अApnaFunda
Menu

JULLUNDUR MOTOR AGENCY DELHI (JMA)

Distribution Services · Wholesale Distributors · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.71 / 100
Profitability 60Growth 52Balance sheet 100

Passes these screensValue PickNear 52-week high

Compare withADANI ENTERPRISESAEGIS LOGISTICSSCHNEIDER ELECTRIC INFRA

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹93.49 latest close · +7.6% over the last 90 sessions

₹80₹90Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹80₹90Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹93.49 month-end · +11.4% over 12 months

₹80₹90Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹80₹90Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹93.49 month-end · +12.9% over 3 years

₹80₹100₹120Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹80₹100₹120Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹93.49 month-end · +203.7% since Jan '19

₹50₹100Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹50₹100Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹67.89 to ₹103.70 · 1-year volatility 34.1%

Was the rally earned?

+11%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 21 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 7.3x to 6.7x), which took 10 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +19 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+19 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −10 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−10 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +2 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+2 ptsShare count changeShare price: +11%+11%Share priceNet profit growth: +19 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+19ProfitP/E change: −10 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−10P/EShare count change: +2 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+2SharesShare price: +11%+11%Share price
Net profit growth+19 ptsNet profit rose about 20%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-10 ptsThe P/E fell from 7.3x to 6.7x, which lowers the price.
Share count change+2 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+13%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 18 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 7.0x to 6.7x), which took 5 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +18 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+18 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −5 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−5 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: +13%+13%Share priceNet profit growth: +18 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+18ProfitP/E change: −5 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−5P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: +13%+13%Share price
Net profit growth+18 ptsNet profit rose about 19%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-5 ptsThe P/E fell from 7.0x to 6.7x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+51%share price, 5 yearsEarnings-driven

Mostly yes.

  • Per-share earnings added 42 points to the rise, while the multiple moved less (P/E 6.2x to 6.7x).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +41 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+41 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +9 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+9 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1 ptsShare count changeShare price: +51%+51%Share priceNet profit growth: +41 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+41ProfitP/E change: +9 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+9P/EShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1SharesShare price: +51%+51%Share price
Net profit growth+41 ptsNet profit rose about 39%, which lifts the price.
P/E change+9 ptsThe P/E rose from 6.2x to 6.7x, which lifts the price.
Share count change+1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with ADANI ENTERPRISES

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-55.9%recovered 2021-04
1-year volatility34.1%annualised

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%2020202120222023202420252026−52.9% 0%−20%−40%2020202220242026−52.9%
Largest drawdowns

-55.9% (2019-05 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2021-04)

-47.1% (2024-02 peak to 2026-01 low, not yet recovered)

-32.0% (2022-01 peak to 2023-03 low, recovered 2024-01)

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

6.7xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history58th percentile
CheapestMedian 6.5xDearest

Usual range 4.4x to 8.6x since 2019-01.

Against Distribution Services6.7x vs 16.7x
This company
6.7x
Sector median
16.7x

60% below the Distribution Services median.

3.1x17.7x32.2x46.7xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '263.1x17.7x32.2x46.7xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianDistribution Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianDistribution Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianDistribution Services median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Distribution Services is valued

Where does it rank among Distribution Services peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Distribution Services peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE70th▼ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin50thflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth55th▲ 13 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth61st▲ 28 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓97thflat vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓53rd▲ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓88th▼ 10 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum76th▲ 5 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Distribution Services sector page Watch it move against Distribution Services in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~4%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 8.1x, the price would imply about 3.6%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Below the ₹1,000 cr market-cap floor used for the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Distribution Services The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹93.49
P/E
6.7x
ROCE
15.0%
Market Cap
₹214 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹643 cr
P/S
0.3x
P/B
0.8x
ROE
11.7%
Operating Margin
5.5%
Debt / Equity
0.0x
Promoter Holding
51.0%
12M Momentum
11.4%

52-week range

₹67.89₹103.70
71% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
34.1%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.28

Balance sheet & cash

Debt service
no meaningful debt
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
0.26x
low
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

4 of 7checks within range1 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance19%Near threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 19.3%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate26%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 25.6%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion0.26xBeyond threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 0.26x (cash from operations ₹21 cr, net profit ₹82 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow3 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 3. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-7 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 7 days (55 vs 62). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress0% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 0% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days-25 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by -25 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, institutional and promoter holdings were broadly unchanged.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupDec '23Jun '26Change
Promoters51.0%51.0%0.0 pts
FIIs0.1%0.1%-0.1 pts
DIIs0.0%0.0%0.0 pts
Public and others48.9%49.0%+0.1 pts

Number of shareholders

11,374shareholders+4% since Dec '23
11k12k12k13k Dec '23Mar '24Jun '24Sep '24Dec '24Jun '26
Dec '23: 10,960
Mar '24: 13,109
Jun '24: 12,339
Sep '24: 12,116
Dec '24: 11,957
Jun '26: 11,374
 11k12k12k13k Dec '23Jun '24Dec '24Jun '26
Dec '23: 10,960
Mar '24: 13,109
Jun '24: 12,339
Sep '24: 12,116
Dec '24: 11,957
Jun '26: 11,374

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+7.5%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like JULLUNDUR MOTOR AGENCY DELHI today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −22% to +45% vs the market, against −4% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+11.4%, 80% range −6.9% to +19.2%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
SAIFL · Jul 2025: −84.2% vs market
PLASTIBLEN · Aug 2024: −43.0% vs market
SHREYANIND · Sep 2025: −41.8% vs market
NRAIL · Jan 2024: −40.0% vs market
ALPA · Jun 2025: −35.5% vs market
GNFC · Dec 2023: −35.4% vs market
PANAMAPET · Feb 2025: −32.2% vs market
RUCHIRA · Jan 2024: −31.2% vs market
MADRASFERT · Sep 2025: −29.9% vs market
VARDHACRLC · Jul 2021: −27.9% vs market
GSFC · Oct 2023: −25.1% vs market
RUBFILA · Sep 2025: −22.8% vs market
ASPINWALL · Apr 2025: −22.8% vs market
MUNJALSHOW · Sep 2023: −19.6% vs market
PODDARMENT · Dec 2023: −18.9% vs market
LINCOLN · Aug 2024: −17.5% vs market
VETO · Jul 2024: −16.3% vs market
SESHAPAPER · Feb 2025: −16.0% vs market
SANDESH · May 2024: −13.2% vs market
PASUPTAC · Sep 2023: −11.4% vs market
HMVL · Sep 2025: −9.9% vs market
FMGOETZE · May 2025: −8.7% vs market
STEELCITY · Apr 2023: −0.1% vs market
AMBIKCO · Jul 2021: +3.2% vs market
SOTL · Jan 2024: +6.5% vs market
SHIVAMILLS · Jun 2021: +8.4% vs market
PTL · Jun 2021: +11.5% vs market
EVERESTIND · Jul 2021: +12.9% vs market
ANDHRAPAP · Jun 2022: +13.5% vs market
BANCOINDIA · Aug 2021: +16.7% vs market
ALBERTDAVD · Jul 2023: +17.7% vs market
IMFA · Aug 2023: +19.1% vs market
PONNIERODE · Oct 2022: +29.4% vs market
KAMATHOTEL · May 2021: +34.9% vs market
AARVI · Jun 2020: +36.0% vs market
TRIGYN · Dec 2020: +37.8% vs market
INSECTICID · Jul 2024: +42.9% vs market
AUSOMENT · Oct 2025: +45.7% vs market
PPL · Sep 2023: +51.7% vs market
TNPETRO · Feb 2021: +57.4% vs market
RPPINFRA · Jun 2023: +58.7% vs market
PDMJEPAPER · Oct 2020: +61.8% vs market
DLINKINDIA · Aug 2022: +62.6% vs market
WINDLAS · Jun 2023: +63.9% vs market
MANAKSIA · Feb 2022: +64.5% vs market
INDRAMEDCO · Jun 2023: +78.1% vs market
DPWIRES · Jun 2020: +91.4% vs market
HINDCON · Mar 2021: +132.0% vs market
MANINDS · Apr 2023: +188.6% vs market
GTL · Sep 2020: +193.1% vs market
Similar setups +7.5%All companies −3.9%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 3 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+7.5%
All companies' median
−3.9%
Beat the market
54% vs 46%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 32 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
RUBFILA
Process Industries		 Sep 2025 15x14% +5%−6% −23%
PODDARMENT
Process Industries		 Dec 2023 15x12% +42%0% −19%
HMVL
Consumer Services		 Sep 2025 7x11% −12%−16% −10%
PASUPTAC
Process Industries		 Sep 2023 10x17% +14%0% −11%
SOTL
Process Industries		 Jan 2024 13x24% +55%0% +7%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
GTL
Technology Services		 Sep 2020 6x— +49%0% +193%
TNPETRO
Process Industries		 Feb 2021 7x18% +51%0% +57%
PANAMAPET
Process Industries		 Feb 2025 11x24% +2%−20% −32%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: ROCE, revenue growth and 12-month momentum. Not used (unavailable for this company): interest cover. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to JULLUNDUR MOTOR AGENCY DELHI. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What changed?

27 events since Mar '20

  1. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Distribution Services on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  2. JanPriceFell 47% from the Feb 2024 peak to the Jan 2026 low.
  3. NovPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Distribution Services on ROCE (from the top quartile).
  4. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  5. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Distribution Services on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  6. MarResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹549 cr.
  7. MarPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Distribution Services on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  8. DecPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Distribution Services on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
Show 19 earlier events
  1. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Distribution Services on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  2. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  3. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Distribution Services on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  4. JanPriceRegained the 2022-01 peak, 10 months after the low.
  5. JanValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (10.1x).
  6. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹503 cr.
  7. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Distribution Services on ROCE (from the top quartile).
  8. MarPriceFell 32% from the Jan 2022 peak to the Mar 2023 low.
  9. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹437 cr.
  10. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Distribution Services on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  11. AprPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Distribution Services on ROCE (from the top quartile).
  12. JanValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (7.7x).
  13. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  14. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Distribution Services on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  15. AprPriceRegained the 2019-05 peak, 13 months after the low.
  16. AprValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (8.1x).
  17. MarPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Distribution Services on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  18. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  19. MarPriceFell 56% from the May 2019 peak to the Mar 2020 low.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history95 months · 2019-01 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-116.7x₹643 cr11.7%15.0%0.0x
2026-105.8x₹643 cr11.8%15.0%0.0x
2026-096.4x₹643 cr11.8%15.0%0.0x
2026-087.1x₹622 cr11.0%15.0%0.0x
2026-076.5x₹622 cr11.0%15.0%0.0x
2026-066.5x₹622 cr11.0%15.0%0.0x
2026-056.5x₹608 cr12.3%15.0%0.0x
2026-046.5x₹608 cr12.3%15.0%0.0x
2026-035.6x₹608 cr12.3%15.0%0.0x
2026-027.1x₹581 cr11.4%15.0%0.0x
2026-016.1x₹581 cr11.4%15.0%0.0x
2025-126.2x₹581 cr11.4%15.0%0.0x
2025-117.3x₹566 cr10.7%15.0%0.0x
2025-107.5x₹566 cr10.7%15.0%0.0x
2025-097.6x₹566 cr10.7%15.0%0.0x
2025-087.5x₹556 cr10.5%15.0%0.0x
2025-077.9x₹556 cr10.5%15.0%0.0x
2025-068.6x₹556 cr10.5%15.0%0.0x
2025-058.6x₹549 cr11.3%16.0%0.0x
2025-047.3x₹549 cr11.3%16.0%0.0x
2025-036.5x₹549 cr11.3%16.0%0.0x
2025-026.8x₹544 cr11.0%16.0%0.0x
2025-017.9x₹544 cr11.0%16.0%0.0x
2024-128.6x₹544 cr11.0%16.0%0.0x
2024-118.5x₹545 cr11.6%16.0%0.0x
2024-108.7x₹545 cr11.6%16.0%0.0x
2024-099.1x₹545 cr11.6%16.0%0.0x
2024-089.4x₹534 cr11.4%16.0%0.0x
2024-0710.0x₹534 cr11.4%16.0%0.0x
2024-069.2x₹534 cr11.4%16.0%0.0x
2024-058.2x₹503 cr13.2%19.0%0.0x
2024-048.2x₹503 cr13.2%19.0%0.0x
2024-038.0x₹503 cr13.2%19.0%0.0x
2024-029.5x₹503 cr13.2%19.0%0.0x
2024-0110.1x₹503 cr13.2%19.0%0.0x
2023-126.7x₹503 cr13.2%19.0%0.0x
2023-117.0x₹503 cr13.2%19.0%0.0x
2023-106.3x₹503 cr13.2%19.0%0.0x
2023-096.1x₹503 cr13.2%19.0%0.0x
2023-086.4x₹503 cr13.2%19.0%0.0x
2023-075.9x₹503 cr13.2%19.0%0.0x
2023-065.5x₹503 cr13.2%19.0%0.0x
2023-056.4x₹437 cr13.7%19.0%0.0x
2023-045.9x₹437 cr13.7%19.0%0.0x
2023-035.5x₹437 cr13.7%19.0%0.0x
2023-026.1x₹437 cr13.7%19.0%0.0x
2023-016.2x₹437 cr13.7%19.0%0.0x
2022-126.2x₹437 cr13.7%19.0%0.0x
2022-116.4x₹437 cr13.7%19.0%0.0x
2022-106.5x₹437 cr13.7%19.0%0.0x
2022-096.6x₹437 cr13.7%19.0%0.0x
2022-086.2x₹437 cr13.7%19.0%0.0x
2022-076.3x₹437 cr13.7%19.0%0.0x
2022-066.0x₹437 cr13.7%19.0%0.0x
2022-056.9x₹387 cr14.1%18.0%0.0x
2022-047.2x₹387 cr14.1%18.0%0.0x
2022-036.3x₹387 cr14.1%18.0%0.0x
2022-026.6x₹387 cr14.1%18.0%0.0x
2022-017.7x₹387 cr14.1%18.0%0.0x
2021-126.7x₹387 cr14.1%18.0%0.0x
2021-116.2x₹387 cr14.1%18.0%0.0x
2021-106.2x₹387 cr14.1%18.0%0.0x
2021-095.8x₹387 cr14.1%18.0%0.0x
2021-086.0x₹387 cr14.1%18.0%0.0x
2021-076.8x₹387 cr14.1%18.0%0.0x
2021-065.2x₹387 cr14.1%18.0%0.0x
2021-059.5x₹362 cr8.1%12.0%0.0x
2021-048.1x₹362 cr8.1%12.0%0.0x
2021-036.6x₹362 cr8.1%12.0%0.0x
2021-026.9x₹362 cr8.1%12.0%0.0x
2021-017.1x₹362 cr8.1%12.0%0.0x
2020-126.6x₹362 cr8.1%12.0%0.0x
2020-116.6x₹362 cr8.1%12.0%0.0x
2020-105.4x₹362 cr8.1%12.0%0.0x
2020-095.1x₹362 cr8.1%12.0%0.0x
2020-085.8x₹362 cr8.1%12.0%0.0x
2020-074.9x₹362 cr8.1%12.0%0.0x
2020-064.4x₹362 cr8.1%12.0%0.0x
2020-053.1x₹355 cr10.0%15.0%0.0x
2020-043.3x₹355 cr10.0%15.0%0.0x
2020-033.3x₹355 cr10.0%15.0%0.0x
2020-024.2x₹355 cr10.0%15.0%0.0x
2020-014.4x₹355 cr10.0%15.0%0.0x
2019-123.9x₹355 cr10.0%15.0%0.0x
2019-114.1x₹355 cr10.0%15.0%0.0x
2019-104.4x₹355 cr10.0%15.0%0.0x
2019-094.0x₹355 cr10.0%15.0%0.0x
2019-084.3x₹355 cr10.0%15.0%0.0x
2019-074.3x₹355 cr10.0%15.0%0.0x
2019-065.3x₹355 cr10.0%15.0%0.0x
2019-057.2x₹327 cr8.7%13.0%0.0x
2019-047.4x₹327 cr8.7%13.0%0.0x
2019-037.5x₹327 cr8.7%13.0%0.0x
2019-027.3x₹327 cr8.7%13.0%0.0x
2019-017.2x₹327 cr8.7%13.0%0.0x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback