अApnaFunda

REMSONS INDUSTRIES LTD (REMSONSIND)

Producer Manufacturing · Auto Parts: OEM · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.45 / 100
Profitability 41Growth 65Balance sheet 29

Passes these screensCash Rich

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹90.92 latest close · +9.7% over the last 90 sessions

₹80₹100₹120Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹80₹100₹120Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹90.92 month-end · −25.2% over 12 months

₹80₹100₹120Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹80₹100₹120Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹90.92 month-end · −29.3% over 3 years

₹100₹150₹200Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹100₹150₹200Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹90.92 month-end · +77.1% since Jun '21

₹100₹200Jun '21Jul '22Aug '23Sep '24Oct '25Nov '26 ₹100₹200Jun '21Mar '24Nov '26

52-week range ₹75.23 to ₹152.45 · 1-year volatility 50.8%

Was the rally earned?

-25%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 11 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 27.8x to 18.3x), which took 36 points back.
  • The share count fell 10%.
Net profit growth: +2 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+2 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −36 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−36 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +9 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+9 ptsShare count changeShare price: −25%−25%Share priceNet profit growth: +2 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+2ProfitP/E change: −36 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−36P/EShare count change: +9 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+9SharesShare price: −25%−25%Share price
Net profit growth+2 ptsNet profit rose about 2%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-36 ptsThe P/E fell from 27.8x to 18.3x, which lowers the price.
Share count change+9 ptsShare count fell 10%, which lifts the price.
-29%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 45 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 43.9x to 18.3x), which took 74 points back.
  • The share count rose 44%.
Net profit growth: +75 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+75 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −74 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−74 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −31 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−31 ptsShare count changeShare price: −29%−29%Share priceNet profit growth: +75 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+75ProfitP/E change: −74 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−74P/EShare count change: −31 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−31SharesShare price: −29%−29%Share price
Net profit growth+75 ptsNet profit rose about 143%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-74 ptsThe P/E fell from 43.9x to 18.3x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-31 ptsShare count rose 44%, which lowers the price.
+95%share price, 5 yearsLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 164 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 29.7x to 18.3x), which took 69 points back.
  • The share count rose 17%.
Net profit growth: +186 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+186 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −69 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−69 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −22 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−22 ptsShare count changeShare price: +95%+95%Share priceNet profit growth: +186 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+186ProfitP/E change: −69 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−69P/EShare count change: −22 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−22SharesShare price: +95%+95%Share price
Net profit growth+186 ptsNet profit rose about 269%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-69 ptsThe P/E fell from 29.7x to 18.3x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-22 ptsShare count rose 17%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with SAMVARDHANA MOTHERSON INT

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-66.2%not yet recovered
1-year volatility50.8%annualised

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2020202120222023202420252026−65.3% 0%−20%−40%−60%2020202220242026−65.3%
Largest drawdowns

-66.2% (2024-09 peak to 2026-07 low, not yet recovered)

-64.6% (2019-02 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2021-02)

-40.4% (2021-07 peak to 2022-03 low, recovered 2023-07)

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

18.3xP/E todayNear its historic low
Against its own history9th percentile
CheapestMedian 27.5xDearest

Usual range 19.0x to 46.0x since 2021-06.

Against Producer Manufacturing18.3x vs 29.6x
This company
18.3x
Sector median
29.6x

38% below the Producer Manufacturing median.

15.3x33.5x51.7x70.0xJun '21Jul '22Aug '23Sep '24Oct '25Nov '2615.3x33.5x51.7x70.0xJun '21Apr '23Feb '25Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Producer Manufacturing is valued

Where does it rank among Producer Manufacturing peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Producer Manufacturing peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE50th▲ 8 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin32nd▼ 13 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth70th▼ 11 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth54th▲ 14 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓22ndflat vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓64th▲ 17 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓75th▲ 16 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum23rd▼ 15 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Producer Manufacturing sector page Watch it move against Producer Manufacturing in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~14%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 18.3x, the price would imply about 13.7%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Below the ₹1,000 cr market-cap floor used for the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Producer Manufacturing The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹90.92
P/E
18.3x
ROCE
15.0%
Market Cap
₹317 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹489 cr
P/S
0.6x
P/B
2.1x
ROE
11.6%
Operating Margin
8.7%
Debt / Equity
0.7x
Promoter Holding
62.8%
12M Momentum
-25.2%

52-week range

₹75.23₹152.45
20% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
50.8%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.28

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
3.9x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
1.90x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

7 of 7checks within rangeAll clear
Other income reliance15%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 14.8%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate23%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 23.3%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion1.90xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 1.90x (cash from operations ₹97 cr, net profit ₹51 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow4 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 4. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-9 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 9 days (59 vs 68). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress0% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 0% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days-5 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by -5 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, promoters trimmed 12.2 pts; FIIs added 2.8 pts; DIIs added 1.1 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 3,321 to 16,791 (+406%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters75.0%62.8%-12.2 pts
FIIs0.0%2.8%+2.8 pts
DIIs0.0%1.1%+1.1 pts
Public and others25.0%33.3%+8.3 pts

Number of shareholders

16,791shareholders+406% since Sep '23
3k8k12k17k Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 3,321
Dec '23: 3,216
Mar '24: 4,276
Jun '24: 5,573
Sep '24: 7,913
Dec '24: 8,138
Mar '25: 8,486
Jun '25: 10,488
Sep '25: 15,556
Dec '25: 16,873
Mar '26: 16,500
Jun '26: 16,791
3k8k12k17k Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 3,321
Dec '23: 3,216
Mar '24: 4,276
Jun '24: 5,573
Sep '24: 7,913
Dec '24: 8,138
Mar '25: 8,486
Jun '25: 10,488
Sep '25: 15,556
Dec '25: 16,873
Mar '26: 16,500
Jun '26: 16,791

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−11.2%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like REMSONS INDUSTRIES LTD today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −29% to +33% vs the market, against −5% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−6.6%, 80% range −18.5% to +2.3%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
DUCON · Jun 2025: −51.6% vs market
CONFIPET · Oct 2024: −47.8% vs market
ASTRON · Jul 2021: −44.5% vs market
BCLIND · Nov 2024: −44.4% vs market
NACLIND · Jul 2023: −43.0% vs market
WTICAB · Jul 2025: −42.7% vs market
RUSHIL · Jun 2025: −40.6% vs market
SALZERELEC · Aug 2025: −36.7% vs market
KDDL · Jan 2020: −33.7% vs market
RICOAUTO · Jan 2020: −33.2% vs market
KANPRPLA · Jun 2022: −30.4% vs market
SATIA · May 2023: −30.2% vs market
BLKASHYAP · Oct 2024: −29.5% vs market
HARIOMPIPE · Sep 2025: −29.3% vs market
HITECH · Feb 2025: −28.0% vs market
ZEELEARN · Jul 2020: −27.2% vs market
ALICON · May 2025: −26.6% vs market
ZIMLAB · Nov 2023: −23.1% vs market
SHIGAN · Jun 2025: −22.0% vs market
MWL · Aug 2023: −21.9% vs market
DONEAR · Jun 2025: −21.1% vs market
APEX · Feb 2022: −20.7% vs market
NIPPOBATRY · Dec 2021: −20.0% vs market
AIROLAM · Sep 2023: −18.8% vs market
DOLLEX · Apr 2024: −13.5% vs market
RPPL · Dec 2023: −9.0% vs market
MANOMAY · Jan 2024: −2.7% vs market
RITCO · Jul 2025: −2.2% vs market
CENTUM · May 2020: −0.5% vs market
CENTEXT · Mar 2025: 0% vs market
MMP · Jul 2025: +0.9% vs market
ASAHISONG · Jul 2025: +1.2% vs market
AXISCADES · Jul 2020: +11.2% vs market
NELCAST · Jan 2020: +12.3% vs market
FAZE3Q · Sep 2024: +16.7% vs market
INDOAMIN · Nov 2023: +18.5% vs market
GOODLUCK · Oct 2024: +30.4% vs market
GOKEX · Mar 2020: +33.4% vs market
TPLPLASTEH · Mar 2020: +35.5% vs market
ARIES · Apr 2021: +40.0% vs market
ARTEMISMED · Feb 2021: +41.0% vs market
TALBROAUTO · May 2020: +50.2% vs market
DYCL · Sep 2024: +57.5% vs market
SHIVATEX · Nov 2020: +60.8% vs market
PREMIERPOL · Apr 2023: +61.2% vs market
HITECHCORP · Oct 2020: +61.8% vs market
MIRZAINT · Dec 2020: +63.3% vs market
SHANKARA · Apr 2021: +64.1% vs market
GRAVITA · May 2020: +77.6% vs market
SALASAR · Mar 2022: +97.0% vs market
Similar setups −11.2%All companies −4.6%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months

Similar setups' median
−11.2%
All companies' median
−4.6%
Beat the market
42% vs 45%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 33 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
SALASAR
Producer Manufacturing
Mar 2022 20x15% +16%−41% +97%
INDOAMIN
Process Industries
Nov 2023 20x17% +4%−15% +19%
KDDL
Consumer Durables
Jan 2020 17x17% −31%−40% −34%
RICOAUTO
Producer Manufacturing
Jan 2020 12x12% −30%−40% −33%
SHIVATEX
Process Industries
Nov 2020 12x— −14%−28% +61%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
RPPL
Process Industries
Dec 2023 23x11% +21%−13% −9%
SHANKARA
Retail Trade
Apr 2021 21x13% +46%−24% +64%
BLKASHYAP
Industrial Services
Oct 2024 29x14% +27%−30% −30%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, ROCE and P/S. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to REMSONS INDUSTRIES LTD. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What changed?

30 events since Mar '20

  1. OctValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (17.4x).
  2. SepPromoterPromoter holding fell 2.7 pts to 62.8% (largest drop since 2024-06).
  3. AugPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  4. JulPriceFell 66% from the Sep 2024 peak to the Jul 2026 low.
  5. JanValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (23.3x).
  6. DecResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  7. DecPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  8. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  2. MarPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  3. FebDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.61x.
  4. SepResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹316 cr.
  5. JulDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.61x.
  6. JunPromoterPromoter holding fell 9.7 pts to 65.3%.
  7. JunInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 3.1 pts over 1 quarter to 3.1%.
  8. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  9. JunDebtDebt / equity fell below 1.0x (0.61x).
  10. JunSharesShare count is up 16.7% over 12 months.
  11. FebPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  12. DecPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  13. JulPriceRegained the 2021-07 peak, 16 months after the low.
  14. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹313 cr.
  15. JunValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (15.8x).
  16. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  17. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹286 cr.
  18. MarPriceFell 40% from the Jul 2021 peak to the Mar 2022 low.
  19. MayPriceRegained the 2021-02 peak, 2 months after the low.
  20. MarPriceFell 27% from the Feb 2021 peak to the Mar 2021 low.
  21. FebPriceRegained the 2019-02 peak, 11 months after the low.
  22. MarPriceFell 65% from the Feb 2019 peak to the Mar 2020 low.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history66 months · 2021-06 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1118.3x₹489 cr11.6%15.0%0.7x
2026-1017.4x₹489 cr11.6%15.0%0.7x
2026-0923.0x₹489 cr11.6%15.0%0.7x
2026-0819.0x₹469 cr12.5%15.0%0.7x
2026-0716.1x₹469 cr12.5%15.0%0.7x
2026-0615.3x₹469 cr12.5%15.0%0.7x
2026-0519.0x₹445 cr16.3%14.0%0.7x
2026-0421.5x₹445 cr16.3%14.0%0.7x
2026-0315.8x₹445 cr16.3%14.0%0.7x
2026-0224.1x₹424 cr15.4%14.0%0.7x
2026-0123.3x₹424 cr15.4%14.0%0.7x
2025-1225.4x₹424 cr15.4%14.0%0.7x
2025-1127.8x₹400 cr13.4%14.0%0.7x
2025-1033.5x₹400 cr13.4%14.0%0.7x
2025-0927.2x₹400 cr13.4%14.0%0.7x
2025-0829.1x₹377 cr11.9%14.0%0.7x
2025-0730.5x₹377 cr11.9%14.0%0.7x
2025-0633.5x₹377 cr11.9%14.0%0.7x
2025-0533.6x₹351 cr12.4%15.0%0.6x
2025-0427.5x₹351 cr12.4%15.0%0.6x
2025-0327.7x₹351 cr12.4%15.0%0.6x
2025-0227.8x₹331 cr11.4%15.0%0.6x
2025-0126.9x₹331 cr11.4%15.0%0.6x
2024-1233.8x₹331 cr11.4%15.0%0.6x
2024-1136.1x₹316 cr11.2%15.0%0.6x
2024-1036.2x₹316 cr11.2%15.0%0.6x
2024-0949.7x₹316 cr11.2%15.0%0.6x
2024-0840.3x₹312 cr10.7%15.0%0.6x
2024-0743.1x₹312 cr10.7%15.0%0.6x
2024-0646.0x₹312 cr10.7%15.0%0.6x
2024-0560.6x₹313 cr16.5%15.0%1.9x
2024-0466.9x₹313 cr16.5%15.0%1.9x
2024-0363.0x₹313 cr16.5%15.0%1.9x
2024-0270.0x₹313 cr16.5%15.0%1.9x
2024-0154.8x₹313 cr16.5%15.0%1.9x
2023-1246.0x₹313 cr16.5%15.0%1.9x
2023-1143.9x₹313 cr16.5%15.0%1.9x
2023-1030.6x₹313 cr16.5%15.0%1.9x
2023-0930.3x₹313 cr16.5%15.0%1.9x
2023-0828.7x₹313 cr16.5%15.0%1.9x
2023-0723.6x₹313 cr16.5%15.0%1.9x
2023-0615.8x₹313 cr16.5%15.0%1.9x
2023-0524.7x₹286 cr12.7%12.0%2.3x
2023-0423.5x₹286 cr12.7%12.0%2.3x
2023-0320.4x₹286 cr12.7%12.0%2.3x
2023-0223.1x₹286 cr12.7%12.0%2.3x
2023-0126.5x₹286 cr12.7%12.0%2.3x
2022-1225.7x₹286 cr12.7%12.0%2.3x
2022-1128.3x₹286 cr12.7%12.0%2.3x
2022-1023.5x₹286 cr12.7%12.0%2.3x
2022-0924.8x₹286 cr12.7%12.0%2.3x
2022-0823.4x₹286 cr12.7%12.0%2.3x
2022-0724.0x₹286 cr12.7%12.0%2.3x
2022-0623.0x₹286 cr12.7%12.0%2.3x
2022-0525.6x₹226 cr15.6%—2.5x
2022-0426.4x₹226 cr15.6%—2.5x
2022-0323.1x₹226 cr15.6%—2.5x
2022-0224.4x₹226 cr15.6%—2.5x
2022-0129.2x₹226 cr15.6%—2.5x
2021-1229.5x₹226 cr15.6%—2.5x
2021-1129.7x₹226 cr15.6%—2.5x
2021-1029.1x₹226 cr15.6%—2.5x
2021-0927.4x₹226 cr15.6%—2.5x
2021-0826.0x₹226 cr15.6%—2.5x
2021-0730.9x₹226 cr15.6%—2.5x
2021-0632.7x₹226 cr15.6%—2.5x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback