अApnaFunda
Menu

PONNI SUGARS (ERODE) LIMITED (PONNIERODE)

Process Industries · Agricultural Commodities/Milling · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.57 / 100
Profitability 19Growth 51Balance sheet 100

Passes these screensValue PickPromoters buying

Compare withPATANJALI FOODSGODREJ INDUSTRIESAWL AGRI BUSINESS

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹332.45 latest close · +5.5% over the last 90 sessions

₹300₹350₹400Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹300₹350₹400Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹332.45 month-end · +16.0% over 12 months

₹250₹300₹350₹400Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹250₹300₹350₹400Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹332.45 month-end · −22.1% over 3 years

₹300₹400₹500Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹300₹400₹500Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹332.45 month-end · +145.6% since Jan '19

₹200₹400₹600Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹200₹400₹600Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹252.40 to ₹455.00 · 1-year volatility 37.5%

Was the rally earned?

+16%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 123 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 15.6x to 5.8x), which took 107 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +122 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+122 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −107 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−107 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +2 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+2 ptsShare count changeShare price: +16%+16%Share priceNet profit growth: +122 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+122ProfitP/E change: −107 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−107P/EShare count change: +2 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+2SharesShare price: +16%+16%Share price
Net profit growth+122 ptsNet profit rose about 209%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-107 ptsThe P/E fell from 15.6x to 5.8x, which lowers the price.
Share count change+2 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-22%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 23 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 9.6x to 5.8x), which took 45 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +23 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+23 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −45 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−45 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1 ptsShare count changeShare price: −22%−22%Share priceNet profit growth: +23 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+23ProfitP/E change: −45 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−45P/EShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1SharesShare price: −22%−22%Share price
Net profit growth+23 ptsNet profit rose about 30%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-45 ptsThe P/E fell from 9.6x to 5.8x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+53%share price, 5 yearsLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 82 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 7.3x to 5.8x), which took 29 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +80 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+80 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −29 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−29 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +2 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+2 ptsShare count changeShare price: +53%+53%Share priceNet profit growth: +80 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+80ProfitP/E change: −29 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−29P/EShare count change: +2 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+2SharesShare price: +53%+53%Share price
Net profit growth+80 ptsNet profit rose about 90%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-29 ptsThe P/E fell from 7.3x to 5.8x, which lowers the price.
Share count change+2 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with PATANJALI FOODS

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-56.2%not yet recovered
1-year volatility37.5%annualised

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%2020202120222023202420252026−55.4% 0%−20%−40%2020202220242026−55.4%
Largest drawdowns

-56.2% (2024-07 peak to 2026-01 low, not yet recovered)

-49.9% (2020-01 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2020-08)

-46.0% (2021-07 peak to 2021-12 low, recovered 2022-12)

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

5.8xP/E todayNear its historic low
Against its own history17th percentile
CheapestMedian 9.3xDearest

Usual range 4.7x to 15.0x since 2019-01.

Against Process Industries5.8x vs 18.1x
This company
5.8x
Sector median
18.1x

68% below the Process Industries median.

4.0x14.8x25.7x36.5xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '264.0x14.8x25.7x36.5xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Process Industries is valued

Where does it rank among Process Industries peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Process Industries peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE31st▲ 11 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin7th▲ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth80th▲ 61 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth95th▲ 82 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓98thflat vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓28th▲ 6 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓94th▲ 28 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum76th▲ 46 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Process Industries sector page Watch it move against Process Industries in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~4%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 8.0x, the price would imply about 3.9%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Below the ₹1,000 cr market-cap floor used for the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Process Industries The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹332.45
P/E
5.8x
ROCE
7.0%
Market Cap
₹286 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹447 cr
P/S
0.6x
P/B
0.5x
ROE
8.7%
Operating Margin
-1.9%
Debt / Equity
0.0x
Promoter Holding
47.3%
12M Momentum
16.0%

52-week range

₹252.40₹455.00
40% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
37.5%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.68

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
91.0x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
0.50x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

3 of 7checks within range1 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance67%Beyond threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 67.0%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate13%Near threshold

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 13.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion0.50xNear threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 0.50x (cash from operations ₹57 cr, net profit ₹114 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow2 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 2. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-10 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 10 days (19 vs 29). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress1% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 1% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days0 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by 0 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, FIIs trimmed 13.4 pts; promoters added 5.0 pts.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters42.4%47.3%+5.0 pts
FIIs22.9%9.5%-13.4 pts
DIIs0.1%0.1%0.0 pts
Public and others34.7%43.2%+8.5 pts

Number of shareholders

16,935shareholders-3% since Sep '23
17k17k18k18k Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 17,434
Dec '23: 17,335
Mar '24: 17,044
Jun '24: 18,456
Sep '24: 18,396
Dec '24: 18,307
Mar '25: 18,264
Jun '25: 18,218
Sep '25: 18,011
Dec '25: 17,750
Mar '26: 17,411
Jun '26: 16,935
 17k17k18k18k Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 17,434
Dec '23: 17,335
Mar '24: 17,044
Jun '24: 18,456
Sep '24: 18,396
Dec '24: 18,307
Mar '25: 18,264
Jun '25: 18,218
Sep '25: 18,011
Dec '25: 17,750
Mar '26: 17,411
Jun '26: 16,935

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−5.2%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like PONNI SUGARS (ERODE) LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −20% to +12% vs the market, against −4% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−1.6%, 80% range −10.2% to +6.2%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−50%0%+50%+100%
NIRAJ · Sep 2025: −39.9% vs market
BOMDYEING · Aug 2025: −37.6% vs market
ALPA · Jul 2025: −37.2% vs market
PLASTIBLEN · Jul 2024: −36.8% vs market
TRIGYN · Aug 2023: −35.5% vs market
TVTODAY · Dec 2024: −35.1% vs market
KIRIINDUS · Dec 2022: −33.5% vs market
DEN · Jun 2024: −30.5% vs market
RUBFILA · Oct 2025: −29.1% vs market
ANDHRSUGAR · Aug 2022: −28.6% vs market
EXCELINDUS · Jun 2025: −27.7% vs market
IFBAGRO · Jul 2022: −20.5% vs market
SCHAND · Sep 2025: −19.7% vs market
FMGOETZE · Aug 2023: −18.6% vs market
PODDARMENT · Aug 2023: −18.3% vs market
IMPAL · Oct 2024: −15.5% vs market
VARDHACRLC · Feb 2020: −15.0% vs market
EIMCOELECO · Feb 2020: −14.6% vs market
LINCOLN · Jul 2024: −13.7% vs market
TTKHLTCARE · Jul 2023: −12.3% vs market
MUNJALSHOW · Dec 2023: −11.2% vs market
GSFC · Nov 2023: −10.3% vs market
HMVL · Sep 2025: −9.9% vs market
AHLEAST · Nov 2023: −7.6% vs market
GROBTEA · Mar 2025: −5.5% vs market
ALBERTDAVD · Jun 2022: −4.8% vs market
SOTL · Sep 2021: −4.0% vs market
BANCOINDIA · Oct 2021: +1.1% vs market
NIITLTD · Aug 2021: +2.6% vs market
STEELCITY · May 2023: +3.7% vs market
GHCLTEXTIL · Apr 2025: +5.3% vs market
MANAKSIA · Jun 2020: +5.7% vs market
KECL · Dec 2020: +6.7% vs market
HINDCOMPOS · Mar 2024: +6.8% vs market
AMBIKCO · Aug 2021: +9.6% vs market
VLSFINANCE · May 2023: +9.6% vs market
CHEMBOND · Oct 2023: +11.5% vs market
CENTENKA · Jul 2025: +11.9% vs market
SANDESH · Oct 2023: +12.1% vs market
INDNIPPON · Nov 2024: +16.4% vs market
GANGESSECU · Oct 2021: +20.2% vs market
DTIL · Mar 2021: +23.0% vs market
GNFC · Dec 2021: +24.9% vs market
SESHAPAPER · Jun 2022: +25.5% vs market
GALLANTT · May 2020: +29.8% vs market
IZMO · Oct 2020: +50.2% vs market
JMA · Apr 2021: +54.1% vs market
CHEMFAB · Jun 2022: +60.6% vs market
NAHARPOLY · Aug 2020: +132.4% vs market
WINDLAS · Oct 2023: +139.2% vs market
Similar setups −5.2%All companies −3.6%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 2 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−5.2%
All companies' median
−3.6%
Beat the market
46% vs 46%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 35 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
JMA
Distribution Services		 Apr 2021 8x12% +114%−12% +54%
PODDARMENT
Process Industries		 Aug 2023 14x12% +39%−4% −18%
MUNJALSHOW
Producer Manufacturing		 Dec 2023 17x5% +45%−7% −11%
GSFC
Process Industries		 Nov 2023 6x13% +46%−7% −10%
NAHARPOLY
Process Industries		 Aug 2020 4x10% +97%−19% +132%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
TRIGYN
Technology Services		 Aug 2023 11x9% +27%−4% −36%
RUBFILA
Process Industries		 Oct 2025 15x14% +3%−9% −29%
ALPA
Health Technology		 Jul 2025 11x16% +8%−27% −37%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: drawdown from 12-month high, size and P/S. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to PONNI SUGARS (ERODE) LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What changed?

30 events since Jun '21

  1. SepResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹447 cr.
  2. SepPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Process Industries on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  3. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  4. JunPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the bottom quartile).
  5. MarPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Process Industries on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  6. JanPriceFell 56% from the Jul 2024 peak to the Jan 2026 low.
  7. DecPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Process Industries on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  8. SepPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Process Industries on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
Show 22 earlier events
  1. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (14.9x).
  2. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  3. MarPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Process Industries on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  4. DecResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  5. DecPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Process Industries on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  6. SepPromoterPromoter holding rose 4.9 pts to 47.3%.
  7. SepInstitutionsFII + DII holding fell 9.3 pts over 2 quarters to 13.6%.
  8. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Process Industries on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  9. JulPriceRegained the 2023-01 peak, 16 months after the low.
  10. AugPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Process Industries on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  11. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹435 cr.
  12. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Process Industries on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  13. MayPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the bottom quartile).
  14. MarPriceFell 36% from the Jan 2023 peak to the Mar 2023 low.
  15. FebPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  16. DecPriceRegained the 2021-07 peak, 12 months after the low.
  17. DecPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the bottom quartile).
  18. AugPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  19. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  20. DecPriceFell 46% from the Jul 2021 peak to the Dec 2021 low.
  21. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  22. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history95 months · 2019-01 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-115.8x₹447 cr8.7%7.0%0.0x
2026-105.6x₹447 cr8.8%7.0%0.0x
2026-096.5x₹447 cr8.8%7.0%0.0x
2026-087.2x₹415 cr8.4%7.0%0.0x
2026-075.4x₹415 cr8.4%7.0%0.0x
2026-065.5x₹415 cr8.4%7.0%0.0x
2026-0510.1x₹419 cr4.9%5.0%0.0x
2026-0410.2x₹419 cr4.9%5.0%0.0x
2026-039.1x₹419 cr4.9%5.0%0.0x
2026-0212.5x₹384 cr3.6%5.0%0.0x
2026-0112.7x₹384 cr3.6%5.0%0.0x
2025-1212.0x₹384 cr3.6%5.0%0.0x
2025-1115.6x₹365 cr3.0%5.0%0.0x
2025-1016.1x₹365 cr3.0%5.0%0.0x
2025-0915.5x₹365 cr3.0%5.0%0.0x
2025-0812.7x₹360 cr3.8%5.0%0.0x
2025-0713.5x₹360 cr3.8%5.0%0.0x
2025-0614.9x₹360 cr3.8%5.0%0.0x
2025-0510.1x₹337 cr5.3%10.0%0.0x
2025-049.7x₹337 cr5.3%10.0%0.0x
2025-039.2x₹337 cr5.3%10.0%0.0x
2025-026.7x₹345 cr7.1%10.0%0.0x
2025-018.4x₹345 cr7.1%10.0%0.0x
2024-129.3x₹345 cr7.1%10.0%0.0x
2024-118.8x₹378 cr7.6%10.0%0.0x
2024-109.3x₹378 cr7.6%10.0%0.0x
2024-0910.5x₹378 cr7.6%10.0%0.0x
2024-089.6x₹421 cr8.5%10.0%0.0x
2024-0710.2x₹421 cr8.5%10.0%0.0x
2024-068.8x₹421 cr8.5%10.0%0.0x
2024-059.4x₹435 cr8.4%12.0%0.0x
2024-049.9x₹435 cr8.4%12.0%0.0x
2024-039.0x₹435 cr8.4%12.0%0.0x
2024-029.3x₹435 cr8.4%12.0%0.0x
2024-019.5x₹435 cr8.4%12.0%0.0x
2023-129.2x₹435 cr8.4%12.0%0.0x
2023-119.6x₹435 cr8.4%12.0%0.0x
2023-109.3x₹435 cr8.4%12.0%0.0x
2023-099.6x₹435 cr8.4%12.0%0.0x
2023-088.9x₹435 cr8.4%12.0%0.0x
2023-078.9x₹435 cr8.4%12.0%0.0x
2023-068.6x₹435 cr8.4%12.0%0.0x
2023-0511.4x₹288 cr7.9%10.0%0.0x
2023-0413.8x₹288 cr7.9%10.0%0.0x
2023-0311.6x₹288 cr7.9%10.0%0.0x
2023-0212.7x₹288 cr7.9%10.0%0.0x
2023-0113.4x₹288 cr7.9%10.0%0.0x
2022-1214.3x₹288 cr7.9%10.0%0.0x
2022-119.1x₹288 cr7.9%10.0%0.0x
2022-108.6x₹288 cr7.9%10.0%0.0x
2022-097.3x₹288 cr7.9%10.0%0.0x
2022-087.5x₹288 cr7.9%10.0%0.0x
2022-077.0x₹288 cr7.9%10.0%0.0x
2022-067.2x₹288 cr7.9%10.0%0.0x
2022-058.2x₹256 cr8.0%10.0%0.0x
2022-048.8x₹256 cr8.0%10.0%0.0x
2022-037.7x₹256 cr8.0%10.0%0.0x
2022-027.6x₹256 cr8.0%10.0%0.0x
2022-018.6x₹256 cr8.0%10.0%0.0x
2021-127.2x₹256 cr8.0%10.0%0.0x
2021-117.3x₹256 cr8.0%10.0%0.0x
2021-107.7x₹256 cr8.0%10.0%0.0x
2021-098.1x₹256 cr8.0%10.0%0.0x
2021-088.1x₹256 cr8.0%10.0%0.0x
2021-079.9x₹256 cr8.0%10.0%0.0x
2021-0611.6x₹256 cr8.0%10.0%0.0x
2021-055.7x₹310 cr12.5%13.0%0.1x
2021-044.9x₹310 cr12.5%13.0%0.1x
2021-034.1x₹310 cr12.5%13.0%0.1x
2021-024.0x₹310 cr12.5%13.0%0.1x
2021-014.3x₹310 cr12.5%13.0%0.1x
2020-124.5x₹310 cr12.5%13.0%0.1x
2020-114.4x₹310 cr12.5%13.0%0.1x
2020-104.2x₹310 cr12.5%13.0%0.1x
2020-094.2x₹310 cr12.5%13.0%0.1x
2020-084.5x₹310 cr12.5%13.0%0.1x
2020-074.2x₹310 cr12.5%13.0%0.1x
2020-064.2x₹310 cr12.5%13.0%0.1x
2020-0514.3x₹185 cr2.7%6.0%0.1x
2020-0412.7x₹185 cr2.7%6.0%0.1x
2020-0314.1x₹185 cr2.7%6.0%0.1x
2020-0213.4x₹185 cr2.7%6.0%0.1x
2020-0115.2x₹185 cr2.7%6.0%0.1x
2019-1216.8x₹185 cr2.7%6.0%0.1x
2019-1113.6x₹185 cr2.7%6.0%0.1x
2019-1011.7x₹185 cr2.7%6.0%0.1x
2019-0911.1x₹185 cr2.7%6.0%0.1x
2019-0810.4x₹185 cr2.7%6.0%0.1x
2019-0710.2x₹185 cr2.7%6.0%0.1x
2019-0612.0x₹185 cr2.7%6.0%0.1x
2019-0533.0x₹196 cr1.2%6.0%0.0x
2019-0433.5x₹196 cr1.2%6.0%0.0x
2019-0334.5x₹196 cr1.2%6.0%0.0x
2019-0236.5x₹196 cr1.2%6.0%0.0x
2019-0134.9x₹196 cr1.2%6.0%0.0x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback