अApnaFunda

RATEGAIN TRAVEL TECHNOLOGIES (RATEGAIN)

Technology Services · Packaged Software · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.62 / 100
Profitability 61Growth 89Balance sheet 35
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.24 / 100
Price 7Earnings 53FII/DII 12

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹701.3 latest close · −25.5% over the last 90 sessions

₹700₹800₹900₹1,000Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹700₹800₹900₹1,000Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹701.3 month-end · −1.3% over 12 months

₹400₹600₹800Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹400₹600₹800Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹701.3 month-end · +6.3% over 3 years

₹400₹600₹800Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹400₹600₹800Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹701.3 month-end · +88.3% since Dec '21

₹250₹500₹750₹1,000Dec '21Dec '22Dec '23Nov '24Nov '25Nov '26 ₹250₹500₹750₹1,000Dec '21Jun '24Nov '26

52-week range ₹437.00 to ₹1050.00 · 1-year volatility 43.7%

Was the rally earned?

-1%share price, 1 yearRoughly flat
  • The share price was roughly flat over 1 year (-1%).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +14 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+14 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −15 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−15 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: −1%−1%Share priceNet profit growth: +14 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+14ProfitP/E change: −15 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−15P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: −1%−1%Share price
Net profit growth+14 ptsNet profit rose about 15%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-15 ptsThe P/E fell from 39.8x to 34.2x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+6%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 121 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 104.6x to 34.2x), which took 115 points back.
  • The share count rose 10%.
Net profit growth: +131 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+131 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −115 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−115 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −10 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−10 ptsShare count changeShare price: +6%+6%Share priceNet profit growth: +131 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+131ProfitP/E change: −115 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−115P/EShare count change: −10 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−10SharesShare price: +6%+6%Share price
Net profit growth+131 ptsNet profit rose about 257%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-115 ptsThe P/E fell from 104.6x to 34.2x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-10 ptsShare count rose 10%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with ONE 97 COMMUNICATIONS PAYTM

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-53.7%recovered 2023-08
1-year volatility43.7%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.663-year daily, correlation 0.31
Volume spikes2last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%2023202420252026−52.3% 0%−20%−40%20242026−52.3%
Largest drawdowns

-53.7% (2022-01 peak to 2022-06 low, recovered 2023-08)

-53.3% (2024-02 peak to 2025-03 low, recovered 2026-07)

-29.2% (2026-08 peak to 2026-11 low, not yet recovered)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-11-06: 7.2x the 50-day median, price -11.4% that day

2026-08-06: 11.6x the 50-day median, price -3.4% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

34.2xP/E todayNear its historic low
Against its own history19th percentile
CheapestMedian 57.5xDearest

Usual range 28.9x to 404.0x since 2021-12.

Against Technology Services34.2x vs 21.1x
This company
34.2x
Sector median
21.1x

62% above the Technology Services median.

19.6x174.4x329.2x484.0xDec '21Dec '22Dec '23Dec '24Dec '25Nov '2619.6x174.4x329.2x484.0xDec '21Aug '23Apr '25Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianTechnology Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianTechnology Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianTechnology Services median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Technology Services is valued

Where does it rank among Technology Services peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Technology Services peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE46th▼ 9 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin77th▲ 16 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth97th▲ 47 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth57th▼ 11 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓18th▼ 66 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓38th▼ 10 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓31st▼ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum75thflat vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Technology Services sector page Watch it move against Technology Services in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~30%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 66.4x, the price would imply about 30.0%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Technology Services The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹701.30
P/E
34.2x
ROCE
14.0%
Market Cap
₹8314 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹2336 cr
P/S
3.6x
P/B
4.1x
ROE
12.1%
Operating Margin
22.0%
Debt / Equity
0.5x
Promoter Holding
48.8%
12M Momentum
-1.3%

52-week range

₹437.00₹1050.00
43% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
43.7%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.75

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
7.7x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
0.92x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

5 of 6checks within range1 near a threshold
Other income reliance3%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 3.2%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate23%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 23.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion0.92xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 0.92x (cash from operations ₹506 cr, net profit ₹548 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow5 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 5. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+16 daysNear threshold

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 16 days (94 vs 78). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress0% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 0% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, promoters trimmed 6.9 pts; DIIs added 3.1 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 59,795 to 90,004 (+51%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters55.7%48.8%-6.9 pts
FIIs5.4%5.8%+0.3 pts
DIIs17.8%20.9%+3.1 pts
Public and others21.1%24.5%+3.5 pts

Number of shareholders

90,004shareholders+51% since Sep '23
60k72k84k96k Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 59,795
Dec '23: 69,427
Mar '24: 71,332
Jun '24: 86,940
Sep '24: 90,105
Dec '24: 92,639
Mar '25: 90,468
Jun '25: 96,390
Sep '25: 90,199
Dec '25: 92,599
Mar '26: 92,900
Jun '26: 90,004
60k72k84k96k Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 59,795
Dec '23: 69,427
Mar '24: 71,332
Jun '24: 86,940
Sep '24: 90,105
Dec '24: 92,639
Mar '25: 90,468
Jun '25: 96,390
Sep '25: 90,199
Dec '25: 92,599
Mar '26: 92,900
Jun '26: 90,004

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−9.9%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like RATEGAIN TRAVEL TECHNOLOGIES today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −30% to +34% vs the market, against −4% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−5.8%, 80% range −19.8% to +8.6%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
SOLARA · Jul 2021: −78.4% vs market
SMSPHARMA · Jul 2021: −54.1% vs market
INOXWIND · Jul 2025: −50.8% vs market
FSL · Sep 2021: −46.6% vs market
ANURAS · Dec 2023: −41.6% vs market
CYIENTDLM · Jul 2024: −40.7% vs market
REPRO · Mar 2020: −40.6% vs market
GREENPANEL · May 2022: −39.1% vs market
POKARNA · Jul 2022: −35.8% vs market
GMMPFAUDLR · Apr 2023: −34.6% vs market
GRANULES · Apr 2021: −31.7% vs market
KPIGREEN · Jul 2025: −30.8% vs market
CAMLINFINE · Aug 2021: −30.0% vs market
SWANCORP · Nov 2024: −29.3% vs market
PVRINOX · Apr 2020: −28.5% vs market
INDOCO · Sep 2021: −27.3% vs market
BOROLTD · Apr 2025: −27.2% vs market
CCL · Jul 2023: −25.6% vs market
GANECOS · Jul 2025: −24.3% vs market
KRISHANA · May 2023: −24.2% vs market
GUFICBIO · Mar 2025: −16.3% vs market
GENUSPOWER · Mar 2025: −15.6% vs market
ARVSMART · May 2025: −13.5% vs market
BANARISUG · Aug 2020: −13.4% vs market
MMFL · Jan 2020: −10.0% vs market
ONEPOINT · Mar 2025: −9.7% vs market
SYRMA · Mar 2024: −4.6% vs market
AMBER · Apr 2021: −3.2% vs market
KOLTEPATIL · Mar 2021: +1.0% vs market
SDBL · Apr 2024: +4.1% vs market
TEGA · Nov 2024: +8.3% vs market
ASTRAMICRO · Dec 2021: +17.7% vs market
TI · Apr 2024: +19.1% vs market
GREENPLY · Apr 2020: +21.6% vs market
VBL · Oct 2020: +21.9% vs market
EIHOTEL · Nov 2023: +23.3% vs market
BRIGADE · Apr 2020: +31.1% vs market
ORIENTHOT · Oct 2023: +35.2% vs market
MOLDTKPAC · Jan 2022: +36.7% vs market
AEGISLOG · Aug 2023: +38.2% vs market
SAFARI · May 2021: +38.6% vs market
PRESTIGE · Apr 2021: +41.1% vs market
PNCINFRA · Mar 2020: +52.6% vs market
SEAMECLTD · Apr 2025: +53.1% vs market
INTELLECT · Jan 2020: +62.3% vs market
OPTIEMUS · Apr 2024: +81.6% vs market
GANESHHOU · Mar 2023: +85.9% vs market
MANINFRA · Jun 2021: +97.2% vs market
KPITTECH · Oct 2020: +105.2% vs market
APOLLO · Dec 2024: +123.1% vs market
Similar setups −9.9%All companies −4.1%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 2 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−9.9%
All companies' median
−4.1%
Beat the market
44% vs 46%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 33 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
GENUSPOWER
Electronic Technology
Mar 2025 38x11% +14%−44% −16%
GREENPLY
Producer Manufacturing
Apr 2020 16x12% −38%−40% +22%
SOLARA
Health Technology
Jul 2021 33x15% +116%−9% −78%
ARVSMART
Finance
May 2025 29x16% +6%−33% −14%
SDBL
Consumer Non-Durables
Apr 2024 41x16% +89%−17% +4%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
KPIGREEN
Utilities
Jul 2025 31x17% −17%−30% −31%
GUFICBIO
Health Technology
Mar 2025 41x— +19%−31% −16%
ORIENTHOT
Consumer Services
Oct 2023 32x13% +36%−12% +35%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: P/S, 12-month momentum and drawdown from 12-month high. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to RATEGAIN TRAVEL TECHNOLOGIES. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

INOX WINDINOXWIND
Producer Manufacturing
72%similar
revenue growthP/E
KDDLKDDL
Consumer Durables
69%similar
revenuedebt/equity
ANANT RAJANANTRAJ
Consumer Durables
66%similar
EPS growthvolatility
Non-Energy Minerals
66%similar
promoter holdingP/E
Producer Manufacturing
65%similar
ROCErevenue
Technology Services
47%similar
market capvolatility
Technology Services
42%similar
volatilityROCE
EMUDHRAEMUDHRA
Technology Services
41%similar
revenue growthoperating margin

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Mar '24

  1. NovPriceFell 29% from the Aug 2026 peak to the Nov 2026 low.
  2. NovPriceVolume reached 7.2x its 50-day median on 2026-11-06; price -11.4% that day.
  3. SepResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  4. SepPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Technology Services on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  5. AugPriceVolume reached 11.6x its 50-day median on 2026-08-06; price -3.4% that day.
  6. JulPriceRegained the 2024-02 peak, 16 months after the low.
  7. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Technology Services on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  8. MayPriceVolume reached 33.2x its 50-day median on 2026-05-22; price +9.5% that day.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. MarResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  2. MarPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Technology Services on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  3. FebPriceVolume reached 22.7x its 50-day median on 2026-02-13; price -4.1% that day.
  4. DecInstitutionsFII + DII holding fell 3.5 pts over 2 quarters to 27.1%.
  5. OctPriceVolume reached 12.7x its 50-day median on 2025-10-01; price +7.4% that day.
  6. AugPriceVolume reached 25.6x its 50-day median on 2025-08-25; price +6.5% that day.
  7. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Technology Services on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  8. MayPriceVolume reached 8.5x its 50-day median on 2025-05-26; price +4.0% that day.
  9. MarPriceFell 53% from the Feb 2024 peak to the Mar 2025 low.
  10. FebPriceVolume reached 11.5x its 50-day median on 2025-02-19; price +0.8% that day.
  11. NovPriceVolume reached 8.8x its 50-day median on 2024-11-12; price -9.5% that day.
  12. SepPromoterPromoter holding fell 3.0 pts to 48.2% (largest drop since 2024-03).
  13. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Technology Services on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  14. SepPriceVolume reached 8.3x its 50-day median on 2024-09-20; price +3.4% that day.
  15. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹957 cr.
  16. JunValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (58.6x).
  17. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Technology Services on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  18. JunSharesShare count is up 9.1% over 12 months.
  19. MayPriceVolume reached 9.9x its 50-day median on 2024-05-21; price +4.7% that day.
  20. MarPromoterPromoter holding fell 4.4 pts to 51.3%.
  21. MarInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 4.2 pts over 1 quarter to 27.4%.
  22. MarPriceVolume reached 11.5x its 50-day median on 2024-03-28; price -7.5% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history60 months · 2021-12 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1134.2x₹2336 cr12.1%14.0%0.5x
2026-1039.0x₹2336 cr12.1%14.0%0.5x
2026-0941.6x₹2336 cr12.1%14.0%0.5x
2026-0857.0x₹1824 cr9.7%14.0%0.5x
2026-0755.8x₹1824 cr9.7%14.0%0.5x
2026-0654.7x₹1824 cr9.7%14.0%0.5x
2026-0549.2x₹1369 cr10.6%17.0%0.0x
2026-0439.7x₹1369 cr10.6%17.0%0.0x
2026-0328.9x₹1369 cr10.6%17.0%0.0x
2026-0229.9x₹1108 cr12.5%17.0%0.0x
2026-0134.5x₹1108 cr12.5%17.0%0.0x
2025-1239.0x₹1108 cr12.5%17.0%0.0x
2025-1139.8x₹1090 cr12.5%17.0%0.0x
2025-1035.8x₹1090 cr12.5%17.0%0.0x
2025-0936.2x₹1090 cr12.5%17.0%0.0x
2025-0828.9x₹1077 cr12.4%17.0%0.0x
2025-0724.8x₹1077 cr12.4%17.0%0.0x
2025-0625.8x₹1077 cr12.4%17.0%0.0x
2025-0525.6x₹1072 cr14.1%17.0%0.0x
2025-0425.1x₹1072 cr14.1%17.0%0.0x
2025-0325.7x₹1072 cr14.1%17.0%0.0x
2025-0230.7x₹1045 cr12.9%17.0%0.0x
2025-0143.8x₹1045 cr12.9%17.0%0.0x
2024-1245.5x₹1045 cr12.9%17.0%0.0x
2024-1149.1x₹1003 cr11.4%17.0%0.0x
2024-1052.7x₹1003 cr11.4%17.0%0.0x
2024-0951.3x₹1003 cr11.4%17.0%0.0x
2024-0857.9x₹957 cr10.0%17.0%0.0x
2024-0764.5x₹957 cr10.0%17.0%0.0x
2024-0658.6x₹957 cr10.0%17.0%0.0x
2024-05110.7x₹565 cr9.6%10.0%0.0x
2024-04110.5x₹565 cr9.6%10.0%0.0x
2024-03113.6x₹565 cr9.6%10.0%0.0x
2024-02128.7x₹565 cr9.6%10.0%0.0x
2024-01126.3x₹565 cr9.6%10.0%0.0x
2023-12115.3x₹565 cr9.6%10.0%0.0x
2023-11104.6x₹565 cr9.6%10.0%0.0x
2023-1098.9x₹565 cr9.6%10.0%0.0x
2023-0994.0x₹565 cr9.6%10.0%0.0x
2023-0895.3x₹565 cr9.6%10.0%0.0x
2023-0773.2x₹565 cr9.6%10.0%0.0x
2023-0666.2x₹565 cr9.6%10.0%0.0x
2023-05484.0x₹367 cr1.3%3.0%0.0x
2023-04456.0x₹367 cr1.3%3.0%0.0x
2023-03440.6x₹367 cr1.3%3.0%0.0x
2023-02451.5x₹367 cr1.3%3.0%0.0x
2023-01470.6x₹367 cr1.3%3.0%0.0x
2022-12365.8x₹367 cr1.3%3.0%0.0x
2022-11372.2x₹367 cr1.3%3.0%0.0x
2022-10347.6x₹367 cr1.3%3.0%0.0x
2022-09345.6x₹367 cr1.3%3.0%0.0x
2022-08382.9x₹367 cr1.3%3.0%0.0x
2022-07413.1x₹367 cr1.3%3.0%0.0x
2022-06305.5x₹367 cr1.3%3.0%0.0x
2022-05—₹251 cr-11.9%-6.0%0.5x
2022-04—₹251 cr-11.9%-6.0%0.5x
2022-03—₹251 cr-11.9%-6.0%0.5x
2022-02—₹251 cr-11.9%-6.0%0.5x
2022-01—₹251 cr-11.9%-6.0%0.5x
2021-12—₹251 cr-11.9%-6.0%0.5x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback