अApnaFunda
Menu

TREJHARA SOLUTIONS LIMITED (TREJHARA)

Technology Services · Information Technology Services · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.75 / 100
Profitability 28Growth 98Balance sheet 100
Compare withTATA CONSULTANCY SERVICESINFOSYSHCL TECHNOLOGIES

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹131.74 latest close · −7.9% over the last 90 sessions

₹120₹140₹160₹180Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹120₹140₹160₹180Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹131.74 month-end · −50.0% over 12 months

₹100₹150₹200₹250Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹100₹150₹200₹250Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹131.74 month-end · −33.4% over 3 years

₹100₹200₹300Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹100₹200₹300Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹131.74 month-end · +328.4% since Jan '19

₹0₹100₹200₹300Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹0₹100₹200₹300Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹110.00 to ₹284.85 · 1-year volatility 45.2%

Was the rally earned?

-50%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 69 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 110.3x to 21.1x), which took 119 points back.
  • The share count rose 60%.
Net profit growth: +103 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+103 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −119 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−119 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −34 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−34 ptsShare count changeShare price: −50%−50%Share priceNet profit growth: +103 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+103ProfitP/E change: −119 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−119P/EShare count change: −34 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−34SharesShare price: −50%−50%Share price
Net profit growth+103 ptsNet profit rose about 318%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-119 ptsThe P/E fell from 110.3x to 21.1x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-34 ptsShare count rose 60%, which lowers the price.
+65%share price, 5 yearsMultiple-driven

Partly.

  • Most of the rise came from investors paying a higher multiple (P/E 8.5x to 21.1x); per-share earnings took off 53 points.
  • The share count rose 75%.
Net profit growth: +20 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+20 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +118 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+118 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −72 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−72 ptsShare count changeShare price: +65%+65%Share priceNet profit growth: +20 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+20ProfitP/E change: +118 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+118P/EShare count change: −72 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−72SharesShare price: +65%+65%Share price
Net profit growth+20 ptsNet profit rose about 16%, which lifts the price.
P/E change+118 ptsThe P/E rose from 8.5x to 21.1x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-72 ptsShare count rose 75%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 3 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-89.3%recovered 2020-12
1-year volatility45.2%annualised

Drawdown from peak

0%−25%−50%−75%2020202120222023202420252026−88.3% 0%−25%−50%−75%2020202220242026−88.3%
Largest drawdowns

-89.3% (2019-01 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2020-12)

-61.6% (2024-09 peak to 2026-11 low, not yet recovered)

-60.9% (2022-01 peak to 2023-03 low, recovered 2023-10)

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

21.1xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history72nd percentile
CheapestMedian 7.8xDearest

Usual range 1.5x to 48.5x since 2019-01.

Against Technology Services21.1x vs 21.1x
This company
21.1x
Sector median
21.1x

Close to the Technology Services median.

1.1x37.5x73.9x110.3xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '261.1x37.5x73.9x110.3xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianTechnology Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianTechnology Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianTechnology Services median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Technology Services is valued

Where does it rank among Technology Services peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Technology Services peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE19thflat vs a year ago
  • Op. margin36th▲ 11 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth93rd▼ 7 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth96th▲ 80 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓52nd▼ 15 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓44th▲ 12 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓50th▲ 42 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum11th▼ 70 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Technology Services sector page Watch it move against Technology Services in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~16%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 21.1x, the price would imply about 15.9%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Below the ₹1,000 cr market-cap floor used for the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Technology Services The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹131.74
P/E
21.1x
ROCE
4.0%
Market Cap
₹319 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹177 cr
P/S
1.8x
P/B
1.1x
ROE
5.1%
Operating Margin
9.8%
Debt / Equity
0.1x
Promoter Holding
33.9%
12M Momentum
-50.0%

52-week range

₹110.00₹284.85
12% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
45.2%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.43

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
10.0x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
-2.00x
low
Share count, 1Y
+60.0%

Are profits backed by cash?

3 of 6checks within range2 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance57%Beyond threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 57.1%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate23%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 22.9%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion-3.73xBeyond threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: -3.73x (cash from operations ₹-123 cr, net profit ₹33 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow3 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 3. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-131 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 131 days (86 vs 217). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress0% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 0% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, promoters added 3.9 pts.
  • The number of shareholders fell from 11,909 to 9,573 (-20%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters30.0%33.9%+3.9 pts
FIIs0.0%0.0%0.0 pts
DIIs0.2%0.0%-0.2 pts
Public and others69.8%66.1%-3.6 pts

Number of shareholders

9,573shareholders-20% since Sep '23
9k10k11k12k Sep '23Mar '24Sep '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 11,909
Dec '23: 10,942
Mar '24: 10,425
Jun '24: 9,972
Sep '24: 10,179
Mar '25: 10,012
Jun '25: 9,892
Sep '25: 9,767
Dec '25: 9,700
Mar '26: 9,494
Jun '26: 9,573
 9k10k11k12k Sep '23Sep '24Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 11,909
Dec '23: 10,942
Mar '24: 10,425
Jun '24: 9,972
Sep '24: 10,179
Mar '25: 10,012
Jun '25: 9,892
Sep '25: 9,767
Dec '25: 9,700
Mar '26: 9,494
Jun '26: 9,573

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−1.7%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like TREJHARA SOLUTIONS LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −19% to +27% vs the market, against −6% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+4.4%, 80% range −2.8% to +12.4%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
FILATFASH · Oct 2025: −64.1% vs market
VIKASECO · Jul 2025: −53.8% vs market
ALANKIT · Aug 2025: −46.5% vs market
GSLSU · Oct 2024: −44.2% vs market
INVENTURE · May 2025: −42.0% vs market
APOLLOPIPE · Nov 2024: −41.6% vs market
DEN · May 2021: −36.3% vs market
ALMONDZ · Jul 2025: −34.4% vs market
AJOONI · Aug 2025: −33.9% vs market
NAHARPOLY · Jun 2023: −32.9% vs market
HPAL · May 2025: −31.4% vs market
BPL · Apr 2025: −27.2% vs market
AARTECH · Apr 2025: −20.1% vs market
CLEDUCATE · Aug 2023: −16.0% vs market
UNIDT · Sep 2024: −15.3% vs market
TEXRAIL · Feb 2020: −12.6% vs market
LINC · Apr 2025: −11.6% vs market
SHIVALIK · Aug 2024: −10.7% vs market
MEDICAMEQ · Jun 2024: −10.3% vs market
BBL · May 2025: −8.5% vs market
ORIENTCER · Nov 2024: −7.9% vs market
PANSARI · Dec 2022: −7.6% vs market
STERTOOLS · Mar 2024: −3.7% vs market
GENUSPAPER · Apr 2023: −2.3% vs market
HARDWYN · Sep 2025: −2.2% vs market
ADOR · Jan 2025: −1.3% vs market
ASHIMASYN · Jun 2022: +0.1% vs market
EIMCOELECO · Nov 2021: +6.7% vs market
DIAMONDYD · May 2021: +8.3% vs market
RISHABH · Sep 2024: +9.7% vs market
NITIRAJ · Feb 2021: +9.9% vs market
KABRAEXTRU · Dec 2023: +10.1% vs market
ADROITINFO · Oct 2025: +16.2% vs market
DCAL · Apr 2020: +17.9% vs market
KRSNAA · Feb 2023: +20.7% vs market
UNICHEMLAB · Dec 2021: +22.4% vs market
PRECAM · May 2020: +26.1% vs market
COMPUSOFT · Feb 2020: +27.1% vs market
GLOBUSSPR · Apr 2024: +30.4% vs market
YATRA · Jun 2025: +31.5% vs market
SHALBY · Jun 2022: +38.5% vs market
GUJAPOLLO · Mar 2024: +38.7% vs market
JTEKTINDIA · Feb 2022: +39.8% vs market
IVC · Oct 2021: +44.3% vs market
ROSSELLIND · Sep 2021: +75.0% vs market
KILITCH · Dec 2022: +86.8% vs market
ZENTEC · Mar 2020: +89.2% vs market
TDPOWERSYS · Oct 2020: +102.3% vs market
NEULANDLAB · May 2022: +134.3% vs market
ARROWGREEN · May 2022: +254.3% vs market
Similar setups −1.7%All companies −6.1%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 3 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−1.7%
All companies' median
−6.1%
Beat the market
48% vs 43%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 35 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
HPAL
Non-Energy Minerals		 May 2025 24x— −48%−51% −31%
ASHIMASYN
Process Industries		 Jun 2022 13x-3% −37%−45% 0%
KILITCH
Health Technology		 Dec 2022 35x6% −38%−41% +87%
YATRA
Consumer Services		 Jun 2025 37x5% −32%−43% +32%
NITIRAJ
Electronic Technology		 Feb 2021 19x4% −21%— +10%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
SHALBY
Health Services		 Jun 2022 20x10% −44%−52% +39%
COMPUSOFT
Technology Services		 Feb 2020 11x4% −47%−52% +27%
EIMCOELECO
Producer Manufacturing		 Nov 2021 18x5% +8%−31% +7%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: interest cover, P/S and drawdown from 12-month high. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to TREJHARA SOLUTIONS LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What changed?

30 events since Apr '22

  1. NovPriceFell 62% from the Sep 2024 peak to the Nov 2026 low.
  2. SepPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Technology Services on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  3. JunPromoterPromoter holding rose 10.8 pts to 33.9%.
  4. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  5. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Technology Services on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  6. JunSharesShare count is up 60.0% over 12 months.
  7. NovPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Technology Services on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  8. SepResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹104 cr.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. SepPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Technology Services on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  2. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Technology Services on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  3. MarPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Technology Services on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  4. DecPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Technology Services on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  5. SepPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Technology Services on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  6. AugPriceRegained the 2023-12 peak, 5 months after the low.
  7. JunPromoterPromoter holding fell 5.3 pts to 23.1%.
  8. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned positive.
  9. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (12.5x).
  10. JunSharesShare count is up 25.0% over 12 months.
  11. MarPriceFell 36% from the Dec 2023 peak to the Mar 2024 low.
  12. OctPriceRegained the 2022-01 peak, 7 months after the low.
  13. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned negative.
  14. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Technology Services on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  15. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 5% to 0% of profit.
  16. MayValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (8.2x).
  17. MarPriceFell 61% from the Jan 2022 peak to the Mar 2023 low.
  18. SepValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (8.1x).
  19. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  20. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Technology Services on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  21. JunDividendStarted paying a dividend (payout 5% of profit).
  22. AprValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (8.0x).

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history95 months · 2019-01 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1121.1x₹177 cr5.1%4.0%0.1x
2026-1018.3x₹177 cr5.1%4.0%0.1x
2026-0922.2x₹177 cr5.1%4.0%0.1x
2026-0831.2x₹142 cr3.5%4.0%0.1x
2026-0728.6x₹142 cr3.5%4.0%0.1x
2026-0630.1x₹142 cr3.5%4.0%0.1x
2026-0536.9x₹140 cr3.2%3.0%0.0x
2026-0438.1x₹140 cr3.2%3.0%0.0x
2026-0335.5x₹140 cr3.2%3.0%0.0x
2026-0247.8x₹112 cr2.9%3.0%0.0x
2026-0148.8x₹112 cr2.9%3.0%0.0x
2025-1258.1x₹112 cr2.9%3.0%0.0x
2025-11110.3x₹104 cr1.5%3.0%0.0x
2025-1090.6x₹104 cr1.5%3.0%0.0x
2025-0975.9x₹104 cr1.5%3.0%0.0x
2025-0880.8x₹77 cr1.6%3.0%0.0x
2025-0785.2x₹77 cr1.6%3.0%0.0x
2025-0692.2x₹77 cr1.6%3.0%0.0x
2025-0527.4x₹45 cr7.0%2.0%0.0x
2025-0426.5x₹45 cr7.0%2.0%0.0x
2025-0320.1x₹45 cr7.0%2.0%0.0x
2025-0218.3x₹45 cr7.5%2.0%0.0x
2025-0122.4x₹45 cr7.5%2.0%0.0x
2024-1225.4x₹45 cr7.5%2.0%0.0x
2024-1120.9x₹25 cr8.9%2.0%0.0x
2024-1020.3x₹25 cr8.9%2.0%0.0x
2024-0924.2x₹25 cr8.9%2.0%0.0x
2024-0815.0x₹23 cr10.5%2.0%0.0x
2024-0712.1x₹23 cr10.5%2.0%0.0x
2024-0612.5x₹23 cr10.5%2.0%0.0x
2024-05—₹22 cr-178.7%0.0%0.1x
2024-04—₹22 cr-178.7%0.0%0.1x
2024-03—₹22 cr-178.7%0.0%0.1x
2024-02—₹22 cr-178.7%0.0%0.1x
2024-01—₹22 cr-178.7%0.0%0.1x
2023-12—₹22 cr-178.7%0.0%0.1x
2023-11—₹22 cr-178.7%0.0%0.1x
2023-10—₹22 cr-178.7%0.0%0.1x
2023-09—₹22 cr-178.7%0.0%0.1x
2023-08—₹22 cr-178.7%0.0%0.1x
2023-07—₹22 cr-178.7%0.0%0.1x
2023-06—₹22 cr-178.7%0.0%0.1x
2023-058.2x₹58 cr2.7%3.0%0.1x
2023-046.3x₹58 cr2.7%3.0%0.1x
2023-035.8x₹58 cr2.7%3.0%0.1x
2023-026.5x₹58 cr2.7%3.0%0.1x
2023-017.3x₹58 cr2.7%3.0%0.1x
2022-127.4x₹58 cr2.7%3.0%0.1x
2022-118.4x₹58 cr2.7%3.0%0.1x
2022-107.7x₹58 cr2.7%3.0%0.1x
2022-098.1x₹58 cr2.7%3.0%0.1x
2022-087.3x₹58 cr2.7%3.0%0.1x
2022-076.1x₹58 cr2.7%3.0%0.1x
2022-065.4x₹58 cr2.7%3.0%0.1x
2022-056.2x₹54 cr2.8%3.0%0.1x
2022-048.0x₹54 cr2.8%3.0%0.1x
2022-037.3x₹54 cr2.8%3.0%0.1x
2022-027.2x₹54 cr2.8%3.0%0.1x
2022-0110.5x₹54 cr2.8%3.0%0.1x
2021-129.2x₹54 cr2.8%3.0%0.1x
2021-118.5x₹54 cr2.8%3.0%0.1x
2021-106.4x₹54 cr2.8%3.0%0.1x
2021-096.6x₹54 cr2.8%3.0%0.1x
2021-086.4x₹54 cr2.8%3.0%0.1x
2021-077.2x₹54 cr2.8%3.0%0.1x
2021-065.9x₹54 cr2.8%3.0%0.1x
2021-056.6x₹58 cr1.8%3.0%0.1x
2021-046.0x₹58 cr1.8%3.0%0.1x
2021-035.1x₹58 cr1.8%3.0%0.1x
2021-025.3x₹58 cr1.8%3.0%0.1x
2021-015.6x₹58 cr1.8%3.0%0.1x
2020-127.0x₹58 cr1.8%3.0%0.1x
2020-115.7x₹58 cr1.8%3.0%0.1x
2020-103.1x₹58 cr1.8%3.0%0.1x
2020-092.7x₹58 cr1.8%3.0%0.1x
2020-081.7x₹58 cr1.8%3.0%0.1x
2020-071.5x₹58 cr1.8%3.0%0.1x
2020-061.5x₹58 cr1.8%3.0%0.1x
2020-05—₹77 cr3.5%5.0%0.1x
2020-04—₹77 cr3.5%5.0%0.1x
2020-03—₹77 cr3.5%5.0%0.1x
2020-02—₹77 cr3.5%5.0%0.1x
2020-011.1x₹77 cr3.5%5.0%0.1x
2019-121.1x₹77 cr3.5%5.0%0.1x
2019-111.5x₹77 cr3.5%5.0%0.1x
2019-101.4x₹77 cr3.5%5.0%0.1x
2019-091.5x₹77 cr3.5%5.0%0.1x
2019-081.5x₹77 cr3.5%5.0%0.1x
2019-071.2x₹77 cr3.5%5.0%0.1x
2019-062.0x₹77 cr3.5%5.0%0.1x
2019-05—₹88 cr1.8%—0.2x
2019-04—₹88 cr1.8%—0.2x
2019-03—₹88 cr1.8%—0.2x
2019-02—₹88 cr1.8%—0.2x
2019-01—₹88 cr1.8%—0.2x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback