अApnaFunda

SHIVA TEXYARN LIMITED (SHIVATEX)

Process Industries · Textiles · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.37 / 100
Profitability 50Growth 15Balance sheet 48

Passes these screensCash Rich

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹169.62 latest close · +13.9% over the last 90 sessions

₹140₹160₹180Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹140₹160₹180Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹169.62 month-end · −10.8% over 12 months

₹140₹160₹180Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹140₹160₹180Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹169.62 month-end · +19.0% over 3 years

₹150₹200Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹150₹200Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹169.62 month-end · −10.7% since Jan '19

₹100₹200Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹100₹200Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹126.06 to ₹217.92 · 1-year volatility 38.7%

Was the rally earned?

-11%share price, 1 yearEarnings-driven

Mostly earnings.

  • Per-share earnings took off 30 points, while the multiple moved less (P/E 18.7x to 22.9x).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −29 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−29 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +19 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+19 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: −11%−11%Share priceNet profit growth: −29 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−29ProfitP/E change: +19 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+19P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: −11%−11%Share price
Net profit growth-29 ptsNet profit fell about 27%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+19 ptsThe P/E rose from 18.7x to 22.9x, which lifts the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-8%share price, 5 yearsLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 6 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 26.3x to 22.9x), which took 13 points back.
  • The share count fell 40%.
Net profit growth: −42 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−42 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −13 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−13 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +49 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+49 ptsShare count changeShare price: −7%−7%Share priceNet profit growth: −42 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−42ProfitP/E change: −13 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−13P/EShare count change: +49 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+49SharesShare price: −7%−7%Share price
Net profit growth-42 ptsNet profit fell about 36%, which lowers the price.
P/E change-13 ptsThe P/E fell from 26.3x to 22.9x, which lowers the price.
Share count change+49 ptsShare count fell 40%, which lifts the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 3 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with VARDHMAN TEXTILES LIMTED

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-76.2%recovered 2021-07
1-year volatility38.7%annualised

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2020202120222023202420252026−71.0% 0%−20%−40%−60%2020202220242026−71.0%
Largest drawdowns

-76.2% (2019-01 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2021-07)

-63.2% (2022-01 peak to 2023-03 low, not yet recovered)

-33.4% (2021-10 peak to 2021-11 low, recovered 2022-01)

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

22.9xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history69th percentile
CheapestMedian 19.4xDearest

Usual range 12.3x to 31.2x since 2019-01.

Against Process Industries22.9x vs 18.1x
This company
22.9x
Sector median
18.1x

26% above the Process Industries median.

6.8x57.6x108.4x159.3xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '266.8x57.6x108.4x159.3xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Process Industries is valued

Where does it rank among Process Industries peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Process Industries peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE59th▲ 20 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin41st▼ 20 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth22nd▼ 37 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth21st
  • Debt/equity ↓41st▲ 14 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓33rd▲ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓38th▼ 18 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum48th▼ 10 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Process Industries sector page Watch it move against Process Industries in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~28%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 57.9x, the price would imply about 28.2%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Process Industries The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹169.62
P/E
22.9x
ROCE
13.0%
Market Cap
₹221 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹338 cr
P/S
0.7x
P/B
1.5x
ROE
6.7%
Operating Margin
9.8%
Debt / Equity
0.5x
Promoter Holding
74.0%
12M Momentum
-10.8%

52-week range

₹126.06₹217.92
47% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
38.7%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.53

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
2.2x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
5.00x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

6 of 7checks within range1 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance45%Beyond threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 44.6%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate20%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 20.2%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion5.91xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 5.91x (cash from operations ₹65 cr, net profit ₹11 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow5 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 5. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-5 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 5 days (36 vs 41). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress0% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 0% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days-11 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by -11 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, institutional and promoter holdings were broadly unchanged.
  • The number of shareholders fell from 9,615 to 7,986 (-17%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters74.0%74.0%0.0 pts
FIIs0.0%0.0%0.0 pts
DIIs0.0%0.0%0.0 pts
Public and others25.9%26.0%0.0 pts

Number of shareholders

7,986shareholders-17% since Sep '23
8k9k9k10k Sep '23Mar '24Sep '24Jun '25Mar '26Jun '26
Sep '23: 9,615
Dec '23: 9,332
Mar '24: 9,366
Jun '24: 8,566
Sep '24: 9,029
Mar '25: 8,607
Jun '25: 8,424
Sep '25: 8,276
Mar '26: 8,100
Jun '26: 7,986
8k9k9k10k Sep '23Jun '24Jun '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 9,615
Dec '23: 9,332
Mar '24: 9,366
Jun '24: 8,566
Sep '24: 9,029
Mar '25: 8,607
Jun '25: 8,424
Sep '25: 8,276
Mar '26: 8,100
Jun '26: 7,986

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−1.8%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like SHIVA TEXYARN LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −26% to +23% vs the market, against −2% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+0.6%, 80% range −8.1% to +5.3%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
DCMSRIND · Oct 2025: −62.7% vs market
BCLIND · Feb 2024: −50.5% vs market
HUHTAMAKI · Feb 2024: −45.2% vs market
UCAL · Feb 2021: −38.6% vs market
NCLIND · Sep 2023: −38.1% vs market
ZIMLAB · Jan 2025: −34.9% vs market
APEX · Sep 2022: −34.7% vs market
INDIANHUME · Feb 2022: −31.1% vs market
WCIL · Sep 2025: −27.7% vs market
ASTRON · Nov 2020: −27.6% vs market
MUNJALAU · Jul 2024: −27.1% vs market
FILATEX · Jan 2024: −26.6% vs market
SUNDRMBRAK · Jun 2021: −26.4% vs market
TVSSRICHAK · Jan 2021: −22.9% vs market
MONTECARLO · Dec 2024: −22.2% vs market
BANSWRAS · May 2025: −19.2% vs market
KALYANIFRG · Jul 2025: −19.0% vs market
PUNJABCHEM · Jun 2025: −15.7% vs market
KCPSUGIND · Jan 2020: −14.6% vs market
WIPL · May 2024: −14.4% vs market
STARPAPER · Jul 2022: −11.6% vs market
DICIND · Oct 2022: −8.2% vs market
TIRUMALCHM · May 2024: −6.6% vs market
SONAMLTD · May 2024: −5.4% vs market
SKMEGGPROD · Nov 2020: −4.2% vs market
NELCAST · May 2025: +0.6% vs market
TBZ · Aug 2024: +0.9% vs market
TIMETECHNO · Jan 2022: +1.0% vs market
UNIVCABLES · Dec 2024: +2.9% vs market
JAYBARMARU · Jan 2021: +3.0% vs market
MANGLMCEM · Feb 2025: +7.0% vs market
MANGCHEFER · Dec 2023: +7.2% vs market
ARIES · Jan 2023: +7.8% vs market
ASPINWALL · May 2020: +12.6% vs market
PGIL · Oct 2020: +13.9% vs market
COSMOFIRST · Jul 2024: +15.3% vs market
HPL · Feb 2021: +22.0% vs market
HARRMALAYA · Jan 2024: +23.1% vs market
TALBROAUTO · Aug 2020: +43.1% vs market
THANGAMAYL · Jan 2020: +46.7% vs market
GPTINFRA · Jul 2022: +48.8% vs market
WABAG · Dec 2022: +50.9% vs market
ALICON · Feb 2021: +52.6% vs market
HITECHCORP · May 2020: +62.3% vs market
KOKUYOCMLN · Sep 2022: +68.8% vs market
KAMDHENU · Jan 2022: +76.4% vs market
DYNAMATECH · Apr 2021: +79.8% vs market
APOLLO · May 2022: +133.5% vs market
SKIPPER · Sep 2022: +162.8% vs market
PCJEWELLER · Oct 2021: +262.4% vs market
Similar setups −1.8%All companies −2.4%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 3 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−1.8%
All companies' median
−2.4%
Beat the market
50% vs 47%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 33 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
UCAL
Producer Manufacturing
Feb 2021 16x11% +46%−3% −39%
ZIMLAB
Health Technology
Jan 2025 31x10% −4%−17% −35%
JAYBARMARU
Distribution Services
Jan 2021 20x10% +8%−7% +3%
NCLIND
Non-Energy Minerals
Sep 2023 24x11% +26%−3% −38%
STARPAPER
Process Industries
Jul 2022 17x20% +3%−9% −12%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
HITECHCORP
Process Industries
May 2020 9x14% −30%−35% +62%
PGIL
Consumer Non-Durables
Oct 2020 16x10% +6%−13% +14%
ASPINWALL
Transportation
May 2020 11x8% −33%−36% +13%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, revenue growth and drawdown from 12-month high. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to SHIVA TEXYARN LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What changed?

23 events since Mar '20

  1. SepPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Process Industries on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  2. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  3. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  4. MarValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (10.2x).
  5. DecPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Process Industries on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  6. JunDividendStarted paying a dividend (payout 6% of profit).
  7. DecResultsEPS (TTM) turned positive.
  8. DecValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (156.4x).
Show 15 earlier events
  1. SepPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Process Industries on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  2. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned negative.
  3. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Process Industries on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  4. MarPriceFell 63% from the Jan 2022 peak to the Mar 2023 low.
  5. AprValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (32.3x).
  6. JanPriceRegained the 2021-10 peak, 2 months after the low.
  7. NovPriceFell 33% from the Oct 2021 peak to the Nov 2021 low.
  8. OctPriceRegained the 2021-07 peak, 1 month after the low.
  9. OctValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (31.1x).
  10. SepPriceFell 28% from the Jul 2021 peak to the Sep 2021 low.
  11. JulPriceRegained the 2019-01 peak, 16 months after the low.
  12. MayPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Process Industries on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  13. MarValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (20.2x).
  14. JanPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Process Industries on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  15. MarPriceFell 76% from the Jan 2019 peak to the Mar 2020 low.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history95 months · 2019-01 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1122.9x₹338 cr6.7%13.0%0.5x
2026-1023.0x₹338 cr6.6%13.0%0.5x
2026-0922.5x₹338 cr6.6%13.0%0.5x
2026-0823.0x₹341 cr7.0%13.0%0.5x
2026-0720.8x₹341 cr7.0%13.0%0.5x
2026-0618.5x₹341 cr7.0%13.0%0.5x
2026-0512.4x₹349 cr11.8%9.0%0.8x
2026-0414.0x₹349 cr11.8%9.0%0.8x
2026-0310.2x₹349 cr11.8%9.0%0.8x
2026-0212.7x₹348 cr11.9%9.0%0.8x
2026-0113.2x₹348 cr11.9%9.0%0.8x
2025-1214.7x₹348 cr11.9%9.0%0.8x
2025-1118.7x₹338 cr9.7%9.0%0.8x
2025-1017.6x₹338 cr9.7%9.0%0.8x
2025-0918.2x₹338 cr9.7%9.0%0.8x
2025-0819.3x₹323 cr8.9%9.0%0.8x
2025-0720.5x₹323 cr8.9%9.0%0.8x
2025-0622.0x₹323 cr8.9%9.0%0.8x
2025-0526.0x₹301 cr9.0%—0.9x
2025-0422.6x₹301 cr9.0%—0.9x
2025-0320.5x₹301 cr9.0%—0.9x
2025-02134.7x₹302 cr1.5%—0.9x
2025-01159.3x₹302 cr1.5%—0.9x
2024-12156.4x₹302 cr1.5%—0.9x
2024-11—₹306 cr-2.9%—0.9x
2024-10—₹306 cr-2.9%—0.9x
2024-09—₹306 cr-2.9%—0.9x
2024-08—₹335 cr-8.8%—0.9x
2024-07—₹335 cr-8.8%—0.9x
2024-06—₹335 cr-8.8%—0.9x
2024-05—₹411 cr———
2024-04—₹411 cr———
2024-03—₹411 cr———
2024-02—₹411 cr———
2024-01—₹411 cr———
2023-12—₹411 cr———
2023-11—₹411 cr———
2023-10—₹411 cr———
2023-09—₹411 cr———
2023-08—₹411 cr———
2023-07—₹411 cr———
2023-06—₹411 cr———
2023-0516.4x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2023-0417.9x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2023-0317.2x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2023-0216.2x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2023-0117.8x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2022-1217.3x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2022-1119.1x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2022-1022.7x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2022-0922.9x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2022-0823.1x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2022-0723.7x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2022-0622.6x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2022-0527.9x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2022-0432.3x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2022-0329.2x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2022-0231.5x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2022-0137.9x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2021-1233.4x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2021-1126.3x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2021-1031.1x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2021-0925.5x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2021-0827.1x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2021-0734.8x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2021-0626.1x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2021-0527.2x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2021-0422.3x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2021-0320.2x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2021-0219.4x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2021-0117.8x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2020-1216.4x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2020-1111.6x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2020-1011.1x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2020-0913.1x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2020-0813.4x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2020-0711.5x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2020-0612.4x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2020-0511.2x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2020-0411.5x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2020-0312.2x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2020-0211.4x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2020-0114.0x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2019-1213.1x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2019-1113.5x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2019-1018.3x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2019-0917.0x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2019-0815.1x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2019-0716.7x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2019-0619.4x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2019-0519.8x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2019-0417.0x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2019-0323.9x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2019-0220.3x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x
2019-0127.3x₹553 cr8.6%—1.3x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback