अApnaFunda

SANDUR MANGANESE & IRON ORES L (SANDUMA)

Non-Energy Minerals · Other Metals/Minerals · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.80 / 100
Profitability 90Growth 90Balance sheet 61
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.55 / 100
Price 28Earnings 64FII/DII 74

Passes these screensCash RichQuality CompounderValue PickDebt-light & profitableLittle growth priced inConsistent compounders

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹176.78 latest close · −15.7% over the last 90 sessions

₹160₹180₹200Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹160₹180₹200Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹176.78 month-end · −17.2% over 12 months

₹175₹200₹225₹250Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹175₹200₹225₹250Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹176.78 month-end · +105.6% over 3 years

₹100₹150₹200₹250Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹100₹150₹200₹250Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹176.78 month-end · +110.7% since Sep '23

₹100₹150₹200₹250Sep '23May '24Dec '24Aug '25Mar '26Nov '26 ₹100₹150₹200₹250Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26

52-week range ₹153.30 to ₹273.00 · 1-year volatility 46.2%

Was the rally earned?

-17%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 34 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 21.1x to 12.0x), which took 51 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +34 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+34 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −51 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−51 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: −17%−17%Share priceNet profit growth: +34 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+34ProfitP/E change: −51 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−51P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: −17%−17%Share price
Net profit growth+34 ptsNet profit rose about 46%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-51 ptsThe P/E fell from 21.1x to 12.0x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+106%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 143 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 15.4x to 12.0x), which took 37 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +142 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+142 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −37 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−37 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: +106%+106%Share priceNet profit growth: +142 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+142ProfitP/E change: −37 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−37P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: +106%+106%Share price
Net profit growth+142 ptsNet profit rose about 164%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-37 ptsThe P/E fell from 15.4x to 12.0x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with HINDUSTAN ZINC

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-43.0%recovered 2025-10
1-year volatility46.2%annualised
Beta vs sector index1.223-year daily, correlation 0.48
Volume spikes1last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%202420252026−43.0% 0%−20%−40%202420252026−43.0%
Largest drawdowns

-43.0% (2024-06 peak to 2025-02 low, recovered 2025-10)

-40.8% (2026-01 peak to 2026-10 low, not yet recovered)

-39.9% (2024-02 peak to 2024-03 low, recovered 2024-06)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-11-04: 25x the 50-day median, price +10.2% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

12.0xP/E todayNear its historic low
Against its own history5th percentile
CheapestMedian 17.9xDearest

Usual range 14.8x to 31.2x since 2023-09.

Against Non-Energy Minerals12.0x vs 21.8x
This company
12.0x
Sector median
21.8x

45% below the Non-Energy Minerals median.

11.0x20.3x29.6x38.9xSep '23May '24Jan '25Sep '25May '26Nov '2611.0x20.3x29.6x38.9xSep '23Oct '24Nov '25Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Non-Energy Minerals is valued

Where does it rank among Non-Energy Minerals peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Non-Energy Minerals peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE90th▲ 7 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin91stflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth89th▼ 7 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth78th▼ 7 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓52nd▲ 22 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓75th▲ 32 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓82nd▲ 16 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum44th▼ 47 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Non-Energy Minerals sector page Watch it move against Non-Energy Minerals in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~14%annual earnings growth implied by the priceBelow delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 18.6x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 14.2%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered34.4%/yrEPS, last 10 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap−20.2 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank776thmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

0%20%40% Jan 2019Nov 2026 0%20%40% Jan 2019Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x15.7%16.7%17.8%
15x13.2%14.2%15.2%
20x10.0%11.0%12.0%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 14.2%/yr

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Non-Energy Minerals The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹176.78
P/E
12.0x
ROCE
24.0%
Market Cap
₹8578 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹5327 cr
P/S
1.6x
P/B
2.6x
ROE
22.0%
Operating Margin
25.0%
Debt / Equity
0.3x
Promoter Holding
74.2%
12M Momentum
-17.2%

52-week range

₹153.30₹273.00
20% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
46.2%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.43

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
5.9x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
1.56x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

7 of 7checks within rangeAll clear
Other income reliance5%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 4.8%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate22%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 22.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion1.56xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 1.56x (cash from operations ₹2,137 cr, net profit ₹1,368 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow4 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 4. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+6 daysWithin range

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 6 days (31 vs 25). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress4% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 4% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days-129 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by -129 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, FIIs added 1.3 pts; DIIs trimmed 0.7 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 34,621 to 87,803 (+154%) between Dec 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupDec '23Jun '26Change
Promoters74.2%74.2%0.0 pts
FIIs0.4%1.7%+1.3 pts
DIIs1.3%0.6%-0.7 pts
Public and others24.1%23.5%-0.6 pts

Number of shareholders

87,803shareholders+154% since Dec '23
35k52k70k88k Dec '23Jun '24Dec '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 34,621
Mar '24: 57,023
Jun '24: 52,803
Sep '24: 54,523
Dec '24: 55,636
Mar '25: 55,408
Jun '25: 55,747
Sep '25: 62,156
Dec '25: 81,705
Mar '26: 85,207
Jun '26: 87,803
35k52k70k88k Dec '23Dec '24Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 34,621
Mar '24: 57,023
Jun '24: 52,803
Sep '24: 54,523
Dec '24: 55,636
Mar '25: 55,408
Jun '25: 55,747
Sep '25: 62,156
Dec '25: 81,705
Mar '26: 85,207
Jun '26: 87,803

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−6.2%typical 12-month return vs the marketBelow the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like SANDUR MANGANESE & IRON ORES L today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −30% to +35% vs the market, against +1% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The analogs' median sat below that base rate (gap −7.1%, 80% range −15.7% to −0.6%), but the matches cluster in only 6 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
EKC · Apr 2022: −50.1% vs market
POWERMECH · Jan 2020: −49.3% vs market
ICIL · Nov 2021: −46.1% vs market
BIRLANU · Feb 2022: −45.2% vs market
HSCL · Apr 2020: −43.9% vs market
EPIGRAL · Sep 2025: −40.5% vs market
MOL · Oct 2022: −39.4% vs market
KOPRAN · May 2022: −37.9% vs market
CYIENT · Aug 2024: −35.9% vs market
RUPA · May 2022: −35.8% vs market
SATIA · Nov 2020: −35.4% vs market
IGPL · Nov 2021: −32.5% vs market
IIFLCAPS · May 2022: −31.7% vs market
SIYSIL · Feb 2023: −25.9% vs market
KRBL · Jan 2020: −24.7% vs market
MASTEK · Apr 2025: −24.0% vs market
MONTECARLO · Jan 2023: −22.8% vs market
BODALCHEM · Feb 2020: −19.7% vs market
DALMIASUG · May 2022: −15.6% vs market
CHEMPLASTS · Dec 2022: −14.4% vs market
NAVNETEDUL · Jun 2023: −12.7% vs market
VISHNU · Jun 2023: −10.1% vs market
KNRCON · Apr 2022: −9.9% vs market
SHK · Aug 2021: −8.5% vs market
SAGCEM · Jan 2022: −6.4% vs market
CAPACITE · Feb 2020: −6.1% vs market
TAJGVK · Oct 2023: −5.0% vs market
VTL · Sep 2022: −4.7% vs market
RAMKY · Apr 2025: +0.8% vs market
INSECTICID · Jun 2020: +0.9% vs market
KPIL · Apr 2020: +1.0% vs market
VADILALIND · Oct 2023: +11.2% vs market
ANGELONE · Aug 2025: +20.5% vs market
HAL · Mar 2021: +20.8% vs market
SHRIPISTON · Jul 2024: +25.7% vs market
KEI · Jul 2020: +29.9% vs market
GNA · Feb 2020: +32.4% vs market
PCBL · Feb 2020: +36.3% vs market
DCMSHRIRAM · May 2020: +42.3% vs market
HFCL · Feb 2020: +47.2% vs market
JINDALSTEL · Jul 2022: +49.8% vs market
THEMISMED · Jul 2022: +63.9% vs market
AARTIPHARM · Mar 2024: +66.3% vs market
ZENSARTECH · Mar 2020: +73.2% vs market
BANCOINDIA · Aug 2024: +84.3% vs market
BALRAMCHIN · Jul 2020: +93.9% vs market
TI · Jul 2024: +107.6% vs market
HGINFRA · Sep 2020: +109.5% vs market
GODFRYPHLP · Nov 2023: +116.7% vs market
TIIL · Nov 2022: +120.0% vs market
Similar setups −6.2%All companies +0.9%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 4 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−6.2%
All companies' median
+0.9%
Beat the market
44% vs 51%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 32 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
ICIL
Process Industries
Nov 2021 18x23% +50%−25% −46%
SIYSIL
Process Industries
Feb 2023 10x29% −2%−33% −26%
HGINFRA
Industrial Services
Sep 2020 7x24% −11%−34% +110%
PCBL
Process Industries
Feb 2020 5x25% −32%−42% +36%
IIFLCAPS
Finance
May 2022 11x25% +4%−36% −32%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
EPIGRAL
Process Industries
Sep 2025 17x25% −26%−28% −41%
BIRLANU
Producer Manufacturing
Feb 2022 12x22% +38%−37% −45%
BALRAMCHIN
Process Industries
Jul 2020 5x16% −11%−35% +94%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, debt/equity and P/S. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to SANDUR MANGANESE & IRON ORES L. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Technology Services
79%similar
market capP/E
Producer Manufacturing
71%similar
market capdebt/equity
Producer Manufacturing
58%similar
revenueP/E
PACE DIGITEKPACEDIGITK
Electronic Technology
57%similar
P/EROCE
Process Industries
56%similar
operating marginrevenue
Non-Energy Minerals
46%similar
revenuepromoter holding
Non-Energy Minerals
44%similar
P/Evolatility
Non-Energy Minerals
41%similar
P/Edebt/equity

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

25 events since Dec '23

  1. NovPriceVolume reached 25.0x its 50-day median on 2026-11-04; price +10.2% that day.
  2. OctPriceFell 41% from the Jan 2026 peak to the Oct 2026 low.
  3. SepPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  4. AugValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (15.0x).
  5. JunDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.31x.
  6. MayPriceVolume reached 23.1x its 50-day median on 2026-05-08; price +11.1% that day.
  7. MarValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (14.5x).
  8. MarPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
Show 17 earlier events
  1. JanPriceVolume reached 11.0x its 50-day median on 2026-01-02; price +8.3% that day.
  2. OctPriceRegained the 2024-06 peak, 8 months after the low.
  3. OctPriceVolume reached 71.8x its 50-day median on 2025-10-03; price +15.4% that day.
  4. SepPriceVolume reached 14.3x its 50-day median on 2025-09-24; price +7.4% that day.
  5. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  6. MayPriceVolume reached 9.8x its 50-day median on 2025-05-29; price -10.3% that day.
  7. MarResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹2,366 cr.
  8. MarPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  9. FebPriceFell 43% from the Jun 2024 peak to the Feb 2025 low.
  10. FebPriceVolume reached 40.8x its 50-day median on 2025-02-18; price +5.2% that day.
  11. DecPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  12. NovPriceVolume reached 6.6x its 50-day median on 2024-11-28; price -0.1% that day.
  13. SepSharesShare count is up 200.0% over 12 months.
  14. JunPriceRegained the 2024-02 peak, 3 months after the low.
  15. JunPriceVolume reached 5.3x its 50-day median on 2024-06-19; price +10.0% that day.
  16. MarPriceFell 40% from the Feb 2024 peak to the Mar 2024 low.
  17. DecPriceVolume reached 21.2x its 50-day median on 2023-12-07; price +14.7% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history39 months · 2023-09 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1112.0x₹5327 cr22.0%24.0%0.3x
2026-1011.0x₹5327 cr22.1%24.0%0.3x
2026-0912.4x₹5327 cr22.1%24.0%0.3x
2026-0815.0x₹5087 cr20.2%24.0%0.3x
2026-0715.8x₹5087 cr20.2%24.0%0.3x
2026-0615.0x₹5087 cr20.2%24.0%0.3x
2026-0519.1x₹4897 cr22.1%21.0%0.7x
2026-0417.7x₹4897 cr22.1%21.0%0.7x
2026-0314.5x₹4897 cr22.1%21.0%0.7x
2026-0217.5x₹4640 cr22.9%21.0%0.7x
2026-0118.0x₹4640 cr22.9%21.0%0.7x
2025-1219.7x₹4640 cr22.9%21.0%0.7x
2025-1121.1x₹3668 cr18.8%21.0%0.7x
2025-1021.4x₹3668 cr18.8%21.0%0.7x
2025-0916.7x₹3668 cr18.8%21.0%0.7x
2025-0814.9x₹3135 cr17.9%21.0%0.7x
2025-0715.6x₹3135 cr17.9%21.0%0.7x
2025-0616.5x₹3135 cr17.9%21.0%0.7x
2025-0516.4x₹2366 cr22.1%15.0%0.1x
2025-0415.6x₹2366 cr22.1%15.0%0.1x
2025-0314.9x₹2366 cr22.1%15.0%0.1x
2025-0217.9x₹1567 cr16.2%15.0%0.1x
2025-0118.2x₹1567 cr16.2%15.0%0.1x
2024-1219.2x₹1567 cr16.2%15.0%0.1x
2024-1123.8x₹1492 cr15.9%15.0%0.1x
2024-1021.3x₹1492 cr15.9%15.0%0.1x
2024-0923.2x₹1492 cr15.9%15.0%0.1x
2024-0833.9x₹1253 cr11.1%15.0%0.1x
2024-0738.9x₹1253 cr11.1%15.0%0.1x
2024-0636.6x₹1253 cr11.1%15.0%0.1x
2024-0531.6x₹2126 cr14.0%—0.1x
2024-0431.1x₹2126 cr14.0%—0.1x
2024-0321.5x₹2126 cr14.0%—0.1x
2024-0224.8x₹2126 cr14.0%—0.1x
2024-0130.8x₹2126 cr14.0%—0.1x
2023-1229.0x₹2126 cr14.0%—0.1x
2023-1115.4x₹2126 cr14.0%—0.1x
2023-1015.3x₹2126 cr14.0%—0.1x
2023-0915.1x₹2126 cr14.0%—0.1x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback