STYLAMIND and GREENLAM, both in Forest Products. Monthly data through 2026-10-09. Change the comparison →
Share price change since Aug '21, the first month all 2 have a price: STYLAMIND +196%, GREENLAM +52%.
Rebased at 2021-08. Monthly closes from each company's history.
Months with a missing value are left as gaps.
The share price return over 3 years, split into net profit growth, share count change and the change in P/E.
STYLAMIND: share price rose 96% over 3 years: +81 pts from net profit growth, +15 pts from the P/E change.
GREENLAM: share price fell 14% over 3 years: +12 pts from net profit growth, −25 pts from the P/E change, −1 pts from share count change.
Segments are percentage points of the price return: price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. These are the same numbers each company's own page shows.
Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its own sector peers that month. Darker is higher-ranked. Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).
Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value.
| Metric | STYLAMIND | GREENLAM |
|---|---|---|
| Share Price | ₹3271.00 | ₹206.34 |
| Market Cap | ₹5531 cr | ₹5284 cr |
| P/E | 32.7x | 38.6x |
| P/B | 6.9x | 4.2x |
| P/S | 4.7x | 2.2x |
| ROCE | 27.0% | 13.0% |
| ROE | 21.0% | 10.8% |
| Operating margin | 21.0% | 10.0% |
| Revenue (TTM), indexed to 100 | ₹1172 cr | ₹2441 cr |
| Net Profit (TTM) | ₹169 cr | ₹137 cr |
| Debt / Equity | 0.0x | 0.4x |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 150d | 59d |
| Promoter holding | 56.9% | 51.0% |
| FII Holding | 2.6% | 1.5% |
| DII Holding | 12.1% | 10.9% |
| 12M momentum | 59.0% | -22.2% |
| Drawdown from Peak | -5.6% | -32.1% |
| Cash conversion (3Y) | 1.0x | 1.8x |
| Interest cover | — | 5.5x |
| Share Count Change (1Y) | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Volatility (1Y) | 34.2% | 36.7% |
Latest month in the data: 2026-10. Highlight marks the higher value, or the lower value for P/E, P/B, P/S, debt, working-capital days, share count change and volatility. It marks a number, not a better investment.
Comparison is descriptive and historical. Highlights mark the higher or lower value on a metric, not a better investment. Not investment advice; ApnaFunda is not a SEBI-registered research analyst.