अApnaFunda
Menu

SUPERHOUSE LIMITED (SUPERHOUSE)

Consumer Non-Durables · Apparel/Footwear · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.25 / 100
Profitability 16Growth 10Balance sheet 50

Passes these screensCash Rich

Compare withPAGE INDUSTRIESKPR MILLPEARL GLOBAL INDUSTRIES

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹148.32 latest close · −2.9% over the last 90 sessions

₹160₹180Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹160₹180Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹148.32 month-end · −5.1% over 12 months

₹140₹160Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹140₹160Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹148.32 month-end · −36.2% over 3 years

₹150₹200₹250Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹150₹200₹250Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹148.32 month-end · +19.8% since Jan '19

₹100₹200Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹100₹200Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹128.55 to ₹189.00 · 1-year volatility 36.8%

Was the rally earned?

-5%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 94 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 57.9x to 21.0x), which took 99 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +94 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+94 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −99 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−99 ptsP/E changeShare price: −5%−5%Share priceNet profit growth: +94 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+94ProfitP/E change: −99 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−99P/EShare price: −5%−5%Share price
Net profit growth+94 ptsNet profit rose about 162%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-99 ptsThe P/E fell from 57.9x to 21.0x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-36%share price, 3 yearsEarnings-driven

Mostly earnings.

  • Per-share earnings took off 98 points, while the multiple moved less (P/E 9.7x to 21.0x).
  • The share count fell 12%.
Net profit growth: −108 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−108 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +62 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+62 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +10 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+10 ptsShare count changeShare price: −36%−36%Share priceNet profit growth: −108 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−108ProfitP/E change: +62 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+62P/EShare count change: +10 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+10SharesShare price: −36%−36%Share price
Net profit growth-108 ptsNet profit fell about 74%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+62 ptsThe P/E rose from 9.7x to 21.0x, which lifts the price.
Share count change+10 ptsShare count fell 12%, which lifts the price.
-1%share price, 5 yearsRoughly flat
  • The share price was roughly flat over 5 years (-1%).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −112 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−112 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +113 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+113 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −2 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−2 ptsShare count changeShare price: −1%−1%Share priceNet profit growth: −112 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−112ProfitP/E change: +113 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+113P/EShare count change: −2 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−2SharesShare price: −1%−1%Share price
Net profit growth-112 ptsNet profit fell about 67%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+113 ptsThe P/E rose from 6.8x to 21.0x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-2 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with PAGE INDUSTRIES

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-59.1%recovered 2021-05
1-year volatility36.8%annualised

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2020202120222023202420252026−57.8% 0%−20%−40%−60%2020202220242026−57.8%
Largest drawdowns

-59.1% (2019-01 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2021-05)

-53.4% (2022-08 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

-36.1% (2022-01 peak to 2022-05 low, recovered 2022-07)

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

21.0xP/E todayNear its historic high
Against its own history85th percentile
CheapestMedian 7.7xDearest

Usual range 4.1x to 27.6x since 2019-01.

Against Consumer Non-Durables21.0x vs 26.8x
This company
21.0x
Sector median
26.8x

22% below the Consumer Non-Durables median.

3.2x22.7x42.2x61.7xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '263.2x22.7x42.2x61.7xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Non-Durables median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Non-Durables median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Non-Durables median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Consumer Non-Durables is valued

Where does it rank among Consumer Non-Durables peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Consumer Non-Durables peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE15thflat vs a year ago
  • Op. margin17th▲ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth18th▼ 23 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth95th▲ 90 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓41st▲ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓17th▲ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓60th▲ 35 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum60th▲ 24 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Consumer Non-Durables sector page Watch it move against Consumer Non-Durables in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~6%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 8.8x, the price would imply about 5.8%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Below the ₹1,000 cr market-cap floor used for the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Consumer Non-Durables The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹148.32
P/E
21.0x
ROCE
4.0%
Market Cap
₹164 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹677 cr
P/S
0.2x
P/B
0.4x
ROE
1.7%
Operating Margin
6.2%
Debt / Equity
0.4x
Promoter Holding
54.9%
12M Momentum
-5.1%

52-week range

₹128.55₹189.00
33% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
36.8%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.75

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
1.6x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
3.37x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

3 of 7checks within range1 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance45%Beyond threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 45.0%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate41%Near threshold

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 41.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion3.37xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 3.37x (cash from operations ₹91 cr, net profit ₹27 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow2 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 2. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+1 daysWithin range

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 1 days (90 vs 89). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress0% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 0% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days+64 days / 2 yrsNear threshold

Days payable changed by +64 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, institutional and promoter holdings were broadly unchanged.
  • The number of shareholders fell from 20,649 to 18,143 (-12%) between Dec 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupDec '23Jun '26Change
Promoters54.9%54.9%0.0 pts
FIIs0.8%0.7%-0.1 pts
DIIs0.0%0.0%0.0 pts
Public and others44.3%44.4%+0.1 pts

Number of shareholders

18,143shareholders-12% since Dec '23
18k19k20k21k Dec '23Jun '24Dec '24Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 20,649
Mar '24: 20,293
Jun '24: 20,100
Sep '24: 20,077
Dec '24: 19,177
Jun '25: 19,006
Dec '25: 18,348
Jun '26: 18,143
 18k19k20k21k Dec '23Sep '24Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 20,649
Mar '24: 20,293
Jun '24: 20,100
Sep '24: 20,077
Dec '24: 19,177
Jun '25: 19,006
Dec '25: 18,348
Jun '26: 18,143

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−3.1%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like SUPERHOUSE LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −17% to +29% vs the market, against −7% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+3.6%, 80% range −5.6% to +12.3%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
MANGALAM · Jan 2025: −68.1% vs market
PIONEEREMB · Aug 2023: −37.8% vs market
SUTLEJTEX · Feb 2024: −37.1% vs market
BODALCHEM · Feb 2024: −33.9% vs market
KOTHARIPRO · Mar 2023: −32.1% vs market
SHREYANIND · Jul 2021: −31.7% vs market
TEXMOPIPES · May 2025: −30.8% vs market
IGPL · Feb 2025: −29.1% vs market
NCLIND · Nov 2023: −22.9% vs market
RGL · Feb 2025: −21.5% vs market
IVP · Jul 2025: −20.9% vs market
NAHARINDUS · May 2025: −19.2% vs market
ASPINWALL · Jan 2020: −17.3% vs market
HISARMETAL · Oct 2025: −17.0% vs market
SUNDRMBRAK · Oct 2021: −16.3% vs market
JAYSREETEA · Nov 2022: −15.2% vs market
AAREYDRUGS · Jul 2023: −13.3% vs market
DCMNVL · Oct 2023: −12.1% vs market
MAWANASUG · Aug 2023: −11.0% vs market
BANSWRAS · Jun 2025: −10.5% vs market
COSMOFIRST · Nov 2024: −10.3% vs market
NAHARPOLY · Nov 2024: −9.9% vs market
NDL · Apr 2024: −8.4% vs market
GILLANDERS · Jun 2022: −8.4% vs market
SAHYADRI · Jul 2025: −4.6% vs market
UCAL · Apr 2023: −1.6% vs market
TBZ · Aug 2024: +0.9% vs market
EMAMIPAP · Aug 2025: +4.6% vs market
BHARATGEAR · Aug 2025: +5.8% vs market
MANORG · Apr 2025: +7.7% vs market
OBCL · Oct 2025: +10.4% vs market
MUNJALAU · May 2023: +10.4% vs market
PPAP · Aug 2025: +11.7% vs market
MAGADSUGAR · May 2023: +20.8% vs market
HPL · Feb 2021: +22.0% vs market
RICOAUTO · Sep 2022: +24.3% vs market
ARIES · Nov 2022: +28.7% vs market
RAMAPHO · Mar 2025: +28.8% vs market
NAHARSPING · Oct 2025: +33.1% vs market
JAYBARMARU · Aug 2025: +34.8% vs market
GALLANTT · Dec 2020: +39.0% vs market
BVCL · May 2022: +40.1% vs market
INCREDIBLE · Feb 2023: +48.4% vs market
RUCHIRA · Feb 2022: +49.8% vs market
GOKUL · May 2020: +52.1% vs market
IFBAGRO · Apr 2025: +72.7% vs market
PGIL · Jun 2021: +90.1% vs market
SHIVAMILLS · Feb 2021: +131.0% vs market
SANGAMIND · Dec 2020: +235.3% vs market
PCJEWELLER · Oct 2021: +262.4% vs market
Similar setups −3.1%All companies −6.7%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 3 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−3.1%
All companies' median
−6.7%
Beat the market
48% vs 43%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 33 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
NAHARINDUS
Process Industries		 May 2025 28x3% +14%−20% −19%
BHARATGEAR
Producer Manufacturing		 Aug 2025 43x2% −19%−22% +6%
BANSWRAS
Process Industries		 Jun 2025 23x7% 0%−15% −11%
AAREYDRUGS
Health Technology		 Jul 2023 26x6% +10%−7% −13%
PGIL
Consumer Non-Durables		 Jun 2021 27x5% +105%−8% +90%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
DCMNVL
Process Industries		 Oct 2023 25x5% +16%−10% −12%
GOKUL
Process Industries		 May 2020 11x8% −27%−41% +52%
OBCL
Miscellaneous		 Oct 2025 37x7% −3%−11% +10%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: drawdown from 12-month high, 12-month momentum and P/E. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to SUPERHOUSE LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What changed?

26 events since Jun '19

  1. SepResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  2. SepPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  3. JunPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  4. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 9% to 0% of profit.
  5. MarPriceFell 53% from the Aug 2022 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  6. SepPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  7. JunPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  8. AprValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (14.2x).
Show 18 earlier events
  1. MarPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  2. SepPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  3. AprValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (9.3x).
  4. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  5. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  6. AprValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (8.3x).
  7. JulPriceRegained the 2022-01 peak, 2 months after the low.
  8. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  9. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  10. MayPriceFell 36% from the Jan 2022 peak to the May 2022 low.
  11. JanValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (9.7x).
  12. JulValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (7.5x).
  13. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  14. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  15. MayPriceRegained the 2019-01 peak, 14 months after the low.
  16. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  17. MarPriceFell 59% from the Jan 2019 peak to the Mar 2020 low.
  18. JunPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on ROCE (from the bottom quartile).

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history95 months · 2019-01 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1121.0x₹677 cr1.7%4.0%0.4x
2026-1020.4x₹677 cr1.7%4.0%0.4x
2026-0922.6x₹677 cr1.7%4.0%0.4x
2026-0847.5x₹677 cr0.9%4.0%0.4x
2026-0744.6x₹677 cr0.9%4.0%0.4x
2026-0644.1x₹677 cr0.9%4.0%0.4x
2026-0527.9x₹698 cr1.3%4.0%0.5x
2026-0427.1x₹698 cr1.3%4.0%0.5x
2026-0323.5x₹698 cr1.3%4.0%0.5x
2026-0231.9x₹693 cr1.1%4.0%0.5x
2026-0132.2x₹693 cr1.1%4.0%0.5x
2025-1230.1x₹693 cr1.1%4.0%0.5x
2025-1157.9x₹685 cr0.7%4.0%0.5x
2025-1061.3x₹685 cr0.7%4.0%0.5x
2025-0961.7x₹685 cr0.7%4.0%0.5x
2025-0818.3x₹665 cr2.0%4.0%0.5x
2025-0720.2x₹665 cr2.0%4.0%0.5x
2025-0620.6x₹665 cr2.0%4.0%0.5x
2025-0516.4x₹654 cr2.7%4.0%0.5x
2025-0414.2x₹654 cr2.7%4.0%0.5x
2025-0312.8x₹654 cr2.7%4.0%0.5x
2025-0212.8x₹635 cr3.0%4.0%0.5x
2025-0115.4x₹635 cr3.0%4.0%0.5x
2024-1216.8x₹635 cr3.0%4.0%0.5x
2024-1113.4x₹644 cr3.8%4.0%0.5x
2024-1014.3x₹644 cr3.8%4.0%0.5x
2024-0914.8x₹644 cr3.8%4.0%0.5x
2024-0819.3x₹665 cr3.1%4.0%0.5x
2024-0721.1x₹665 cr3.1%4.0%0.5x
2024-0618.7x₹665 cr3.1%4.0%0.5x
2024-058.7x₹766 cr6.8%8.0%0.4x
2024-049.3x₹766 cr6.8%8.0%0.4x
2024-038.2x₹766 cr6.8%8.0%0.4x
2024-029.2x₹766 cr6.8%8.0%0.4x
2024-0110.4x₹766 cr6.8%8.0%0.4x
2023-1210.4x₹766 cr6.8%8.0%0.4x
2023-119.7x₹766 cr6.8%8.0%0.4x
2023-109.2x₹766 cr6.8%8.0%0.4x
2023-0910.3x₹766 cr6.8%8.0%0.4x
2023-088.8x₹766 cr6.8%8.0%0.4x
2023-078.8x₹766 cr6.8%8.0%0.4x
2023-069.0x₹766 cr6.8%8.0%0.4x
2023-056.8x₹650 cr8.7%10.0%0.4x
2023-048.3x₹650 cr8.7%10.0%0.4x
2023-037.3x₹650 cr8.7%10.0%0.4x
2023-027.1x₹650 cr8.7%10.0%0.4x
2023-016.2x₹650 cr8.7%10.0%0.4x
2022-126.3x₹650 cr8.7%10.0%0.4x
2022-116.6x₹650 cr8.7%10.0%0.4x
2022-106.8x₹650 cr8.7%10.0%0.4x
2022-097.0x₹650 cr8.7%10.0%0.4x
2022-086.4x₹650 cr8.7%10.0%0.4x
2022-077.2x₹650 cr8.7%10.0%0.4x
2022-065.4x₹650 cr8.7%10.0%0.4x
2022-058.6x₹537 cr6.3%8.0%0.4x
2022-048.3x₹537 cr6.3%8.0%0.4x
2022-037.4x₹537 cr6.3%8.0%0.4x
2022-027.6x₹537 cr6.3%8.0%0.4x
2022-019.7x₹537 cr6.3%8.0%0.4x
2021-127.5x₹537 cr6.3%8.0%0.4x
2021-116.8x₹537 cr6.3%8.0%0.4x
2021-107.6x₹537 cr6.3%8.0%0.4x
2021-097.7x₹537 cr6.3%8.0%0.4x
2021-087.5x₹537 cr6.3%8.0%0.4x
2021-077.5x₹537 cr6.3%8.0%0.4x
2021-067.0x₹537 cr6.3%8.0%0.4x
2021-056.2x₹609 cr7.4%8.0%0.5x
2021-045.0x₹609 cr7.4%8.0%0.5x
2021-035.2x₹609 cr7.4%8.0%0.5x
2021-025.4x₹609 cr7.4%8.0%0.5x
2021-015.1x₹609 cr7.4%8.0%0.5x
2020-125.6x₹609 cr7.4%8.0%0.5x
2020-114.6x₹609 cr7.4%8.0%0.5x
2020-103.6x₹609 cr7.4%8.0%0.5x
2020-093.7x₹609 cr7.4%8.0%0.5x
2020-084.0x₹609 cr7.4%8.0%0.5x
2020-073.5x₹609 cr7.4%8.0%0.5x
2020-063.4x₹609 cr7.4%8.0%0.5x
2020-053.4x₹694 cr6.5%10.0%0.6x
2020-043.9x₹694 cr6.5%10.0%0.6x
2020-033.2x₹694 cr6.5%10.0%0.6x
2020-024.3x₹694 cr6.5%10.0%0.6x
2020-014.8x₹694 cr6.5%10.0%0.6x
2019-124.8x₹694 cr6.5%10.0%0.6x
2019-114.7x₹694 cr6.5%10.0%0.6x
2019-104.7x₹694 cr6.5%10.0%0.6x
2019-094.2x₹694 cr6.5%10.0%0.6x
2019-083.8x₹694 cr6.5%10.0%0.6x
2019-073.4x₹694 cr6.5%10.0%0.6x
2019-065.0x₹694 cr6.5%10.0%0.6x
2019-056.9x₹650 cr6.0%7.0%0.7x
2019-047.1x₹650 cr6.0%7.0%0.7x
2019-037.7x₹650 cr6.0%7.0%0.7x
2019-027.0x₹650 cr6.0%7.0%0.7x
2019-017.7x₹650 cr6.0%7.0%0.7x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback