अApnaFunda

CARYSIL LIMITED (CARYSIL)

Consumer Durables · Home Furnishings · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.59 / 100
Profitability 74Growth 56Balance sheet 47
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.53 / 100
Price 8Earnings 74FII/DII 76

Passes these screensDebt-light & profitableConsistent compounders

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹956.95 latest close · −17.7% over the last 90 sessions

₹1,000₹1,100₹1,200Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹1,000₹1,100₹1,200Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹956.95 month-end · −5.5% over 12 months

₹800₹1,000₹1,200Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹800₹1,000₹1,200Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹956.95 month-end · +4.6% over 3 years

₹500₹750₹1,000₹1,250Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹500₹750₹1,000₹1,250Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹956.95 month-end · +412.1% since Jan '21

₹500₹1,000Jan '21Mar '22May '23Jul '24Sep '25Nov '26 ₹500₹1,000Jan '21Dec '23Nov '26

52-week range ₹732.10 to ₹1280.90 · 1-year volatility 43.5%

Was the rally earned?

-6%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 40 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 40.7x to 25.5x), which took 46 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +38 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+38 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −46 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−46 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +2 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+2 ptsShare count changeShare price: −5%−5%Share priceNet profit growth: +38 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+38ProfitP/E change: −46 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−46P/EShare count change: +2 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+2SharesShare price: −5%−5%Share price
Net profit growth+38 ptsNet profit rose about 48%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-46 ptsThe P/E fell from 40.7x to 25.5x, which lowers the price.
Share count change+2 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+5%share price, 3 yearsRoughly flat
  • The share price was roughly flat over 3 years (+5%).
  • The share count rose 5%.
Net profit growth: +72 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+72 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −62 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−62 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −5 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−5 ptsShare count changeShare price: +5%+5%Share priceNet profit growth: +72 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+72ProfitP/E change: −62 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−62P/EShare count change: −5 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−5SharesShare price: +5%+5%Share price
Net profit growth+72 ptsNet profit rose about 101%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-62 ptsThe P/E fell from 46.7x to 25.5x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-5 ptsShare count rose 5%, which lowers the price.
+18%share price, 5 yearsLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 102 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 55.3x to 25.5x), which took 84 points back.
  • The share count rose 7%.
Net profit growth: +110 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+110 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −84 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−84 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −7 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−7 ptsShare count changeShare price: +18%+18%Share priceNet profit growth: +110 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+110ProfitP/E change: −84 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−84P/EShare count change: −7 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−7SharesShare price: +18%+18%Share price
Net profit growth+110 ptsNet profit rose about 174%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-84 ptsThe P/E fell from 55.3x to 25.5x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-7 ptsShare count rose 7%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with ASAHI INDIA GLASS

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-55.3%recovered 2026-05
1-year volatility43.5%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.863-year daily, correlation 0.32
Volume spikes2last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%20222023202420252026−53.4% 0%−20%−40%202220242026−53.4%
Largest drawdowns

-55.3% (2024-02 peak to 2025-03 low, recovered 2026-05)

-51.9% (2021-12 peak to 2023-01 low, recovered 2023-11)

-25.1% (2026-08 peak to 2026-11 low, not yet recovered)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-08-10: 6x the 50-day median, price +5.7% that day

2026-07-15: 13.9x the 50-day median, price +3.2% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

25.5xP/E todayNear its historic low
Against its own history18th percentile
CheapestMedian 34.7xDearest

Usual range 22.6x to 50.2x since 2021-01.

Against Consumer Durables25.5x vs 25.5x
This company
25.5x
Sector median
25.5x

Close to the Consumer Durables median.

18.0x34.6x51.2x67.8xJan '21Mar '22May '23Jul '24Sep '25Nov '2618.0x34.6x51.2x67.8xJan '21Jan '23Jan '25Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Durables median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Durables median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Durables median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Consumer Durables is valued

Where does it rank among Consumer Durables peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Consumer Durables peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE62nd▲ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin87thflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth48th▼ 8 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth76th▲ 30 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓38th▲ 7 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓17th▼ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓51st▲ 14 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum60th▼ 25 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Consumer Durables sector page Watch it move against Consumer Durables in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~23%annual earnings growth implied by the priceBelow delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 40.2x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 23.1%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered26.7%/yrEPS, last 10 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap−3.6 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank601stmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

0%18%36% Jun 2020Nov 2026 0%18%36% Jun 2020Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x24.6%25.8%26.9%
15x22.0%23.1%24.2%
20x18.6%19.7%20.7%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 23.1%/yr

Looking back

  • Jan 2021Price implied 21%/yr; EPS has since grown 24%/yr (6.0 yrs)
  • Jan 2022Price implied 35%/yr; EPS has since grown 16%/yr (5.0 yrs)

Past comparisons cover only companies listed today (survivorship bias) and say nothing about future outcomes.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Consumer Durables The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹956.95
P/E
25.5x
ROCE
18.0%
Market Cap
₹2721 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹960 cr
P/S
2.8x
P/B
4.5x
ROE
17.5%
Operating Margin
20.0%
Debt / Equity
0.5x
Promoter Holding
41.3%
12M Momentum
-5.5%

52-week range

₹732.10₹1280.90
41% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
43.5%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.00

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
8.0x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
1.00x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

6 of 7checks within range1 near a threshold
Other income reliance11%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 10.6%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate26%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 25.5%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion1.00xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 1.00x (cash from operations ₹222 cr, net profit ₹221 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow2 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 2. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-1 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 1 days (64 vs 65). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress5% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 5% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days-18 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by -18 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, DIIs added 4.6 pts; promoters trimmed 2.5 pts; FIIs added 1.0 pts.
  • The number of shareholders fell from 58,189 to 50,289 (-14%) between Dec 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupDec '23Jun '26Change
Promoters43.8%41.3%-2.5 pts
FIIs0.6%1.6%+1.0 pts
DIIs7.3%11.9%+4.6 pts
Public and others46.5%45.1%-1.4 pts

Number of shareholders

50,289shareholders-14% since Dec '23
48k52k56k60k Dec '23Jun '24Dec '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 58,189
Mar '24: 57,986
Jun '24: 58,019
Sep '24: 59,032
Dec '24: 59,880
Mar '25: 59,838
Jun '25: 55,303
Sep '25: 54,797
Dec '25: 50,184
Mar '26: 47,620
Jun '26: 50,289
48k52k56k60k Dec '23Dec '24Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 58,189
Mar '24: 57,986
Jun '24: 58,019
Sep '24: 59,032
Dec '24: 59,880
Mar '25: 59,838
Jun '25: 55,303
Sep '25: 54,797
Dec '25: 50,184
Mar '26: 47,620
Jun '26: 50,289

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−6.9%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like CARYSIL LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −19% to +17% vs the market, against −2% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−5.0%, 80% range −12.5% to +1.4%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−50%0%+50%+100%
THEMISMED · Jan 2025: −66.7% vs market
RKFORGE · Jan 2025: −38.5% vs market
KOLTEPATIL · Mar 2024: −32.5% vs market
AARTIDRUGS · Aug 2023: −30.9% vs market
MINDACORP · Feb 2020: −29.2% vs market
SULA · Dec 2023: −28.9% vs market
HINDWAREAP · Mar 2023: −28.7% vs market
INSECTICID · Apr 2020: −26.6% vs market
ASAHIINDIA · Feb 2023: −25.6% vs market
TCI · Mar 2020: −24.2% vs market
GREENPLY · Jul 2022: −19.3% vs market
KDDL · Aug 2024: −18.7% vs market
TVSSRICHAK · May 2020: −18.5% vs market
NRBBEARING · May 2024: −18.4% vs market
GUFICBIO · Nov 2024: −17.3% vs market
MASTEK · Mar 2024: −17.2% vs market
ROTO · Sep 2025: −16.8% vs market
TIIL · Jun 2025: −15.3% vs market
SUDARSCHEM · Nov 2020: −15.3% vs market
JTEKTINDIA · Feb 2020: −14.3% vs market
EVEREADY · Oct 2025: −13.6% vs market
HUHTAMAKI · Jun 2020: −11.7% vs market
LUMAXIND · Apr 2020: −8.4% vs market
GRANULES · Nov 2024: −8.4% vs market
INDOCO · Feb 2022: −7.6% vs market
USHAMART · Feb 2024: −6.3% vs market
XPROINDIA · May 2023: −5.2% vs market
VADILALIND · Aug 2020: −2.8% vs market
CANTABIL · Jul 2024: +0.1% vs market
SUPRAJIT · May 2022: +2.2% vs market
GREENLAM · Mar 2020: +4.9% vs market
SUBROS · May 2020: +5.5% vs market
STYLAMIND · Mar 2023: +8.2% vs market
KNRCON · Apr 2021: +9.2% vs market
VRLLOG · Nov 2022: +11.2% vs market
ADFFOODS · Apr 2025: +11.5% vs market
BHAGCHEM · Feb 2023: +12.0% vs market
TEGA · Feb 2024: +18.3% vs market
ASTRAMICRO · Feb 2025: +35.2% vs market
TI · Jun 2024: +35.4% vs market
SIGACHI · Jul 2023: +44.7% vs market
ARTEMISMED · Sep 2025: +46.7% vs market
CCL · Apr 2022: +49.6% vs market
RUPA · May 2020: +54.9% vs market
JASH · Feb 2024: +64.7% vs market
ASTEC · Jan 2020: +85.0% vs market
DOLLAR · Apr 2021: +95.9% vs market
CENTURYPLY · May 2020: +124.7% vs market
HIKAL · Jun 2020: +140.0% vs market
KPRMILL · Dec 2020: +183.3% vs market
Similar setups −6.9%All companies −1.9%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 4 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−6.9%
All companies' median
−1.9%
Beat the market
44% vs 48%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 34 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
SUPRAJIT
Producer Manufacturing
May 2022 33x17% +27%−27% +2%
GUFICBIO
Health Technology
Nov 2024 48x— +24%−15% −17%
CCL
Consumer Non-Durables
Apr 2022 30x17% +53%−20% +50%
VRLLOG
Transportation
Nov 2022 31x22% +23%−21% +11%
DOLLAR
Consumer Non-Durables
Apr 2021 24x14% +82%−12% +96%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
GREENLAM
Non-Energy Minerals
Mar 2020 16x19% −48%−52% +5%
ARTEMISMED
Health Services
Sep 2025 37x15% −18%−31% +47%
TIIL
Producer Manufacturing
Jun 2025 27x16% +5%−22% −15%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, ROCE and drawdown from 12-month high. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to CARYSIL LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Distribution Services
73%similar
operating marginROCE
Non-Energy Minerals
72%similar
debt/equityrevenue
NRB BEARINGSNRBBEARING
Producer Manufacturing
68%similar
ROCEvolatility
Producer Manufacturing
68%similar
EPS growthP/E
ADF FOODSADFFOODS
Consumer Non-Durables
66%similar
market caprevenue growth
KDDLKDDL
Consumer Durables
54%similar
debt/equityvolatility
Consumer Durables
50%similar
promoter holdingvolatility
Consumer Durables
49%similar
volatilityROCE

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Feb '23

  1. NovPriceFell 25% from the Aug 2026 peak to the Nov 2026 low.
  2. JulPriceVolume reached 13.9x its 50-day median on 2026-07-15; price +3.2% that day.
  3. MayPriceRegained the 2024-02 peak, 14 months after the low.
  4. MayPriceVolume reached 19.6x its 50-day median on 2026-05-20; price +11.2% that day.
  5. MarPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Consumer Durables on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  6. FebPriceVolume reached 17.3x its 50-day median on 2026-02-04; price +6.5% that day.
  7. DecPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Consumer Durables on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  8. NovPriceVolume reached 7.1x its 50-day median on 2025-11-10; price +3.4% that day.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. SepPriceVolume reached 7.0x its 50-day median on 2025-09-05; price +7.3% that day.
  2. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Consumer Durables on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  3. JunSharesShare count is up 20.0% over 12 months.
  4. MayPriceVolume reached 17.7x its 50-day median on 2025-05-22; price +14.5% that day.
  5. MarPriceFell 55% from the Feb 2024 peak to the Mar 2025 low.
  6. MarPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Consumer Durables on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  7. MarPriceVolume reached 31.0x its 50-day median on 2025-03-13; price +2.6% that day.
  8. FebValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (22.1x).
  9. DecPromoterPromoter holding fell 2.4 pts to 41.4%.
  10. DecInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 4.4 pts over 1 quarter to 12.3%.
  11. DecPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Consumer Durables on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  12. JulPriceVolume reached 6.2x its 50-day median on 2024-07-02; price +2.6% that day.
  13. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  14. JunPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Consumer Durables on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  15. FebPriceVolume reached 8.8x its 50-day median on 2024-02-05; price +9.6% that day.
  16. NovPriceRegained the 2021-12 peak, 10 months after the low.
  17. NovPriceVolume reached 16.8x its 50-day median on 2023-11-10; price +8.2% that day.
  18. SepPriceVolume reached 6.4x its 50-day median on 2023-09-12; price -6.0% that day.
  19. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  20. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Consumer Durables on ROCE (from the top quartile).
  21. JunPriceVolume reached 8.4x its 50-day median on 2023-06-13; price +6.3% that day.
  22. FebPriceVolume reached 13.9x its 50-day median on 2023-02-16; price +4.6% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history71 months · 2021-01 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1125.5x₹960 cr17.5%18.0%0.5x
2026-1025.6x₹960 cr17.6%18.0%0.5x
2026-0927.6x₹960 cr17.6%18.0%0.5x
2026-0832.7x₹925 cr16.1%18.0%0.5x
2026-0734.0x₹925 cr16.1%18.0%0.5x
2026-0634.7x₹925 cr16.1%18.0%0.5x
2026-0534.2x₹895 cr17.1%15.0%0.5x
2026-0428.6x₹895 cr17.1%15.0%0.5x
2026-0323.9x₹895 cr17.1%15.0%0.5x
2026-0231.4x₹875 cr15.6%15.0%0.5x
2026-0127.9x₹875 cr15.6%15.0%0.5x
2025-1231.5x₹875 cr15.6%15.0%0.5x
2025-1140.7x₹841 cr13.7%15.0%0.5x
2025-1037.6x₹841 cr13.7%15.0%0.5x
2025-0933.9x₹841 cr13.7%15.0%0.5x
2025-0837.8x₹815 cr12.3%15.0%0.5x
2025-0739.0x₹815 cr12.3%15.0%0.5x
2025-0638.2x₹815 cr12.3%15.0%0.5x
2025-0537.6x₹802 cr17.5%17.0%0.9x
2025-0427.6x₹802 cr17.5%17.0%0.9x
2025-0328.3x₹802 cr17.5%17.0%0.9x
2025-0222.1x₹787 cr18.1%17.0%0.9x
2025-0129.6x₹787 cr18.1%17.0%0.9x
2024-1232.2x₹787 cr18.1%17.0%0.9x
2024-1132.9x₹744 cr17.8%17.0%0.9x
2024-1034.7x₹744 cr17.8%17.0%0.9x
2024-0934.5x₹744 cr17.8%17.0%0.9x
2024-0841.6x₹685 cr16.7%17.0%0.9x
2024-0736.1x₹685 cr16.7%17.0%0.9x
2024-0639.0x₹685 cr16.7%17.0%0.9x
2024-0540.8x₹594 cr17.5%18.0%0.8x
2024-0448.3x₹594 cr17.5%18.0%0.8x
2024-0350.2x₹594 cr17.5%18.0%0.8x
2024-0248.8x₹594 cr17.5%18.0%0.8x
2024-0144.0x₹594 cr17.5%18.0%0.8x
2023-1242.0x₹594 cr17.5%18.0%0.8x
2023-1146.7x₹594 cr17.5%18.0%0.8x
2023-1032.1x₹594 cr17.5%18.0%0.8x
2023-0931.7x₹594 cr17.5%18.0%0.8x
2023-0832.6x₹594 cr17.5%18.0%0.8x
2023-0734.7x₹594 cr17.5%18.0%0.8x
2023-0636.0x₹594 cr17.5%18.0%0.8x
2023-0523.1x₹484 cr25.7%27.0%0.6x
2023-0424.6x₹484 cr25.7%27.0%0.6x
2023-0322.5x₹484 cr25.7%27.0%0.6x
2023-0221.1x₹484 cr25.7%27.0%0.6x
2023-0118.0x₹484 cr25.7%27.0%0.6x
2022-1219.3x₹484 cr25.7%27.0%0.6x
2022-1120.2x₹484 cr25.7%27.0%0.6x
2022-1021.7x₹484 cr25.7%27.0%0.6x
2022-0925.1x₹484 cr25.7%27.0%0.6x
2022-0828.7x₹484 cr25.7%27.0%0.6x
2022-0726.5x₹484 cr25.7%27.0%0.6x
2022-0625.9x₹484 cr25.7%27.0%0.6x
2022-0540.4x₹310 cr20.4%22.0%0.5x
2022-0450.9x₹310 cr20.4%22.0%0.5x
2022-0356.6x₹310 cr20.4%22.0%0.5x
2022-0246.1x₹310 cr20.4%22.0%0.5x
2022-0153.4x₹310 cr20.4%22.0%0.5x
2021-1256.0x₹310 cr20.4%22.0%0.5x
2021-1155.3x₹310 cr20.4%22.0%0.5x
2021-1049.2x₹310 cr20.4%22.0%0.5x
2021-0954.2x₹310 cr20.4%22.0%0.5x
2021-0843.9x₹310 cr20.4%22.0%0.5x
2021-0742.3x₹310 cr20.4%22.0%0.5x
2021-0642.6x₹310 cr20.4%22.0%0.5x
2021-0567.8x₹276 cr14.6%16.0%0.6x
2021-0439.0x₹276 cr14.6%16.0%0.6x
2021-0337.2x₹276 cr14.6%16.0%0.6x
2021-0237.1x₹276 cr14.6%16.0%0.6x
2021-0122.6x₹276 cr14.6%16.0%0.6x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback