अApnaFunda

LAMOSAIC INDIA LIMITED (LAMOSAIC)

Miscellaneous · figures to Nov '26

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹49.7 latest close · +22.1% over the last 90 sessions

₹40₹50₹60Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹40₹50₹60Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹49.7 month-end · +31.1% over 12 months

₹20₹40₹60Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹20₹40₹60Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹49.7 month-end · −71.1% since Nov '24

₹50₹100₹150Nov '24Apr '25Sep '25Jan '26Jun '26Nov '26 ₹50₹100₹150Nov '24Nov '25Nov '26

52-week range ₹20.45 to ₹61.55 · 1-year volatility 61.1%

Was the rally earned?

+31%share price, 1 yearMultiple-driven

Partly.

  • Most of the rise came from investors paying a higher multiple (P/E 15.8x to 30.7x); per-share earnings took off 45 points.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −45 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−45 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +76 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+76 ptsP/E changeShare price: +31%+31%Share priceNet profit growth: −45 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−45ProfitP/E change: +76 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+76P/EShare price: +31%+31%Share price
Net profit growth-45 ptsNet profit fell about 32%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+76 ptsThe P/E rose from 15.8x to 30.7x, which lifts the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 3 years and 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare with other companies

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-88.0%not yet recovered
1-year volatility61.1%annualised

Drawdown from peak

0%−25%−50%−75%20252026−87.1% 0%−25%−50%−75%2026−87.1%
Largest drawdowns

-88.0% (2024-11 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

30.7xP/E todayNear its historic high
Against its own history88th percentile
CheapestMedian 14.8xDearest

Usual range 4.5x to 30.7x since 2024-11.

3.9x14.8x25.8x36.8xNov '24Apr '25Sep '25Feb '26Jul '26Nov '263.9x14.8x25.8x36.8xNov '24Jul '25Mar '26Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median.

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Miscellaneous is valued

What is the price implying?

~12%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 15.3x, the price would imply about 12.3%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹49.70
P/E
30.7x
ROCE
5.0%
Market Cap
₹51 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹102 cr
P/S
0.5x
P/B
0.7x
ROE
2.1%
Debt / Equity
0.1x
Promoter Holding
49.5%
12M Momentum
31.1%

52-week range

₹20.45₹61.55
71% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
61.1%

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
4.0x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
-2.00x
low
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

2 of 5checks within range3 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance0%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 0.0%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Cash conversion-4.25xBeyond threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: -4.25x (cash from operations ₹-51 cr, net profit ₹12 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow0 of 3 yrsBeyond threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 3: 0. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+187 daysBeyond threshold

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 187 days (326 vs 140). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Payable days-46 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by -46 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

What happened next to similar setups

−6.9%typical 12-month return vs the marketBelow the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like LAMOSAIC INDIA LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −23% to +21% vs the market, against −2% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The analogs' median sat below that base rate (gap −5.2%, 80% range −13.5% to −1.8%), but the matches cluster in only 6 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
SAKUMA · Jun 2024: −57.7% vs market
MITTAL · Aug 2025: −52.7% vs market
DHRUV · Mar 2024: −42.9% vs market
ZENITHSTL · Oct 2025: −41.9% vs market
SUNDARAM · Jan 2020: −35.4% vs market
TARMAT · Oct 2023: −33.3% vs market
SIKKO · Jul 2024: −30.4% vs market
AAKASH · May 2024: −30.2% vs market
RPPL · Jun 2022: −26.1% vs market
PIGL · Mar 2023: −24.7% vs market
MADHAV · Jan 2021: −24.2% vs market
SOMICONVEY · Apr 2021: −23.9% vs market
BANG · Apr 2022: −23.1% vs market
AHLADA · Apr 2023: −22.2% vs market
VASWANI · Aug 2025: −19.7% vs market
AKG · Nov 2020: −19.5% vs market
SHUBHSHREE · Oct 2025: −18.9% vs market
UNIINFO · Jan 2024: −18.0% vs market
ROML · Jul 2025: −16.9% vs market
PARTYCRUS · Mar 2024: −15.4% vs market
MODISONLTD · Apr 2024: −13.2% vs market
BVCL · Sep 2025: −12.0% vs market
PONNIERODE · Jan 2020: −11.6% vs market
PASUPTAC · Aug 2024: −10.4% vs market
ASPINWALL · Sep 2022: −7.3% vs market
SURANASOL · Jan 2020: −6.4% vs market
LOVABLE · May 2021: −4.4% vs market
ARCHIDPLY · Nov 2022: −4.3% vs market
ANIKINDS · Apr 2022: −3.2% vs market
MCL · Apr 2025: −1.5% vs market
AAREYDRUGS · Apr 2024: +0.9% vs market
MHHL · Jan 2023: +9.9% vs market
BYKE · May 2021: +10.7% vs market
VETO · Nov 2020: +11.9% vs market
WEIZMANIND · Sep 2022: +16.1% vs market
KAMDHENU · May 2021: +16.6% vs market
HPIL · Oct 2022: +17.6% vs market
BANSWRAS · Apr 2022: +21.7% vs market
SHREYANIND · Apr 2022: +24.2% vs market
SARLAPOLY · May 2024: +38.7% vs market
ZENITHEXPO · Dec 2023: +46.4% vs market
SONAMLTD · Nov 2023: +52.3% vs market
ISFT · Apr 2021: +57.0% vs market
GUJRAFFIA · Oct 2020: +58.2% vs market
GSS · Dec 2020: +61.3% vs market
GROBTEA · May 2020: +76.5% vs market
ORIENTBELL · Apr 2021: +86.9% vs market
MAHICKRA · May 2025: +89.2% vs market
PNC · Apr 2020: +132.9% vs market
TERASOFT · Jun 2024: +243.5% vs market
Similar setups −6.9%All companies −1.7%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 2 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−6.9%
All companies' median
−1.7%
Beat the market
40% vs 48%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 33 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
HPIL
Process Industries
Oct 2022 33x— +49%−16% +18%
ZENITHEXPO
Consumer Non-Durables
Dec 2023 55x2% +98%−9% +46%
ANIKINDS
Distribution Services
Apr 2022 21x2% +131%−12% −3%
TARMAT
Industrial Services
Oct 2023 25x4% +69%−12% −33%
MADHAV
Non-Energy Minerals
Jan 2021 23x3% +55%−10% −24%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
AHLADA
Producer Manufacturing
Apr 2023 26x7% +8%−21% −22%
SIKKO
Process Industries
Jul 2024 62x— +95%−2% −30%
TERASOFT
Technology Services
Jun 2024 29x8% +72%−11% +244%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: ROCE, interest cover and 12-month momentum. Not used (unavailable for this company): operating margin. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to LAMOSAIC INDIA LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What changed?

6 events since Jun '25

  1. NovValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (30.7x).
  2. SepPromoterPromoter holding fell 19.8 pts to 49.5%.
  3. MarPriceFell 88% from the Nov 2024 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  4. NovDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.09x.
  5. NovSharesShare count is up 42.9% over 12 months.
  6. JunDebtDebt / equity fell below 1.0x (0.09x).

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history25 months · 2024-11 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1130.7x₹102 cr2.1%5.0%0.1x
2026-1030.4x₹102 cr2.1%5.0%0.1x
2026-0930.7x₹102 cr2.1%5.0%0.1x
2026-0836.8x₹102 cr2.1%5.0%0.1x
2026-0731.8x₹102 cr2.1%5.0%0.1x
2026-0620.6x₹102 cr2.1%5.0%0.1x
2026-0510.3x₹143 cr3.2%11.0%0.1x
2026-0410.8x₹143 cr3.2%11.0%0.1x
2026-038.6x₹143 cr3.2%11.0%0.1x
2026-0210.8x₹143 cr3.2%11.0%0.1x
2026-0112.3x₹143 cr3.2%11.0%0.1x
2025-1214.2x₹143 cr3.2%11.0%0.1x
2025-1115.8x₹143 cr3.2%11.0%0.1x
2025-1016.8x₹143 cr3.2%11.0%0.1x
2025-0916.1x₹143 cr3.2%11.0%0.1x
2025-0816.0x₹143 cr3.2%11.0%0.1x
2025-0714.8x₹143 cr3.2%11.0%0.1x
2025-0616.1x₹143 cr3.2%11.0%0.1x
2025-053.9x₹51 cr72.3%—1.1x
2025-043.9x₹51 cr72.3%—1.1x
2025-033.9x₹51 cr72.3%—1.1x
2025-025.2x₹51 cr72.3%—1.1x
2025-016.3x₹51 cr72.3%—1.1x
2024-129.6x₹51 cr72.3%—1.1x
2024-1116.4x₹51 cr72.3%—1.1x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback