अApnaFunda
Menu

APOLLO SINDOORI HOTELS LIMITED (APOLSINHOT)

Consumer Services · Hotels/Resorts/Cruise lines · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.44 / 100
Profitability 40Growth 53Balance sheet 37
Compare withINDIAN HOTELS COITC HOTELSLEELA PALACES HOTELS & RESORTS

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹1,096.5 latest close · −11.5% over the last 90 sessions

₹1,100₹1,200₹1,300Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹1,100₹1,200₹1,300Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹1,096.5 month-end · −15.5% over 12 months

₹1,000₹1,200Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹1,000₹1,200Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹1,096.5 month-end · −29.9% over 3 years

₹1,000₹1,500₹2,000Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹1,000₹1,500₹2,000Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹1,096.5 month-end · −1.1% since Jan '19

₹1,000₹2,000Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹1,000₹2,000Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹950.00 to ₹1440.00 · 1-year volatility 35.2%

Was the rally earned?

-16%share price, 1 yearEarnings-driven

Mostly earnings.

  • Per-share earnings took off 19 points, while the multiple moved less (P/E 33.1x to 34.3x).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −19 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−19 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +3 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+3 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: −15%−15%Share priceNet profit growth: −19 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−19ProfitP/E change: +3 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+3P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: −15%−15%Share price
Net profit growth-19 ptsNet profit fell about 18%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+3 ptsThe P/E rose from 33.1x to 34.3x, which lifts the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-30%share price, 3 yearsEarnings-driven

Mostly earnings.

  • Per-share earnings took off 60 points, while the multiple moved less (P/E 24.0x to 34.3x).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −60 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−60 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +30 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+30 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: −30%−30%Share priceNet profit growth: −60 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−60ProfitP/E change: +30 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+30P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: −30%−30%Share price
Net profit growth-60 ptsNet profit fell about 51%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+30 ptsThe P/E rose from 24.0x to 34.3x, which lifts the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+31%share price, 5 yearsMultiple-driven

Partly.

  • Most of the rise came from investors paying a higher multiple (P/E 22.7x to 34.3x); per-share earnings took off 16 points.
  • The share count fell 4%.
Net profit growth: −21 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−21 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +47 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+47 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +5 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+5 ptsShare count changeShare price: +31%+31%Share priceNet profit growth: −21 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−21ProfitP/E change: +47 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+47P/EShare count change: +5 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+5SharesShare price: +31%+31%Share price
Net profit growth-21 ptsNet profit fell about 17%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+47 ptsThe P/E rose from 22.7x to 34.3x, which lifts the price.
Share count change+5 ptsShare count fell 4%, which lifts the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with INDIAN HOTELS CO

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-72.7%recovered 2022-09
1-year volatility35.2%annualised

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2020202120222023202420252026−69.7% 0%−20%−40%−60%2020202220242026−69.7%
Largest drawdowns

-72.7% (2019-01 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2022-09)

-62.4% (2024-01 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

-38.2% (2022-10 peak to 2023-02 low, recovered 2023-08)

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

34.3xP/E todayNear its historic high
Against its own history81st percentile
CheapestMedian 22.4xDearest

Usual range 9.2x to 43.1x since 2019-01.

Against Consumer Services34.3x vs 22.4x
This company
34.3x
Sector median
22.4x

53% above the Consumer Services median.

5.0x22.8x40.6x58.4xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '265.0x22.8x40.6x58.4xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Services median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Consumer Services is valued

Where does it rank among Consumer Services peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Consumer Services peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE61st▲ 9 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin20thflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth82nd▲ 38 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth35th▼ 36 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓27th▼ 9 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓38th▼ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓31st▼ 14 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum59th▲ 29 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Consumer Services sector page Watch it move against Consumer Services in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~17%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 23.4x, the price would imply about 16.8%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Below the ₹1,000 cr market-cap floor used for the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Consumer Services The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹1096.50
P/E
34.3x
ROCE
12.0%
Market Cap
₹285 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹672 cr
P/S
0.4x
P/B
1.8x
ROE
5.3%
Operating Margin
3.5%
Debt / Equity
0.6x
Promoter Holding
64.7%
12M Momentum
-15.5%

52-week range

₹950.00₹1440.00
30% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
35.2%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.54

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
2.8x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
2.59x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

3 of 6checks within range1 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance44%Beyond threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 44.3%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate42%Near threshold

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 42.3%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion2.59xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 2.59x (cash from operations ₹75 cr, net profit ₹29 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow3 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 3. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+1 daysWithin range

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 1 days (65 vs 64). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress2% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 2% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, institutional and promoter holdings were broadly unchanged.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 2,907 to 6,820 (+135%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters64.7%64.7%0.0 pts
FIIs0.1%0.0%-0.1 pts
DIIs0.0%0.0%0.0 pts
Public and others35.3%35.3%+0.1 pts

Number of shareholders

6,820shareholders+135% since Sep '23
3k5k7k9k Sep '23Jun '24Dec '24Jun '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 2,907
Mar '24: 8,583
Jun '24: 8,534
Sep '24: 8,216
Dec '24: 8,105
Mar '25: 7,988
Jun '25: 8,121
Sep '25: 7,761
Jun '26: 6,820
 3k5k7k9k Sep '23Sep '24Jun '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 2,907
Mar '24: 8,583
Jun '24: 8,534
Sep '24: 8,216
Dec '24: 8,105
Mar '25: 7,988
Jun '25: 8,121
Sep '25: 7,761
Jun '26: 6,820

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+24.0%typical 12-month return vs the marketAbove the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like APOLLO SINDOORI HOTELS LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −27% to +53% vs the market, against −2% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The analogs' median sat above that base rate (gap +26.3%, 80% range +5.9% to +31.2%), but the matches cluster in only 6 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
EVERESTIND · Apr 2024: −61.0% vs market
SARVESHWAR · Jul 2025: −58.1% vs market
RAYMOND · Jan 2020: −58.0% vs market
INDTERRAIN · Apr 2024: −55.0% vs market
TNPL · Jan 2020: −47.6% vs market
RUSHIL · Sep 2025: −44.0% vs market
NACLIND · Apr 2023: −43.8% vs market
DUCON · Sep 2024: −39.7% vs market
PDSL · Mar 2025: −38.3% vs market
NELCAST · Feb 2024: −34.4% vs market
ASAHISONG · Jun 2022: −34.1% vs market
MADRASFERT · Jul 2025: −32.2% vs market
SHANKARA · Apr 2023: −27.0% vs market
WHEELS · Jul 2023: −25.2% vs market
RPPL · Jan 2024: −24.7% vs market
GRPLTD · Apr 2020: −23.5% vs market
ALICON · Mar 2024: −22.8% vs market
WIPL · Nov 2024: −20.7% vs market
SKIPPER · Sep 2021: −10.8% vs market
ASPINWALL · Oct 2025: −6.1% vs market
RANEHOLDIN · Jan 2024: +8.8% vs market
MUNJALAU · Sep 2025: +9.1% vs market
CAPACITE · Oct 2022: +18.6% vs market
TVSSRICHAK · Aug 2022: +21.4% vs market
NRAIL · Jul 2025: +23.1% vs market
MANAKALUCO · Jan 2023: +24.8% vs market
TBZ · Jan 2023: +26.5% vs market
HITECH · Apr 2022: +27.2% vs market
LUMAXIND · Oct 2022: +28.4% vs market
PGIL · Sep 2020: +30.4% vs market
SANDHAR · Jul 2022: +33.2% vs market
JAYBARMARU · Nov 2022: +33.7% vs market
AAREYDRUGS · Aug 2025: +36.1% vs market
HPL · May 2022: +37.1% vs market
SANGAMIND · May 2020: +45.2% vs market
ELECTCAST · Mar 2020: +49.5% vs market
GOKUL · May 2020: +52.1% vs market
RML · Oct 2025: +53.8% vs market
KOKUYOCMLN · May 2022: +63.5% vs market
MMP · Sep 2025: +68.9% vs market
SKMEGGPROD · Jun 2020: +71.7% vs market
THANGAMAYL · Jan 2023: +83.6% vs market
RAMRAT · Jul 2024: +94.9% vs market
TEMBO · Mar 2024: +97.6% vs market
CEMPRO · Jul 2022: +98.2% vs market
GLOBUSSPR · May 2020: +99.9% vs market
MANGLMCEM · Aug 2023: +102.4% vs market
RICOAUTO · Jun 2022: +102.6% vs market
BLKASHYAP · Oct 2022: +115.2% vs market
JBMA · Jun 2021: +147.5% vs market
Similar setups +24.0%All companies −2.3%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 4 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+24.0%
All companies' median
−2.3%
Beat the market
60% vs 47%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 31 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
JAYBARMARU
Distribution Services		 Nov 2022 27x9% +1%−12% +34%
KOKUYOCMLN
Consumer Durables		 May 2022 40x9% −1%−22% +64%
SKIPPER
Producer Manufacturing		 Sep 2021 42x9% +72%−14% −11%
NELCAST
Non-Energy Minerals		 Feb 2024 44x10% +53%−15% −34%
RICOAUTO
Producer Manufacturing		 Jun 2022 24x7% −14%−29% +103%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
TVSSRICHAK
Consumer Durables		 Aug 2022 38x7% −1%−15% +21%
HITECH
Non-Energy Minerals		 Apr 2022 30x13% +65%−16% +27%
CEMPRO
Industrial Services		 Jul 2022 20x14% −5%−14% +98%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: drawdown from 12-month high, 12-month momentum and interest cover. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to APOLLO SINDOORI HOTELS LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What changed?

28 events since Mar '20

  1. SepResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  2. SepPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Consumer Services on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  3. MarPriceFell 62% from the Jan 2024 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  4. MarPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Consumer Services on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  5. SepResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  6. SepPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Consumer Services on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  7. MarPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Consumer Services on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  8. SepPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Consumer Services on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
Show 20 earlier events
  1. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  2. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (34.9x).
  3. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Consumer Services on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  4. JunDebtDebt / equity fell below 1.0x (0.64x).
  5. JanValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (32.2x).
  6. AugPriceRegained the 2022-10 peak, 6 months after the low.
  7. AugValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (27.1x).
  8. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹367 cr.
  9. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Consumer Services on ROCE (from the top quartile).
  10. JunDebtDebt / equity rose above 1.0x (1.06x).
  11. AprValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (24.3x).
  12. FebPriceFell 38% from the Oct 2022 peak to the Feb 2023 low.
  13. OctValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (27.4x).
  14. SepPriceRegained the 2019-01 peak, 30 months after the low.
  15. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  16. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (22.7x).
  17. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Consumer Services on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  18. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  19. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Consumer Services on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  20. MarPriceFell 73% from the Jan 2019 peak to the Mar 2020 low.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history95 months · 2019-01 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1134.3x₹672 cr5.3%12.0%0.6x
2026-1036.4x₹672 cr5.3%12.0%0.6x
2026-0936.3x₹672 cr5.3%12.0%0.6x
2026-0830.5x₹632 cr6.7%12.0%0.6x
2026-0729.7x₹632 cr6.7%12.0%0.6x
2026-0631.3x₹632 cr6.7%12.0%0.6x
2026-0532.4x₹587 cr6.8%9.0%0.6x
2026-0430.3x₹587 cr6.8%9.0%0.6x
2026-0324.9x₹587 cr6.8%9.0%0.6x
2026-0229.4x₹567 cr7.6%9.0%0.6x
2026-0130.8x₹567 cr7.6%9.0%0.6x
2025-1228.4x₹567 cr7.6%9.0%0.6x
2025-1133.1x₹552 cr7.0%9.0%0.6x
2025-1033.5x₹552 cr7.0%9.0%0.6x
2025-0934.3x₹552 cr7.0%9.0%0.6x
2025-0845.7x₹542 cr5.3%9.0%0.6x
2025-0746.5x₹542 cr5.3%9.0%0.6x
2025-0643.3x₹542 cr5.3%9.0%0.6x
2025-0547.3x₹539 cr5.4%12.0%0.6x
2025-0445.9x₹539 cr5.4%12.0%0.6x
2025-0342.9x₹539 cr5.4%12.0%0.6x
2025-0236.5x₹534 cr6.8%12.0%0.6x
2025-0145.2x₹534 cr6.8%12.0%0.6x
2024-1248.5x₹534 cr6.8%12.0%0.6x
2024-1155.3x₹526 cr6.5%12.0%0.6x
2024-1056.0x₹526 cr6.5%12.0%0.6x
2024-0958.4x₹526 cr6.5%12.0%0.6x
2024-0837.1x₹519 cr8.2%12.0%0.6x
2024-0738.4x₹519 cr8.2%12.0%0.6x
2024-0634.9x₹519 cr8.2%12.0%0.6x
2024-0524.5x₹367 cr14.2%12.0%1.1x
2024-0427.5x₹367 cr14.2%12.0%1.1x
2024-0325.6x₹367 cr14.2%12.0%1.1x
2024-0230.6x₹367 cr14.2%12.0%1.1x
2024-0132.2x₹367 cr14.2%12.0%1.1x
2023-1223.2x₹367 cr14.2%12.0%1.1x
2023-1124.0x₹367 cr14.2%12.0%1.1x
2023-1027.6x₹367 cr14.2%12.0%1.1x
2023-0923.4x₹367 cr14.2%12.0%1.1x
2023-0827.1x₹367 cr14.2%12.0%1.1x
2023-0720.8x₹367 cr14.2%12.0%1.1x
2023-0621.5x₹367 cr14.2%12.0%1.1x
2023-0524.1x₹208 cr14.7%17.0%0.2x
2023-0424.3x₹208 cr14.7%17.0%0.2x
2023-0318.5x₹208 cr14.7%17.0%0.2x
2023-0218.2x₹208 cr14.7%17.0%0.2x
2023-0119.8x₹208 cr14.7%17.0%0.2x
2022-1222.0x₹208 cr14.7%17.0%0.2x
2022-1123.7x₹208 cr14.7%17.0%0.2x
2022-1027.4x₹208 cr14.7%17.0%0.2x
2022-0922.0x₹208 cr14.7%17.0%0.2x
2022-0814.9x₹208 cr14.7%17.0%0.2x
2022-0711.1x₹208 cr14.7%17.0%0.2x
2022-0610.2x₹208 cr14.7%17.0%0.2x
2022-0517.3x₹169 cr11.4%12.0%0.3x
2022-0420.5x₹169 cr11.4%12.0%0.3x
2022-0322.2x₹169 cr11.4%12.0%0.3x
2022-0221.2x₹169 cr11.4%12.0%0.3x
2022-0122.1x₹169 cr11.4%12.0%0.3x
2021-1222.4x₹169 cr11.4%12.0%0.3x
2021-1122.7x₹169 cr11.4%12.0%0.3x
2021-1022.3x₹169 cr11.4%12.0%0.3x
2021-0921.8x₹169 cr11.4%12.0%0.3x
2021-0822.7x₹169 cr11.4%12.0%0.3x
2021-0719.9x₹169 cr11.4%12.0%0.3x
2021-0622.7x₹169 cr11.4%12.0%0.3x
2021-0515.2x₹193 cr19.0%23.0%0.3x
2021-049.5x₹193 cr19.0%23.0%0.3x
2021-039.6x₹193 cr19.0%23.0%0.3x
2021-029.1x₹193 cr19.0%23.0%0.3x
2021-019.3x₹193 cr19.0%23.0%0.3x
2020-1210.0x₹193 cr19.0%23.0%0.3x
2020-1110.2x₹193 cr19.0%23.0%0.3x
2020-1010.4x₹193 cr19.0%23.0%0.3x
2020-098.8x₹193 cr19.0%23.0%0.3x
2020-089.9x₹193 cr19.0%23.0%0.3x
2020-078.7x₹193 cr19.0%23.0%0.3x
2020-067.8x₹193 cr19.0%23.0%0.3x
2020-055.5x₹165 cr31.3%42.0%0.0x
2020-046.3x₹165 cr31.3%42.0%0.0x
2020-035.0x₹165 cr31.3%42.0%0.0x
2020-026.7x₹165 cr31.3%42.0%0.0x
2020-019.4x₹165 cr31.3%42.0%0.0x
2019-128.5x₹165 cr31.3%42.0%0.0x
2019-118.5x₹165 cr31.3%42.0%0.0x
2019-109.9x₹165 cr31.3%42.0%0.0x
2019-0910.3x₹165 cr31.3%42.0%0.0x
2019-0810.8x₹165 cr31.3%42.0%0.0x
2019-0710.9x₹165 cr31.3%42.0%0.0x
2019-0611.7x₹165 cr31.3%42.0%0.0x
2019-0516.0x₹140 cr31.9%42.0%0.0x
2019-0415.7x₹140 cr31.9%42.0%0.0x
2019-0315.1x₹140 cr31.9%42.0%0.0x
2019-0216.2x₹140 cr31.9%42.0%0.0x
2019-0119.0x₹140 cr31.9%42.0%0.0x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback