LATTEYS INDUSTRIES LIMITED (LATTEYS): Financials & Fundamentals History

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

3M1Y3YAll

₹18.64 latest close · −10.8% over the last 90 sessions

₹18.64 month-end · −21.9% over 12 months

₹18.64 month-end · −45.4% over 3 years

₹18.64 month-end · −45.6% since Jun '23

52-week range ₹15.79 to ₹30.35 · 1-year volatility 50.0%

Was the rally earned?

1 year3 years

-22%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

Per-share earnings added 47 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 66.3x to 30.6x), which took 69 points back.
The share count barely moved.

Net profit growth+47 ptsNet profit rose about 69%, which lifts the price.

P/E change-69 ptsThe P/E fell from 66.3x to 30.6x, which lowers the price.

Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.

-45%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

Per-share earnings added 73 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 148.5x to 30.6x), which took 119 points back.
The share count barely moved.

Net profit growth+73 ptsNet profit rose about 165%, which lifts the price.

P/E change-119 ptsThe P/E fell from 148.5x to 30.6x, which lowers the price.

Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.

What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with WELSPUN CORP

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-72.5%not yet recovered

1-year volatility50.0%annualised

Drawdown from peak

Largest drawdowns

-72.5% (2023-05 peak to 2024-03 low, not yet recovered)

-43.7% (2019-04 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2021-03)

-40.0% (2023-02 peak to 2023-05 low, recovered 2023-05)

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

30.6xP/E todayNear its historic low

Against its own history5th percentile

CheapestMedian 70.9xDearest

Usual range 34.3x to 171.8x since 2023-06.

Against Producer Manufacturing30.6x vs 29.6x

This company

30.6x

Sector median

29.6x

Close to the Producer Manufacturing median.

P/EP/BP/S

P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Producer Manufacturing is valued

Where does it rank among Producer Manufacturing peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Producer Manufacturing peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

ROCE54th▲ 17 pts vs a year ago
Op. margin20th▲ 4 pts vs a year ago
Revenue growth86th▲ 3 pts vs a year ago
EPS growth84th▼ 10 pts vs a year ago
Debt/equity ↓12th▼ 24 pts vs a year ago
Cash cycle ↓44th▼ 6 pts vs a year ago
P/E ↓49th▲ 33 pts vs a year ago
12M momentum27th▼ 15 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE

Op. margin

Revenue growth

EPS growth

Debt/equity ↓

Cash cycle ↓

P/E ↓

12M momentum

Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26

Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Producer Manufacturing sector page Watch it move against Producer Manufacturing in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~27%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 54.5x, the price would imply about 27.4%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Producer Manufacturing The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov: ₹18.64
P/E: 30.6x
ROCE: 16.0%
Market Cap: ₹107 cr
Revenue (TTM): ₹117 cr
P/S: 0.9x
P/B: 4.5x
ROE: 14.6%
Operating Margin: 6.1%
Debt / Equity: 0.9x
Promoter Holding: 74.4%
12M Momentum: -21.9%

52-week range

₹15.79₹30.35

20% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility

50.0%

Beta vs sector

1-year daily

0.61

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover

operating profit ÷ interest

4.8x

Cash from profit, 3Y

operating cash flow ÷ net profit

0.00x

low

Share count, 1Y

unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

4 of 7checks within range1 beyond a threshold

Other income reliance-0%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): -0.2%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate25%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 25.5%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion0.00xBeyond threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 0.00x (cash from operations ₹0 cr, net profit ₹7 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow2 of 4 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 4: 2. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+44 daysNear threshold

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 44 days (138 vs 94). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress0% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 0% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days+20 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by +20 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

What happened next to similar setups

−8.4%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate

We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like LATTEYS INDUSTRIES LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −33% to +37% vs the market, against −5% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
The gap against the base rate (−3.0%, 80% range −15.1% to +13.4%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months

Similar setups' median

−8.4%

All companies' median

−5.4%

Beat the market

42% vs 44%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 36 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

Company	When	P/E	ROCE	12M mom.	Drawdown	Next 12 months
DOLLEX Process Industries	Jan 2024	30x	13%	+48%	−12%	−28%
KDDL Consumer Durables	Jan 2020	17x	17%	−31%	−40%	−34%
BTML Consumer Services	Oct 2025	26x	22%	−29%	−34%	−23%
TEMBO Producer Manufacturing	May 2024	44x	18%	+1%	−26%	+91%
APOLSINHOT Consumer Services	Dec 2024	49x	12%	+13%	−33%	−33%

Show the other 3 matches

Company	When	P/E	ROCE	12M mom.	Drawdown	Next 12 months
ANNAPURNA Consumer Non-Durables	Apr 2025	36x	19%	−28%	−44%	−45%
MUKTAARTS Technology Services	Mar 2020	16x	13%	−61%	−66%	−13%
MCON Non-Energy Minerals	May 2025	36x	17%	−16%	−46%	−70%

How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high and P/S. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to LATTEYS INDUSTRIES LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

Feature	Weight	Non-financial	Financial
P/E	1	yes	yes
P/S	1	yes	—
P/B	1	—	yes
ROCE	1	yes	—
operating margin	1	yes	—
ROE	1	—	yes
debt/equity	0.75	yes	—
interest cover	0.5	yes	—
revenue growth	0.75	yes	yes
12-month momentum	1	yes	yes
drawdown from 12-month high	0.75	yes	yes
size	0.75	yes	yes
volatility	0.5	yes	yes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What changed?

22 events since Mar '20

2026
SepPromoterPromoter holding rose 4.0 pts to 74.4%.
JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
MarValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (34.3x).
JanDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.43x.
2025
SepPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
JunDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.43x.

Show 14 earlier events

2025
MarResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
MarPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
2024
DecResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
DecPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
SepResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
SepPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
MarPriceFell 72% from the May 2023 peak to the Mar 2024 low.
2023
MayPriceRegained the 2023-02 peak, 0 months after the low.
MayPriceFell 40% from the Feb 2023 peak to the May 2023 low.
2022
JulPriceRegained the 2021-03 peak, 15 months after the low.
2021
AprPriceFell 29% from the Mar 2021 peak to the Apr 2021 low.
MarPriceRegained the 2019-04 peak, 12 months after the low.
2020
MarPriceFell 44% from the Apr 2019 peak to the Mar 2020 low.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history42 months · 2023-06 to 2026-11

Month	P/E	Revenue (TTM)	ROE	ROCE	Debt / Equity
2026-11	30.6x	₹117 cr	14.6%	16.0%	0.9x
2026-10	29.9x	₹117 cr	14.6%	16.0%	0.9x
2026-09	34.3x	₹117 cr	14.6%	16.0%	0.9x
2026-08	35.6x	₹117 cr	14.6%	16.0%	0.9x
2026-07	32.8x	₹117 cr	14.6%	16.0%	0.9x
2026-06	34.3x	₹117 cr	14.6%	16.0%	0.9x
2026-05	50.3x	₹102 cr	12.6%	13.0%	0.4x
2026-04	45.5x	₹102 cr	12.6%	13.0%	0.4x
2026-03	34.3x	₹102 cr	12.6%	13.0%	0.4x
2026-02	65.8x	₹86 cr	9.3%	13.0%	0.4x
2026-01	61.5x	₹86 cr	9.3%	13.0%	0.4x
2025-12	66.0x	₹86 cr	9.3%	13.0%	0.4x
2025-11	66.3x	₹84 cr	9.8%	13.0%	0.4x
2025-10	77.9x	₹84 cr	9.8%	13.0%	0.4x
2025-09	55.1x	₹84 cr	9.8%	13.0%	0.4x
2025-08	60.0x	₹80 cr	8.7%	13.0%	0.4x
2025-07	67.1x	₹80 cr	8.7%	13.0%	0.4x
2025-06	70.1x	₹80 cr	8.7%	13.0%	0.4x
2025-05	88.5x	₹73 cr	7.9%	12.0%	0.9x
2025-04	87.7x	₹73 cr	7.9%	12.0%	0.9x
2025-03	73.3x	₹73 cr	7.9%	12.0%	0.9x
2025-02	71.6x	₹68 cr	7.5%	12.0%	0.9x
2025-01	104.0x	₹68 cr	7.5%	12.0%	0.9x
2024-12	128.4x	₹68 cr	7.5%	12.0%	0.9x
2024-11	177.3x	₹65 cr	5.1%	12.0%	0.9x
2024-10	233.5x	₹65 cr	5.1%	12.0%	0.9x
2024-09	219.2x	₹65 cr	5.1%	12.0%	0.9x
2024-08	82.3x	₹64 cr	7.9%	12.0%	0.9x
2024-07	89.4x	₹64 cr	7.9%	12.0%	0.9x
2024-06	60.8x	₹64 cr	7.9%	12.0%	0.9x
2024-05	40.0x	₹64 cr	13.2%	—	0.7x
2024-04	43.1x	₹64 cr	13.2%	—	0.7x
2024-03	35.0x	₹64 cr	13.2%	—	0.7x
2024-02	82.0x	₹53 cr	7.8%	—	0.7x
2024-01	93.5x	₹53 cr	7.8%	—	0.7x
2023-12	151.7x	₹53 cr	7.8%	—	0.7x
2023-11	148.5x	₹53 cr	7.8%	—	0.7x
2023-10	162.6x	₹53 cr	7.8%	—	0.7x
2023-09	172.8x	₹53 cr	7.8%	—	0.7x
2023-08	181.7x	₹53 cr	7.8%	—	0.7x
2023-07	151.5x	₹53 cr	7.8%	—	0.7x
2023-06	148.9x	₹53 cr	7.8%	—	0.7x

Methodology and data notes