अApnaFunda

GILLANDERS ARBUTHNOT & CO LTD (GILLANDERS)

Consumer Non-Durables · Food: Major Diversified · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.29 / 100
Profitability 20Growth 29Balance sheet 38

Passes these screensValue Pick

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹97.23 latest close · +7.5% over the last 90 sessions

₹90₹100₹110Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹90₹100₹110Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹97.23 month-end · −14.7% over 12 months

₹80₹100Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹80₹100Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹97.23 month-end · −11.0% over 3 years

₹75₹100₹125₹150Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹75₹100₹125₹150Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹97.23 month-end · +79.4% since Jan '19

₹50₹100₹150Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹50₹100₹150Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹76.00 to ₹127.05 · 1-year volatility 38.6%

Was the rally earned?

-15%share price, 1 yearEarnings-driven

Mostly earnings.

  • Per-share earnings took off 53 points, while the multiple moved less (P/E 7.8x to 11.9x).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −53 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−53 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +39 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+39 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: −15%−15%Share priceNet profit growth: −53 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−53ProfitP/E change: +39 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+39P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: −15%−15%Share price
Net profit growth-53 ptsNet profit fell about 44%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+39 ptsThe P/E rose from 7.8x to 11.9x, which lifts the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-11%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 15 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 15.7x to 11.9x), which took 26 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +14 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+14 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −26 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−26 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1 ptsShare count changeShare price: −11%−11%Share priceNet profit growth: +14 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+14ProfitP/E change: −26 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−26P/EShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1SharesShare price: −11%−11%Share price
Net profit growth+14 ptsNet profit rose about 16%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-26 ptsThe P/E fell from 15.7x to 11.9x, which lowers the price.
Share count change+1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with NESTLE INDIA

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-70.0%recovered 2021-07
1-year volatility38.6%annualised

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2020202120222023202420252026−69.4% 0%−20%−40%−60%2020202220242026−69.4%
Largest drawdowns

-70.0% (2019-01 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2021-07)

-53.6% (2024-01 peak to 2024-03 low, not yet recovered)

-36.9% (2022-04 peak to 2022-06 low, recovered 2023-09)

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

11.9xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history51st percentile
CheapestMedian 11.9xDearest

Usual range 8.1x to 200.7x since 2019-01.

Against Consumer Non-Durables11.9x vs 26.8x
This company
11.9x
Sector median
26.8x

56% below the Consumer Non-Durables median.

7.8x2099.5x4191.3x6283.0xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '267.8x2099.5x4191.3x6283.0xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Non-Durables median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Non-Durables median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Non-Durables median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Consumer Non-Durables is valued

Where does it rank among Consumer Non-Durables peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Consumer Non-Durables peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE19th▼ 7 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin21st▲ 15 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth16th▼ 64 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth10th
  • Debt/equity ↓32nd▲ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓34th▼ 11 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓85th▼ 12 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum51st▼ 6 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Consumer Non-Durables sector page Watch it move against Consumer Non-Durables in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~28%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 57.6x, the price would imply about 28.1%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Consumer Non-Durables The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹97.23
P/E
11.9x
ROCE
6.0%
Market Cap
₹208 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹434 cr
P/S
0.5x
P/B
0.8x
ROE
6.8%
Operating Margin
7.0%
Debt / Equity
0.6x
Promoter Holding
69.0%
12M Momentum
-14.7%

52-week range

₹76.00₹127.05
42% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
38.6%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.77

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
2.5x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
5.00x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

2 of 6checks within range2 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance68%Beyond threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 67.9%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate5%Beyond threshold

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 4.6%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Free cash flow5 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 5. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+25 daysNear threshold

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 25 days (54 vs 29). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress8% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 8% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days+33 days / 2 yrsNear threshold

Days payable changed by +33 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, institutional and promoter holdings were broadly unchanged.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupDec '23Jun '26Change
Promoters69.1%69.0%0.0 pts
FIIs0.1%0.0%-0.1 pts
DIIs0.3%0.3%0.0 pts
Public and others30.5%30.6%+0.1 pts

Number of shareholders

9,733shareholders-5% since Dec '23
10k10k10k10k Dec '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 10,240
Mar '24: 10,197
Jun '24: 10,046
Sep '24: 9,994
Mar '25: 9,853
Jun '25: 10,447
Dec '25: 9,983
Mar '26: 9,795
Jun '26: 9,733
10k10k10k10k Dec '23Sep '24Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 10,240
Mar '24: 10,197
Jun '24: 10,046
Sep '24: 9,994
Mar '25: 9,853
Jun '25: 10,447
Dec '25: 9,983
Mar '26: 9,795
Jun '26: 9,733

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−9.9%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like GILLANDERS ARBUTHNOT & CO LTD today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −24% to +21% vs the market, against −7% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−3.3%, 80% range −8.5% to +4.0%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
MANGALAM · Feb 2025: −73.2% vs market
RUSHIL · Aug 2025: −44.2% vs market
GLOBE · Oct 2024: −39.5% vs market
PIONEEREMB · Aug 2023: −37.8% vs market
ASAHISONG · Oct 2024: −37.2% vs market
NAHARSPING · Feb 2024: −36.8% vs market
BODALCHEM · Feb 2024: −33.9% vs market
SUKHJITS · Aug 2024: −30.1% vs market
UNIVCABLES · Jun 2021: −28.1% vs market
JINDALPOLY · Oct 2024: −27.6% vs market
SUPERHOUSE · Jul 2024: −26.0% vs market
BANSWRAS · Dec 2024: −25.2% vs market
NAHARINDUS · Dec 2024: −24.4% vs market
RGL · Feb 2025: −21.5% vs market
KCPSUGIND · Jun 2021: −21.3% vs market
IVP · Jul 2025: −20.9% vs market
IGPL · Mar 2025: −19.9% vs market
AVADHSUGAR · Apr 2025: −16.7% vs market
NCLIND · Dec 2023: −16.1% vs market
JAYSREETEA · Nov 2022: −15.2% vs market
BIL · Sep 2020: −14.6% vs market
SUNDRMBRAK · May 2022: −12.1% vs market
KMSUGAR · Aug 2023: −10.7% vs market
COSMOFIRST · Nov 2024: −10.3% vs market
UCAL · Nov 2022: −10.1% vs market
DCMNVL · Feb 2024: −9.7% vs market
TEXMOPIPES · Oct 2025: −6.0% vs market
SAHYADRI · Jul 2025: −4.6% vs market
AROGRANITE · Jan 2020: −2.0% vs market
3IINFOLTD · Aug 2025: −0.7% vs market
NELCAST · Feb 2025: +1.6% vs market
PRITIKAUTO · Sep 2022: +1.9% vs market
SUTLEJTEX · Jan 2020: +5.6% vs market
ARIES · Mar 2020: +6.9% vs market
HUHTAMAKI · Dec 2022: +13.3% vs market
TIMETECHNO · Feb 2022: +19.6% vs market
MUNJALAU · Aug 2023: +20.0% vs market
MAGADSUGAR · May 2023: +20.8% vs market
SHREYANIND · Oct 2021: +21.2% vs market
HPL · Feb 2021: +22.0% vs market
ASPINWALL · Mar 2020: +22.7% vs market
DHAMPURSUG · Oct 2025: +23.3% vs market
INDIAGLYCO · Feb 2024: +28.0% vs market
TBZ · Jun 2024: +51.6% vs market
HARRMALAYA · Dec 2023: +56.9% vs market
GPTINFRA · Aug 2022: +59.5% vs market
TALBROAUTO · Sep 2020: +62.6% vs market
DCMSRIND · Jun 2023: +83.8% vs market
INDSWFTLAB · Mar 2020: +96.7% vs market
PCJEWELLER · Oct 2021: +262.4% vs market
Similar setups −9.9%All companies −6.6%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 1 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−9.9%
All companies' median
−6.6%
Beat the market
40% vs 43%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 29 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
HPL
Electronic Technology
Feb 2021 13x7% +27%−8% +22%
MAGADSUGAR
Process Industries
May 2023 11x9% +10%−9% +21%
BANSWRAS
Process Industries
Dec 2024 22x9% 0%−17% −25%
SAHYADRI
Non-Energy Minerals
Jul 2025 17x7% −25%−25% −5%
PIONEEREMB
Consumer Non-Durables
Aug 2023 16x3% +16%−9% −38%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
MANGALAM
Health Technology
Feb 2025 16x— −25%−34% −73%
KMSUGAR
Process Industries
Aug 2023 12x9% +13%−7% −11%
RUSHIL
Non-Energy Minerals
Aug 2025 16x— −24%−29% −44%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: drawdown from 12-month high, 12-month momentum and P/S. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to GILLANDERS ARBUTHNOT & CO LTD. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What changed?

27 events since Jun '19

  1. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  2. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  3. AprPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  4. MarResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  5. MarPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  6. JanValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (7.9x).
  7. DecPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  8. SepValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (7.9x).
Show 19 earlier events
  1. JunPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on ROCE (from the bottom quartile).
  2. MarResultsEPS (TTM) turned positive.
  3. MarValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (4860.0x).
  4. MarPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  5. DecPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  6. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned negative.
  7. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  8. MarPriceFell 54% from the Jan 2024 peak to the Mar 2024 low.
  9. SepPriceRegained the 2022-04 peak, 15 months after the low.
  10. JunPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  11. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned positive.
  12. JunPriceFell 37% from the Apr 2022 peak to the Jun 2022 low.
  13. OctPriceRegained the 2021-07 peak, 1 month after the low.
  14. SepPriceFell 30% from the Jul 2021 peak to the Sep 2021 low.
  15. JulPriceRegained the 2019-01 peak, 16 months after the low.
  16. JunDebtDebt / equity fell below 1.0x (0.90x).
  17. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned negative.
  18. MarPriceFell 70% from the Jan 2019 peak to the Mar 2020 low.
  19. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned positive.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history95 months · 2019-01 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1111.9x₹434 cr6.8%6.0%0.6x
2026-1011.5x₹434 cr6.8%6.0%0.6x
2026-0914.1x₹434 cr6.8%6.0%0.6x
2026-0823.8x₹431 cr3.7%6.0%0.6x
2026-0720.2x₹431 cr3.7%6.0%0.6x
2026-0620.6x₹431 cr3.7%6.0%0.6x
2026-0512.8x₹431 cr6.3%7.0%0.6x
2026-0413.0x₹431 cr6.3%7.0%0.6x
2026-0310.7x₹431 cr6.3%7.0%0.6x
2026-028.3x₹452 cr9.7%7.0%0.6x
2026-017.9x₹452 cr9.7%7.0%0.6x
2025-129.3x₹452 cr9.7%7.0%0.6x
2025-117.8x₹447 cr12.7%7.0%0.6x
2025-108.4x₹447 cr12.7%7.0%0.6x
2025-097.9x₹447 cr12.7%7.0%0.6x
2025-089.1x₹443 cr10.9%7.0%0.6x
2025-0711.7x₹443 cr10.9%7.0%0.6x
2025-0611.0x₹443 cr10.9%7.0%0.6x
2025-056283.0x₹408 cr0.0%-8.0%0.6x
2025-046037.5x₹408 cr0.0%-8.0%0.6x
2025-034860.0x₹408 cr0.0%-8.0%0.6x
2025-02—₹382 cr-16.3%-8.0%0.6x
2025-01—₹382 cr-16.3%-8.0%0.6x
2024-12—₹382 cr-16.3%-8.0%0.6x
2024-11—₹360 cr-24.5%-8.0%0.6x
2024-10—₹360 cr-24.5%-8.0%0.6x
2024-09—₹360 cr-24.5%-8.0%0.6x
2024-08—₹363 cr-22.4%-8.0%0.6x
2024-07—₹363 cr-22.4%-8.0%0.6x
2024-06—₹363 cr-22.4%-8.0%0.6x
2024-0511.6x₹449 cr5.4%4.0%0.5x
2024-0412.7x₹449 cr5.4%4.0%0.5x
2024-0310.3x₹449 cr5.4%4.0%0.5x
2024-0213.1x₹449 cr5.4%4.0%0.5x
2024-0119.8x₹449 cr5.4%4.0%0.5x
2023-1216.0x₹449 cr5.4%4.0%0.5x
2023-1115.7x₹449 cr5.4%4.0%0.5x
2023-1012.5x₹449 cr5.4%4.0%0.5x
2023-0914.1x₹449 cr5.4%4.0%0.5x
2023-0810.5x₹449 cr5.4%4.0%0.5x
2023-0710.7x₹449 cr5.4%4.0%0.5x
2023-069.8x₹449 cr5.4%4.0%0.5x
2023-058.7x₹406 cr5.9%7.0%0.7x
2023-049.4x₹406 cr5.9%7.0%0.7x
2023-038.0x₹406 cr5.9%7.0%0.7x
2023-028.3x₹406 cr5.9%7.0%0.7x
2023-0110.4x₹406 cr5.9%7.0%0.7x
2022-1210.0x₹406 cr5.9%7.0%0.7x
2022-1110.0x₹406 cr5.9%7.0%0.7x
2022-108.1x₹406 cr5.9%7.0%0.7x
2022-098.4x₹406 cr5.9%7.0%0.7x
2022-089.4x₹406 cr5.9%7.0%0.7x
2022-078.0x₹406 cr5.9%7.0%0.7x
2022-068.1x₹406 cr5.9%7.0%0.7x
2022-05—₹431 cr-6.3%4.0%0.9x
2022-04—₹431 cr-6.3%4.0%0.9x
2022-03—₹431 cr-6.3%4.0%0.9x
2022-02—₹431 cr-6.3%4.0%0.9x
2022-01—₹431 cr-6.3%4.0%0.9x
2021-12—₹431 cr-6.3%4.0%0.9x
2021-11—₹431 cr-6.3%4.0%0.9x
2021-10—₹431 cr-6.3%4.0%0.9x
2021-09—₹431 cr-6.3%4.0%0.9x
2021-08—₹431 cr-6.3%4.0%0.9x
2021-07—₹431 cr-6.3%4.0%0.9x
2021-06—₹431 cr-6.3%4.0%0.9x
2021-05—₹660 cr-5.4%4.0%1.3x
2021-04—₹660 cr-5.4%4.0%1.3x
2021-03—₹660 cr-5.4%4.0%1.3x
2021-02—₹660 cr-5.4%4.0%1.3x
2021-01—₹660 cr-5.4%4.0%1.3x
2020-12—₹660 cr-5.4%4.0%1.3x
2020-11—₹660 cr-5.4%4.0%1.3x
2020-10—₹660 cr-5.4%4.0%1.3x
2020-09—₹660 cr-5.4%4.0%1.3x
2020-08—₹660 cr-5.4%4.0%1.3x
2020-07—₹660 cr-5.4%4.0%1.3x
2020-06—₹660 cr-5.4%4.0%1.3x
2020-05134.7x₹751 cr0.1%8.0%1.4x
2020-04146.7x₹751 cr0.1%8.0%1.4x
2020-03133.3x₹751 cr0.1%8.0%1.4x
2020-02173.3x₹751 cr0.1%8.0%1.4x
2020-01206.7x₹751 cr0.1%8.0%1.4x
2019-12190.3x₹751 cr0.1%8.0%1.4x
2019-11193.3x₹751 cr0.1%8.0%1.4x
2019-10180.7x₹751 cr0.1%8.0%1.4x
2019-09192.3x₹751 cr0.1%8.0%1.4x
2019-08196.7x₹751 cr0.1%8.0%1.4x
2019-07250.0x₹751 cr0.1%8.0%1.4x
2019-06276.3x₹751 cr0.1%8.0%1.4x
2019-05—₹665 cr-3.1%6.0%1.5x
2019-04—₹665 cr-3.1%6.0%1.5x
2019-03—₹665 cr-3.1%6.0%1.5x
2019-02—₹665 cr-3.1%6.0%1.5x
2019-01—₹665 cr-3.1%6.0%1.5x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback