अApnaFunda
Menu

AMD INDUSTRIES LIMITED (AMDIND)

Process Industries · Containers/Packaging · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.54 / 100
Profitability 39Growth 75Balance sheet 47

Passes these screensCash Rich

Compare withTIME TECHNOPLASTEPLAGI GREENPAC

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹47.68 latest close · +0.4% over the last 90 sessions

₹50₹60₹70Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹50₹60₹70Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹47.68 month-end · −11.1% over 12 months

₹40₹50Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹40₹50Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹47.68 month-end · −40.1% over 3 years

₹40₹60₹80Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹40₹60₹80Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹47.68 month-end · +116.7% since Jan '19

₹25₹50₹75Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹25₹50₹75Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹33.77 to ₹74.39 · 1-year volatility 49.3%

Was the rally earned?

-11%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 193 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 103.1x to 11.8x), which took 204 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +193 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+193 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −204 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−204 ptsP/E changeShare price: −11%−11%Share priceNet profit growth: +193 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+193ProfitP/E change: −204 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−204P/EShare price: −11%−11%Share price
Net profit growth+193 ptsNet profit rose about 675%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-204 ptsThe P/E fell from 103.1x to 11.8x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-40%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 21 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 25.9x to 11.8x), which took 61 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +21 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+21 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −61 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−61 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1 ptsShare count changeShare price: −40%−40%Share priceNet profit growth: +21 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+21ProfitP/E change: −61 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−61P/EShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1SharesShare price: −40%−40%Share price
Net profit growth+21 ptsNet profit rose about 30%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-61 ptsThe P/E fell from 25.9x to 11.8x, which lowers the price.
Share count change+1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+67%share price, 5 yearsEarnings and multiple

Both mattered.

  • Per-share earnings added 36 points and the multiple added 32 points (P/E 9.3x to 11.8x).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +34 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+34 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +32 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+32 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1 ptsShare count changeShare price: +67%+67%Share priceNet profit growth: +34 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+34ProfitP/E change: +32 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+32P/EShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1SharesShare price: +67%+67%Share price
Net profit growth+34 ptsNet profit rose about 30%, which lifts the price.
P/E change+32 ptsThe P/E rose from 9.3x to 11.8x, which lifts the price.
Share count change+1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with TIME TECHNOPLAST

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-68.6%recovered 2021-06
1-year volatility49.3%annualised

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2020202120222023202420252026−65.1% 0%−20%−40%−60%2020202220242026−65.1%
Largest drawdowns

-68.6% (2019-01 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2021-06)

-66.1% (2022-08 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

-38.2% (2022-04 peak to 2022-05 low, recovered 2022-08)

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

11.8xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history40th percentile
CheapestMedian 15.0xDearest

Usual range 5.2x to 84.0x since 2019-01.

Against Process Industries11.8x vs 18.1x
This company
11.8x
Sector median
18.1x

35% below the Process Industries median.

3.4x39.6x75.8x111.9xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '263.4x39.6x75.8x111.9xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Process Industries is valued

Where does it rank among Process Industries peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Process Industries peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE8th
  • Op. margin70th
  • Revenue growth83rd▼ 10 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth99th▲ 92 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓40thflat vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓45th▲ 10 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓71st▲ 65 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum46th▼ 21 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Process Industries sector page Watch it move against Process Industries in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~24%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 45.7x, the price would imply about 23.7%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Below the ₹1,000 cr market-cap floor used for the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Process Industries The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹47.68
P/E
11.8x
ROCE
0.0%
Market Cap
₹92 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹345 cr
P/S
0.3x
P/B
0.6x
ROE
5.1%
Operating Margin
15.1%
Debt / Equity
0.5x
Promoter Holding
66.7%
12M Momentum
-11.1%

52-week range

₹33.77₹74.39
34% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
49.3%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.99

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
2.1x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
4.38x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

3 of 6checks within range3 near a threshold
Other income reliance33%Near threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 32.7%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Cash conversion36.33xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 36.33x (cash from operations ₹109 cr, net profit ₹3 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow4 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 4. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+27 daysNear threshold

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 27 days (108 vs 81). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress0% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 0% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days+78 days / 2 yrsNear threshold

Days payable changed by +78 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, institutional and promoter holdings were broadly unchanged.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupDec '23Jun '26Change
Promoters66.7%66.7%0.0 pts
FIIs0.0%0.0%0.0 pts
DIIs———
Public and others33.3%33.3%0.0 pts

Number of shareholders

13,269shareholders-2% since Dec '23
13k13k13k14k Dec '23Jun '24Dec '24Jun '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 13,488
Mar '24: 13,241
Jun '24: 13,487
Sep '24: 13,392
Dec '24: 13,378
Mar '25: 13,378
Jun '25: 13,265
Dec '25: 13,583
Jun '26: 13,269
 13k13k13k14k Dec '23Sep '24Jun '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 13,488
Mar '24: 13,241
Jun '24: 13,487
Sep '24: 13,392
Dec '24: 13,378
Mar '25: 13,378
Jun '25: 13,265
Dec '25: 13,583
Jun '26: 13,269

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−8.5%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like AMD INDUSTRIES LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −26% to +56% vs the market, against −7% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−1.5%, 80% range −9.2% to +5.1%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
MANGALAM · Apr 2025: −64.6% vs market
RPPL · Dec 2024: −50.2% vs market
PIONEEREMB · Mar 2025: −44.5% vs market
UMA · Nov 2024: −42.9% vs market
MUKANDLTD · Jan 2024: −42.2% vs market
RUSHIL · Jun 2025: −40.6% vs market
GLOBE · Oct 2024: −39.5% vs market
SUPERHOUSE · Jun 2023: −32.9% vs market
ASAHISONG · Apr 2025: −32.2% vs market
KMSUGAR · Jul 2024: −31.4% vs market
AROGRANITE · Mar 2022: −27.4% vs market
DAMODARIND · Mar 2020: −26.1% vs market
AAKASH · Jan 2025: −25.5% vs market
MURUDCERA · Jun 2025: −25.3% vs market
HPL · Jan 2020: −24.6% vs market
ARIHANT · Apr 2020: −21.3% vs market
LIBAS · Jun 2025: −19.9% vs market
MWL · Sep 2023: −19.5% vs market
BVCL · Oct 2024: −17.9% vs market
BANG · May 2023: −16.9% vs market
DONEAR · May 2025: −16.7% vs market
DYNPRO · May 2025: −13.0% vs market
EMMBI · Sep 2025: −11.8% vs market
JAYSREETEA · Mar 2022: −10.2% vs market
PATINTLOG · Mar 2022: −10.2% vs market
LAMBODHARA · Oct 2025: −6.8% vs market
RKDL · Mar 2020: −4.3% vs market
GILLANDERS · Dec 2023: −2.8% vs market
UTTAMSUGAR · Mar 2025: −1.4% vs market
SHIVATEX · Oct 2025: +0.6% vs market
ANIKINDS · May 2023: +4.4% vs market
SAKHTISUG · Aug 2020: +9.7% vs market
INCREDIBLE · Aug 2023: +18.7% vs market
ISFT · Sep 2021: +21.8% vs market
NECCLTD · Mar 2020: +25.8% vs market
GOKUL · Feb 2020: +48.5% vs market
PRITIKAUTO · Mar 2023: +52.0% vs market
HITECHCORP · Jun 2025: +57.4% vs market
SALZERELEC · Jul 2022: +65.4% vs market
MADHUSUDAN · Sep 2025: +70.2% vs market
TBZ · May 2024: +71.8% vs market
TEXMOPIPES · Apr 2020: +72.9% vs market
VASCONEQ · Jun 2022: +79.0% vs market
SURANASOL · Sep 2021: +80.8% vs market
SOMICONVEY · Sep 2023: +91.9% vs market
SHREYANIND · Jun 2022: +101.9% vs market
RELIABLE · Jan 2025: +120.3% vs market
MANAKALUCO · May 2020: +169.7% vs market
TCPLPACK · Dec 2021: +186.0% vs market
BODALCHEM · Sep 2025: +219.5% vs market
Similar setups −8.5%All companies −7.0%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 5 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−8.5%
All companies' median
−7.0%
Beat the market
42% vs 42%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 30 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
MANGALAM
Health Technology		 Apr 2025 12x— −23%−44% −65%
GILLANDERS
Consumer Non-Durables		 Dec 2023 16x4% +45%−11% −3%
PIONEEREMB
Consumer Non-Durables		 Mar 2025 20x6% −2%−46% −45%
AROGRANITE
Non-Energy Minerals		 Mar 2022 14x4% +33%−35% −27%
TEXMOPIPES
Producer Manufacturing		 Apr 2020 9x5% −45%−50% +73%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
RKDL
Consumer Non-Durables		 Mar 2020 3x-1% −51%−52% −4%
INCREDIBLE
Non-Energy Minerals		 Aug 2023 26x7% +15%−11% +19%
MADHUSUDAN
Consumer Non-Durables		 Sep 2025 12x— −30%−39% +70%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high and interest cover. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 5 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to AMD INDUSTRIES LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What changed?

30 events since Mar '20

  1. OctResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  2. SepResultsEPS (TTM) turned positive.
  3. SepPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Process Industries on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  4. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned negative.
  5. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  6. MarPriceFell 66% from the Aug 2022 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  7. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹276 cr.
  8. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (95.6x).
Show 22 earlier events
  1. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Process Industries on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  2. JunDebtDebt / equity fell below 1.0x (0.53x).
  3. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 29% to 0% of profit.
  4. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (22.8x).
  5. OctValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (22.2x).
  6. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Process Industries on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  7. MayPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the bottom quartile).
  8. AprValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (17.8x).
  9. FebPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  10. DecValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (19.4x).
  11. DecPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the bottom quartile).
  12. AugPriceRegained the 2022-04 peak, 3 months after the low.
  13. AugPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  14. JulValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (14.9x).
  15. MayPriceFell 38% from the Apr 2022 peak to the May 2022 low.
  16. DecPriceRegained the 2021-10 peak, 1 month after the low.
  17. NovPriceFell 31% from the Oct 2021 peak to the Nov 2021 low.
  18. JunPriceRegained the 2019-01 peak, 15 months after the low.
  19. MayPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Process Industries on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  20. FebValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (8.5x).
  21. JanPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Process Industries on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  22. MarPriceFell 69% from the Jan 2019 peak to the Mar 2020 low.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history95 months · 2019-01 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1111.8x₹345 cr5.1%0.0%0.5x
2026-1010.9x₹345 cr5.1%0.0%0.5x
2026-0913.3x₹345 cr5.0%0.0%0.5x
2026-08—₹305 cr-0.9%0.0%0.5x
2026-07—₹305 cr-0.9%0.0%0.5x
2026-06—₹305 cr-0.9%0.0%0.5x
2026-0588.7x₹276 cr0.6%—0.5x
2026-0485.1x₹276 cr0.6%—0.5x
2026-0367.0x₹276 cr0.6%—0.5x
2026-0279.8x₹276 cr0.6%—0.5x
2026-0184.4x₹276 cr0.6%—0.5x
2025-1292.3x₹276 cr0.6%—0.5x
2025-11103.1x₹276 cr0.6%—0.5x
2025-10111.9x₹276 cr0.6%—0.5x
2025-09105.3x₹276 cr0.6%—0.5x
2025-0894.3x₹276 cr0.6%—0.5x
2025-0797.4x₹276 cr0.6%—0.5x
2025-0695.6x₹276 cr0.6%—0.5x
2025-0516.3x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2025-0414.8x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2025-0314.7x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2025-0214.3x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2025-0119.1x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2024-1219.5x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2024-1119.7x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2024-1020.8x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2024-0923.0x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2024-0825.5x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2024-0724.6x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2024-0622.8x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2024-0519.5x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2024-0422.6x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2024-0319.1x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2024-0219.6x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2024-0124.9x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2023-1226.0x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2023-1125.9x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2023-1022.2x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2023-0917.9x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2023-0818.3x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2023-0722.7x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2023-0622.2x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2023-0522.2x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2023-0417.8x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2023-0314.5x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2023-0216.1x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2023-0117.7x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2022-1219.4x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2022-1115.0x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2022-1023.4x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2022-0925.1x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2022-0827.3x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2022-0714.9x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2022-0613.9x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2022-0516.5x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2022-0416.4x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2022-0314.9x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2022-0215.1x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2022-0116.1x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2021-1214.4x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2021-119.3x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2021-1011.2x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2021-098.7x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2021-089.3x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2021-0710.3x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2021-069.0x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2021-056.9x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2021-045.9x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2021-035.7x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2021-028.5x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2021-016.1x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2020-126.4x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2020-115.0x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2020-105.1x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2020-095.5x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2020-085.6x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2020-074.5x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2020-065.1x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2020-055.5x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2020-044.3x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2020-033.4x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2020-025.0x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2020-015.7x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2019-125.0x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2019-115.3x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2019-105.0x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2019-095.3x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2019-085.5x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2019-074.6x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2019-065.8x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2019-056.2x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2019-046.4x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2019-036.7x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2019-027.1x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x
2019-017.2x₹190 cr5.8%10.0%1.0x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback