अApnaFunda
Menu

GENUS POWER INFRASTRUCTURES LT (GENUSPOWER)

Electronic Technology · Electronic Equipment/Instruments · figures to Nov '26

Growth #13
Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.62 / 100
Profitability 74Growth 99Balance sheet 12
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.43 / 100
Price 50Earnings 67FII/DII 13

Passes these screensValue PickConsistent compounders

Compare withHITACHI ENERGY INDIAAPAR INDUSTRIESHONEYWELL AUTOMATION INDIA

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹286.5 latest close · −10.9% over the last 90 sessions

₹300₹350Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹300₹350Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹286.5 month-end · −9.1% over 12 months

₹250₹300Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹250₹300Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹286.5 month-end · +29.6% over 3 years

₹200₹300₹400Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹200₹300₹400Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹286.5 month-end · +793.9% since Jan '19

₹0₹200₹400Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹0₹200₹400Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹210.40 to ₹363.00 · 1-year volatility 41.4%

Was the rally earned?

-9%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 46 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 23.9x to 13.4x), which took 55 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +46 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+46 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −55 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−55 ptsP/E changeShare price: −9%−9%Share priceNet profit growth: +46 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+46ProfitP/E change: −55 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−55P/EShare price: −9%−9%Share price
Net profit growth+46 ptsNet profit rose about 63%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-55 ptsThe P/E fell from 23.9x to 13.4x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+30%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 337 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 197.5x to 13.4x), which took 307 points back.
  • The share count rose 17%.
Net profit growth: +355 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+355 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −307 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−307 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −18 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−18 ptsShare count changeShare price: +30%+30%Share priceNet profit growth: +355 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+355ProfitP/E change: −307 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−307P/EShare count change: −18 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−18SharesShare price: +30%+30%Share price
Net profit growth+355 ptsNet profit rose about 2141%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-307 ptsThe P/E fell from 197.5x to 13.4x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-18 ptsShare count rose 17%, which lowers the price.
+324%share price, 5 yearsLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 467 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 25.3x to 13.4x), which took 143 points back.
  • The share count rose 18%.
Net profit growth: +503 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+503 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −143 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−143 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −36 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−36 ptsShare count changeShare price: +324%+324%Share priceNet profit growth: +503 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+503ProfitP/E change: −143 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−143P/EShare count change: −36 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−36SharesShare price: +324%+324%Share price
Net profit growth+503 ptsNet profit rose about 843%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-143 ptsThe P/E fell from 25.3x to 13.4x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-36 ptsShare count rose 18%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with HITACHI ENERGY INDIA

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-63.2%recovered 2020-12
1-year volatility41.4%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.853-year daily, correlation 0.51
Volume spikes4last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2020202120222023202420252026−61.0% 0%−20%−40%−60%2020202220242026−61.0%
Largest drawdowns

-63.2% (2019-03 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2020-12)

-53.9% (2024-08 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

-37.3% (2022-04 peak to 2022-06 low, recovered 2023-06)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-08-28: 5.7x the 50-day median, price +5.3% that day

2026-08-20: 13.4x the 50-day median, price +8.1% that day

2026-07-16: 8.8x the 50-day median, price +3.8% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

13.4xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history25th percentile
CheapestMedian 25.7xDearest

Usual range 9.4x to 183.9x since 2019-01.

Against Electronic Technology13.4x vs 55.3x
This company
13.4x
Sector median
55.3x

76% below the Electronic Technology median.

7.5x98.4x189.3x280.1xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '267.5x98.4x189.3x280.1xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianElectronic Technology median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianElectronic Technology median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianElectronic Technology median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Electronic Technology is valued

Where does it rank among Electronic Technology peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Electronic Technology peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE76th▲ 14 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin71st▼ 11 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth87th▼ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth69th▼ 25 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓9th▼ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓47th▲ 20 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓91st▲ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum45th▲ 15 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Electronic Technology sector page Watch it move against Electronic Technology in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~23%annual earnings growth implied by the priceIn line with delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 40.5x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 22.7%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered22.4%/yrEPS, last 10 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap+0.3 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank519thmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

-8%18%44% Jan 2019Nov 2026 -8%18%44% Jan 2019Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x24.2%25.3%26.4%
15x21.6%22.7%23.8%
20x18.3%19.4%20.4%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 22.7%/yr

Looking back

  • Jan 2020Price implied 6%/yr; EPS has since grown 39%/yr (7.0 yrs)
  • Jan 2021Price implied 9%/yr; EPS has since grown 37%/yr (6.0 yrs)
  • Jan 2022Price implied 17%/yr; EPS has since grown 48%/yr (5.0 yrs)

Past comparisons cover only companies listed today (survivorship bias) and say nothing about future outcomes.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Electronic Technology The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹286.50
P/E
13.4x
ROCE
25.0%
Market Cap
₹8701 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹5173 cr
P/S
1.7x
P/B
3.9x
ROE
29.3%
Operating Margin
19.0%
Debt / Equity
1.0x
Promoter Holding
39.3%
12M Momentum
-9.2%

52-week range

₹210.40₹363.00
50% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
41.4%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.03

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
5.7x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
-0.82x
low
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

5 of 7checks within range1 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance11%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 11.0%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate27%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 26.5%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion-0.82xBeyond threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: -0.82x (cash from operations ₹-814 cr, net profit ₹990 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow2 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 2. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-89 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 89 days (115 vs 204). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress13% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 13% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days-81 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by -81 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, FIIs added 16.2 pts; promoters trimmed 11.0 pts; DIIs trimmed 2.4 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 72,661 to 1.7 lakh (+131%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters50.3%39.3%-11.0 pts
FIIs2.5%18.7%+16.2 pts
DIIs5.4%3.0%-2.4 pts
Public and others41.8%38.9%-2.9 pts

Number of shareholders

1.7 lakhshareholders+131% since Sep '23
73k1.1L1.5L1.8L Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 72,661
Dec '23: 83,104
Mar '24: 1.1 lakh
Jun '24: 1.1 lakh
Sep '24: 1.6 lakh
Dec '24: 1.7 lakh
Mar '25: 1.7 lakh
Jun '25: 1.8 lakh
Sep '25: 1.8 lakh
Dec '25: 1.8 lakh
Mar '26: 1.6 lakh
Jun '26: 1.7 lakh
 73k1.1L1.5L1.8L Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 72,661
Dec '23: 83,104
Mar '24: 1.1 lakh
Jun '24: 1.1 lakh
Sep '24: 1.6 lakh
Dec '24: 1.7 lakh
Mar '25: 1.7 lakh
Jun '25: 1.8 lakh
Sep '25: 1.8 lakh
Dec '25: 1.8 lakh
Mar '26: 1.6 lakh
Jun '26: 1.7 lakh

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+5.5%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like GENUS POWER INFRASTRUCTURES LT today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −24% to +36% vs the market, against −1% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+6.2%, 80% range −8.1% to +18.5%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
VPRPL · Dec 2024: −83.0% vs market
SMSPHARMA · Aug 2021: −55.9% vs market
ZEELEARN · Mar 2020: −52.6% vs market
MBAPL · Sep 2023: −51.5% vs market
ALLCARGO · Mar 2023: −45.8% vs market
POWERMECH · Feb 2020: −43.2% vs market
JKLAKSHMI · Jul 2021: −40.6% vs market
WELSPUNLIV · Aug 2024: −38.6% vs market
INDUSTOWER · Jul 2022: −32.6% vs market
JKPAPER · Apr 2023: −31.3% vs market
MOTILALOFS · Feb 2022: −31.0% vs market
ICIL · Oct 2024: −28.8% vs market
SAGCEM · Nov 2021: −24.2% vs market
CESC · Jun 2020: −24.2% vs market
KPIL · Apr 2021: −21.1% vs market
SHK · Oct 2021: −16.9% vs market
VISHNU · Jul 2023: −15.3% vs market
KNRCON · May 2022: −13.0% vs market
ROHLTD · Jan 2024: −12.1% vs market
GSPL · Sep 2020: −7.6% vs market
PITTIENG · May 2025: −7.6% vs market
KEC · Jul 2020: −0.9% vs market
SOBHA · May 2021: +3.5% vs market
CANTABIL · Feb 2024: +4.0% vs market
ROSSELLIND · Jul 2021: +5.1% vs market
ARVSMART · Jul 2020: +5.9% vs market
WELENT · Jul 2025: +14.2% vs market
CHAMBLFERT · May 2021: +16.9% vs market
VADILALIND · May 2024: +18.3% vs market
PNCINFRA · Oct 2020: +18.7% vs market
TCPLPACK · Dec 2023: +20.0% vs market
BALRAMCHIN · Oct 2020: +27.7% vs market
ANGELONE · May 2023: +27.7% vs market
SARDAEN · Mar 2023: +27.9% vs market
HGINFRA · Jun 2021: +28.1% vs market
SANDUMA · Aug 2025: +30.7% vs market
CRAFTSMAN · Nov 2024: +32.6% vs market
BIRLANU · Jan 2020: +37.3% vs market
AEGISLOG · Aug 2023: +38.2% vs market
EPIGRAL · May 2024: +38.9% vs market
MANINFRA · May 2023: +42.0% vs market
JBMA · Apr 2020: +44.7% vs market
HFCL · Feb 2020: +47.2% vs market
TRIVENI · Oct 2020: +67.3% vs market
FILATEX · Apr 2020: +71.4% vs market
THANGAMAYL · Jul 2020: +74.7% vs market
TORNTPOWER · Aug 2023: +80.2% vs market
LUMAXTECH · Jul 2024: +107.9% vs market
BANCOINDIA · Sep 2024: +165.8% vs market
RKFORGE · Jul 2022: +175.2% vs market
Similar setups +5.5%All companies −0.7%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 3 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+5.5%
All companies' median
−0.7%
Beat the market
56% vs 49%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 37 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
PNCINFRA
Industrial Services		 Oct 2020 8x21% +1%−18% +19%
MOTILALOFS
Finance		 Feb 2022 10x22% +46%−22% −31%
SANDUMA
Non-Energy Minerals		 Aug 2025 15x21% −14%−22% +31%
HGINFRA
Industrial Services		 Jun 2021 11x26% +98%−4% +28%
EPIGRAL
Process Industries		 May 2024 14x32% +32%−13% +39%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
TORNTPOWER
Utilities		 Aug 2023 15x18% +13%−5% +80%
SAGCEM
Non-Energy Minerals		 Nov 2021 16x18% +80%−17% −24%
WELENT
Industrial Services		 Jul 2025 21x18% −12%−24% +14%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, interest cover and drawdown from 12-month high. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to GENUS POWER INFRASTRUCTURES LT. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

KPI GREEN ENERGYKPIGREEN
Utilities
60%similar
revenue growthP/E
ASHAPURA MINECHEMASHAPURMIN
Non-Energy Minerals
58%similar
revenuedebt/equity
IIFL CAPITAL SERVICESIIFLCAPS
Finance
58%similar
market cappromoter holding
SPR AUTO TECHNOLOGIESSHRIPISTON
Producer Manufacturing
56%similar
revenueoperating margin
SHAKTI PUMPS (INDIA)SHAKTIPUMP
Producer Manufacturing
53%similar
ROCEEPS growth
PREMIER ENERGIESPREMIERENE
Electronic Technology
39%similar
debt/equityrevenue
KERNEX MICROSYSTEMS INDIA LTKERNEX
Electronic Technology
31%similar
revenue growthP/E
PACE DIGITEKPACEDIGITK
Electronic Technology
27%similar
P/Evolatility

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Jan '23

  1. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Electronic Technology on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  2. JulPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Electronic Technology on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  3. JulPriceVolume reached 25.5x its 50-day median on 2026-07-01; price +2.8% that day.
  4. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Electronic Technology on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  5. JunDebtDebt / equity rose above 1.0x (1.04x).
  6. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 22% to 2% of profit.
  7. JunPriceVolume reached 74.9x its 50-day median on 2026-06-30; price -6.0% that day.
  8. MarPriceFell 54% from the Aug 2024 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. FebPriceVolume reached 5.8x its 50-day median on 2026-02-03; price -2.5% that day.
  2. DecInstitutionsFII + DII holding fell 4.1 pts over 2 quarters to 22.1%.
  3. NovPriceVolume reached 7.3x its 50-day median on 2025-11-07; price -0.3% that day.
  4. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Electronic Technology on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  5. JunPriceVolume reached 9.5x its 50-day median on 2025-06-02; price +6.1% that day.
  6. MarInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 3.6 pts over 2 quarters to 26.4%.
  7. DecPromoterPromoter holding fell 3.3 pts to 39.3% (largest drop since 2024-06).
  8. SepPriceVolume reached 5.8x its 50-day median on 2024-09-20; price +1.6% that day.
  9. JulPriceRegained the 2024-02 peak, 4 months after the low.
  10. JunPromoterPromoter holding fell 7.6 pts to 42.7%.
  11. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  12. JunInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 14.2 pts over 1 quarter to 21.9%.
  13. JunPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Electronic Technology on ROCE (from the bottom quartile).
  14. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 60% to 19% of profit.
  15. JunSharesShare count is up 21.7% over 12 months.
  16. MarPriceFell 36% from the Feb 2024 peak to the Mar 2024 low.
  17. JulPriceVolume reached 47.8x its 50-day median on 2023-07-05; price +20.0% that day.
  18. JunPriceRegained the 2022-04 peak, 12 months after the low.
  19. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Electronic Technology on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  20. JunPriceVolume reached 14.9x its 50-day median on 2023-06-09; price +7.5% that day.
  21. AprValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (40.7x).
  22. JanPriceVolume reached 6.0x its 50-day median on 2023-01-30; price +8.1% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history60 months · 2021-12 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1113.4x₹5173 cr29.3%25.0%1.0x
2026-1012.8x₹5173 cr29.4%25.0%1.0x
2026-0913.5x₹5173 cr29.4%25.0%1.0x
2026-0817.2x₹4750 cr26.7%25.0%1.0x
2026-0716.1x₹4750 cr26.7%25.0%1.0x
2026-0615.4x₹4750 cr26.7%25.0%1.0x
2026-0517.5x₹4150 cr29.1%19.0%0.7x
2026-0417.4x₹4150 cr29.1%19.0%0.7x
2026-0312.0x₹4150 cr29.1%19.0%0.7x
2026-0217.3x₹3632 cr24.6%19.0%0.7x
2026-0118.7x₹3632 cr24.6%19.0%0.7x
2025-1219.9x₹3632 cr24.6%19.0%0.7x
2025-1123.9x₹2970 cr21.4%19.0%0.7x
2025-1025.9x₹2970 cr21.4%19.0%0.7x
2025-0923.5x₹2970 cr21.4%19.0%0.7x
2025-0832.0x₹2442 cr16.6%19.0%0.7x
2025-0734.8x₹2442 cr16.6%19.0%0.7x
2025-0636.4x₹2442 cr16.6%19.0%0.7x
2025-0556.6x₹1925 cr13.5%11.0%0.4x
2025-0440.7x₹1925 cr13.5%11.0%0.4x
2025-0337.5x₹1925 cr13.5%11.0%0.4x
2025-0253.9x₹1581 cr9.2%11.0%0.4x
2025-0168.6x₹1581 cr9.2%11.0%0.4x
2024-1281.0x₹1581 cr9.2%11.0%0.4x
2024-11112.5x₹1353 cr7.1%11.0%0.4x
2024-10105.9x₹1353 cr7.1%11.0%0.4x
2024-09101.6x₹1353 cr7.1%11.0%0.4x
2024-08141.7x₹1200 cr5.5%11.0%0.4x
2024-07117.6x₹1200 cr5.5%11.0%0.4x
2024-0696.3x₹1200 cr5.5%11.0%0.4x
2024-05280.1x₹808 cr3.0%6.0%0.4x
2024-04266.1x₹808 cr3.0%6.0%0.4x
2024-03205.6x₹808 cr3.0%6.0%0.4x
2024-02223.3x₹808 cr3.0%6.0%0.4x
2024-01236.3x₹808 cr3.0%6.0%0.4x
2023-12207.1x₹808 cr3.0%6.0%0.4x
2023-11197.5x₹808 cr3.0%6.0%0.4x
2023-10220.0x₹808 cr3.0%6.0%0.4x
2023-09228.2x₹808 cr3.0%6.0%0.4x
2023-08230.9x₹808 cr3.0%6.0%0.4x
2023-07163.6x₹808 cr3.0%6.0%0.4x
2023-06112.9x₹808 cr3.0%6.0%0.4x
2023-0541.1x₹685 cr6.0%8.0%0.3x
2023-0440.7x₹685 cr6.0%8.0%0.3x
2023-0338.0x₹685 cr6.0%8.0%0.3x
2023-0239.9x₹685 cr6.0%8.0%0.3x
2023-0141.6x₹685 cr6.0%8.0%0.3x
2022-1237.9x₹685 cr6.0%8.0%0.3x
2022-1142.0x₹685 cr6.0%8.0%0.3x
2022-1039.9x₹685 cr6.0%8.0%0.3x
2022-0936.0x₹685 cr6.0%8.0%0.3x
2022-0838.1x₹685 cr6.0%8.0%0.3x
2022-0734.7x₹685 cr6.0%8.0%0.3x
2022-0633.9x₹685 cr6.0%8.0%0.3x
2022-0533.0x₹609 cr7.6%11.0%0.2x
2022-0438.7x₹609 cr7.6%11.0%0.2x
2022-0326.9x₹609 cr7.6%11.0%0.2x
2022-0224.0x₹609 cr7.6%11.0%0.2x
2022-0125.7x₹609 cr7.6%11.0%0.2x
2021-1225.9x₹609 cr7.6%11.0%0.2x

Older months are in the live observatory.

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback