अApnaFunda

ORCHASP LIMITED (ORCHASP)

Technology Services · Information Technology Services · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.55 / 100
Profitability 9Balance sheet 100

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹1.09 latest close · −42.3% over the last 90 sessions

₹1₹2₹2Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹1₹2₹2Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹1.09 month-end · −63.4% over 12 months

₹1₹2₹3Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹1₹2₹3Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹1.09 month-end · −64.1% since Feb '25

₹1₹2₹3Feb '25Jun '25Oct '25Mar '26Jul '26Nov '26 ₹1₹2₹3Feb '25Jan '26Nov '26

52-week range ₹1.00 to ₹3.52 · 1-year volatility 58.6%

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-73.9%not yet recovered
1-year volatility58.6%annualised

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2026−72.9% 0%−20%−40%−60%2026−72.9%
Largest drawdowns

-73.9% (2025-10 peak to 2026-11 low, not yet recovered)

-39.1% (2025-02 peak to 2025-03 low, recovered 2025-04)

-31.6% (2025-04 peak to 2025-09 low, recovered 2025-10)

Where does it rank among Technology Services peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Technology Services peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE11th▲ 6 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin8th▼ 26 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth4th
  • Debt/equity ↓58th▲ 19 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓1stflat vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓28th
  • 12M momentum3rd

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Technology Services sector page Watch it move against Technology Services in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~22%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 36.3x, the price would imply about 22.4%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Technology Services The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹1.09
P/E
36.3x
ROCE
0.8%
Market Cap
₹38 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹16 cr
P/S
2.4x
P/B
0.3x
ROE
0.9%
Operating Margin
-16.4%
Debt / Equity
0.1x
Promoter Holding
18.5%
12M Momentum
-63.4%

52-week range

₹1.00₹3.52
4% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
58.6%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.38

Balance sheet & cash

Debt service
no meaningful debt
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
-2.00x
low
Share count, 1Y
+8.4%

Are profits backed by cash?

1 of 4checks within range2 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance300%Beyond threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 300.0%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate0%Beyond threshold

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 0.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Free cash flow2 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 2. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Capital work in progress0% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 0% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, promoters trimmed 2.8 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 42,119 to 44,949 (+7%) between Sep 2024 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '24Jun '26Change
Promoters21.3%18.5%-2.8 pts
FIIs0.0%0.0%0.0 pts
DIIs———
Public and others78.7%81.5%+2.8 pts

Number of shareholders

44,949shareholders+7% since Sep '24
42k43k45k46k Sep '24Dec '24Sep '25Dec '25Mar '26Jun '26
Sep '24: 42,119
Dec '24: 45,762
Sep '25: 45,491
Dec '25: 44,891
Mar '26: 44,799
Jun '26: 44,949
42k43k45k46k Sep '24Sep '25Mar '26Jun '26
Sep '24: 42,119
Dec '24: 45,762
Sep '25: 45,491
Dec '25: 44,891
Mar '26: 44,799
Jun '26: 44,949

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−7.6%typical 12-month return vs the marketBelow the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like ORCHASP LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −29% to +30% vs the market, against −5% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The analogs' median sat below that base rate (gap −2.4%, 80% range −16.4% to −0.4%), but the matches cluster in only 6 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
GSTL · Jul 2024: −73.9% vs market
FILATFASH · Jun 2025: −70.5% vs market
QUICKTOUCH · Oct 2025: −69.6% vs market
RILINFRA · Feb 2024: −59.4% vs market
KAMOPAINTS · Aug 2025: −59.3% vs market
ISHAN · Feb 2025: −59.2% vs market
SONAMAC · Jun 2025: −57.5% vs market
PRITI · Oct 2025: −56.3% vs market
PRUDMOULI · Oct 2025: −48.5% vs market
GOLDTECH · Feb 2025: −45.3% vs market
MIRZAINT · Jun 2023: −38.5% vs market
CHEMBOND · May 2025: −33.3% vs market
OMINFRAL · Jul 2025: −29.6% vs market
ALANKIT · Jun 2022: −28.9% vs market
LOVABLE · Jul 2025: −28.0% vs market
BIOFILCHEM · Sep 2025: −27.4% vs market
NIDAN · Sep 2023: −26.9% vs market
ACEINTEG · Nov 2023: −25.5% vs market
AATMAJ · Jul 2024: −22.9% vs market
ONMOBILE · Apr 2023: −22.7% vs market
BYKE · Jan 2020: −21.1% vs market
UNIDT · Jun 2023: −20.5% vs market
ZENITHEXPO · Jun 2025: −18.2% vs market
INVENTURE · Aug 2023: −13.0% vs market
DIAMINESQ · Oct 2025: −7.9% vs market
MADHAVBAUG · Jun 2024: −7.3% vs market
GROBTEA · Jul 2022: −5.2% vs market
KHANDSE · Nov 2023: −4.7% vs market
JHS · Jun 2021: −4.6% vs market
AKASH · Jul 2023: −4.4% vs market
V2RETAIL · Jan 2020: −3.3% vs market
HGM · Mar 2022: +0.2% vs market
ORICONENT · Aug 2023: +4.4% vs market
BPL · Sep 2022: +6.5% vs market
SUBEXLTD · Jul 2022: +7.4% vs market
AHLADA · Jun 2022: +15.0% vs market
NILASPACES · Jan 2020: +26.0% vs market
ARVEE · Jun 2022: +31.9% vs market
COUNCODOS · May 2020: +32.1% vs market
SAMBHAAV · May 2023: +34.0% vs market
PANSARI · Oct 2023: +39.9% vs market
BHANDARI · Jan 2023: +40.0% vs market
AJOONI · Jul 2023: +42.3% vs market
HYBRIDFIN · Dec 2023: +45.2% vs market
IBULLSLTD · Mar 2020: +55.1% vs market
SHYAMCENT · Feb 2020: +61.3% vs market
ORBTEXP · Jun 2021: +61.4% vs market
KILITCH · Mar 2021: +68.7% vs market
ANTGRAPHIC · Mar 2023: +95.8% vs market
URJA · Jan 2020: +290.3% vs market
Similar setups −7.6%All companies −5.2%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 1 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−7.6%
All companies' median
−5.2%
Beat the market
38% vs 44%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 31 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
ACEINTEG
Technology Services
Nov 2023 47x— −39%−55% −26%
AATMAJ
Health Services
Jul 2024 69x6% −45%−54% −23%
SAMBHAAV
Consumer Services
May 2023 —-2% −32%−52% +34%
COUNCODOS
Finance
May 2020 14x6% −81%−81% +32%
HYBRIDFIN
Finance
Dec 2023 54x4% −56%−66% +45%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
QUICKTOUCH
Technology Services
Oct 2025 57x6% −65%−70% −70%
UNIDT
Industrial Services
Jun 2023 39x6% −50%−53% −21%
ANTGRAPHIC
Process Industries
Mar 2023 —0% −61%−67% +96%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: drawdown from 12-month high, debt/equity and 12-month momentum. Not used (unavailable for this company): interest cover. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to ORCHASP LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What changed?

12 events since Mar '25

  1. NovPriceFell 74% from the Oct 2025 peak to the Nov 2026 low.
  2. JunPromoterPromoter holding rose 6.9 pts to 18.5%.
  3. FebSharesShare count is up 113.2% over 12 months.
  4. DecResultsEPS (TTM) turned positive.
  5. DecPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Technology Services on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  6. OctPriceRegained the 2025-04 peak, 1 month after the low.
  7. SepPriceFell 32% from the Apr 2025 peak to the Sep 2025 low.
  8. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Technology Services on operating margin (from the top quartile).
Show 4 earlier events
  1. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Technology Services on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  2. AprPriceRegained the 2025-02 peak, 1 month after the low.
  3. MarPromoterPromoter holding fell 9.7 pts to 11.6%.
  4. MarPriceFell 39% from the Feb 2025 peak to the Mar 2025 low.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history22 months · 2025-02 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1136.3x₹16 cr0.9%0.8%0.1x
2026-1036.0x₹16 cr0.9%0.8%0.1x
2026-0944.0x₹16 cr0.9%0.8%0.1x
2026-0834.3x₹21 cr1.1%0.8%0.1x
2026-0740.8x₹21 cr1.1%0.8%0.1x
2026-0649.8x₹21 cr1.1%0.8%0.1x
2026-0515.1x₹27 cr3.7%-8.3%0.1x
2026-0415.7x₹27 cr3.7%-8.3%0.1x
2026-0315.9x₹27 cr3.7%-8.3%0.1x
2026-0219.3x₹28 cr4.0%-8.3%0.1x
2026-0119.2x₹28 cr4.0%-8.3%0.1x
2025-1220.9x₹28 cr4.0%-8.3%0.1x
2025-11—₹25 cr-9.9%-8.3%0.1x
2025-10—₹25 cr-9.9%-8.3%0.1x
2025-09—₹25 cr-9.9%-8.3%0.1x
2025-08—₹21 cr-10.2%-8.3%0.1x
2025-07—₹21 cr-10.2%-8.3%0.1x
2025-06—₹21 cr-10.2%-8.3%0.1x
2025-05—₹18 cr-13.6%1.2%0.1x
2025-04—₹18 cr-13.6%1.2%0.1x
2025-03—₹18 cr-13.6%1.2%0.1x
2025-02—₹15 cr-13.8%1.2%0.1x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback