अApnaFunda

ENFUSE SOLUTIONS LTD (ENFUSE)

Technology Services · Information Technology Services · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.3 / 100
Profitability 2Balance sheet 4

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹148 latest close · −24.1% over the last 90 sessions

₹125₹150₹175₹200May 25Jun 24Jul 28Aug 26Sep 28Nov 8 ₹125₹150₹175₹200May 25Aug 13Nov 8

₹148 month-end · −38.4% over 12 months

₹150₹200₹250Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹150₹200₹250Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹148 month-end · −40.1% since Jun '25

₹150₹200₹250Jun '25Sep '25Jan '26Apr '26Aug '26Nov '26 ₹150₹200₹250Jun '25Mar '26Nov '26

52-week range ₹125.00 to ₹284.00 · 1-year volatility 74.7%

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-54.3%not yet recovered
1-year volatility74.7%annualised

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%20252026−54.3% 0%−20%−40%20252026−54.3%
Largest drawdowns

-54.3% (2025-05 peak to 2026-10 low, not yet recovered)

-32.6% (2024-07 peak to 2024-10 low, recovered 2024-11)

-20.1% (2024-04 peak to 2024-06 low, recovered 2024-07)

Where does it rank among Technology Services peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Technology Services peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE2nd
  • Revenue growth79th
  • EPS growth4th
  • Debt/equity ↓2nd▼ 7 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓80th▲ 56 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓22nd
  • 12M momentum22nd▼ 62 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Technology Services sector page Watch it move against Technology Services in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

Trailing earnings per share are negative, so a P/E-based figure does not exist. See the loss-makers list on the Expectations Gap page for a revenue-based version.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Technology Services The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 8 Nov
₹148.00
ROCE
-22.0%
Market Cap
₹131 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹58 cr
P/S
2.3x
P/B
6.5x
ROE
-76.9%
Debt / Equity
1.4x
Promoter Holding
70.6%
12M Momentum
-38.4%

52-week range

₹125.00₹284.00
14% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
74.7%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
-0.06

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
-4.0x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, promoters trimmed 3.0 pts; DIIs added 2.1 pts.
  • The number of shareholders fell from 621 to 503 (-19%) between Sep 2024 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '24Jun '26Change
Promoters73.6%70.6%-3.0 pts
FIIs0.3%0.0%-0.3 pts
DIIs0.0%2.1%+2.1 pts
Public and others26.1%27.3%+1.2 pts

Number of shareholders

503shareholders-19% since Sep '24
488532577621 Sep '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '24: 621
Dec '24: 621
Jun '25: 504
Sep '25: 532
Dec '25: 497
Mar '26: 488
Jun '26: 503
488532577621 Sep '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '24: 621
Dec '24: 621
Jun '25: 504
Sep '25: 532
Dec '25: 497
Mar '26: 488
Jun '26: 503

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−0.1%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like ENFUSE SOLUTIONS LTD today on valuation, return on capital, debt, growth, price momentum and size.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −25% to +30% vs the market, against −3% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+2.7%, 80% range −2.5% to +9.5%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
RAJTV · Jul 2025: −74.7% vs market
KREBSBIO · May 2022: −47.9% vs market
SECURKLOUD · Dec 2023: −46.8% vs market
COFFEEDAY · Aug 2023: −45.3% vs market
SUMIT · Jul 2021: −44.5% vs market
MTNL · Jul 2025: −43.9% vs market
BROOKS · May 2022: −33.5% vs market
NDTV · Jul 2025: −33.0% vs market
NITCO · Oct 2025: −29.9% vs market
NEXTMEDIA · Dec 2022: −29.2% vs market
ZODIACLOTH · Jun 2025: −27.8% vs market
UNITECH · May 2025: −25.7% vs market
TIPSFILMS · Sep 2025: −25.6% vs market
NDLVENTURE · May 2021: −21.1% vs market
VIPULLTD · Dec 2022: −21.0% vs market
RBA · Apr 2024: −20.2% vs market
PRAENG · Sep 2025: −16.7% vs market
ACL · Mar 2025: −14.7% vs market
ASTEC · Oct 2025: −12.7% vs market
MUKTAARTS · Jul 2023: −9.0% vs market
OILCOUNTUB · Apr 2020: −4.1% vs market
ENIL · Aug 2023: −3.0% vs market
BANKA · Jul 2025: −1.5% vs market
BRNL · Jun 2023: −1.4% vs market
CINELINE · Oct 2022: −0.5% vs market
SHAH · Apr 2023: +0.2% vs market
ATLANTAA · Jan 2023: +1.5% vs market
VERANDA · Feb 2024: +4.3% vs market
SICALLOG · Sep 2025: +4.7% vs market
SHALPAINTS · Oct 2025: +7.3% vs market
SIL · Nov 2020: +12.0% vs market
DELTAMAGNT · Jun 2020: +13.7% vs market
RAMANEWS · Jul 2023: +14.3% vs market
LYKALABS · Jan 2020: +20.1% vs market
KRITI · May 2024: +22.9% vs market
OMAXE · Dec 2023: +25.3% vs market
AURUM · Jun 2024: +25.8% vs market
ASAHISONG · Jun 2023: +31.2% vs market
JINDRILL · Jan 2021: +37.6% vs market
SAMPANN · Feb 2020: +40.1% vs market
UFO · Mar 2023: +44.9% vs market
SPLIL · Mar 2021: +59.0% vs market
DREDGECORP · Jul 2025: +61.9% vs market
PRAXIS · Jan 2021: +62.7% vs market
NOIDATOLL · Sep 2023: +64.8% vs market
DWARKESH · Dec 2020: +70.6% vs market
CCHHL · May 2023: +76.0% vs market
NIBL · Mar 2020: +96.2% vs market
TARC · Nov 2022: +135.7% vs market
GANESHHOU · Aug 2020: +166.8% vs market
Similar setups −0.1%All companies −2.8%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 2 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−0.1%
All companies' median
−2.8%
Beat the market
50% vs 47%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 35 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
NEXTMEDIA
Consumer Services
Dec 2022 —-18% −31%−37% −29%
SIL
Process Industries
Nov 2020 —-26% −17%−38% +12%
ACL
Non-Energy Minerals
Mar 2025 —-6% −37%−54% −15%
SHAH
Non-Energy Minerals
Apr 2023 —-23% −35%−36% 0%
OMAXE
Finance
Dec 2023 —-16% +2%−18% +25%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
SPLIL
Consumer Non-Durables
Mar 2021 —-35% +50%−35% +59%
KREBSBIO
Health Technology
May 2022 —-40% −6%−46% −48%
RAMANEWS
Process Industries
Jul 2023 —0% −22%−31% +14%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/S, ROCE, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high and size. Closest on: drawdown from 12-month high, 12-month momentum and interest cover. Not used (unavailable for this company): P/E, operating margin and volatility. This company is loss-making, so it was only compared with loss-making companies. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to ENFUSE SOLUTIONS LTD. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What changed?

6 events since Oct '24

  1. OctPriceFell 54% from the May 2025 peak to the Oct 2026 low.
  2. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned negative.
  3. JunDebtDebt / equity rose above 1.0x (1.45x).
  4. DecPromoterPromoter holding fell 2.9 pts to 70.7%.
  5. NovPriceRegained the 2024-07 peak, 1 month after the low.
  6. OctPriceFell 33% from the Jul 2024 peak to the Oct 2024 low.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history18 months · 2025-06 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-11—₹58 cr-76.9%-22.0%1.4x
2026-10—₹58 cr-75.0%-22.0%1.4x
2026-09—₹58 cr-75.0%-22.0%1.4x
2026-08—₹58 cr-75.0%-22.0%1.4x
2026-07—₹58 cr-75.0%-22.0%1.4x
2026-06—₹58 cr-75.0%-22.0%1.4x
2026-0547.3x₹43 cr9.2%—0.7x
2026-0454.7x₹43 cr9.2%—0.7x
2026-0344.5x₹43 cr9.2%—0.7x
2026-0253.3x₹43 cr9.2%—0.7x
2026-0162.0x₹43 cr9.2%—0.7x
2025-1258.7x₹43 cr9.2%—0.7x
2025-1165.6x₹43 cr9.2%—0.7x
2025-1052.7x₹43 cr9.2%—0.7x
2025-0953.6x₹43 cr9.2%—0.7x
2025-0868.3x₹43 cr9.2%—0.7x
2025-0760.9x₹43 cr9.2%—0.7x
2025-0667.5x₹43 cr9.2%—0.7x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback