अApnaFunda

TRIGYN TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED (TRIGYN)

Technology Services · Information Technology Services · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.40 / 100
Profitability 13Growth 8Balance sheet 100

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹60.25 latest close · +15.0% over the last 90 sessions

₹45₹50₹55₹60Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹45₹50₹55₹60Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹60.25 month-end · −15.5% over 12 months

₹40₹50₹60₹70Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹40₹50₹60₹70Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹60.25 month-end · −52.2% over 3 years

₹50₹100₹150Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹50₹100₹150Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹60.25 month-end · −17.4% since Jan '19

₹50₹100₹150Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹50₹100₹150Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹37.55 to ₹78.50 · 1-year volatility 51.6%

Was the rally earned?

-52%share price, 3 yearsEarnings-driven

Mostly earnings.

  • Per-share earnings took off 88 points, while the multiple moved less (P/E 11.2x to 18.5x).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −88 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−88 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +36 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+36 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1 ptsShare count changeShare price: −52%−52%Share priceNet profit growth: −88 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−88ProfitP/E change: +36 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+36P/EShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1SharesShare price: −52%−52%Share price
Net profit growth-88 ptsNet profit fell about 71%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+36 ptsThe P/E rose from 11.2x to 18.5x, which lifts the price.
Share count change+1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-44%share price, 5 yearsEarnings-driven

Mostly earnings.

  • Per-share earnings took off 139 points, while the multiple moved less (P/E 5.3x to 18.5x).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −138 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−138 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +95 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+95 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: −44%−44%Share priceNet profit growth: −138 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−138ProfitP/E change: +95 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+95P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: −44%−44%Share price
Net profit growth-138 ptsNet profit fell about 84%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+95 ptsThe P/E rose from 5.3x to 18.5x, which lifts the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 1 year: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-81.7%not yet recovered
1-year volatility51.6%annualised

Drawdown from peak

0%−25%−50%−75%2020202120222023202420252026−80.1% 0%−25%−50%−75%2020202220242026−80.1%
Largest drawdowns

-81.7% (2022-01 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

-79.0% (2019-01 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2021-01)

-36.5% (2021-07 peak to 2021-11 low, recovered 2022-01)

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

18.5xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history77th percentile
CheapestMedian 7.9xDearest

Usual range 3.0x to 39.5x since 2019-01.

Against Technology Services18.5x vs 21.1x
This company
18.5x
Sector median
21.1x

12% below the Technology Services median.

1.4x33.1x64.8x96.4xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '261.4x33.1x64.8x96.4xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianTechnology Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianTechnology Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianTechnology Services median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Technology Services is valued

Where does it rank among Technology Services peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Technology Services peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE14th▼ 8 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin12thflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth55th▲ 46 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth7th▼ 14 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓77thflat vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓40th▲ 13 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓59th
  • 12M momentum57th▲ 32 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Technology Services sector page Watch it move against Technology Services in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~6%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 8.6x, the price would imply about 6.0%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Below the ₹1,000 cr market-cap floor used for the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Technology Services The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹60.25
P/E
18.5x
ROCE
2.0%
Market Cap
₹186 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹1005 cr
P/S
0.2x
P/B
0.2x
ROE
1.3%
Operating Margin
1.4%
Debt / Equity
0.0x
Promoter Holding
44.5%
12M Momentum
-15.6%

52-week range

₹37.55₹78.50
55% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
51.6%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.84

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
7.5x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
4.94x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

3 of 6checks within range2 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance81%Beyond threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 81.5%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate53%Beyond threshold

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 53.5%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion4.94xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 4.94x (cash from operations ₹168 cr, net profit ₹34 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow3 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 3. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+6 daysWithin range

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 6 days (93 vs 87). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress0% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 0% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, FIIs trimmed 0.6 pts.
  • The number of shareholders fell from 36,925 to 31,751 (-14%) between Dec 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupDec '23Jun '26Change
Promoters44.5%44.5%0.0 pts
FIIs0.7%0.1%-0.6 pts
DIIs0.0%0.0%0.0 pts
Public and others54.8%55.4%+0.6 pts

Number of shareholders

31,751shareholders-14% since Dec '23
32k34k35k37k Dec '23Jun '24Dec '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 36,925
Mar '24: 37,298
Jun '24: 35,155
Sep '24: 33,850
Dec '24: 33,832
Mar '25: 34,420
Jun '25: 34,136
Sep '25: 34,157
Dec '25: 33,217
Mar '26: 32,264
Jun '26: 31,751
32k34k35k37k Dec '23Dec '24Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 36,925
Mar '24: 37,298
Jun '24: 35,155
Sep '24: 33,850
Dec '24: 33,832
Mar '25: 34,420
Jun '25: 34,136
Sep '25: 34,157
Dec '25: 33,217
Mar '26: 32,264
Jun '26: 31,751

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−0.9%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like TRIGYN TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −29% to +33% vs the market, against −7% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+6.0%, 80% range −3.0% to +9.3%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
UMAEXPORTS · Feb 2025: −74.1% vs market
SPECTSTM · Apr 2025: −57.7% vs market
MITTAL · Jul 2025: −49.8% vs market
GRAPHISAD · Feb 2025: −49.7% vs market
SMARTLINK · Sep 2024: −46.8% vs market
ELIN · Jun 2025: −44.1% vs market
NIRAJ · Sep 2025: −39.9% vs market
PLASTIBLEN · Apr 2024: −33.5% vs market
CELEBRITY · Apr 2020: −33.1% vs market
KOTHARIPRO · Mar 2023: −32.1% vs market
GOLDTECH · Oct 2025: −30.9% vs market
AJOONI · Mar 2025: −29.5% vs market
VETO · Aug 2024: −29.5% vs market
HMVL · Dec 2024: −28.9% vs market
ISFT · Jun 2025: −28.6% vs market
GHCLTEXTIL · Sep 2024: −19.0% vs market
INCREDIBLE · Jan 2025: −18.2% vs market
SUNDRMBRAK · Oct 2021: −16.3% vs market
ROML · Sep 2025: −11.1% vs market
MUNJALSHOW · May 2024: −10.6% vs market
RILINFRA · Oct 2025: −9.6% vs market
JAYAGROGN · Dec 2023: −6.4% vs market
JOCIL · Jan 2023: −5.4% vs market
ASPINWALL · Aug 2024: −2.4% vs market
SAGARDEEP · Oct 2025: −1.0% vs market
BLBLIMITED · Sep 2025: −0.8% vs market
POLYPLEX · Sep 2025: +1.1% vs market
SILLYMONKS · May 2025: +1.5% vs market
ANDHRSUGAR · Oct 2025: +2.2% vs market
VARDHACRLC · Oct 2025: +3.8% vs market
PDMJEPAPER · Jan 2020: +4.5% vs market
WINDMACHIN · Apr 2022: +10.5% vs market
CENTENKA · Jul 2025: +11.9% vs market
IFBAGRO · Jun 2020: +12.5% vs market
SAKUMA · Aug 2023: +14.9% vs market
AARVI · Mar 2025: +21.5% vs market
MODISONLTD · Jun 2023: +21.5% vs market
GENUSPAPER · Oct 2020: +36.2% vs market
GALLANTT · Dec 2020: +39.0% vs market
AAREYDRUGS · Nov 2024: +41.3% vs market
RUCHIRA · Feb 2022: +49.8% vs market
CHEMBOND · Oct 2022: +63.1% vs market
MINDTECK · Mar 2020: +63.4% vs market
SHREYANIND · Sep 2022: +69.7% vs market
EVERESTIND · Feb 2021: +73.8% vs market
NAHARPOLY · Jan 2020: +99.5% vs market
RPPINFRA · Apr 2023: +102.0% vs market
VASCONEQ · Aug 2022: +118.0% vs market
PRECAM · Apr 2021: +145.2% vs market
TEXMOPIPES · Jul 2020: +181.2% vs market
Similar setups −0.9%All companies −6.9%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 4 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−0.9%
All companies' median
−6.9%
Beat the market
48% vs 42%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 36 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
JOCIL
Process Industries
Jan 2023 23x5% −4%−19% −5%
SAKUMA
Distribution Services
Aug 2023 20x9% +8%−11% +15%
BLBLIMITED
Finance
Sep 2025 23x— −17%−26% −1%
AAREYDRUGS
Health Technology
Nov 2024 29x6% +28%−19% +41%
MUNJALSHOW
Producer Manufacturing
May 2024 18x5% +38%−23% −11%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
NIRAJ
Industrial Services
Sep 2025 15x10% −27%−36% −40%
ISFT
Retail Trade
Jun 2025 14x6% −11%−38% −29%
CENTENKA
Process Industries
Jul 2025 17x6% −11%−37% +12%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, P/E and drawdown from 12-month high. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to TRIGYN TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What changed?

30 events since Jun '20

  1. MarPriceFell 82% from the Jan 2022 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  2. MarPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Technology Services on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  3. DecResultsEPS (TTM) turned positive.
  4. DecValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (46.5x).
  5. DecPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Technology Services on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  6. SepResultsEPS (TTM) turned negative.
  7. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (22.3x).
  8. SepPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Technology Services on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
Show 22 earlier events
  1. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹1,280 cr.
  2. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (22.5x).
  3. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Technology Services on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  4. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹1,273 cr.
  5. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (9.2x).
  6. JunPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Technology Services on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  7. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  8. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (7.7x).
  9. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Technology Services on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  10. JanPriceRegained the 2021-07 peak, 2 months after the low.
  11. NovPriceFell 36% from the Jul 2021 peak to the Nov 2021 low.
  12. OctValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (5.9x).
  13. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹985 cr.
  14. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 2% to 0% of profit.
  15. MayPriceRegained the 2021-01 peak, 2 months after the low.
  16. MayValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (6.4x).
  17. MarPriceFell 31% from the Jan 2021 peak to the Mar 2021 low.
  18. MarPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Technology Services on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  19. JanPriceRegained the 2019-01 peak, 10 months after the low.
  20. OctPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Technology Services on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  21. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹911 cr.
  22. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 5% to 2% of profit.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history95 months · 2019-01 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1118.5x₹1005 cr1.3%2.0%0.0x
2026-1014.6x₹1005 cr1.3%2.0%0.0x
2026-0916.3x₹1005 cr1.3%2.0%0.0x
2026-0896.4x₹976 cr0.2%2.0%0.0x
2026-0785.3x₹976 cr0.2%2.0%0.0x
2026-0681.3x₹976 cr0.2%2.0%0.0x
2026-0546.0x₹964 cr0.5%4.0%0.0x
2026-0447.0x₹964 cr0.5%4.0%0.0x
2026-0330.7x₹964 cr0.5%4.0%0.0x
2026-0236.2x₹913 cr0.6%4.0%0.0x
2026-0139.9x₹913 cr0.6%4.0%0.0x
2025-1246.5x₹913 cr0.6%4.0%0.0x
2025-11—₹879 cr-0.1%4.0%0.0x
2025-10—₹879 cr-0.1%4.0%0.0x
2025-09—₹879 cr-0.1%4.0%0.0x
2025-0819.4x₹896 cr1.6%4.0%0.0x
2025-0720.8x₹896 cr1.6%4.0%0.0x
2025-0622.3x₹896 cr1.6%4.0%0.0x
2025-059.5x₹991 cr4.0%6.0%0.0x
2025-048.2x₹991 cr4.0%6.0%0.0x
2025-037.4x₹991 cr4.0%6.0%0.0x
2025-0248.8x₹1091 cr0.7%6.0%0.0x
2025-0166.1x₹1091 cr0.7%6.0%0.0x
2024-1267.5x₹1091 cr0.7%6.0%0.0x
2024-1122.7x₹1199 cr2.2%6.0%0.0x
2024-1023.1x₹1199 cr2.2%6.0%0.0x
2024-0927.3x₹1199 cr2.2%6.0%0.0x
2024-0818.9x₹1280 cr2.8%6.0%0.0x
2024-0720.8x₹1280 cr2.8%6.0%0.0x
2024-0622.5x₹1280 cr2.8%6.0%0.0x
2024-0510.3x₹1273 cr5.1%9.0%0.0x
2024-0410.3x₹1273 cr5.1%9.0%0.0x
2024-038.3x₹1273 cr5.1%9.0%0.0x
2024-0210.9x₹1273 cr5.1%9.0%0.0x
2024-0113.8x₹1273 cr5.1%9.0%0.0x
2023-1211.9x₹1273 cr5.1%9.0%0.0x
2023-1111.2x₹1273 cr5.1%9.0%0.0x
2023-1010.3x₹1273 cr5.1%9.0%0.0x
2023-0910.8x₹1273 cr5.1%9.0%0.0x
2023-0811.4x₹1273 cr5.1%9.0%0.0x
2023-0711.4x₹1273 cr5.1%9.0%0.0x
2023-069.2x₹1273 cr5.1%9.0%0.0x
2023-057.9x₹1041 cr6.4%10.0%0.0x
2023-047.3x₹1041 cr6.4%10.0%0.0x
2023-037.2x₹1041 cr6.4%10.0%0.0x
2023-028.0x₹1041 cr6.4%10.0%0.0x
2023-017.2x₹1041 cr6.4%10.0%0.0x
2022-127.4x₹1041 cr6.4%10.0%0.0x
2022-118.0x₹1041 cr6.4%10.0%0.0x
2022-107.9x₹1041 cr6.4%10.0%0.0x
2022-098.1x₹1041 cr6.4%10.0%0.0x
2022-088.0x₹1041 cr6.4%10.0%0.0x
2022-078.3x₹1041 cr6.4%10.0%0.0x
2022-067.7x₹1041 cr6.4%10.0%0.0x
2022-055.2x₹985 cr11.1%17.0%0.0x
2022-046.8x₹985 cr11.1%17.0%0.0x
2022-036.7x₹985 cr11.1%17.0%0.0x
2022-026.8x₹985 cr11.1%17.0%0.0x
2022-018.6x₹985 cr11.1%17.0%0.0x
2021-128.2x₹985 cr11.1%17.0%0.0x
2021-115.3x₹985 cr11.1%17.0%0.0x
2021-105.9x₹985 cr11.1%17.0%0.0x
2021-095.3x₹985 cr11.1%17.0%0.0x
2021-085.5x₹985 cr11.1%17.0%0.0x
2021-077.8x₹985 cr11.1%17.0%0.0x
2021-066.4x₹985 cr11.1%17.0%0.0x
2021-056.4x₹911 cr9.9%17.0%0.0x
2021-045.0x₹911 cr9.9%17.0%0.0x
2021-033.8x₹911 cr9.9%17.0%0.0x
2021-024.3x₹911 cr9.9%17.0%0.0x
2021-014.6x₹911 cr9.9%17.0%0.0x
2020-125.5x₹911 cr9.9%17.0%0.0x
2020-114.1x₹911 cr9.9%17.0%0.0x
2020-103.0x₹911 cr9.9%17.0%0.0x
2020-093.4x₹911 cr9.9%17.0%0.0x
2020-083.4x₹911 cr9.9%17.0%0.0x
2020-071.9x₹911 cr9.9%17.0%0.0x
2020-062.1x₹911 cr9.9%17.0%0.0x
2020-051.8x₹895 cr11.1%21.0%0.0x
2020-041.9x₹895 cr11.1%21.0%0.0x
2020-031.4x₹895 cr11.1%21.0%0.0x
2020-022.4x₹895 cr11.1%21.0%0.0x
2020-013.0x₹895 cr11.1%21.0%0.0x
2019-122.9x₹895 cr11.1%21.0%0.0x
2019-113.2x₹895 cr11.1%21.0%0.0x
2019-103.2x₹895 cr11.1%21.0%0.0x
2019-093.0x₹895 cr11.1%21.0%0.0x
2019-083.0x₹895 cr11.1%21.0%0.0x
2019-072.9x₹895 cr11.1%21.0%0.0x
2019-063.8x₹895 cr11.1%21.0%0.0x
2019-055.5x₹685 cr10.5%17.0%0.0x
2019-045.3x₹685 cr10.5%17.0%0.0x
2019-035.4x₹685 cr10.5%17.0%0.0x
2019-025.2x₹685 cr10.5%17.0%0.0x
2019-015.5x₹685 cr10.5%17.0%0.0x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback