अApnaFunda

KIOCL LIMITED (KIOCL)

Non-Energy Minerals · Steel · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.34 / 100
Profitability 8Growth 7Balance sheet 88
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.59 / 100
Price 27Earnings 97FII/DII 55

Passes these screensBusiness ahead of price

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹336.75 latest close · −13.1% over the last 90 sessions

₹325₹350₹375₹400Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹325₹350₹375₹400Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹336.75 month-end · −5.2% over 12 months

₹350₹400Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹350₹400Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹336.75 month-end · +10.3% over 3 years

₹300₹400₹500Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹300₹400₹500Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹336.75 month-end · +132.0% since Jan '19

₹200₹400Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹200₹400Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹290.65 to ₹442.00 · 1-year volatility 44.7%

Was the rally earned?

+47%share price, 5 yearsMultiple-driven

Partly.

  • Most of the rise came from investors paying a higher multiple (P/E 46.2x to 518.1x); per-share earnings took off 248 points.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −248 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−248 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +295 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+295 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: +47%+47%Share priceNet profit growth: −248 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−248ProfitP/E change: +295 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+295P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: +47%+47%Share price
Net profit growth-248 ptsNet profit fell about 87%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+295 ptsThe P/E rose from 46.2x to 518.1x, which lifts the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 1 year and 3 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with JSW STEEL

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-71.5%recovered 2021-03
1-year volatility44.7%annualised
Beta vs sector index1.353-year daily, correlation 0.48
Volume spikes2last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2020202120222023202420252026−66.8% 0%−20%−40%−60%2020202220242026−66.8%
Largest drawdowns

-71.5% (2019-01 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2021-03)

-60.2% (2024-02 peak to 2025-04 low, recovered 2025-10)

-52.7% (2025-10 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-08-03: 27.6x the 50-day median, price +8.0% that day

2026-07-31: 13.5x the 50-day median, price +2.6% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

518.1xP/E todayNear its historic high
Against its own history95th percentile
CheapestMedian 63.2xDearest

Usual range 37.1x to 395.6x since 2019-01.

Against Non-Energy Minerals518.1x vs 21.8x
This company
518.1x
Sector median
21.8x

2278% above the Non-Energy Minerals median.

8.6x469.2x929.9x1390.5xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '268.6x469.2x929.9x1390.5xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Non-Energy Minerals is valued

Where does it rank among Non-Energy Minerals peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Non-Energy Minerals peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE13th▲ 8 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin3rdflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth84th▲ 83 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth9th▼ 25 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓75th▼ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓100th▲ 6 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓2nd
  • 12M momentum57thflat vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Non-Energy Minerals sector page Watch it move against Non-Energy Minerals in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~60%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 518.1x, the price would imply about 59.6%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Non-Energy Minerals The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹336.75
P/E
518.1x
ROCE
1.0%
Market Cap
₹20478 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹681 cr
P/S
30.1x
P/B
11.8x
ROE
2.3%
Operating Margin
-17.0%
Debt / Equity
0.1x
Promoter Holding
99.0%
12M Momentum
-5.2%

52-week range

₹290.65₹442.00
30% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
44.7%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.38

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
3.0x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
-1.02x
low
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

2 of 6checks within range2 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance288%Beyond threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 288.2%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate-1%Beyond threshold

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: -0.5%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Free cash flow3 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 3. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+7 daysWithin range

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 7 days (21 vs 14). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress18% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 18% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days+2509 days / 2 yrsNear threshold

Days payable changed by +2509 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, institutional and promoter holdings were broadly unchanged.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 18,859 to 39,787 (+111%) between Jun 2023 and Mar 2026.

Holdings, Mar '26

How each group changed

GroupJun '23Mar '26Change
Promoters99.0%99.0%0.0 pts
FIIs0.0%0.1%+0.1 pts
DIIs0.1%0.0%-0.1 pts
Public and others0.8%0.9%0.0 pts

Number of shareholders

39,787shareholders+111% since Jun '23
19k26k33k40k Jun '23Mar '24Sep '24Mar '25Sep '25Mar '26
Jun '23: 18,859
Dec '23: 27,539
Mar '24: 29,345
Jun '24: 30,882
Sep '24: 31,684
Dec '24: 35,777
Mar '25: 37,419
Jun '25: 37,381
Sep '25: 38,115
Dec '25: 40,444
Mar '26: 39,787
19k26k33k40k Jun '23Sep '24Sep '25Mar '26
Jun '23: 18,859
Dec '23: 27,539
Mar '24: 29,345
Jun '24: 30,882
Sep '24: 31,684
Dec '24: 35,777
Mar '25: 37,419
Jun '25: 37,381
Sep '25: 38,115
Dec '25: 40,444
Mar '26: 39,787

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−9.6%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like KIOCL LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −22% to +10% vs the market, against −5% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−5.1%, 80% range −13.1% to +1.6%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
VAKRANGEE · Apr 2024: −63.4% vs market
DHANI · Dec 2020: −61.7% vs market
TEJASNET · Aug 2024: −52.0% vs market
EIHOTEL · Feb 2020: −46.1% vs market
LEMONTREE · Feb 2020: −41.8% vs market
EIFFL · Mar 2020: −41.1% vs market
ABB · Jun 2024: −29.9% vs market
URJA · May 2025: −28.9% vs market
SUNTECK · Jan 2022: −27.9% vs market
HINDOILEXP · May 2023: −26.5% vs market
SINCLAIR · Aug 2025: −22.6% vs market
MMTC · Oct 2025: −22.4% vs market
ZYDUSWELL · Jun 2021: −22.1% vs market
SOBHA · Sep 2025: −21.2% vs market
MAHLIFE · Jul 2023: −20.7% vs market
BATAINDIA · Aug 2022: −20.6% vs market
TEXINFRA · Nov 2024: −20.4% vs market
NAZARA · Sep 2023: −18.8% vs market
MAANALU · Jun 2024: −16.6% vs market
ASHIANA · Oct 2021: −15.5% vs market
INDIGO · Mar 2020: −14.9% vs market
PROZONER · May 2020: −13.7% vs market
TATAINVEST · Mar 2025: −12.0% vs market
DELTACORP · Jul 2022: −11.9% vs market
SAPPHIRE · Nov 2022: −9.9% vs market
GODREJPROP · Jan 2024: −9.4% vs market
BHAGCHEM · Jul 2025: −8.5% vs market
FORTIS · May 2021: −3.2% vs market
MAHSCOOTER · Mar 2020: −3.2% vs market
OLECTRA · Mar 2022: −2.6% vs market
INOXGREEN · Jul 2025: −2.3% vs market
DLF · Nov 2021: −1.7% vs market
ITDC · Dec 2022: +0.1% vs market
TRENT · May 2020: +4.3% vs market
NAUKRI · Jul 2024: +5.2% vs market
FMGOETZE · May 2022: +7.9% vs market
NYKAA · Apr 2024: +8.2% vs market
PARAS · Aug 2024: +10.6% vs market
GENUSPOWER · Jan 2024: +13.7% vs market
ETERNAL · Mar 2025: +16.7% vs market
GENESYS · Mar 2024: +17.5% vs market
ITI · Jan 2020: +19.0% vs market
RATEGAIN · May 2023: +28.9% vs market
POLICYBZR · Jul 2024: +32.4% vs market
PTCIL · Sep 2025: +42.1% vs market
PHOENIXLTD · Mar 2023: +44.0% vs market
MCX · Mar 2024: +53.0% vs market
BHEL · Sep 2025: +73.3% vs market
CARTRADE · Jul 2024: +167.6% vs market
ZENTEC · Oct 2022: +222.9% vs market
Similar setups −9.6%All companies −4.5%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 2 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−9.6%
All companies' median
−4.5%
Beat the market
36% vs 45%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 34 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
POLICYBZR
Technology Services
Jul 2024 982x2% +99%−4% +32%
RATEGAIN
Technology Services
May 2023 484x3% +30%−9% +29%
ZENTEC
Technology Services
Oct 2022 811x2% −3%−18% +223%
INOXGREEN
Utilities
Jul 2025 290x3% −7%−25% −2%
MAHLIFE
Finance
Jul 2023 100x2% +29%−4% −21%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
CARTRADE
Technology Services
Jul 2024 285x4% +73%−8% +168%
ITDC
Consumer Services
Dec 2022 724x3% +4%−14% 0%
SUNTECK
Finance
Jan 2022 178x4% +59%−11% −28%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: drawdown from 12-month high, 12-month momentum and interest cover. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to KIOCL LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Consumer Services
47%similar
P/EROCE
Health Technology
45%similar
operating marginrevenue growth
Energy Minerals
44%similar
revenue growthROCE
Transportation
34%similar
revenue growthvolatility
Consumer Services
30%similar
P/Eoperating margin
Non-Energy Minerals
31%similar
ROCEdebt/equity
Non-Energy Minerals
18%similar
volatilitypromoter holding
NELCASTNELCAST
Non-Energy Minerals
16%similar
operating marginpromoter holding

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Jan '23

  1. SepPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  2. AugPriceVolume reached 27.6x its 50-day median on 2026-08-03; price +8.0% that day.
  3. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned positive.
  4. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (1390.5x).
  5. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  6. AprPriceVolume reached 21.3x its 50-day median on 2026-04-16; price +7.8% that day.
  7. MarPriceFell 53% from the Oct 2025 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  8. MarPriceVolume reached 78.2x its 50-day median on 2026-03-20; price +14.4% that day.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. DecPriceVolume reached 22.6x its 50-day median on 2025-12-30; price +5.3% that day.
  2. OctPriceRegained the 2024-02 peak, 6 months after the low.
  3. AugPriceVolume reached 244.0x its 50-day median on 2025-08-01; price +13.9% that day.
  4. AprPriceFell 60% from the Feb 2024 peak to the Apr 2025 low.
  5. AprPriceVolume reached 46.1x its 50-day median on 2025-04-24; price +12.6% that day.
  6. JanPriceVolume reached 54.2x its 50-day median on 2025-01-06; price +7.9% that day.
  7. DecPriceVolume reached 52.0x its 50-day median on 2024-12-31; price +16.6% that day.
  8. JulPriceVolume reached 5.3x its 50-day median on 2024-07-08; price +3.5% that day.
  9. JunPriceVolume reached 12.4x its 50-day median on 2024-06-13; price +11.3% that day.
  10. FebPriceRegained the 2023-10 peak, 3 months after the low.
  11. FebPriceVolume reached 21.0x its 50-day median on 2024-02-07; price +14.3% that day.
  12. NovPriceFell 36% from the Oct 2023 peak to the Nov 2023 low.
  13. OctPriceVolume reached 12.6x its 50-day median on 2023-10-18; price -8.5% that day.
  14. SepPriceRegained the 2021-10 peak, 6 months after the low.
  15. AugPriceVolume reached 100.7x its 50-day median on 2023-08-01; price +15.1% that day.
  16. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned negative.
  17. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  18. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 34% to 0% of profit.
  19. AprPriceVolume reached 45.0x its 50-day median on 2023-04-17; price +14.3% that day.
  20. MarPriceFell 45% from the Oct 2021 peak to the Mar 2023 low.
  21. FebValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (36.3x).
  22. JanPriceVolume reached 7.8x its 50-day median on 2023-01-03; price +1.6% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history95 months · 2019-01 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-11518.1x₹681 cr2.3%1.0%0.1x
2026-10498.8x₹681 cr2.2%1.0%0.1x
2026-09511.2x₹681 cr2.2%1.0%0.1x
2026-081361.4x₹614 cr0.9%1.0%0.1x
2026-071305.5x₹614 cr0.9%1.0%0.1x
2026-061390.5x₹614 cr0.9%1.0%0.1x
2026-05—₹640 cr-4.3%-9.0%0.1x
2026-04—₹640 cr-4.3%-9.0%0.1x
2026-03—₹640 cr-4.3%-9.0%0.1x
2026-02—₹661 cr-8.2%-9.0%0.1x
2026-01—₹661 cr-8.2%-9.0%0.1x
2025-12—₹661 cr-8.2%-9.0%0.1x
2025-11—₹534 cr-11.2%-9.0%0.1x
2025-10—₹534 cr-11.2%-9.0%0.1x
2025-09—₹534 cr-11.2%-9.0%0.1x
2025-08—₹590 cr-12.0%-9.0%0.1x
2025-07—₹590 cr-12.0%-9.0%0.1x
2025-06—₹590 cr-12.0%-9.0%0.1x
2025-05—₹716 cr-11.0%-2.0%0.1x
2025-04—₹716 cr-11.0%-2.0%0.1x
2025-03—₹716 cr-11.0%-2.0%0.1x
2025-02—₹1084 cr-6.5%-2.0%0.1x
2025-01—₹1084 cr-6.5%-2.0%0.1x
2024-12—₹1084 cr-6.5%-2.0%0.1x
2024-11—₹1499 cr-4.0%-2.0%0.1x
2024-10—₹1499 cr-4.0%-2.0%0.1x
2024-09—₹1499 cr-4.0%-2.0%0.1x
2024-08—₹1853 cr-4.3%-2.0%0.1x
2024-07—₹1853 cr-4.3%-2.0%0.1x
2024-06—₹1853 cr-4.3%-2.0%0.1x
2024-05—₹1543 cr-4.9%-5.0%0.3x
2024-04—₹1543 cr-4.9%-5.0%0.3x
2024-03—₹1543 cr-4.9%-5.0%0.3x
2024-02—₹1543 cr-4.9%-5.0%0.3x
2024-01—₹1543 cr-4.9%-5.0%0.3x
2023-12—₹1543 cr-4.9%-5.0%0.3x
2023-11—₹1543 cr-4.9%-5.0%0.3x
2023-10—₹1543 cr-4.9%-5.0%0.3x
2023-09—₹1543 cr-4.9%-5.0%0.3x
2023-08—₹1543 cr-4.9%-5.0%0.3x
2023-07—₹1543 cr-4.9%-5.0%0.3x
2023-06—₹1543 cr-4.9%-5.0%0.3x
2023-0537.2x₹3006 cr14.6%19.0%0.1x
2023-0437.8x₹3006 cr14.6%19.0%0.1x
2023-0332.7x₹3006 cr14.6%19.0%0.1x
2023-0236.3x₹3006 cr14.6%19.0%0.1x
2023-0140.9x₹3006 cr14.6%19.0%0.1x
2022-1244.2x₹3006 cr14.6%19.0%0.1x
2022-1142.6x₹3006 cr14.6%19.0%0.1x
2022-1034.3x₹3006 cr14.6%19.0%0.1x
2022-0936.6x₹3006 cr14.6%19.0%0.1x
2022-0840.2x₹3006 cr14.6%19.0%0.1x
2022-0738.9x₹3006 cr14.6%19.0%0.1x
2022-0636.5x₹3006 cr14.6%19.0%0.1x
2022-0539.9x₹2376 cr15.2%21.0%0.1x
2022-0445.0x₹2376 cr15.2%21.0%0.1x
2022-0342.1x₹2376 cr15.2%21.0%0.1x
2022-0244.0x₹2376 cr15.2%21.0%0.1x
2022-0149.9x₹2376 cr15.2%21.0%0.1x
2021-1252.0x₹2376 cr15.2%21.0%0.1x
2021-1146.2x₹2376 cr15.2%21.0%0.1x
2021-1052.8x₹2376 cr15.2%21.0%0.1x
2021-0949.2x₹2376 cr15.2%21.0%0.1x
2021-0850.4x₹2376 cr15.2%21.0%0.1x
2021-0760.0x₹2376 cr15.2%21.0%0.1x
2021-0656.4x₹2376 cr15.2%21.0%0.1x
2021-05369.8x₹1938 cr2.2%3.0%0.1x
2021-04234.1x₹1938 cr2.2%3.0%0.1x
2021-03204.9x₹1938 cr2.2%3.0%0.1x
2021-02216.8x₹1938 cr2.2%3.0%0.1x
2021-01182.1x₹1938 cr2.2%3.0%0.1x
2020-12197.9x₹1938 cr2.2%3.0%0.1x
2020-11165.3x₹1938 cr2.2%3.0%0.1x
2020-10160.1x₹1938 cr2.2%3.0%0.1x
2020-09177.8x₹1938 cr2.2%3.0%0.1x
2020-08191.9x₹1938 cr2.2%3.0%0.1x
2020-07180.9x₹1938 cr2.2%3.0%0.1x
2020-06152.2x₹1938 cr2.2%3.0%0.1x
2020-0539.1x₹1888 cr5.6%9.0%0.0x
2020-0443.8x₹1888 cr5.6%9.0%0.0x
2020-0332.9x₹1888 cr5.6%9.0%0.0x
2020-0252.4x₹1888 cr5.6%9.0%0.0x
2020-0164.9x₹1888 cr5.6%9.0%0.0x
2019-1263.2x₹1888 cr5.6%9.0%0.0x
2019-1165.0x₹1888 cr5.6%9.0%0.0x
2019-1066.7x₹1888 cr5.6%9.0%0.0x
2019-0967.9x₹1888 cr5.6%9.0%0.0x
2019-0868.2x₹1888 cr5.6%9.0%0.0x
2019-0762.8x₹1888 cr5.6%9.0%0.0x
2019-0672.5x₹1888 cr5.6%9.0%0.0x
2019-05108.4x₹1602 cr3.8%3.0%0.0x
2019-04101.3x₹1602 cr3.8%3.0%0.0x
2019-03111.0x₹1602 cr3.8%3.0%0.0x
2019-0299.4x₹1602 cr3.8%3.0%0.0x
2019-01113.4x₹1602 cr3.8%3.0%0.0x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback