अApnaFunda

VENUS PIPES TUBES LIMITED (VENUSPIPES)

Non-Energy Minerals · Steel · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.71 / 100
Profitability 81Growth 85Balance sheet 49
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.64 / 100
Price 81Earnings 39FII/DII 71

Passes these screensQuality CompounderHigh MomentumDebt-light & profitablePrice ahead of businessConsistent compounders

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹1,764.2 latest close · −1.1% over the last 90 sessions

₹1,500₹1,750₹2,000₹2,250Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹1,500₹1,750₹2,000₹2,250Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹1,764.2 month-end · +38.7% over 12 months

₹1,000₹1,500₹2,000Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹1,000₹1,500₹2,000Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹1,764.2 month-end · +33.8% over 3 years

₹1,000₹1,500₹2,000₹2,500Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹1,000₹1,500₹2,000₹2,500Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹1,764.2 month-end · +434.8% since May '22

₹1,000₹2,000May '22Apr '23Mar '24Jan '25Dec '25Nov '26 ₹1,000₹2,000May '22Aug '24Nov '26

52-week range ₹890.00 to ₹2347.90 · 1-year volatility 47.0%

Was the rally earned?

+39%share price, 1 yearEarnings and multiple

Both mattered.

  • Per-share earnings added 15 points and the multiple added 24 points (P/E 28.8x to 35.2x).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +16 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+16 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +24 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+24 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1 ptsShare count changeShare price: +39%+39%Share priceNet profit growth: +16 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+16ProfitP/E change: +24 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+24P/EShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1SharesShare price: +39%+39%Share price
Net profit growth+16 ptsNet profit rose about 14%, which lifts the price.
P/E change+24 ptsThe P/E rose from 28.8x to 35.2x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+34%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 97 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 60.5x to 35.2x), which took 63 points back.
  • The share count rose 3%.
Net profit growth: +100 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+100 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −63 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−63 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −3 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−3 ptsShare count changeShare price: +34%+34%Share priceNet profit growth: +100 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+100ProfitP/E change: −63 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−63P/EShare count change: −3 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−3SharesShare price: +34%+34%Share price
Net profit growth+100 ptsNet profit rose about 136%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-63 ptsThe P/E fell from 60.5x to 35.2x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-3 ptsShare count rose 3%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with JSW STEEL

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-63.2%not yet recovered
1-year volatility47.0%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.903-year daily, correlation 0.41
Volume spikes5last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2023202420252026−61.5% 0%−20%−40%−60%2023202420252026−61.5%
Largest drawdowns

-63.2% (2024-08 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

-22.6% (2023-09 peak to 2023-10 low, recovered 2024-02)

-20.8% (2024-03 peak to 2024-03 low, recovered 2024-04)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-09-18: 13x the 50-day median, price +7.1% that day

2026-09-17: 13.2x the 50-day median, price +10.0% that day

2026-09-08: 11x the 50-day median, price +8.0% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

35.2xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history58th percentile
CheapestMedian 34.5xDearest

Usual range 23.4x to 65.8x since 2022-05.

Against Non-Energy Minerals35.2x vs 21.8x
This company
35.2x
Sector median
21.8x

62% above the Non-Energy Minerals median.

14.4x42.1x69.9x97.6xMay '22Apr '23Mar '24Feb '25Jan '26Nov '2614.4x42.1x69.9x97.6xMay '22Nov '23May '25Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Non-Energy Minerals is valued

Where does it rank among Non-Energy Minerals peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Non-Energy Minerals peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE87thflat vs a year ago
  • Op. margin74th▲ 7 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth78thflat vs a year ago
  • EPS growth55th▲ 13 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓42nd▼ 8 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓36th▲ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓30th▼ 13 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum88th▲ 58 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Non-Energy Minerals sector page Watch it move against Non-Energy Minerals in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~27%annual earnings growth implied by the priceBelow delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 51.3x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 26.6%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered31.2%/yrEPS, last 8 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap−4.6 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank625thmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

0%23%45% May 2022Nov 2026 0%23%45% May 2022Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x28.2%29.4%30.5%
15x25.4%26.6%27.7%
20x21.9%23.0%24.1%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 26.6%/yr

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Non-Energy Minerals The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹1764.20
P/E
35.2x
ROCE
21.0%
Market Cap
₹4049 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹1212 cr
P/S
3.3x
P/B
6.1x
ROE
17.2%
Operating Margin
16.0%
Debt / Equity
0.4x
Promoter Holding
48.4%
12M Momentum
38.7%

52-week range

₹890.00₹2347.90
60% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
47.0%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.78

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
4.5x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
0.83x
Share count, 1Y
+5.0%

Are profits backed by cash?

4 of 7checks within range1 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance7%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 7.2%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate26%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 26.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion0.83xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 0.83x (cash from operations ₹233 cr, net profit ₹281 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow0 of 5 yrsBeyond threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 0. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+8 daysWithin range

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 8 days (81 vs 73). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress31% of fixed assetsNear threshold

Capital work-in-progress is 31% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days+31 days / 2 yrsNear threshold

Days payable changed by +31 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, DIIs added 10.6 pts; FIIs trimmed 4.0 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 38,977 to 53,604 (+38%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters48.6%48.4%-0.2 pts
FIIs6.6%2.6%-4.0 pts
DIIs7.3%17.8%+10.6 pts
Public and others37.5%31.1%-6.4 pts

Number of shareholders

53,604shareholders+38% since Sep '23
39k46k54k61k Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 38,977
Dec '23: 45,875
Mar '24: 47,062
Jun '24: 57,273
Sep '24: 50,831
Dec '24: 58,065
Mar '25: 58,842
Jun '25: 58,344
Sep '25: 60,837
Dec '25: 58,700
Mar '26: 57,317
Jun '26: 53,604
39k46k54k61k Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 38,977
Dec '23: 45,875
Mar '24: 47,062
Jun '24: 57,273
Sep '24: 50,831
Dec '24: 58,065
Mar '25: 58,842
Jun '25: 58,344
Sep '25: 60,837
Dec '25: 58,700
Mar '26: 57,317
Jun '26: 53,604

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−5.5%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like VENUS PIPES TUBES LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −23% to +14% vs the market, against −5% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−0.2%, 80% range −10.0% to +3.4%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−80%−60%−40%−20%0%+20%+40%+60%
SOLARA · Jun 2021: −79.1% vs market
HIKAL · Jul 2021: −56.3% vs market
MOTISONS · Jan 2025: −54.4% vs market
SATIA · Sep 2020: −47.4% vs market
EPL · Nov 2020: −46.2% vs market
SIGACHI · Jan 2024: −45.3% vs market
ROTO · May 2025: −38.3% vs market
KRISHANA · Apr 2023: −33.8% vs market
DOLLAR · Mar 2022: −33.4% vs market
BECTORFOOD · Feb 2025: −33.1% vs market
ROLEXRINGS · Apr 2023: −30.8% vs market
SUPRAJIT · Dec 2021: −26.0% vs market
CYIENT · Sep 2023: −23.5% vs market
INNOVACAP · Feb 2025: −22.0% vs market
THEJO · Jul 2024: −19.4% vs market
GOKEX · Aug 2023: −19.2% vs market
CARYSIL · Apr 2022: −19.0% vs market
RAINBOW · Aug 2023: −18.8% vs market
ASAHIINDIA · Oct 2022: −17.3% vs market
JASH · Aug 2025: −16.7% vs market
GUFICBIO · May 2025: −16.5% vs market
TIIL · Mar 2025: −14.4% vs market
FSL · Apr 2021: −10.4% vs market
TCI · Nov 2021: −7.7% vs market
ICEMAKE · Aug 2025: −5.9% vs market
RKFORGE · Jan 2024: −5.0% vs market
GREENLAM · Jun 2020: −5.0% vs market
CRAFTSMAN · Apr 2023: −3.4% vs market
BHAGCHEM · Apr 2023: −3.1% vs market
VRLLOG · Oct 2022: −0.1% vs market
KDDL · May 2024: +0.8% vs market
THEMISMED · Sep 2021: +1.0% vs market
HINDWAREAP · Dec 2021: +1.3% vs market
ARTEMISMED · Jun 2025: +3.9% vs market
MOLDTKPAC · Jan 2020: +4.0% vs market
POWERMECH · Sep 2023: +10.1% vs market
TI · Jan 2025: +10.8% vs market
AURIONPRO · May 2024: +15.5% vs market
TEGA · Aug 2023: +16.4% vs market
GRAVITA · Jul 2024: +21.3% vs market
BETA · Jul 2025: +21.9% vs market
WABAG · Aug 2025: +26.1% vs market
XPROINDIA · Oct 2022: +26.3% vs market
ASTRAMICRO · Sep 2024: +26.9% vs market
CENTURYPLY · Jan 2020: +30.0% vs market
VADILALIND · Mar 2023: +33.1% vs market
PRINCEPIPE · Feb 2021: +33.5% vs market
VISHNU · Sep 2025: +46.0% vs market
RAJRATAN · Mar 2022: +51.7% vs market
PGEL · Jul 2024: +93.9% vs market
Similar setups −5.5%All companies −5.3%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 1 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−5.5%
All companies' median
−5.3%
Beat the market
40% vs 44%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 30 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
VADILALIND
Consumer Non-Durables
Mar 2023 35x19% +56%−26% +33%
CARYSIL
Consumer Durables
Apr 2022 51x22% +131%−17% −19%
HIKAL
Health Technology
Jul 2021 50x16% +244%−4% −56%
RAJRATAN
Producer Manufacturing
Mar 2022 49x23% +229%−14% +52%
HINDWAREAP
Producer Manufacturing
Dec 2021 62x21% +164%−12% +1%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
KDDL
Consumer Durables
May 2024 59x18% +128%−16% +1%
BHAGCHEM
Process Industries
Apr 2023 39x25% +44%−11% −3%
GRAVITA
Non-Energy Minerals
Jul 2024 47x28% +144%−5% +21%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, P/E and ROCE. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to VENUS PIPES TUBES LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

CARYSILCARYSIL
Consumer Durables
72%similar
debt/equityrevenue
Consumer Durables
71%similar
ROCErevenue growth
Producer Manufacturing
67%similar
operating marginmarket cap
Technology Services
66%similar
promoter holdingP/E
KDDLKDDL
Consumer Durables
64%similar
revenue growthdebt/equity
Non-Energy Minerals
66%similar
volatilitymarket cap
Non-Energy Minerals
59%similar
debt/equityEPS growth
Non-Energy Minerals
51%similar
revenuepromoter holding

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since May '23

  1. SepPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  2. SepPriceVolume reached 13.2x its 50-day median on 2026-09-17; price +10.0% that day.
  3. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  4. JunSharesShare count is up 5.0% over 12 months.
  5. JunPriceVolume reached 16.4x its 50-day median on 2026-06-22; price +8.2% that day.
  6. MarResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  7. MarPriceFell 63% from the Aug 2024 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  8. MarPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
Show 22 earlier events
  1. FebPriceVolume reached 10.4x its 50-day median on 2026-02-05; price +1.3% that day.
  2. DecValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (25.7x).
  3. NovPriceVolume reached 6.0x its 50-day median on 2025-11-20; price +2.0% that day.
  4. SepResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  5. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  6. JulPriceVolume reached 23.0x its 50-day median on 2025-07-02; price +7.9% that day.
  7. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  8. MayPriceVolume reached 9.8x its 50-day median on 2025-05-23; price +12.4% that day.
  9. MarPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  10. NovPriceVolume reached 6.5x its 50-day median on 2024-11-14; price -10.1% that day.
  11. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹802 cr.
  12. JunInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 4.2 pts over 1 quarter to 17.3%.
  13. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  14. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 2% to 1% of profit.
  15. MayValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (97.6x).
  16. FebPriceVolume reached 16.1x its 50-day median on 2024-02-29; price +5.3% that day.
  17. DecPriceVolume reached 12.5x its 50-day median on 2023-12-29; price +3.4% that day.
  18. SepPriceVolume reached 12.1x its 50-day median on 2023-09-26; price +0.2% that day.
  19. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹552 cr.
  20. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  21. JunDividendStarted paying a dividend (payout 2% of profit).
  22. MaySharesShare count is up 66.7% over 12 months.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history55 months · 2022-05 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1135.2x₹1212 cr17.2%21.0%0.4x
2026-1036.1x₹1212 cr17.2%21.0%0.4x
2026-0942.9x₹1212 cr17.2%21.0%0.4x
2026-0833.2x₹1167 cr17.0%21.0%0.4x
2026-0733.7x₹1167 cr17.0%21.0%0.4x
2026-0635.0x₹1167 cr17.0%21.0%0.4x
2026-0528.7x₹1123 cr21.0%25.0%0.4x
2026-0428.3x₹1123 cr21.0%25.0%0.4x
2026-0318.4x₹1123 cr21.0%25.0%0.4x
2026-0224.6x₹1057 cr19.4%25.0%0.4x
2026-0122.7x₹1057 cr19.4%25.0%0.4x
2025-1225.7x₹1057 cr19.4%25.0%0.4x
2025-1128.8x₹994 cr18.9%25.0%0.4x
2025-1028.8x₹994 cr18.9%25.0%0.4x
2025-0929.6x₹994 cr18.9%25.0%0.4x
2025-0826.2x₹958 cr19.6%25.0%0.4x
2025-0730.6x₹958 cr19.6%25.0%0.4x
2025-0629.9x₹958 cr19.6%25.0%0.4x
2025-0530.7x₹924 cr25.9%28.0%0.4x
2025-0426.3x₹924 cr25.9%28.0%0.4x
2025-0326.0x₹924 cr25.9%28.0%0.4x
2025-0226.4x₹900 cr27.2%28.0%0.4x
2025-0127.6x₹900 cr27.2%28.0%0.4x
2024-1230.7x₹900 cr27.2%28.0%0.4x
2024-1134.5x₹862 cr26.1%28.0%0.4x
2024-1040.3x₹862 cr26.1%28.0%0.4x
2024-0945.8x₹862 cr26.1%28.0%0.4x
2024-0857.3x₹802 cr23.1%28.0%0.4x
2024-0751.9x₹802 cr23.1%28.0%0.4x
2024-0648.4x₹802 cr23.1%28.0%0.4x
2024-0597.6x₹552 cr15.1%23.0%0.3x
2024-0495.6x₹552 cr15.1%23.0%0.3x
2024-0386.9x₹552 cr15.1%23.0%0.3x
2024-0283.9x₹552 cr15.1%23.0%0.3x
2024-0166.9x₹552 cr15.1%23.0%0.3x
2023-1264.3x₹552 cr15.1%23.0%0.3x
2023-1160.5x₹552 cr15.1%23.0%0.3x
2023-1063.6x₹552 cr15.1%23.0%0.3x
2023-0960.1x₹552 cr15.1%23.0%0.3x
2023-0870.0x₹552 cr15.1%23.0%0.3x
2023-0757.0x₹552 cr15.1%23.0%0.3x
2023-0652.7x₹552 cr15.1%23.0%0.3x
2023-0551.4x₹387 cr27.6%37.0%0.5x
2023-0442.2x₹387 cr27.6%37.0%0.5x
2023-0335.8x₹387 cr27.6%37.0%0.5x
2023-0234.7x₹387 cr27.6%37.0%0.5x
2023-0135.2x₹387 cr27.6%37.0%0.5x
2022-1234.3x₹387 cr27.6%37.0%0.5x
2022-1133.4x₹387 cr27.6%37.0%0.5x
2022-1036.3x₹387 cr27.6%37.0%0.5x
2022-0927.3x₹387 cr27.6%37.0%0.5x
2022-0819.6x₹387 cr27.6%37.0%0.5x
2022-0718.6x₹387 cr27.6%37.0%0.5x
2022-0616.1x₹387 cr27.6%37.0%0.5x
2022-0518.3x₹309 cr66.3%53.0%0.9x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback