अApnaFunda
Menu

ALMONDZ GLOBAL SECURITIES LIMI (ALMONDZ)

Finance · Investment Banks/Brokers · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.68 / 100
Profitability 52Growth 72Balance sheet 79

Passes these screensValue PickPromoters buying

Compare withBSEBILLIONBRAINS GARAGE VENTURESMULTI COMMODITY EXCHANGE

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹18.1 latest close · +36.8% over the last 90 sessions

₹15₹20Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹15₹20Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹18.1 month-end · −0.7% over 12 months

₹15₹20Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹15₹20Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹18.1 month-end · +23.0% over 3 years

₹10₹20₹30Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹10₹20₹30Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹18.1 month-end · +384.0% since Jan '19

₹0₹10₹20₹30Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹0₹10₹20₹30Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹10.68 to ₹21.92 · 1-year volatility 59.1%

Was the rally earned?

-1%share price, 1 yearRoughly flat
  • The share price was roughly flat over 1 year (-1%).
  • The share count rose 5%.
Net profit growth: +66 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+66 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −62 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−62 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −4 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−4 ptsShare count changeShare price: −1%−1%Share priceNet profit growth: +66 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+66ProfitP/E change: −62 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−62P/EShare count change: −4 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−4SharesShare price: −1%−1%Share price
Net profit growth+66 ptsNet profit rose about 95%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-62 ptsThe P/E fell from 17.2x to 9.2x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-4 ptsShare count rose 5%, which lowers the price.
+23%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 73 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 14.4x to 9.2x), which took 50 points back.
  • The share count rose 13%.
Net profit growth: +87 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+87 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −50 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−50 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −14 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−14 ptsShare count changeShare price: +23%+23%Share priceNet profit growth: +87 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+87ProfitP/E change: −50 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−50P/EShare count change: −14 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−14SharesShare price: +23%+23%Share price
Net profit growth+87 ptsNet profit rose about 119%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-50 ptsThe P/E fell from 14.4x to 9.2x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-14 ptsShare count rose 13%, which lowers the price.
-5%share price, 5 yearsRoughly flat
  • The share price was roughly flat over 5 years (-5%).
  • The share count rose 18%.
Net profit growth: +65 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+65 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −54 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−54 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −16 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−16 ptsShare count changeShare price: −5%−5%Share priceNet profit growth: +65 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+65ProfitP/E change: −54 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−54P/EShare count change: −16 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−16SharesShare price: −5%−5%Share price
Net profit growth+65 ptsNet profit rose about 94%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-54 ptsThe P/E fell from 15.9x to 9.2x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-16 ptsShare count rose 18%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with BSE

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-69.6%not yet recovered
1-year volatility59.1%annualised

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2020202120222023202420252026−68.2% 0%−20%−40%−60%2020202220242026−68.2%
Largest drawdowns

-69.6% (2024-08 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

-67.2% (2019-01 peak to 2019-10 low, recovered 2021-02)

-59.8% (2021-10 peak to 2023-03 low, recovered 2024-07)

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

9.2xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history32nd percentile
CheapestMedian 11.6xDearest

Usual range 6.3x to 18.0x since 2019-01.

Against Finance9.2x vs 18.1x
This company
9.2x
Sector median
18.1x

49% below the Finance median.

3.9x11.2x18.6x26.0xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '263.9x11.2x18.6x26.0xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianFinance median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianFinance median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianFinance median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Finance is valued

Where does it rank among Finance peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Finance peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE62nd▲ 17 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin42nd▲ 11 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth74th▲ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth85th▲ 69 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓47th▲ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓27th▲ 6 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓83rd▲ 14 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum67th▲ 49 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Finance sector page Watch it move against Finance in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~11%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 14.0x, the price would imply about 11.2%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Below the ₹1,000 cr market-cap floor used for the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Finance The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹18.10
P/E
9.2x
ROCE
12.0%
Market Cap
₹344 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹202 cr
P/S
1.7x
P/B
1.3x
ROE
13.9%
Operating Margin
22.0%
Debt / Equity
0.2x
Promoter Holding
50.8%
12M Momentum
-0.7%

52-week range

₹10.68₹21.92
66% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
59.1%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.12

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
10.5x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
0.28x
low
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

2 of 6checks within range2 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance47%Beyond threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 47.4%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate13%Near threshold

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 12.5%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion0.28xBeyond threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 0.28x (cash from operations ₹22 cr, net profit ₹80 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow2 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 2. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-40 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 40 days (114 vs 154). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress2% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 2% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, promoters trimmed 7.4 pts; FIIs trimmed 2.5 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 6,451 to 15,271 (+137%) between Dec 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupDec '23Jun '26Change
Promoters58.2%50.8%-7.4 pts
FIIs2.5%0.0%-2.5 pts
DIIs0.0%0.4%+0.4 pts
Public and others39.3%48.8%+9.6 pts

Number of shareholders

15,271shareholders+137% since Dec '23
6k9k12k15k Dec '23Jun '24Dec '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 6,451
Mar '24: 7,501
Jun '24: 6,742
Sep '24: 12,483
Dec '24: 13,538
Mar '25: 13,712
Jun '25: 14,385
Sep '25: 14,894
Dec '25: 15,452
Mar '26: 15,484
Jun '26: 15,271
 6k9k12k15k Dec '23Dec '24Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 6,451
Mar '24: 7,501
Jun '24: 6,742
Sep '24: 12,483
Dec '24: 13,538
Mar '25: 13,712
Jun '25: 14,385
Sep '25: 14,894
Dec '25: 15,452
Mar '26: 15,484
Jun '26: 15,271

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+7.2%typical 12-month return vs the marketAbove the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like ALMONDZ GLOBAL SECURITIES LIMI today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −17% to +50% vs the market, against −3% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The analogs' median sat above that base rate (gap +9.8%, 80% range +3.9% to +24.6%), but the matches cluster in only 6 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
SCHAND · Sep 2023: −45.7% vs market
KCPSUGIND · Sep 2024: −41.8% vs market
USK · May 2024: −36.8% vs market
SHREEPUSHK · Jun 2022: −36.2% vs market
NILAINFRA · Jan 2025: −35.6% vs market
KCP · Dec 2024: −26.2% vs market
STEELCITY · Jan 2025: −22.1% vs market
DVL · Sep 2024: −21.1% vs market
MALLCOM · Jun 2025: −20.3% vs market
DALMIASUG · Apr 2022: −20.0% vs market
VETO · Dec 2022: −17.8% vs market
MONTECARLO · Nov 2022: −17.7% vs market
GALLANTT · Jul 2021: −17.5% vs market
SUNFLAG · Jul 2021: −15.6% vs market
SARLAPOLY · Jun 2025: −13.5% vs market
ORIENTCER · Jan 2021: −12.3% vs market
TALBROAUTO · Jun 2024: −4.8% vs market
ADSL · Jun 2024: −2.3% vs market
IZMO · Jun 2024: +0.9% vs market
SPAL · Sep 2022: +1.8% vs market
WEIZMANIND · Mar 2020: +2.8% vs market
SHREERAMA · Jun 2025: +3.5% vs market
RUCHIRA · Sep 2022: +4.0% vs market
NIITLTD · Jul 2021: +5.0% vs market
MMP · Jun 2022: +5.5% vs market
PDMJEPAPER · May 2024: +8.8% vs market
ESTER · Sep 2021: +10.5% vs market
VASCONEQ · Jul 2023: +20.5% vs market
ORBTEXP · Oct 2025: +23.1% vs market
BLISSGVS · Oct 2024: +23.8% vs market
JINDRILL · Jun 2023: +26.0% vs market
RADHIKAJWE · May 2024: +31.2% vs market
ASAHISONG · Jun 2020: +39.1% vs market
KRISHANA · Jun 2020: +40.1% vs market
CHEMFAB · Jul 2022: +44.0% vs market
SOUTHWEST · Jun 2025: +45.8% vs market
BETA · Feb 2020: +48.9% vs market
TIIL · Oct 2020: +49.8% vs market
TPLPLASTEH · Oct 2023: +51.3% vs market
OCCLLTD · Oct 2025: +51.8% vs market
AMJLAND · Jun 2024: +53.5% vs market
MBAPL · Jul 2020: +53.8% vs market
AARVI · Mar 2021: +81.5% vs market
DATAMATICS · Jan 2021: +97.8% vs market
TDPOWERSYS · Aug 2021: +98.1% vs market
DEEPINDS · Aug 2022: +104.0% vs market
CYBERTECH · Aug 2020: +106.4% vs market
NAHARPOLY · Jun 2021: +121.4% vs market
KOPRAN · Mar 2020: +130.0% vs market
GOLDIAM · May 2020: +174.6% vs market
Similar setups +7.2%All companies −2.6%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 5 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+7.2%
All companies' median
−2.6%
Beat the market
64% vs 47%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 32 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
NAHARPOLY
Process Industries		 Jun 2021 7x14% +166%−2% +121%
SARLAPOLY
Process Industries		 Jun 2025 15x15% +10%−11% −14%
KCPSUGIND
Process Industries		 Sep 2024 7x14% +58%−4% −42%
IZMO
Technology Services		 Jun 2024 18x10% +83%−5% +1%
DATAMATICS
Technology Services		 Jan 2021 10x14% +46%−11% +98%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
VASCONEQ
Industrial Services		 Jul 2023 10x11% +76%−6% +21%
SUNFLAG
Non-Energy Minerals		 Jul 2021 12x11% +141%−1% −16%
ESTER
Process Industries		 Sep 2021 9x— +100%−6% +11%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: interest cover, drawdown from 12-month high and size. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to ALMONDZ GLOBAL SECURITIES LIMI. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What changed?

28 events since Jun '19

  1. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Finance on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  2. MarResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  3. MarPriceFell 70% from the Aug 2024 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  4. MarPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Finance on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  5. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  6. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Finance on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  7. JunSharesShare count is up 6.2% over 12 months.
  8. MarValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (21.1x).
Show 20 earlier events
  1. MarPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Finance on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  2. DecPromoterPromoter holding fell 5.8 pts to 50.6%.
  3. DecPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Finance on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  4. NovPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Finance on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  5. SepPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Finance on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  6. JulPriceRegained the 2021-10 peak, 16 months after the low.
  7. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  8. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Finance on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  9. JanValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (20.5x).
  10. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  11. MarPriceFell 60% from the Oct 2021 peak to the Mar 2023 low.
  12. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Finance on ROCE (from the top quartile).
  13. OctValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (16.9x).
  14. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  15. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Finance on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  16. FebPriceRegained the 2019-01 peak, 16 months after the low.
  17. JanValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (11.5x).
  18. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Finance on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  19. OctPriceFell 67% from the Jan 2019 peak to the Oct 2019 low.
  20. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Finance on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history95 months · 2019-01 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-119.2x₹202 cr13.9%12.0%0.2x
2026-109.7x₹202 cr13.9%12.0%0.2x
2026-0910.2x₹202 cr13.9%12.0%0.2x
2026-0810.6x₹190 cr11.5%12.0%0.2x
2026-078.9x₹190 cr11.5%12.0%0.2x
2026-067.8x₹190 cr11.5%12.0%0.2x
2026-058.0x₹171 cr13.3%9.0%0.2x
2026-049.6x₹171 cr13.3%9.0%0.2x
2026-036.6x₹171 cr13.3%9.0%0.2x
2026-0214.5x₹152 cr8.4%9.0%0.2x
2026-0113.2x₹152 cr8.4%9.0%0.2x
2025-1215.9x₹152 cr8.4%9.0%0.2x
2025-1117.2x₹152 cr8.0%9.0%0.2x
2025-1018.0x₹152 cr8.0%9.0%0.2x
2025-0916.9x₹152 cr8.0%9.0%0.2x
2025-0819.0x₹150 cr7.5%9.0%0.2x
2025-0720.7x₹150 cr7.5%9.0%0.2x
2025-0624.7x₹150 cr7.5%9.0%0.2x
2025-0519.8x₹142 cr8.3%10.0%0.1x
2025-0421.5x₹142 cr8.3%10.0%0.1x
2025-0321.1x₹142 cr8.3%10.0%0.1x
2025-0210.0x₹139 cr17.0%10.0%0.1x
2025-0113.9x₹139 cr17.0%10.0%0.1x
2024-1215.7x₹139 cr17.0%10.0%0.1x
2024-1112.4x₹128 cr17.5%10.0%0.1x
2024-1013.9x₹128 cr17.5%10.0%0.1x
2024-0914.0x₹128 cr17.5%10.0%0.1x
2024-0816.0x₹116 cr16.5%10.0%0.1x
2024-0716.7x₹116 cr16.5%10.0%0.1x
2024-0610.9x₹116 cr16.5%10.0%0.1x
2024-0519.2x₹76 cr8.1%10.0%0.1x
2024-0417.4x₹76 cr8.1%10.0%0.1x
2024-0317.0x₹76 cr8.1%10.0%0.1x
2024-0218.0x₹76 cr8.1%10.0%0.1x
2024-0120.5x₹76 cr8.1%10.0%0.1x
2023-1214.6x₹76 cr8.1%10.0%0.1x
2023-1114.4x₹76 cr8.1%10.0%0.1x
2023-1013.6x₹76 cr8.1%10.0%0.1x
2023-0914.2x₹76 cr8.1%10.0%0.1x
2023-0814.9x₹76 cr8.1%10.0%0.1x
2023-0715.5x₹76 cr8.1%10.0%0.1x
2023-0612.6x₹76 cr8.1%10.0%0.1x
2023-059.8x₹69 cr11.0%13.0%0.1x
2023-049.5x₹69 cr11.0%13.0%0.1x
2023-038.3x₹69 cr11.0%13.0%0.1x
2023-028.9x₹69 cr11.0%13.0%0.1x
2023-019.6x₹69 cr11.0%13.0%0.1x
2022-129.9x₹69 cr11.0%13.0%0.1x
2022-1111.0x₹69 cr11.0%13.0%0.1x
2022-1011.3x₹69 cr11.0%13.0%0.1x
2022-0911.6x₹69 cr11.0%13.0%0.1x
2022-0812.7x₹69 cr11.0%13.0%0.1x
2022-0710.9x₹69 cr11.0%13.0%0.1x
2022-0612.4x₹69 cr11.0%13.0%0.1x
2022-0513.4x₹63 cr11.7%13.0%0.1x
2022-0415.1x₹63 cr11.7%13.0%0.1x
2022-0313.8x₹63 cr11.7%13.0%0.1x
2022-0213.8x₹63 cr11.7%13.0%0.1x
2022-0115.4x₹63 cr11.7%13.0%0.1x
2021-1217.1x₹63 cr11.7%13.0%0.1x
2021-1115.9x₹63 cr11.7%13.0%0.1x
2021-1016.9x₹63 cr11.7%13.0%0.1x
2021-0914.1x₹63 cr11.7%13.0%0.1x
2021-0810.8x₹63 cr11.7%13.0%0.1x
2021-079.2x₹63 cr11.7%13.0%0.1x
2021-067.8x₹63 cr11.7%13.0%0.1x
2021-0522.5x₹61 cr3.7%4.0%0.2x
2021-0415.9x₹61 cr3.7%4.0%0.2x
2021-0317.1x₹61 cr3.7%4.0%0.2x
2021-0216.2x₹61 cr3.7%4.0%0.2x
2021-0111.5x₹61 cr3.7%4.0%0.2x
2020-1212.1x₹61 cr3.7%4.0%0.2x
2020-119.2x₹61 cr3.7%4.0%0.2x
2020-107.6x₹61 cr3.7%4.0%0.2x
2020-096.5x₹61 cr3.7%4.0%0.2x
2020-087.3x₹61 cr3.7%4.0%0.2x
2020-075.9x₹61 cr3.7%4.0%0.2x
2020-066.7x₹61 cr3.7%4.0%0.2x
2020-054.2x₹75 cr4.6%7.0%0.1x
2020-044.2x₹75 cr4.6%7.0%0.1x
2020-036.2x₹75 cr4.6%7.0%0.1x
2020-026.7x₹75 cr4.6%7.0%0.1x
2020-016.6x₹75 cr4.6%7.0%0.1x
2019-124.6x₹75 cr4.6%7.0%0.1x
2019-113.9x₹75 cr4.6%7.0%0.1x
2019-104.1x₹75 cr4.6%7.0%0.1x
2019-094.2x₹75 cr4.6%7.0%0.1x
2019-084.0x₹75 cr4.6%7.0%0.1x
2019-075.1x₹75 cr4.6%7.0%0.1x
2019-066.8x₹75 cr4.6%7.0%0.1x
2019-057.7x₹73 cr4.9%5.0%0.2x
2019-048.0x₹73 cr4.9%5.0%0.2x
2019-039.1x₹73 cr4.9%5.0%0.2x
2019-029.6x₹73 cr4.9%5.0%0.2x
2019-019.1x₹73 cr4.9%5.0%0.2x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback