '261.1x9.4x17.7x26.0xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianFinance median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianFinance median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianFinance median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Finance is valued

Where does it rank among Finance peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Finance peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE99th▲ 39 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin100thflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth100th▲ 74 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth92nd▲ 47 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓70thflat vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓89thflat vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓100thflat vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum57th▼ 29 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Finance sector page Watch it move against Finance in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~-11%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 1.4x, the price would imply about −11.4%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

This model is not meaningful for insurers, asset managers and holding companies.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Finance The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹931.00
P/E
1.2x
ROCE
63.0%
Market Cap
₹978 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹1037 cr
P/S
0.9x
P/B
0.6x
ROE
50.4%
Operating Margin
99.0%
Debt / Equity
0.0x
Promoter Holding
74.6%
12M Momentum
-10.0%

52-week range

₹842.70₹1487.70
14% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
46.3%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.72

Balance sheet & cash

Debt service
no meaningful debt
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
0.00x
low
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

3 of 5checks within range2 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance5%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 5.2%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate2%Beyond threshold

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 2.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion0.00xBeyond threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 0.00x (cash from operations ₹6 cr, net profit ₹1,450 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow4 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 4. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history0 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 0 days (0 vs 0). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, institutional and promoter holdings were broadly unchanged.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters74.6%74.6%0.0 pts
FIIs0.0%0.1%+0.1 pts
DIIs0.4%0.4%0.0 pts
Public and others24.9%24.8%-0.1 pts

Number of shareholders

19,164shareholders+3% since Sep '23
18k19k20k22k Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 18,621
Dec '23: 18,955
Mar '24: 18,583
Jun '24: 18,260
Sep '24: 18,382
Dec '24: 21,243
Mar '25: 21,537
Jun '25: 20,111
Sep '25: 19,498
Dec '25: 18,517
Mar '26: 19,032
Jun '26: 19,164
18k19k20k22k Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 18,621
Dec '23: 18,955
Mar '24: 18,583
Jun '24: 18,260
Sep '24: 18,382
Dec '24: 21,243
Mar '25: 21,537
Jun '25: 20,111
Sep '25: 19,498
Dec '25: 18,517
Mar '26: 19,032
Jun '26: 19,164

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

This comparison is not meaningful for insurers, asset managers and holding companies.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

INDOSOLARWAAREEINDO
Producer Manufacturing
73%similar
P/EROCE
CRIZACCRIZAC
Technology Services
64%similar
revenueROCE
Industrial Services
64%similar
ROCEdebt/equity
Non-Energy Minerals
49%similar
market cappromoter holding
Industrial Services
44%similar
volatilitydebt/equity
MASTER TRUSTMASTERTR
Finance
42%similar
market capP/E
Finance
37%similar
operating marginROCE
Finance
35%similar
EPS growthpromoter holding

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Jun '23

  1. OctPriceFell 40% from the Mar 2026 peak to the Oct 2026 low.
  2. AugPriceVolume reached 14.2x its 50-day median on 2026-08-24; price -1.9% that day.
  3. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Finance on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  4. JunPriceVolume reached 24.4x its 50-day median on 2026-06-05; price +11.6% that day.
  5. MarResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  6. MarValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (1.2x).
  7. MarPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Finance on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  8. MarPriceVolume reached 308.4x its 50-day median on 2026-03-10; price +7.7% that day.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. OctPriceVolume reached 100.1x its 50-day median on 2025-10-09; price +11.6% that day.
  2. SepResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  3. SepPriceRegained the 2024-11 peak, 6 months after the low.
  4. SepPriceVolume reached 62.7x its 50-day median on 2025-09-02; price -7.7% that day.
  5. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (3.2x).
  6. JunPriceVolume reached 10.3x its 50-day median on 2025-06-20; price +6.3% that day.
  7. MarPriceFell 44% from the Nov 2024 peak to the Mar 2025 low.
  8. MarPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Finance on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  9. DecPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Finance on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  10. NovPriceVolume reached 71.0x its 50-day median on 2024-11-21; price +6.3% that day.
  11. JulPriceVolume reached 6.5x its 50-day median on 2024-07-02; price +2.3% that day.
  12. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Finance on ROCE (from the top quartile).
  13. JunPriceVolume reached 53.2x its 50-day median on 2024-06-25; price +11.5% that day.
  14. FebPriceVolume reached 15.1x its 50-day median on 2024-02-15; price +8.5% that day.
  15. JanDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.01x.
  16. OctPriceRegained the 2023-06 peak, 2 months after the low.
  17. OctPriceVolume reached 62.6x its 50-day median on 2023-10-17; price +10.1% that day.
  18. SepPriceVolume reached 24.2x its 50-day median on 2023-09-21; price +6.9% that day.
  19. AugPriceFell 31% from the Jun 2023 peak to the Aug 2023 low.
  20. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned positive.
  21. JunPriceRegained the 2022-11 peak, 4 months after the low.
  22. JunDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.01x.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history95 months · 2019-01 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-111.2x₹1037 cr50.4%63.0%0.0x
2026-101.1x₹1037 cr50.4%63.0%0.0x
2026-091.2x₹1037 cr50.4%63.0%0.0x
2026-081.2x₹1036 cr53.5%63.0%0.0x
2026-071.3x₹1036 cr53.5%63.0%0.0x
2026-061.4x₹1036 cr53.5%63.0%0.0x
2026-051.2x₹997 cr58.4%13.0%0.0x
2026-041.3x₹997 cr58.4%13.0%0.0x
2026-031.2x₹997 cr58.4%13.0%0.0x
2026-025.6x₹43 cr14.5%13.0%0.0x
2026-014.7x₹43 cr14.5%13.0%0.0x
2025-124.9x₹43 cr14.5%13.0%0.0x
2025-113.6x₹32 cr19.9%13.0%0.0x
2025-103.4x₹32 cr19.9%13.0%0.0x
2025-093.3x₹32 cr19.9%13.0%0.0x
2025-083.1x₹32 cr19.4%13.0%0.0x
2025-072.8x₹32 cr19.4%13.0%0.0x
2025-063.2x₹32 cr19.4%13.0%0.0x
2025-052.7x₹38 cr12.3%12.0%0.0x
2025-042.8x₹38 cr12.3%12.0%0.0x
2025-032.2x₹38 cr12.3%12.0%0.0x
2025-021.6x₹37 cr14.9%12.0%0.0x
2025-012.0x₹37 cr14.9%12.0%0.0x
2024-122.3x₹37 cr14.9%12.0%0.0x
2024-113.1x₹36 cr11.6%12.0%0.0x
2024-102.5x₹36 cr11.6%12.0%0.0x
2024-092.7x₹36 cr11.6%12.0%0.0x
2024-083.0x₹35 cr11.1%12.0%0.0x
2024-073.1x₹35 cr11.1%12.0%0.0x
2024-063.2x₹35 cr11.1%12.0%0.0x
2024-052.7x₹3125 cr21.1%21.0%0.0x
2024-042.6x₹3125 cr21.1%21.0%0.0x
2024-032.3x₹3125 cr21.1%21.0%0.0x
2024-022.7x₹3125 cr21.1%21.0%0.0x
2024-012.6x₹3125 cr21.1%21.0%0.0x
2023-122.3x₹3125 cr21.1%21.0%0.0x
2023-112.5x₹3125 cr21.1%21.0%0.0x
2023-102.6x₹3125 cr21.1%21.0%0.0x
2023-092.0x₹3125 cr21.1%21.0%0.0x
2023-081.8x₹3125 cr21.1%21.0%0.0x
2023-072.0x₹3125 cr21.1%21.0%0.0x
2023-062.2x₹3125 cr21.1%21.0%0.0x
2023-05—₹2477 cr58.8%41.0%0.7x
2023-04—₹2477 cr58.8%41.0%0.7x
2023-03—₹2477 cr58.8%41.0%0.7x
2023-02—₹2477 cr58.8%41.0%0.7x
2023-01—₹2477 cr58.8%41.0%0.7x
2022-12—₹2477 cr58.8%41.0%0.7x
2022-11—₹2477 cr58.8%41.0%0.7x
2022-10—₹2477 cr58.8%41.0%0.7x
2022-09—₹2477 cr58.8%41.0%0.7x
2022-08—₹2477 cr58.8%41.0%0.7x
2022-07—₹2477 cr58.8%41.0%0.7x
2022-06—₹2477 cr58.8%41.0%0.7x
2022-05—₹1 cr—12.0%—
2022-04—₹1 cr—12.0%—
2022-03—₹1 cr—12.0%—
2022-02—₹1 cr—12.0%—
2022-01—₹1 cr—12.0%—
2021-12—₹1 cr—12.0%—
2021-11—₹1 cr—12.0%—
2021-10—₹1 cr—12.0%—
2021-09—₹1 cr—12.0%—
2021-08—₹1 cr—12.0%—
2021-07—₹1 cr—12.0%—
2021-06—₹1 cr—12.0%—
2021-05—₹1 cr—-53.0%—
2021-04—₹1 cr—-53.0%—
2021-03—₹1 cr—-53.0%—
2021-02—₹1 cr—-53.0%—
2021-01—₹1 cr—-53.0%—
2020-12—₹1 cr—-53.0%—
2020-11—₹1 cr—-53.0%—
2020-10—₹1 cr—-53.0%—
2020-09—₹1 cr—-53.0%—
2020-08—₹1 cr—-53.0%—
2020-07—₹1 cr—-53.0%—
2020-06—₹1 cr—-53.0%—
2020-05—₹1 cr—-49.0%—
2020-04—₹1 cr—-49.0%—
2020-03—₹1 cr—-49.0%—
2020-02—₹1 cr—-49.0%—
2020-01—₹1 cr—-49.0%—
2019-12—₹1 cr—-49.0%—
2019-11—₹1 cr—-49.0%—
2019-10—₹1 cr—-49.0%—
2019-09—₹1 cr—-49.0%—
2019-08—₹1 cr—-49.0%—
2019-07—₹1 cr—-49.0%—
2019-06—₹1 cr—-49.0%—
2019-05—₹242 cr—-8.0%—
2019-04—₹242 cr—-8.0%—
2019-03—₹242 cr—-8.0%—
2019-02—₹242 cr—-8.0%—
2019-01—₹242 cr—-8.0%—

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback