अApnaFunda

NEELAM LINENS GARMENTS IND LTD (NEELAM)

Consumer Non-Durables · Apparel/Footwear · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.12 / 100
Profitability 19Balance sheet 4

Passes these screensValue Pick

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹6.3 latest close · −45.7% over the last 90 sessions

₹8₹10₹13Feb 27Mar 30May 20Jun 24Sep 1Nov 9 ₹8₹10₹13Feb 27Jun 8Nov 9

₹6.3 month-end · −54.0% over 12 months

₹8₹10₹13Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹8₹10₹13Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹6.3 month-end · −87.5% since Nov '24

₹20₹40₹60Nov '24Apr '25Sep '25Jan '26Jun '26Nov '26 ₹20₹40₹60Nov '24Nov '25Nov '26

52-week range ₹6.10 to ₹32.85 · 1-year volatility 61.1%

Was the rally earned?

-54%share price, 1 yearEarnings-driven

Mostly earnings.

  • Per-share earnings took off 38 points, while the multiple moved less (P/E 10.3x to 8.2x).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −38 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−38 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −16 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−16 ptsP/E changeShare price: −54%−54%Share priceNet profit growth: −38 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−38ProfitP/E change: −16 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−16P/EShare price: −54%−54%Share price
Net profit growth-38 ptsNet profit fell about 42%, which lowers the price.
P/E change-16 ptsThe P/E fell from 10.3x to 8.2x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 3 years and 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with PAGE INDUSTRIES

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-90.9%not yet recovered
1-year volatility61.1%annualised

Drawdown from peak

0%−25%−50%−75%20252026−90.9% 0%−25%−50%−75%20252026−90.9%
Largest drawdowns

-90.9% (2024-12 peak to 2026-09 low, not yet recovered)

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

8.2xP/E todayNear its historic low
Against its own history8th percentile
CheapestMedian 12.4xDearest

Usual range 8.6x to 23.8x since 2024-11.

Against Consumer Non-Durables8.2x vs 26.8x
This company
8.2x
Sector median
26.8x

69% below the Consumer Non-Durables median.

7.6x21.2x34.9x48.6xNov '24Apr '25Sep '25Feb '26Jul '26Nov '267.6x21.2x34.9x48.6xNov '24Jul '25Mar '26Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Non-Durables median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Non-Durables median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Non-Durables median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Consumer Non-Durables is valued

Where does it rank among Consumer Non-Durables peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Consumer Non-Durables peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE19th▼ 15 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth49thflat vs a year ago
  • EPS growth13th▼ 9 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓3rdflat vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓21st▼ 7 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓91st▼ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum2ndflat vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Consumer Non-Durables sector page Watch it move against Consumer Non-Durables in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~4%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 6.8x, the price would imply about 3.5%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Below the ₹1,000 cr market-cap floor used for the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Consumer Non-Durables The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹6.30
P/E
8.2x
ROCE
6.0%
Market Cap
₹13 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹118 cr
P/S
0.1x
P/B
0.3x
ROE
3.9%
Debt / Equity
1.7x
Promoter Holding
54.3%
12M Momentum
-54.0%

52-week range

₹6.10₹32.85
1% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
61.1%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.29

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
1.2x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
0.43x
low
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

3 of 6checks within range2 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance150%Beyond threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 150.0%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Cash conversion0.43xBeyond threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 0.43x (cash from operations ₹3 cr, net profit ₹7 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow2 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 2. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+4 daysWithin range

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 4 days (156 vs 152). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress0% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 0% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days-62 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by -62 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Since Dec 2024, FIIs trimmed 7.3 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 274 to 354 (+29%) between Dec 2024 and Mar 2026.

Holdings, Mar '26

How each group changed

GroupDec '24Mar '26Change
Promoters54.3%54.3%0.0 pts
FIIs7.3%0.0%-7.3 pts
DIIs0.0%0.0%0.0 pts
Public and others38.4%45.7%+7.3 pts

Number of shareholders

354shareholders+29% since Dec '24
274301327354 Dec '24Mar '25Sep '25Mar '26
Dec '24: 274
Mar '25: 289
Sep '25: 329
Mar '26: 354
274301327354 Dec '24Mar '25Sep '25Mar '26
Dec '24: 274
Mar '25: 289
Sep '25: 329
Mar '26: 354

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−10.4%typical 12-month return vs the marketBelow the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like NEELAM LINENS GARMENTS IND LTD today on valuation, return on capital, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −34% to +44% vs the market, against −6% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The analogs' median sat below that base rate (gap −4.2%, 80% range −9.9% to −2.6%), but the matches cluster in only 6 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
PRECISION · Apr 2025: −69.2% vs market
SVPGLOB · Apr 2023: −63.9% vs market
CADSYS · Dec 2024: −56.5% vs market
RAJSREESUG · Jan 2025: −46.4% vs market
DANGEE · Jan 2024: −45.4% vs market
MFML · Aug 2025: −42.8% vs market
SWASTIK · May 2025: −41.2% vs market
SHANTI · May 2023: −39.5% vs market
SHUBHLAXMI · Aug 2024: −39.4% vs market
ANMOL · Jul 2025: −37.6% vs market
SADBHIN · Oct 2025: −35.9% vs market
AKSHAR · Dec 2024: −34.7% vs market
PURVFLEXI · Jun 2025: −34.3% vs market
JALAN · Sep 2023: −31.8% vs market
QVCEL · Aug 2025: −21.7% vs market
PHOGLOBAL · Sep 2025: −21.1% vs market
SIMPLEXINF · Jan 2020: −19.6% vs market
SHAHALLOYS · Jan 2020: −18.8% vs market
DAMODARIND · Aug 2024: −18.5% vs market
VINNY · Mar 2025: −16.9% vs market
MAHESHWARI · Apr 2024: −16.8% vs market
SGL · Jun 2023: −14.1% vs market
JAIPURKURT · Nov 2024: −13.4% vs market
GLOBE · Jul 2025: −12.6% vs market
JETFREIGHT · May 2023: −11.3% vs market
ACCURACY · Dec 2023: −9.6% vs market
CELLPOINT · Jul 2025: −9.5% vs market
CELEBRITY · Jul 2023: −9.5% vs market
AROGRANITE · Jun 2022: −6.2% vs market
BSL · Jun 2025: −5.1% vs market
UMA · Jun 2024: −4.2% vs market
KONSTELEC · Aug 2025: −0.9% vs market
BALKRISHNA · Jul 2023: −0.8% vs market
AUSOMENT · Oct 2021: +9.7% vs market
MANAKCOAT · Dec 2022: +23.4% vs market
CENTEXT · Jan 2020: +28.5% vs market
RKEC · Jun 2022: +38.4% vs market
BHARATGEAR · Feb 2020: +45.3% vs market
MGEL · Dec 2023: +48.3% vs market
XPROINDIA · Jan 2020: +54.5% vs market
NDL · May 2020: +73.4% vs market
SPMLINFRA · Nov 2020: +78.7% vs market
KANANIIND · Mar 2020: +90.0% vs market
LAGNAM · Jun 2023: +107.4% vs market
RAMASTEEL · Mar 2020: +111.4% vs market
HITECH · Jun 2020: +136.5% vs market
SARVESHWAR · Dec 2020: +149.5% vs market
PIGL · Aug 2023: +204.8% vs market
MCLEODRUSS · Jan 2020: +235.0% vs market
VIKASECO · Apr 2021: +251.5% vs market
Similar setups −10.4%All companies −6.2%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 7 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−10.4%
All companies' median
−6.2%
Beat the market
34% vs 43%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 33 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
SARVESHWAR
Process Industries
Dec 2020 6x7% −33%−67% +150%
DANGEE
Consumer Non-Durables
Jan 2024 10x— −37%−41% −45%
ACCURACY
Transportation
Dec 2023 18x11% −43%−56% −10%
CADSYS
Technology Services
Dec 2024 10x12% −52%−78% −57%
SGL
Process Industries
Jun 2023 3x— −43%−52% −14%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
JETFREIGHT
Transportation
May 2023 17x14% −54%−56% −11%
UMA
Process Industries
Jun 2024 13x9% −7%−37% −4%
SHAHALLOYS
Non-Energy Minerals
Jan 2020 2x2% −53%−58% −19%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, P/S and P/E. Not used (unavailable for this company): operating margin. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to NEELAM LINENS GARMENTS IND LTD. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What changed?

8 events since Nov '25

  1. NovValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (8.2x).
  2. SepPriceFell 91% from the Dec 2024 peak to the Sep 2026 low.
  3. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹118 cr.
  4. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  5. MarPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  6. DecInstitutionsFII + DII holding fell 6.1 pts over 1 quarter to 1.6%.
  7. DecPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  8. NovSharesShare count is up 33.3% over 12 months.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history25 months · 2024-11 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-118.2x₹118 cr3.9%6.0%1.7x
2026-108.4x₹118 cr3.9%6.0%1.7x
2026-099.2x₹118 cr3.9%6.0%1.7x
2026-089.1x₹118 cr3.9%6.0%1.7x
2026-0712.0x₹118 cr3.9%6.0%1.7x
2026-0614.1x₹118 cr3.9%6.0%1.7x
2026-059.2x₹110 cr6.9%10.0%1.7x
2026-049.6x₹110 cr6.9%10.0%1.7x
2026-037.6x₹110 cr6.9%10.0%1.7x
2026-028.7x₹110 cr6.9%10.0%1.7x
2026-0110.5x₹110 cr6.9%10.0%1.7x
2025-1210.5x₹110 cr6.9%10.0%1.7x
2025-1110.3x₹110 cr6.9%10.0%1.7x
2025-1014.1x₹110 cr6.9%10.0%1.7x
2025-0915.5x₹110 cr6.9%10.0%1.7x
2025-0816.2x₹110 cr6.9%10.0%1.7x
2025-0717.7x₹110 cr6.9%10.0%1.7x
2025-0619.5x₹110 cr6.9%10.0%1.7x
2025-0517.2x₹102 cr10.5%10.0%2.9x
2025-0418.2x₹102 cr10.5%10.0%2.9x
2025-0312.4x₹102 cr10.5%10.0%2.9x
2025-0222.4x₹102 cr10.5%10.0%2.9x
2025-0124.7x₹102 cr10.5%10.0%2.9x
2024-1234.4x₹102 cr10.5%10.0%2.9x
2024-1130.4x₹102 cr10.5%10.0%2.9x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback