अApnaFunda

ANANT RAJ LIMITED (ANANTRAJ)

Consumer Durables · Homebuilding · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.82 / 100
Profitability 67Growth 90Balance sheet 88
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.31 / 100
Price 6Earnings 69FII/DII 19

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹449.55 latest close · −19.0% over the last 90 sessions

₹500₹600Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹500₹600Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹449.55 month-end · −22.0% over 12 months

₹400₹500₹600Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹400₹500₹600Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹449.55 month-end · +67.5% over 3 years

₹400₹600₹800Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹400₹600₹800Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹449.55 month-end · +2223.3% since Jan '19

₹0₹250₹500₹750Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹0₹250₹500₹750Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹403.00 to ₹657.25 · 1-year volatility 44.2%

Was the rally earned?

-22%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 17 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 42.9x to 27.6x), which took 39 points back.
  • The share count rose 5%.
Net profit growth: +21 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+21 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −39 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−39 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −4 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−4 ptsShare count changeShare price: −22%−22%Share priceNet profit growth: +21 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+21ProfitP/E change: −39 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−39P/EShare count change: −4 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−4SharesShare price: −22%−22%Share price
Net profit growth+21 ptsNet profit rose about 27%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-39 ptsThe P/E fell from 42.9x to 27.6x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-4 ptsShare count rose 5%, which lowers the price.
+68%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 162 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 56.7x to 27.6x), which took 94 points back.
  • The share count rose 14%.
Net profit growth: +179 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+179 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −94 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−94 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −17 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−17 ptsShare count changeShare price: +68%+68%Share priceNet profit growth: +179 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+179ProfitP/E change: −94 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−94P/EShare count change: −17 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−17SharesShare price: +68%+68%Share price
Net profit growth+179 ptsNet profit rose about 293%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-94 ptsThe P/E fell from 56.7x to 27.6x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-17 ptsShare count rose 14%, which lowers the price.
+590%share price, 5 yearsLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 1164 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 181.0x to 27.6x), which took 574 points back.
  • The share count rose 44%.
Net profit growth: +1275 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+1275 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −574 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−574 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −111 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−111 ptsShare count changeShare price: +590%+590%Share priceNet profit growth: +1275 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+1275ProfitP/E change: −574 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−574P/EShare count change: −111 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−111SharesShare price: +590%+590%Share price
Net profit growth+1275 ptsNet profit rose about 6406%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-574 ptsThe P/E fell from 181.0x to 27.6x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-111 ptsShare count rose 44%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with NCC

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-63.2%recovered 2020-11
1-year volatility44.2%annualised
Beta vs sector index1.213-year daily, correlation 0.42
Volume spikes2last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2020202120222023202420252026−62.9% 0%−20%−40%−60%2020202220242026−62.9%
Largest drawdowns

-63.2% (2020-01 peak to 2020-05 low, recovered 2020-11)

-56.6% (2025-01 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

-48.1% (2022-01 peak to 2022-06 low, recovered 2022-08)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-09-03: 14.1x the 50-day median, price +6.7% that day

2026-07-08: 5.1x the 50-day median, price +1.2% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

27.6xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history27th percentile
CheapestMedian 45.5xDearest

Usual range 11.4x to 168.4x since 2019-01.

Against Consumer Durables27.6x vs 25.5x
This company
27.6x
Sector median
25.5x

9% above the Consumer Durables median.

6.0x79.5x153.0x226.5xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '266.0x79.5x153.0x226.5xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Durables median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Durables median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Durables median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Consumer Durables is valued

Where does it rank among Consumer Durables peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Consumer Durables peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE39th▲ 7 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin95thflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth51st▼ 36 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth52nd▼ 38 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓70th▼ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓75thflat vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓46th▲ 12 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum34th▼ 8 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Consumer Durables sector page Watch it move against Consumer Durables in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~27%annual earnings growth implied by the priceIn line with delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 55.0x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 27.2%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered28.6%/yrEPS, last 10 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap−1.3 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank559thmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

-29%11%50% Jan 2019Nov 2026 -29%11%50% Jan 2019Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x28.9%30.1%31.2%
15x26.1%27.2%28.4%
20x22.6%23.7%24.8%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 27.2%/yr

Looking back

  • Jan 2020Price implied 3%/yr; EPS has since grown 42%/yr (7.0 yrs)
  • Jan 2021Price implied 14%/yr; EPS has since grown 64%/yr (6.0 yrs)
  • Jan 2022Price implied 25%/yr; EPS has since grown 120%/yr (5.0 yrs)

Past comparisons cover only companies listed today (survivorship bias) and say nothing about future outcomes.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Consumer Durables The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹449.55
P/E
27.6x
ROCE
12.0%
Market Cap
₹16189 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹2551 cr
P/S
6.3x
P/B
2.8x
ROE
10.1%
Operating Margin
29.0%
Debt / Equity
0.1x
Promoter Holding
57.4%
12M Momentum
-22.0%

52-week range

₹403.00₹657.25
18% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
44.2%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.17

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
64.4x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
-0.17x
low
Share count, 1Y
+4.3%

Are profits backed by cash?

4 of 6checks within range1 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance11%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 11.1%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate17%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 17.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion-0.17xBeyond threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: -0.17x (cash from operations ₹-208 cr, net profit ₹1,256 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow2 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 2. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+4 daysWithin range

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 4 days (26 vs 22). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress2% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 2% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, promoters trimmed 5.9 pts; DIIs added 2.9 pts; FIIs added 1.2 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 50,956 to 3.8 lakh (+636%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters63.3%57.4%-5.9 pts
FIIs9.5%10.7%+1.2 pts
DIIs1.7%4.6%+2.9 pts
Public and others25.5%27.2%+1.7 pts

Number of shareholders

3.8 lakhshareholders+636% since Sep '23
51k1.6L2.7L3.8L Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 50,956
Dec '23: 57,858
Mar '24: 63,832
Jun '24: 74,161
Sep '24: 1.2 lakh
Dec '24: 1.6 lakh
Mar '25: 2.1 lakh
Jun '25: 2.6 lakh
Sep '25: 2.9 lakh
Dec '25: 3.4 lakh
Mar '26: 3.7 lakh
Jun '26: 3.8 lakh
51k1.6L2.7L3.8L Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 50,956
Dec '23: 57,858
Mar '24: 63,832
Jun '24: 74,161
Sep '24: 1.2 lakh
Dec '24: 1.6 lakh
Mar '25: 2.1 lakh
Jun '25: 2.6 lakh
Sep '25: 2.9 lakh
Dec '25: 3.4 lakh
Mar '26: 3.7 lakh
Jun '26: 3.8 lakh

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−2.1%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like ANANT RAJ LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −23% to +28% vs the market, against −5% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+3.2%, 80% range −4.0% to +10.5%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
AURIONPRO · Oct 2025: −52.7% vs market
SEAMECLTD · Sep 2022: −49.9% vs market
SYNGENE · Sep 2025: −41.7% vs market
SYMPHONY · Dec 2024: −37.9% vs market
NATCOPHARM · Feb 2022: −37.5% vs market
SANOFI · Feb 2025: −33.0% vs market
MIDHANI · Dec 2020: −33.0% vs market
ATUL · Oct 2022: −32.1% vs market
GPPL · Jun 2021: −31.6% vs market
NINSYS · Jan 2025: −27.5% vs market
PARKHOTELS · Jul 2025: −25.1% vs market
CONCOR · Jan 2025: −24.1% vs market
POLYMED · Oct 2025: −23.4% vs market
RAILTEL · Aug 2025: −21.9% vs market
ADVENZYMES · Aug 2025: −21.1% vs market
ROUTE · Apr 2023: −18.8% vs market
RESPONIND · Jul 2024: −18.7% vs market
BALKRISIND · Aug 2023: −17.3% vs market
EIHOTEL · Feb 2025: −16.8% vs market
TECHNOE · Jun 2021: −14.2% vs market
TTKPRESTIG · Apr 2022: −12.6% vs market
LATENTVIEW · Aug 2024: −6.8% vs market
NOCIL · Apr 2022: −4.9% vs market
ENDURANCE · Sep 2022: −3.7% vs market
OBEROIRLTY · Dec 2021: −2.9% vs market
STARCEMENT · Jun 2024: −1.3% vs market
SAREGAMA · Aug 2024: +2.9% vs market
FINPIPE · Feb 2021: +3.9% vs market
MAYURUNIQ · Aug 2022: +6.0% vs market
TEGA · Jun 2025: +8.7% vs market
GRAPHITE · Nov 2022: +11.7% vs market
ADFFOODS · Oct 2025: +13.3% vs market
ICRA · Jun 2021: +13.4% vs market
ZEEL · Mar 2021: +14.9% vs market
INTELLECT · Jun 2023: +16.0% vs market
GREAVESCOT · Mar 2021: +21.1% vs market
AUROPHARMA · Feb 2020: +24.3% vs market
RADICO · Dec 2022: +29.0% vs market
LAOPALA · Jun 2022: +33.8% vs market
JUSTDIAL · May 2020: +38.1% vs market
CARBORUNIV · Apr 2022: +42.4% vs market
MAXHEALTH · May 2024: +42.4% vs market
PERSISTENT · Oct 2022: +51.9% vs market
HSCL · Sep 2025: +53.0% vs market
KIOCL · May 2023: +54.6% vs market
EMAMILTD · Jun 2020: +55.3% vs market
ANUP · Jul 2024: +57.0% vs market
RATEGAIN · Aug 2025: +70.1% vs market
SONACOMS · Aug 2025: +70.4% vs market
HINDCOPPER · Feb 2025: +137.1% vs market
Similar setups −2.1%All companies −5.3%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 1 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−2.1%
All companies' median
−5.3%
Beat the market
48% vs 44%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 32 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
HINDCOPPER
Non-Energy Minerals
Feb 2025 49x18% −25%−49% +137%
CONCOR
Transportation
Jan 2025 37x14% −12%−34% −24%
SANOFI
Health Technology
Feb 2025 25x— −35%−45% −33%
ADVENZYMES
Consumer Non-Durables
Aug 2025 30x13% −22%−37% −21%
KIOCL
Non-Energy Minerals
May 2023 37x19% −3%−16% +55%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
POLYMED
Health Technology
Oct 2025 57x18% −30%−36% −23%
RATEGAIN
Technology Services
Aug 2025 29x17% −31%−39% +70%
INTELLECT
Technology Services
Jun 2023 32x19% −1%−10% +16%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high and P/E. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to ANANT RAJ LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Technology Services
66%similar
EPS growthvolatility
Process Industries
66%similar
P/Erevenue growth
Health Technology
65%similar
ROCEmarket cap
Industrial Services
65%similar
promoter holdingP/E
INOX WINDINOXWIND
Producer Manufacturing
63%similar
ROCErevenue growth
Consumer Durables
48%similar
promoter holdingrevenue growth
KDDLKDDL
Consumer Durables
48%similar
ROCEvolatility
PC JEWELLERPCJEWELLER
Consumer Durables
45%similar
operating marginmarket cap

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Jun '22

  1. SepPriceVolume reached 14.1x its 50-day median on 2026-09-03; price +6.7% that day.
  2. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 6% to 0% of profit.
  3. AprPriceVolume reached 7.0x its 50-day median on 2026-04-27; price +8.3% that day.
  4. MarPromoterPromoter holding fell 2.7 pts to 57.4% (largest drop since 2024-06).
  5. MarPriceFell 57% from the Jan 2025 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  6. MarPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Consumer Durables on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  7. FebPriceVolume reached 18.0x its 50-day median on 2026-02-01; price +5.3% that day.
  8. OctPriceVolume reached 9.4x its 50-day median on 2025-10-03; price +3.0% that day.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. SepPriceVolume reached 30.9x its 50-day median on 2025-09-15; price +10.5% that day.
  2. JanDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.17x.
  3. JanPriceVolume reached 10.1x its 50-day median on 2025-01-28; price -20.0% that day.
  4. DecPriceVolume reached 6.6x its 50-day median on 2024-12-17; price +2.4% that day.
  5. SepPriceVolume reached 9.8x its 50-day median on 2024-09-20; price +6.4% that day.
  6. JunPromoterPromoter holding fell 3.3 pts to 60.0%.
  7. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹1,483 cr.
  8. JunInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 4.6 pts over 1 quarter to 15.1%.
  9. JunPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Consumer Durables on ROCE (from the bottom quartile).
  10. JunDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.17x.
  11. MayPriceVolume reached 5.2x its 50-day median on 2024-05-13; price +1.1% that day.
  12. FebPriceVolume reached 5.8x its 50-day median on 2024-02-08; price +6.2% that day.
  13. OctPriceVolume reached 5.1x its 50-day median on 2023-10-05; price +7.7% that day.
  14. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹957 cr.
  15. JunSharesShare count is up 10.2% over 12 months.
  16. JunPriceVolume reached 6.7x its 50-day median on 2023-06-15; price -2.7% that day.
  17. DecPriceVolume reached 6.3x its 50-day median on 2022-12-30; price +6.5% that day.
  18. AugPriceRegained the 2022-01 peak, 2 months after the low.
  19. AugPriceVolume reached 12.8x its 50-day median on 2022-08-25; price +8.4% that day.
  20. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  21. JunPriceFell 48% from the Jan 2022 peak to the Jun 2022 low.
  22. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Consumer Durables on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history60 months · 2021-12 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1127.6x₹2551 cr10.1%12.0%0.1x
2026-1027.5x₹2551 cr10.0%12.0%0.1x
2026-0936.8x₹2551 cr10.0%12.0%0.1x
2026-0838.3x₹2512 cr9.6%12.0%0.1x
2026-0739.6x₹2512 cr9.6%12.0%0.1x
2026-0633.1x₹2512 cr9.6%12.0%0.1x
2026-0533.9x₹2406 cr12.7%11.0%0.1x
2026-0432.1x₹2406 cr12.7%11.0%0.1x
2026-0326.8x₹2406 cr12.7%11.0%0.1x
2026-0236.8x₹2299 cr11.8%11.0%0.1x
2026-0135.1x₹2299 cr11.8%11.0%0.1x
2025-1238.1x₹2299 cr11.8%11.0%0.1x
2025-1142.9x₹2181 cr11.1%11.0%0.1x
2025-1047.9x₹2181 cr11.1%11.0%0.1x
2025-0951.9x₹2181 cr11.1%11.0%0.1x
2025-0841.5x₹2061 cr10.2%11.0%0.1x
2025-0745.4x₹2061 cr10.2%11.0%0.1x
2025-0645.5x₹2061 cr10.2%11.0%0.1x
2025-0549.8x₹1963 cr10.7%9.0%0.2x
2025-0440.1x₹1963 cr10.7%9.0%0.2x
2025-0343.6x₹1963 cr10.7%9.0%0.2x
2025-0245.2x₹1820 cr9.6%9.0%0.2x
2025-0158.3x₹1820 cr9.6%9.0%0.2x
2024-1283.4x₹1820 cr9.6%9.0%0.2x
2024-1174.7x₹1639 cr8.4%9.0%0.2x
2024-1082.1x₹1639 cr8.4%9.0%0.2x
2024-0978.1x₹1639 cr8.4%9.0%0.2x
2024-0878.1x₹1483 cr7.4%9.0%0.2x
2024-0772.8x₹1483 cr7.4%9.0%0.2x
2024-0656.3x₹1483 cr7.4%9.0%0.2x
2024-0581.5x₹957 cr5.3%6.0%0.4x
2024-0476.7x₹957 cr5.3%6.0%0.4x
2024-0365.8x₹957 cr5.3%6.0%0.4x
2024-0274.0x₹957 cr5.3%6.0%0.4x
2024-0167.3x₹957 cr5.3%6.0%0.4x
2023-1262.4x₹957 cr5.3%6.0%0.4x
2023-1156.7x₹957 cr5.3%6.0%0.4x
2023-1051.4x₹957 cr5.3%6.0%0.4x
2023-0946.4x₹957 cr5.3%6.0%0.4x
2023-0846.4x₹957 cr5.3%6.0%0.4x
2023-0742.6x₹957 cr5.3%6.0%0.4x
2023-0637.5x₹957 cr5.3%6.0%0.4x
2023-0581.7x₹462 cr2.0%2.0%0.5x
2023-0476.1x₹462 cr2.0%2.0%0.5x
2023-0365.7x₹462 cr2.0%2.0%0.5x
2023-0256.3x₹462 cr2.0%2.0%0.5x
2023-0159.9x₹462 cr2.0%2.0%0.5x
2022-1260.3x₹462 cr2.0%2.0%0.5x
2022-1154.5x₹462 cr2.0%2.0%0.5x
2022-1061.2x₹462 cr2.0%2.0%0.5x
2022-0952.2x₹462 cr2.0%2.0%0.5x
2022-0846.9x₹462 cr2.0%2.0%0.5x
2022-0739.7x₹462 cr2.0%2.0%0.5x
2022-0627.4x₹462 cr2.0%2.0%0.5x
2022-05149.0x₹250 cr0.4%1.0%0.7x
2022-04175.1x₹250 cr0.4%1.0%0.7x
2022-03183.1x₹250 cr0.4%1.0%0.7x
2022-02203.3x₹250 cr0.4%1.0%0.7x
2022-01226.5x₹250 cr0.4%1.0%0.7x
2021-12214.9x₹250 cr0.4%1.0%0.7x

Older months are in the live observatory.

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback