GREENLAM and STYLAMIND, both in Forest Products. Monthly data through 2026-10-21. Change the comparison →
Share price change since Aug '21, the first month all 2 have a price: GREENLAM +56%, STYLAMIND +184%.
Rebased at 2021-08. Monthly closes from each company's history.
Months with a missing value are left as gaps.
The share price return over 3 years, split into net profit growth, share count change and the change in P/E.
GREENLAM: share price fell 11% over 3 years: −31 pts from net profit growth, +20 pts from the P/E change.
STYLAMIND: share price rose 88% over 3 years: +80 pts from net profit growth, +9 pts from the P/E change.
Segments are percentage points of the price return: price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. These are the same numbers each company's own page shows.
Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its own sector peers that month. Darker is higher-ranked. Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).
Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value.
| Metric | GREENLAM | STYLAMIND |
|---|---|---|
| Share Price | ₹212.39 | ₹3141.10 |
| Market Cap | ₹5395 cr | ₹5338 cr |
| P/E | 58.2x | 31.4x |
| P/B | 4.6x | 6.6x |
| P/S | 1.7x | 4.6x |
| ROCE | 8.0% | 27.0% |
| ROE | 7.9% | 21.1% |
| Operating margin | 10.0% | 21.0% |
| Revenue (TTM), indexed to 100 | ₹3169 cr | ₹1172 cr |
| Net Profit (TTM) | ₹93 cr | ₹169 cr |
| Debt / Equity | 1.0x | 0.0x |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 92d | 150d |
| Promoter holding | 51.0% | 56.9% |
| FII Holding | 1.5% | 2.6% |
| DII Holding | 10.9% | 12.1% |
| 12M momentum | -19.9% | 52.7% |
| Drawdown from Peak | -30.1% | -9.3% |
| Cash conversion (3Y) | 2.7x | 1.0x |
| Interest cover | 2.5x | — |
| Share Count Change (1Y) | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Volatility (1Y) | 36.7% | 33.6% |
Latest month in the data: 2026-10. Highlight marks the higher value, or the lower value for P/E, P/B, P/S, debt, working-capital days, share count change and volatility. It marks a number, not a better investment.
Comparison is descriptive and historical. Highlights mark the higher or lower value on a metric, not a better investment.