ULTRACEMCO and TATASTEEL. Monthly data through 2026-10-26. Change the comparison →
Share price change since Jan '19, the first month all 2 have a price: ULTRACEMCO +224%, TATASTEEL +295%.
Rebased at 2019-01. Monthly closes from each company's history.
Months with a missing value are left as gaps.
The share price return over 3 years, split into net profit growth, share count change and the change in P/E.
ULTRACEMCO: share price rose 35% over 3 years: +61 pts from net profit growth, −23 pts from the P/E change, −3 pts from share count change.
TATASTEEL: share price rose 51% over 3 years: +39 pts from net profit growth, +25 pts from the P/E change, −13 pts from share count change.
Segments are percentage points of the price return: price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. These are the same numbers each company's own page shows.
Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its own sector peers that month. Darker is higher-ranked. Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).
Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value.
| Metric | ULTRACEMCO | TATASTEEL |
|---|---|---|
| Share Price | ₹11180.00 | ₹169.94 |
| Market Cap | ₹3.31L cr | ₹2.13L cr |
| P/E | 38.6x | 19.2x |
| P/B | 4.3x | 2.1x |
| P/S | 3.6x | 0.9x |
| ROCE | 13.0% | 13.0% |
| ROE | 11.2% | 10.8% |
| Operating margin | 20.0% | 15.0% |
| Revenue (TTM), indexed to 100 | ₹91884 cr | ₹2.40L cr |
| Net Profit (TTM) | ₹8571 cr | ₹11263 cr |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | 0.9x |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 13d | 56d |
| Promoter holding | 59.3% | 32.9% |
| FII Holding | 12.4% | 18.9% |
| DII Holding | 19.7% | 26.4% |
| 12M momentum | -4.5% | -7.1% |
| Drawdown from Peak | -10.1% | -20.0% |
| Cash conversion (3Y) | 1.7x | 5.0x |
| Interest cover | 7.0x | 3.4x |
| Share Count Change (1Y) | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Volatility (1Y) | 23.8% | 26.2% |
Latest month in the data: 2026-10. Highlight marks the higher value, or the lower value for P/E, P/B, P/S, debt, working-capital days, share count change and volatility. It marks a number, not a better investment.
Comparison is descriptive and historical. Highlights mark the higher or lower value on a metric, not a better investment.