अApnaFunda
Menu

AIRO LAM LIMITED (AIROLAM)

Non-Energy Minerals · Forest Products · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.30 / 100
Profitability 37Growth 39Balance sheet 14
Compare withSTYLAM INDUSTRIESGREENLAM INDUSTRIESRESPONSIVE INDUSTRIES

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹106.2 latest close · +15.0% over the last 90 sessions

₹80₹90₹100₹110Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹80₹90₹100₹110Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹106.2 month-end · +3.8% over 12 months

₹80₹90₹100Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹80₹90₹100Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹106.2 month-end · −17.1% over 3 years

₹100₹150Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹100₹150Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹106.2 month-end · +405.7% since Jun '20

₹50₹100₹150Jun '20Sep '21Jan '23Apr '24Aug '25Nov '26 ₹50₹100₹150Jun '20Sep '23Nov '26

52-week range ₹78.00 to ₹123.77 · 1-year volatility 42.5%

Was the rally earned?

+4%share price, 1 yearRoughly flat
  • The share price was roughly flat over 1 year (+4%).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +108 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+108 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −105 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−105 ptsP/E changeShare price: +4%+4%Share priceNet profit growth: +108 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+108ProfitP/E change: −105 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−105P/EShare price: +4%+4%Share price
Net profit growth+108 ptsNet profit rose about 190%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-105 ptsThe P/E fell from 80.5x to 28.9x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-17%share price, 3 yearsEarnings-driven

Mostly earnings.

  • Per-share earnings took off 27 points, while the multiple moved less (P/E 26.0x to 28.9x).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −26 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−26 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +10 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+10 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1 ptsShare count changeShare price: −17%−17%Share priceNet profit growth: −26 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−26ProfitP/E change: +10 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+10P/EShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1SharesShare price: −17%−17%Share price
Net profit growth-26 ptsNet profit fell about 25%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+10 ptsThe P/E rose from 26.0x to 28.9x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+92%share price, 5 yearsMultiple-driven

Partly.

  • Most of the rise came from investors paying a higher multiple (P/E 15.2x to 28.9x); per-share earnings added 2 points.
  • The share count rose 4%.
Net profit growth: +7 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+7 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +91 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+91 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −5 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−5 ptsShare count changeShare price: +92%+92%Share priceNet profit growth: +7 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+7ProfitP/E change: +91 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+91P/EShare count change: −5 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−5SharesShare price: +92%+92%Share price
Net profit growth+7 ptsNet profit rose about 5%, which lifts the price.
P/E change+91 ptsThe P/E rose from 15.2x to 28.9x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-5 ptsShare count rose 4%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with STYLAM INDUSTRIES

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-58.6%not yet recovered
1-year volatility42.5%annualised

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2020202120222023202420252026−58.1% 0%−20%−40%−60%2020202220242026−58.1%
Largest drawdowns

-58.6% (2024-02 peak to 2026-06 low, not yet recovered)

-57.0% (2019-03 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2021-06)

-47.1% (2022-09 peak to 2023-03 low, recovered 2023-08)

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

28.9xP/E todayNear its historic high
Against its own history81st percentile
CheapestMedian 19.9xDearest

Usual range 8.4x to 68.5x since 2020-06.

Against Non-Energy Minerals28.9x vs 21.8x
This company
28.9x
Sector median
21.8x

32% above the Non-Energy Minerals median.

6.6x34.0x61.5x89.0xJun '20Oct '21Feb '23Jun '24Oct '25Nov '266.6x34.0x61.5x89.0xJun '20Aug '22Oct '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Non-Energy Minerals is valued

Where does it rank among Non-Energy Minerals peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Non-Energy Minerals peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE47th▲ 18 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin27th▼ 8 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth62nd▲ 7 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth98th▲ 89 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓12thflat vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓22nd▲ 8 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓39th▲ 32 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum68th▲ 30 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Non-Energy Minerals sector page Watch it move against Non-Energy Minerals in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~18%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 25.3x, the price would imply about 18.0%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Below the ₹1,000 cr market-cap floor used for the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Non-Energy Minerals The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹106.20
P/E
28.9x
ROCE
10.0%
Market Cap
₹159 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹243 cr
P/S
0.7x
P/B
2.0x
ROE
7.0%
Operating Margin
5.7%
Debt / Equity
1.0x
Promoter Holding
53.4%
12M Momentum
3.8%

52-week range

₹78.00₹123.77
62% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
42.5%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.43

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
1.8x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
2.00x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

4 of 7checks within range1 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance19%Near threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 18.8%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate30%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 30.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion2.00xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 2.00x (cash from operations ₹32 cr, net profit ₹16 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow1 of 5 yrsBeyond threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 1. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+4 daysWithin range

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 4 days (102 vs 98). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress0% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 0% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days+31 days / 2 yrsNear threshold

Days payable changed by +31 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, institutional and promoter holdings were broadly unchanged.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 3,550 to 4,276 (+20%) between Dec 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupDec '23Jun '26Change
Promoters53.0%53.4%+0.4 pts
FIIs———
DIIs———
Public and others47.0%46.6%-0.4 pts

Number of shareholders

4,276shareholders+20% since Dec '23
4k4k4k5k Dec '23Sep '24Mar '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 3,550
Mar '24: 4,613
Sep '24: 4,334
Dec '24: 4,829
Mar '25: 4,607
Dec '25: 4,406
Jun '26: 4,276
 4k4k4k5k Dec '23Sep '24Mar '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 3,550
Mar '24: 4,613
Sep '24: 4,334
Dec '24: 4,829
Mar '25: 4,607
Dec '25: 4,406
Jun '26: 4,276

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+15.1%typical 12-month return vs the marketAbove the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like AIRO LAM LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −17% to +62% vs the market, against −4% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The analogs' median sat above that base rate (gap +19.2%, 80% range +6.6% to +27.2%), but the matches cluster in only 6 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
RPPL · Feb 2024: −53.0% vs market
DUCON · Aug 2024: −43.1% vs market
UCAL · Jun 2021: −42.3% vs market
AROGRANITE · Dec 2021: −42.0% vs market
WHEELS · Jun 2023: −33.5% vs market
HISARMETAL · Jul 2025: −32.4% vs market
KHADIM · Oct 2023: −30.9% vs market
SUNDRMBRAK · Aug 2024: −25.5% vs market
KHFM · Sep 2024: −24.3% vs market
AMBICAAGAR · May 2025: −22.9% vs market
HPL · Jun 2021: −22.6% vs market
SPORTKING · Aug 2024: −20.6% vs market
GOACARBON · Mar 2022: −17.3% vs market
BALPHARMA · Jan 2024: −15.0% vs market
MANAKALUCO · Feb 2023: −10.9% vs market
MAGADSUGAR · Jun 2021: −5.6% vs market
KALYANIFRG · Nov 2024: −1.6% vs market
PPAP · Jun 2025: −0.2% vs market
SALZERELEC · Jan 2023: +0.1% vs market
NELCAST · May 2025: +0.6% vs market
PARAGMILK · May 2025: +3.1% vs market
ARIES · Jan 2023: +7.8% vs market
HITECH · Dec 2022: +10.4% vs market
PIONEEREMB · Jan 2020: +12.3% vs market
PGIL · Oct 2020: +13.9% vs market
NRAIL · Aug 2025: +16.2% vs market
SHIVATEX · Apr 2021: +17.3% vs market
CENTUM · Oct 2021: +17.6% vs market
JAYBARMARU · Oct 2022: +23.3% vs market
SANGAMIND · May 2025: +24.1% vs market
INDIANHUME · Jun 2023: +25.7% vs market
LUMAXIND · Sep 2022: +26.8% vs market
RICOAUTO · Oct 2022: +35.6% vs market
RAMRAT · Apr 2024: +46.4% vs market
BLKASHYAP · Mar 2023: +48.9% vs market
ELGIRUBCO · Jul 2023: +49.9% vs market
UNITEDPOLY · Mar 2025: +56.5% vs market
GOKEX · Oct 2021: +64.1% vs market
KANPRPLA · Apr 2025: +70.6% vs market
GPTINFRA · Oct 2023: +73.0% vs market
COMSYN · Feb 2025: +74.9% vs market
HARRMALAYA · Jun 2020: +78.6% vs market
TCPLPACK · Feb 2022: +96.0% vs market
KAPSTON · May 2025: +105.4% vs market
GLOBUSSPR · Jan 2020: +126.9% vs market
REMSONSIND · Jan 2023: +133.0% vs market
GRPLTD · Jun 2022: +134.2% vs market
SKIPPER · Nov 2022: +143.3% vs market
ARTEMISMED · Jun 2022: +150.3% vs market
SKMEGGPROD · Sep 2022: +283.4% vs market
Similar setups +15.1%All companies −4.1%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 7 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+15.1%
All companies' median
−4.1%
Beat the market
64% vs 45%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 33 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
KHADIM
Consumer Non-Durables		 Oct 2023 40x10% +37%−4% −31%
REMSONSIND
Producer Manufacturing		 Jan 2023 27x12% +8%−11% +133%
RICOAUTO
Producer Manufacturing		 Oct 2022 34x7% +37%−6% +36%
CENTUM
Electronic Technology		 Oct 2021 40x8% +96%−7% +18%
COMSYN
Process Industries		 Feb 2025 35x9% −7%−16% +75%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
HISARMETAL
Non-Energy Minerals		 Jul 2025 35x9% +4%−6% −32%
GRPLTD
Producer Manufacturing		 Jun 2022 30x6% +36%−16% +134%
HARRMALAYA
Process Industries		 Jun 2020 14x13% −1%−13% +79%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: ROCE, P/S and 12-month momentum. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to AIRO LAM LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What changed?

30 events since Mar '22

  1. AugPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  2. JunPriceFell 59% from the Feb 2024 peak to the Jun 2026 low.
  3. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  4. DecResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  5. DecPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  6. SepValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (88.0x).
  7. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  8. JunPromoterPromoter holding rose 3.7 pts to 53.1%.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹214 cr.
  2. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  3. MarPromoterPromoter holding fell 3.6 pts to 49.5%.
  4. MarPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  5. DecValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (80.2x).
  6. DecPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  7. SepResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  8. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (27.3x).
  9. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  10. JunDebtDebt / equity rose above 1.0x (1.13x).
  11. MarResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹208 cr.
  12. MarPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  13. AugPriceRegained the 2022-09 peak, 5 months after the low.
  14. AugValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (24.1x).
  15. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹198 cr.
  16. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  17. MarPriceFell 47% from the Sep 2022 peak to the Mar 2023 low.
  18. SepPriceRegained the 2021-10 peak, 10 months after the low.
  19. SepValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (28.0x).
  20. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹168 cr.
  21. MayPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  22. MarPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history78 months · 2020-06 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1128.9x₹243 cr7.0%10.0%1.0x
2026-1022.5x₹243 cr7.0%10.0%1.0x
2026-0925.2x₹243 cr7.0%10.0%1.0x
2026-0823.9x₹243 cr7.0%10.0%1.0x
2026-0723.4x₹243 cr7.0%10.0%1.0x
2026-0625.7x₹243 cr7.0%10.0%1.0x
2026-0515.2x₹241 cr11.2%7.0%1.2x
2026-0415.8x₹241 cr11.2%7.0%1.2x
2026-0315.5x₹241 cr11.2%7.0%1.2x
2026-0218.1x₹226 cr10.7%7.0%1.2x
2026-0118.3x₹226 cr10.7%7.0%1.2x
2025-1220.1x₹226 cr10.7%7.0%1.2x
2025-1180.5x₹216 cr2.6%7.0%1.2x
2025-1080.9x₹216 cr2.6%7.0%1.2x
2025-0988.0x₹216 cr2.6%7.0%1.2x
2025-0859.4x₹214 cr3.7%7.0%1.2x
2025-0759.3x₹214 cr3.7%7.0%1.2x
2025-0664.6x₹214 cr3.7%7.0%1.2x
2025-0589.0x₹209 cr2.3%12.0%1.1x
2025-0484.0x₹209 cr2.3%12.0%1.1x
2025-0384.4x₹209 cr2.3%12.0%1.1x
2025-0263.1x₹212 cr3.4%12.0%1.1x
2025-0177.7x₹212 cr3.4%12.0%1.1x
2024-1280.2x₹212 cr3.4%12.0%1.1x
2024-1125.5x₹210 cr10.9%12.0%1.1x
2024-1023.6x₹210 cr10.9%12.0%1.1x
2024-0926.9x₹210 cr10.9%12.0%1.1x
2024-0825.2x₹206 cr11.7%12.0%1.1x
2024-0723.8x₹206 cr11.7%12.0%1.1x
2024-0627.3x₹206 cr11.7%12.0%1.1x
2024-0525.4x₹208 cr14.1%12.0%1.0x
2024-0430.6x₹208 cr14.1%12.0%1.0x
2024-0326.7x₹208 cr14.1%12.0%1.0x
2024-0235.5x₹198 cr11.5%12.0%1.0x
2024-0130.3x₹198 cr11.5%12.0%1.0x
2023-1226.4x₹198 cr11.5%12.0%1.0x
2023-1126.0x₹198 cr11.5%12.0%1.0x
2023-1023.4x₹198 cr11.5%12.0%1.0x
2023-0922.5x₹198 cr11.5%12.0%1.0x
2023-0824.1x₹198 cr11.5%12.0%1.0x
2023-0718.4x₹198 cr11.5%12.0%1.0x
2023-0618.3x₹198 cr11.5%12.0%1.0x
2023-0518.7x₹168 cr13.1%13.0%0.9x
2023-0416.1x₹168 cr13.1%13.0%0.9x
2023-0315.0x₹168 cr13.1%13.0%0.9x
2023-0216.3x₹168 cr13.1%13.0%0.9x
2023-0117.8x₹168 cr13.1%13.0%0.9x
2022-1218.7x₹168 cr13.1%13.0%0.9x
2022-1119.7x₹168 cr13.1%13.0%0.9x
2022-1024.2x₹168 cr13.1%13.0%0.9x
2022-0928.0x₹168 cr13.1%13.0%0.9x
2022-0816.3x₹168 cr13.1%13.0%0.9x
2022-0714.7x₹168 cr13.1%13.0%0.9x
2022-0614.3x₹168 cr13.1%13.0%0.9x
2022-0518.4x₹133 cr10.5%12.0%0.8x
2022-0419.5x₹133 cr10.5%12.0%0.8x
2022-0318.8x₹133 cr10.5%12.0%0.8x
2022-0219.1x₹133 cr10.5%12.0%0.8x
2022-0121.9x₹133 cr10.5%12.0%0.8x
2021-1222.0x₹133 cr10.5%12.0%0.8x
2021-1115.2x₹133 cr10.5%12.0%0.8x
2021-1018.6x₹133 cr10.5%12.0%0.8x
2021-0917.6x₹133 cr10.5%12.0%0.8x
2021-0815.2x₹133 cr10.5%12.0%0.8x
2021-0710.7x₹133 cr10.5%12.0%0.8x
2021-069.5x₹133 cr10.5%12.0%0.8x
2021-058.3x₹105 cr11.9%—0.8x
2021-047.5x₹105 cr11.9%—0.8x
2021-038.5x₹105 cr11.9%—0.8x
2021-028.5x₹105 cr11.9%—0.8x
2021-019.4x₹105 cr11.9%—0.8x
2020-128.4x₹105 cr11.9%—0.8x
2020-118.2x₹105 cr11.9%—0.8x
2020-107.8x₹105 cr11.9%—0.8x
2020-097.8x₹105 cr11.9%—0.8x
2020-086.9x₹105 cr11.9%—0.8x
2020-076.9x₹105 cr11.9%—0.8x
2020-066.6x₹105 cr11.9%—0.8x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback