अApnaFunda
Menu

COMPUCOM SOFTWARE LT (COMPUSOFT)

Technology Services · Information Technology Services · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.29 / 100
Profitability 30Growth 8Balance sheet 48
Compare withTATA CONSULTANCY SERVICESINFOSYSHCL TECHNOLOGIES

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹12.71 latest close · −4.1% over the last 90 sessions

₹12₹13₹14Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹12₹13₹14Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹12.71 month-end · −25.8% over 12 months

₹12₹14₹16Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹12₹14₹16Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹12.71 month-end · −69.3% over 3 years

₹10₹20₹30₹40Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹10₹20₹30₹40Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹12.71 month-end · +27.1% since Jan '19

₹0₹20₹40Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹0₹20₹40Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹11.92 to ₹18.80 · 1-year volatility 37.2%

Was the rally earned?

-26%share price, 1 yearEarnings and multiple

Both mattered.

  • Per-share earnings took off 17 points and the multiple took off 9 points (P/E 38.1x to 34.4x).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −17 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−17 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −9 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−9 ptsP/E changeShare price: −26%−26%Share priceNet profit growth: −17 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−17ProfitP/E change: −9 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−9P/EShare price: −26%−26%Share price
Net profit growth-17 ptsNet profit fell about 18%, which lowers the price.
P/E change-9 ptsThe P/E fell from 38.1x to 34.4x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-69%share price, 3 yearsEarnings and multiple

Both mattered.

  • Per-share earnings took off 31 points and the multiple took off 38 points (P/E 65.8x to 34.4x).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −31 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−31 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −38 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−38 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: −69%−69%Share priceNet profit growth: −31 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−31ProfitP/E change: −38 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−38P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: −69%−69%Share price
Net profit growth-31 ptsNet profit fell about 41%, which lowers the price.
P/E change-38 ptsThe P/E fell from 65.8x to 34.4x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-24%share price, 5 yearsLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 34 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 67.2x to 34.4x), which took 59 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +34 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+34 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −59 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−59 ptsP/E changeShare price: −24%−24%Share priceNet profit growth: +34 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+34ProfitP/E change: −59 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−59P/EShare price: −24%−24%Share price
Net profit growth+34 ptsNet profit rose about 48%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-59 ptsThe P/E fell from 67.2x to 34.4x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-72.5%not yet recovered
1-year volatility37.2%annualised

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2020202120222023202420252026−72.5% 0%−20%−40%−60%2020202220242026−72.5%
Largest drawdowns

-72.5% (2023-11 peak to 2026-10 low, not yet recovered)

-69.2% (2019-01 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2020-06)

-60.7% (2022-01 peak to 2023-03 low, recovered 2023-11)

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

34.4xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history37th percentile
CheapestMedian 40.4xDearest

Usual range 13.7x to 171.4x since 2019-01.

Against Technology Services34.4x vs 21.1x
This company
34.4x
Sector median
21.1x

63% above the Technology Services median.

7.4x85.0x162.7x240.3xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '267.4x85.0x162.7x240.3xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianTechnology Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianTechnology Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianTechnology Services median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Technology Services is valued

Where does it rank among Technology Services peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Technology Services peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE13th▼ 8 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin47th▼ 35 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth12th▲ 7 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth20th▼ 14 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓26th▼ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓4thflat vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓30th▼ 8 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum41st▲ 19 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Technology Services sector page Watch it move against Technology Services in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~10%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 17.9x, the price would imply about 9.8%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Below the ₹1,000 cr market-cap floor used for the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Technology Services The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹12.71
P/E
34.4x
ROCE
1.9%
Market Cap
₹100 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹33 cr
P/S
3.0x
P/B
0.7x
ROE
2.1%
Operating Margin
14.4%
Debt / Equity
0.3x
Promoter Holding
71.6%
12M Momentum
-25.9%

52-week range

₹11.92₹18.80
11% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
37.2%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.13

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
2.3x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
1.36x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

4 of 6checks within range1 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance287%Beyond threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 287.2%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate27%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 27.3%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion1.36xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 1.36x (cash from operations ₹13.5 cr, net profit ₹9.9 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow2 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 2. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-44 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 44 days (325 vs 370). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress32% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 32% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, institutional and promoter holdings were broadly unchanged.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters71.4%71.6%+0.2 pts
FIIs0.0%0.0%0.0 pts
DIIs0.0%0.0%0.0 pts
Public and others28.6%28.4%-0.2 pts

Number of shareholders

32,584shareholders+2% since Sep '23
32k33k34k35k Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 32,048
Dec '23: 34,990
Mar '24: 34,639
Jun '24: 34,626
Sep '24: 35,168
Dec '24: 34,914
Mar '25: 35,130
Jun '25: 34,860
Sep '25: 34,144
Dec '25: 33,421
Mar '26: 33,196
Jun '26: 32,584
 32k33k34k35k Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 32,048
Dec '23: 34,990
Mar '24: 34,639
Jun '24: 34,626
Sep '24: 35,168
Dec '24: 34,914
Mar '25: 35,130
Jun '25: 34,860
Sep '25: 34,144
Dec '25: 33,421
Mar '26: 33,196
Jun '26: 32,584

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+7.6%typical 12-month return vs the marketAbove the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like COMPUCOM SOFTWARE LT today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −21% to +47% vs the market, against −3% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The analogs' median sat above that base rate (gap +11.0%, 80% range +3.6% to +18.9%), but the matches cluster in only 6 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
INDOWIND · Mar 2025: −55.2% vs market
TARSONS · Nov 2024: −48.3% vs market
EXXARO · Jun 2023: −45.1% vs market
REPRO · Jun 2020: −42.9% vs market
ENIL · Aug 2025: −41.5% vs market
ALKALI · Jan 2024: −37.9% vs market
RAJTV · Oct 2020: −37.0% vs market
BHANDARI · Apr 2025: −30.1% vs market
MURUDCERA · Sep 2025: −29.8% vs market
MEDICAMEQ · Oct 2025: −28.1% vs market
AHLEAST · Jan 2020: −26.9% vs market
SANGHIIND · Jan 2020: −23.1% vs market
VIPCLOTHNG · Nov 2023: −22.2% vs market
GUJAPOLLO · May 2023: −16.8% vs market
CHEMCON · Nov 2024: −12.5% vs market
MANALIPETC · Jul 2025: −9.4% vs market
SAKAR · May 2024: −9.3% vs market
BHAGERIA · Aug 2023: −1.7% vs market
KAKATCEM · May 2020: −0.3% vs market
DYNPRO · Sep 2024: −0.2% vs market
DPSCLTD · Mar 2023: +0.1% vs market
DMCC · Oct 2024: +1.7% vs market
JAICORPLTD · Mar 2021: +4.5% vs market
INDIANCARD · Dec 2023: +5.5% vs market
COUNCODOS · Feb 2024: +5.7% vs market
TOKYOPLAST · Jul 2024: +9.5% vs market
BANKA · Sep 2023: +10.6% vs market
UNIDT · Sep 2025: +10.7% vs market
PILITA · Apr 2023: +16.0% vs market
LIBERTSHOE · Apr 2024: +19.4% vs market
BPL · Apr 2023: +19.4% vs market
LOVABLE · Jun 2020: +20.1% vs market
SWELECTES · Jan 2020: +23.7% vs market
ORIENTCER · Apr 2023: +30.2% vs market
THEINVEST · Jun 2023: +30.5% vs market
ARVSMART · Jul 2021: +35.6% vs market
HINDCOMPOS · May 2020: +46.3% vs market
SOFTTECH · Mar 2022: +46.8% vs market
SURANASOL · Oct 2023: +65.6% vs market
EIMCOELECO · May 2022: +70.5% vs market
SRHHYPOLTD · Jan 2020: +72.4% vs market
SURANAT&P · Jun 2023: +76.7% vs market
ANTELOPUS · Oct 2021: +92.1% vs market
ORBTEXP · Sep 2021: +96.6% vs market
SEMAC · Apr 2022: +113.0% vs market
KKCL · Mar 2022: +120.8% vs market
MAANALU · Feb 2020: +126.5% vs market
KABRAEXTRU · Jun 2020: +139.0% vs market
APOLLO · Feb 2022: +144.7% vs market
ANANTRAJ · Jun 2020: +178.0% vs market
Similar setups +7.6%All companies −3.4%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 6 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+7.6%
All companies' median
−3.4%
Beat the market
60% vs 46%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 36 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
INDIANCARD
Producer Manufacturing		 Dec 2023 44x2% +17%−11% +6%
SRHHYPOLTD
Process Industries		 Jan 2020 20x4% −26%−39% +72%
ANANTRAJ
Consumer Durables		 Jun 2020 15x1% −24%−42% +178%
THEINVEST
Finance		 Jun 2023 37x5% −11%−21% +31%
SURANAT&P
Distribution Services		 Jun 2023 24x0% −5%−30% +77%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
SURANASOL
Electronic Technology		 Oct 2023 46x— +7%−18% +66%
DMCC
Process Industries		 Oct 2024 74x8% −1%−22% +2%
GUJAPOLLO
Producer Manufacturing		 May 2023 28x3% −9%−17% −17%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high and P/E. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to COMPUCOM SOFTWARE LT. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What changed?

30 events since Jun '21

  1. OctPriceFell 72% from the Nov 2023 peak to the Oct 2026 low.
  2. SepResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  3. SepPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Technology Services on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  4. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Technology Services on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  5. MarPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Technology Services on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  6. DecResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  7. DecPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Technology Services on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  8. SepPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Technology Services on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
Show 22 earlier events
  1. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Technology Services on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  2. MarValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (191.9x).
  3. DecPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Technology Services on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  4. SepResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  5. SepPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Technology Services on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  6. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  7. JunPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Technology Services on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  8. NovPriceRegained the 2022-01 peak, 8 months after the low.
  9. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  10. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Technology Services on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  11. MarPriceFell 61% from the Jan 2022 peak to the Mar 2023 low.
  12. JulValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (13.5x).
  13. JunPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Technology Services on ROCE (from the bottom quartile).
  14. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 122% to 25% of profit.
  15. DecPriceRegained the 2021-10 peak, 1 month after the low.
  16. NovPriceFell 25% from the Oct 2021 peak to the Nov 2021 low.
  17. OctPriceRegained the 2021-07 peak, 2 months after the low.
  18. AugPriceFell 25% from the Jul 2021 peak to the Aug 2021 low.
  19. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  20. JunPriceRegained the 2020-06 peak, 9 months after the low.
  21. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Technology Services on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  22. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 552% to 122% of profit.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history95 months · 2019-01 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1134.4x₹33 cr2.1%1.9%0.3x
2026-1033.4x₹33 cr2.1%1.9%0.3x
2026-0936.4x₹33 cr2.1%1.9%0.3x
2026-0836.4x₹34 cr2.1%1.9%0.3x
2026-0736.3x₹34 cr2.1%1.9%0.3x
2026-0635.9x₹34 cr2.1%1.9%0.3x
2026-0540.0x₹36 cr1.9%3.3%0.2x
2026-0441.4x₹36 cr1.9%3.3%0.2x
2026-0335.8x₹36 cr1.9%3.3%0.2x
2026-0234.7x₹35 cr2.3%3.3%0.2x
2026-0134.6x₹35 cr2.3%3.3%0.2x
2025-1239.7x₹35 cr2.3%3.3%0.2x
2025-1138.1x₹35 cr2.5%3.3%0.2x
2025-1041.3x₹35 cr2.5%3.3%0.2x
2025-0940.4x₹35 cr2.5%3.3%0.2x
2025-08105.2x₹34 cr1.0%3.3%0.2x
2025-07114.3x₹34 cr1.0%3.3%0.2x
2025-06123.1x₹34 cr1.0%3.3%0.2x
2025-05240.3x₹33 cr0.5%6.0%0.3x
2025-04225.9x₹33 cr0.5%6.0%0.3x
2025-03191.9x₹33 cr0.5%6.0%0.3x
2025-0298.3x₹47 cr1.0%6.0%0.3x
2025-01129.1x₹47 cr1.0%6.0%0.3x
2024-12157.5x₹47 cr1.0%6.0%0.3x
2024-1158.4x₹68 cr2.7%6.0%0.3x
2024-1058.8x₹68 cr2.7%6.0%0.3x
2024-0966.9x₹68 cr2.7%6.0%0.3x
2024-0845.7x₹70 cr3.8%6.0%0.3x
2024-0745.5x₹70 cr3.8%6.0%0.3x
2024-0641.7x₹70 cr3.8%6.0%0.3x
2024-0543.6x₹55 cr3.5%5.0%0.0x
2024-0457.9x₹55 cr3.5%5.0%0.0x
2024-0337.1x₹55 cr3.5%5.0%0.0x
2024-0247.5x₹55 cr3.5%5.0%0.0x
2024-0148.2x₹55 cr3.5%5.0%0.0x
2023-1248.1x₹55 cr3.5%5.0%0.0x
2023-1165.8x₹55 cr3.5%5.0%0.0x
2023-1033.2x₹55 cr3.5%5.0%0.0x
2023-0935.2x₹55 cr3.5%5.0%0.0x
2023-0833.7x₹55 cr3.5%5.0%0.0x
2023-0731.8x₹55 cr3.5%5.0%0.0x
2023-0631.1x₹55 cr3.5%5.0%0.0x
2023-0512.6x₹30 cr8.7%13.1%0.0x
2023-0411.4x₹30 cr8.7%13.1%0.0x
2023-0311.6x₹30 cr8.7%13.1%0.0x
2023-0210.4x₹30 cr8.7%13.1%0.0x
2023-0111.9x₹30 cr8.7%13.1%0.0x
2022-1212.5x₹30 cr8.7%13.1%0.0x
2022-1113.5x₹30 cr8.7%13.1%0.0x
2022-1013.9x₹30 cr8.7%13.1%0.0x
2022-0913.9x₹30 cr8.7%13.1%0.0x
2022-0814.5x₹30 cr8.7%13.1%0.0x
2022-0713.5x₹30 cr8.7%13.1%0.0x
2022-0615.1x₹30 cr8.7%13.1%0.0x
2022-0589.0x₹17 cr1.6%2.4%0.0x
2022-0493.6x₹17 cr1.6%2.4%0.0x
2022-0388.0x₹17 cr1.6%2.4%0.0x
2022-0294.2x₹17 cr1.6%2.4%0.0x
2022-0195.6x₹17 cr1.6%2.4%0.0x
2021-12112.2x₹17 cr1.6%2.4%0.0x
2021-1167.2x₹17 cr1.6%2.4%0.0x
2021-1065.6x₹17 cr1.6%2.4%0.0x
2021-0958.0x₹17 cr1.6%2.4%0.0x
2021-0854.4x₹17 cr1.6%2.4%0.0x
2021-0756.0x₹17 cr1.6%2.4%0.0x
2021-0656.2x₹17 cr1.6%2.4%0.0x
2021-05195.0x₹15 cr0.3%1.2%0.1x
2021-04175.0x₹15 cr0.3%1.2%0.1x
2021-03177.0x₹15 cr0.3%1.2%0.1x
2021-02173.0x₹15 cr0.3%1.2%0.1x
2021-01184.0x₹15 cr0.3%1.2%0.1x
2020-12176.0x₹15 cr0.3%1.2%0.1x
2020-11141.0x₹15 cr0.3%1.2%0.1x
2020-10145.0x₹15 cr0.3%1.2%0.1x
2020-09156.0x₹15 cr0.3%1.2%0.1x
2020-08169.0x₹15 cr0.3%1.2%0.1x
2020-07149.0x₹15 cr0.3%1.2%0.1x
2020-06179.0x₹15 cr0.3%1.2%0.1x
2020-0518.1x₹68 cr2.8%4.1%0.1x
2020-0414.7x₹68 cr2.8%4.1%0.1x
2020-038.0x₹68 cr2.8%4.1%0.1x
2020-0211.1x₹68 cr2.8%4.1%0.1x
2020-0115.8x₹68 cr2.8%4.1%0.1x
2019-1216.8x₹68 cr2.8%4.1%0.1x
2019-1117.7x₹68 cr2.8%4.1%0.1x
2019-1020.0x₹68 cr2.8%4.1%0.1x
2019-0920.1x₹68 cr2.8%4.1%0.1x
2019-0819.2x₹68 cr2.8%4.1%0.1x
2019-0717.6x₹68 cr2.8%4.1%0.1x
2019-0621.0x₹68 cr2.8%4.1%0.1x
2019-0516.2x₹52 cr4.0%6.3%0.0x
2019-0414.2x₹52 cr4.0%6.3%0.0x
2019-0314.6x₹52 cr4.0%6.3%0.0x
2019-0216.2x₹52 cr4.0%6.3%0.0x
2019-0117.2x₹52 cr4.0%6.3%0.0x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback