अApnaFunda
Menu

WEIZMANN LIMITED (WEIZMANIND)

Process Industries · Textiles · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.67 / 100
Profitability 54Growth 47Balance sheet 100
Compare withVARDHMAN TEXTILES LIMTEDARVINDTRIDENT

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹69.59 latest close · −14.2% over the last 90 sessions

₹70₹80Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹70₹80Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹69.59 month-end · −33.9% over 12 months

₹80₹100Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹80₹100Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹69.59 month-end · −42.0% over 3 years

₹75₹100₹125₹150Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹75₹100₹125₹150Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹69.59 month-end · +60.3% since Jan '19

₹50₹100₹150Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹50₹100₹150Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹60.11 to ₹114.50 · 1-year volatility 36.2%

Was the rally earned?

-42%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 30 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 44.6x to 17.6x), which took 72 points back.
  • The share count fell 6%.
Net profit growth: +25 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+25 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −72 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−72 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +5 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+5 ptsShare count changeShare price: −42%−42%Share priceNet profit growth: +25 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+25ProfitP/E change: −72 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−72P/EShare count change: +5 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+5SharesShare price: −42%−42%Share price
Net profit growth+25 ptsNet profit rose about 38%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-72 ptsThe P/E fell from 44.6x to 17.6x, which lowers the price.
Share count change+5 ptsShare count fell 6%, which lifts the price.
+33%share price, 5 yearsEarnings-driven

Mostly yes.

  • Per-share earnings added 32 points to the rise, while the multiple moved less (P/E 17.4x to 17.6x).
  • The share count fell 7%.
Net profit growth: +23 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+23 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+1 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +9 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+9 ptsShare count changeShare price: +33%+33%Share priceNet profit growth: +23 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+23ProfitP/E change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+1P/EShare count change: +9 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+9SharesShare price: +33%+33%Share price
Net profit growth+23 ptsNet profit rose about 22%, which lifts the price.
P/E change+1 ptsThe P/E rose from 17.4x to 17.6x, which lifts the price.
Share count change+9 ptsShare count fell 7%, which lifts the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 1 year: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with VARDHMAN TEXTILES LIMTED

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-74.6%recovered 2020-12
1-year volatility36.2%annualised

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2020202120222023202420252026−69.3% 0%−20%−40%−60%2020202220242026−69.3%
Largest drawdowns

-74.6% (2019-01 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2020-12)

-59.8% (2024-06 peak to 2026-10 low, not yet recovered)

-52.1% (2022-02 peak to 2022-07 low, recovered 2022-09)

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

17.6xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history25th percentile
CheapestMedian 22.6xDearest

Usual range 7.3x to 44.3x since 2019-01.

Against Process Industries17.6x vs 18.1x
This company
17.6x
Sector median
18.1x

Close to the Process Industries median.

5.5x20.7x35.9x51.1xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '265.5x20.7x35.9x51.1xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Process Industries is valued

Where does it rank among Process Industries peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Process Industries peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE62nd▼ 8 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin46th▼ 14 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth35th▼ 33 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth3rd▼ 82 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓78th▲ 10 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓97thflat vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓52nd
  • 12M momentum14th▼ 43 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Process Industries sector page Watch it move against Process Industries in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~19%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 30.0x, the price would imply about 19.3%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Below the ₹1,000 cr market-cap floor used for the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Process Industries The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹69.59
P/E
17.6x
ROCE
14.0%
Market Cap
₹108 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹128 cr
P/S
0.8x
P/B
1.6x
ROE
9.3%
Operating Margin
10.9%
Debt / Equity
0.1x
Promoter Holding
68.3%
12M Momentum
-33.9%

52-week range

₹60.11₹114.50
17% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
36.2%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.12

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
17.2x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
3.82x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

6 of 7checks within range1 near a threshold
Other income reliance4%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 4.2%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate26%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 25.5%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion3.82xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 3.82x (cash from operations ₹42 cr, net profit ₹11 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow5 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 5. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history0 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 0 days (37 vs 37). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress0% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 0% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days+50 days / 2 yrsNear threshold

Days payable changed by +50 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, institutional and promoter holdings were broadly unchanged.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters67.9%68.3%+0.5 pts
FIIs0.0%0.0%0.0 pts
DIIs———
Public and others32.1%31.7%-0.4 pts

Number of shareholders

8,989shareholders-1% since Sep '23
9k10k10k11k Sep '23Mar '24Dec '24Jun '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 9,074
Dec '23: 9,693
Mar '24: 9,612
Sep '24: 10,735
Dec '24: 10,021
Mar '25: 9,865
Jun '25: 9,660
Jun '26: 8,989
 9k10k10k11k Sep '23Sep '24Jun '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 9,074
Dec '23: 9,693
Mar '24: 9,612
Sep '24: 10,735
Dec '24: 10,021
Mar '25: 9,865
Jun '25: 9,660
Jun '26: 8,989

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+5.0%typical 12-month return vs the marketAbove the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like WEIZMANN LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −17% to +55% vs the market, against −4% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The analogs' median sat above that base rate (gap +8.7%, 80% range +0.1% to +17.8%), but the matches cluster in only 6 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
ALANKIT · Mar 2025: −49.3% vs market
ORIENTBELL · Oct 2023: −49.0% vs market
HPAL · Oct 2025: −37.7% vs market
ARCHIES · Mar 2020: −36.2% vs market
ASAHISONG · Feb 2022: −30.8% vs market
TVTODAY · Jun 2024: −26.2% vs market
FAIRCHEMOR · Oct 2024: −25.6% vs market
APEX · Jan 2023: −22.1% vs market
PPAP · Mar 2021: −21.9% vs market
SHREEPUSHK · Sep 2023: −19.4% vs market
BLISSGVS · May 2022: −18.1% vs market
PREMEXPLN · Jan 2020: −17.2% vs market
INSECTICID · May 2023: −17.1% vs market
AVTNPL · Nov 2024: −16.6% vs market
PLASTIBLEN · May 2022: −15.6% vs market
ASTRON · Mar 2021: −15.5% vs market
GOYALALUM · Aug 2024: −14.8% vs market
VETO · Mar 2025: −14.3% vs market
LINC · Apr 2025: −11.6% vs market
REPL · Apr 2024: −6.8% vs market
KAKATCEM · Aug 2022: −3.7% vs market
PODDARMENT · Oct 2025: −1.1% vs market
PYRAMID · Sep 2024: +1.1% vs market
ROML · May 2023: +2.4% vs market
INTLCONV · May 2023: +3.8% vs market
ALBERTDAVD · Jun 2021: +6.2% vs market
CLEDUCATE · Jul 2024: +7.0% vs market
IOLCP · Oct 2024: +12.5% vs market
ORIENTCER · Aug 2023: +14.3% vs market
WIPL · Oct 2023: +15.9% vs market
HERITGFOOD · Sep 2022: +17.2% vs market
AIRAN · Jun 2023: +21.5% vs market
IFGLEXPOR · Jul 2022: +24.6% vs market
MAZDA · Feb 2022: +25.4% vs market
INDNIPPON · Jan 2023: +33.2% vs market
WINDLAS · Oct 2022: +34.9% vs market
DICIND · Apr 2024: +52.8% vs market
MMP · Jun 2021: +55.8% vs market
PRECWIRE · Mar 2020: +58.0% vs market
MODISONLTD · Dec 2022: +66.4% vs market
LGBBROSLTD · May 2021: +72.3% vs market
INFOBEAN · Mar 2025: +74.7% vs market
GANECOS · Dec 2021: +75.0% vs market
MINDTECK · Aug 2023: +77.5% vs market
APOLSINHOT · May 2022: +97.8% vs market
LUMAXTECH · Sep 2021: +99.6% vs market
AMBIKCO · Apr 2021: +101.5% vs market
CHEMBOND · Jul 2022: +106.7% vs market
SMSPHARMA · Jan 2020: +124.7% vs market
SHREERAMA · Sep 2024: +147.2% vs market
Similar setups +5.0%All companies −3.7%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 4 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+5.0%
All companies' median
−3.7%
Beat the market
56% vs 46%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 31 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
MODISONLTD
Producer Manufacturing		 Dec 2022 15x14% −22%−29% +66%
PLASTIBLEN
Process Industries		 May 2022 14x16% −20%−35% −16%
LINC
Consumer Non-Durables		 Apr 2025 17x— −31%−45% −12%
WINDLAS
Health Technology		 Oct 2022 13x15% −27%−30% +35%
DICIND
Process Industries		 Apr 2024 19x15% +6%−17% +53%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
MMP
Non-Energy Minerals		 Jun 2021 15x11% +23%−14% +56%
ARCHIES
Retail Trade		 Mar 2020 4x16% −66%−66% −36%
AVTNPL
Consumer Non-Durables		 Nov 2024 24x16% −11%−28% −17%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high and P/S. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to WEIZMANN LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What changed?

30 events since Jun '21

  1. OctPriceFell 60% from the Jun 2024 peak to the Oct 2026 low.
  2. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned positive.
  3. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Process Industries on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  4. JunDividendStarted paying a dividend (payout 13% of profit).
  5. MarPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Process Industries on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  6. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned negative.
  7. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Process Industries on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  8. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 9% to -22% of profit.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. MarPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Process Industries on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  2. JunPriceRegained the 2023-11 peak, 3 months after the low.
  3. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  4. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 19% to 9% of profit.
  5. AprValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (48.4x).
  6. MarPriceFell 40% from the Nov 2023 peak to the Mar 2024 low.
  7. OctPriceRegained the 2022-11 peak, 7 months after the low.
  8. OctValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (51.1x).
  9. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  10. JunPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the bottom quartile).
  11. MarPriceFell 40% from the Nov 2022 peak to the Mar 2023 low.
  12. SepPriceRegained the 2022-02 peak, 2 months after the low.
  13. AugValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (35.3x).
  14. JulPriceFell 52% from the Feb 2022 peak to the Jul 2022 low.
  15. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  16. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  17. FebPriceRegained the 2021-07 peak, 6 months after the low.
  18. AugPriceFell 38% from the Jul 2021 peak to the Aug 2021 low.
  19. JulPriceRegained the 2020-12 peak, 3 months after the low.
  20. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  21. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Process Industries on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  22. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 580% to 17% of profit.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history95 months · 2019-01 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1117.6x₹128 cr9.3%14.0%0.1x
2026-1017.3x₹128 cr9.3%14.0%0.1x
2026-0917.9x₹128 cr9.3%14.0%0.1x
2026-0819.2x₹127 cr9.0%14.0%0.1x
2026-0720.3x₹127 cr9.0%14.0%0.1x
2026-0622.4x₹127 cr9.0%14.0%0.1x
2026-05—₹131 cr-5.2%16.0%0.2x
2026-04—₹131 cr-5.2%16.0%0.2x
2026-03—₹131 cr-5.2%16.0%0.2x
2026-02—₹131 cr-5.8%16.0%0.2x
2026-01—₹131 cr-5.8%16.0%0.2x
2025-12—₹131 cr-5.8%16.0%0.2x
2025-11—₹126 cr-5.4%16.0%0.2x
2025-10—₹126 cr-5.4%16.0%0.2x
2025-09—₹126 cr-5.4%16.0%0.2x
2025-08—₹117 cr-6.0%16.0%0.2x
2025-07—₹117 cr-6.0%16.0%0.2x
2025-06—₹117 cr-6.0%16.0%0.2x
2025-0527.0x₹112 cr9.5%16.0%0.1x
2025-0424.9x₹112 cr9.5%16.0%0.1x
2025-0324.3x₹112 cr9.5%16.0%0.1x
2025-0222.6x₹111 cr10.1%16.0%0.1x
2025-0127.1x₹111 cr10.1%16.0%0.1x
2024-1229.5x₹111 cr10.1%16.0%0.1x
2024-1129.7x₹111 cr9.4%16.0%0.1x
2024-1029.8x₹111 cr9.4%16.0%0.1x
2024-0933.2x₹111 cr9.4%16.0%0.1x
2024-0823.6x₹123 cr12.3%16.0%0.1x
2024-0721.5x₹123 cr12.3%16.0%0.1x
2024-0623.6x₹123 cr12.3%16.0%0.1x
2024-0543.3x₹135 cr6.8%12.0%0.2x
2024-0448.4x₹135 cr6.8%12.0%0.2x
2024-0341.2x₹135 cr6.8%12.0%0.2x
2024-0239.9x₹135 cr6.8%12.0%0.2x
2024-0141.5x₹135 cr6.8%12.0%0.2x
2023-1242.8x₹135 cr6.8%12.0%0.2x
2023-1144.6x₹135 cr6.8%12.0%0.2x
2023-1051.1x₹135 cr6.8%12.0%0.2x
2023-0938.8x₹135 cr6.8%12.0%0.2x
2023-0834.4x₹135 cr6.8%12.0%0.2x
2023-0734.4x₹135 cr6.8%12.0%0.2x
2023-0636.8x₹135 cr6.8%12.0%0.2x
2023-0545.7x₹100 cr5.5%4.0%0.3x
2023-0448.9x₹100 cr5.5%4.0%0.3x
2023-0337.3x₹100 cr5.5%4.0%0.3x
2023-0242.3x₹100 cr5.5%4.0%0.3x
2023-0149.0x₹100 cr5.5%4.0%0.3x
2022-1246.4x₹100 cr5.5%4.0%0.3x
2022-1147.8x₹100 cr5.5%4.0%0.3x
2022-1050.3x₹100 cr5.5%4.0%0.3x
2022-0935.3x₹100 cr5.5%4.0%0.3x
2022-0835.3x₹100 cr5.5%4.0%0.3x
2022-0722.2x₹100 cr5.5%4.0%0.3x
2022-0620.8x₹100 cr5.5%4.0%0.3x
2022-0517.1x₹98 cr6.8%9.0%0.2x
2022-0420.0x₹98 cr6.8%9.0%0.2x
2022-0318.8x₹98 cr6.8%9.0%0.2x
2022-0221.1x₹98 cr6.8%9.0%0.2x
2022-0119.9x₹98 cr6.8%9.0%0.2x
2021-1219.2x₹98 cr6.8%9.0%0.2x
2021-1117.4x₹98 cr6.8%9.0%0.2x
2021-1017.8x₹98 cr6.8%9.0%0.2x
2021-0915.8x₹98 cr6.8%9.0%0.2x
2021-0816.2x₹98 cr6.8%9.0%0.2x
2021-0718.2x₹98 cr6.8%9.0%0.2x
2021-0618.5x₹98 cr6.8%9.0%0.2x
2021-0530.6x₹96 cr4.3%7.0%0.3x
2021-0424.9x₹96 cr4.3%7.0%0.3x
2021-0325.3x₹96 cr4.3%7.0%0.3x
2021-0227.0x₹96 cr4.3%7.0%0.3x
2021-0124.0x₹96 cr4.3%7.0%0.3x
2020-1227.9x₹96 cr4.3%7.0%0.3x
2020-1118.6x₹96 cr4.3%7.0%0.3x
2020-1016.9x₹96 cr4.3%7.0%0.3x
2020-0917.4x₹96 cr4.3%7.0%0.3x
2020-0820.1x₹96 cr4.3%7.0%0.3x
2020-0719.0x₹96 cr4.3%7.0%0.3x
2020-0614.0x₹96 cr4.3%7.0%0.3x
2020-056.4x₹105 cr7.1%11.0%0.0x
2020-046.6x₹105 cr7.1%11.0%0.0x
2020-036.4x₹105 cr7.1%11.0%0.0x
2020-025.9x₹105 cr7.1%11.0%0.0x
2020-017.2x₹105 cr7.1%11.0%0.0x
2019-125.5x₹105 cr7.1%11.0%0.0x
2019-116.0x₹105 cr7.1%11.0%0.0x
2019-106.2x₹105 cr7.1%11.0%0.0x
2019-096.8x₹105 cr7.1%11.0%0.0x
2019-087.6x₹105 cr7.1%11.0%0.0x
2019-077.5x₹105 cr7.1%11.0%0.0x
2019-069.4x₹105 cr7.1%11.0%0.0x
2019-0519.7x₹87 cr2.6%5.0%0.0x
2019-0420.9x₹87 cr2.6%5.0%0.0x
2019-0322.7x₹87 cr2.6%5.0%0.0x
2019-0223.0x₹87 cr2.6%5.0%0.0x
2019-0124.5x₹87 cr2.6%5.0%0.0x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback