अApnaFunda
Menu

AURIONPRO SOLUTIONS LIMITED (AURIONPRO)

Technology Services · Information Technology Services · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.76 / 100
Profitability 56Growth 71Balance sheet 100
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.30 / 100
Price 15Earnings 31FII/DII 44

Passes these screensDebt-light & profitableConsistent compounders

Compare withTATA CONSULTANCY SERVICESINFOSYSHCL TECHNOLOGIES

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹585.7 latest close · −33.4% over the last 90 sessions

₹600₹800Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹600₹800Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹585.7 month-end · −46.6% over 12 months

₹600₹800₹1,000Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹600₹800₹1,000Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹585.7 month-end · −33.3% over 3 years

₹500₹1,000₹1,500₹2,000Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹500₹1,000₹1,500₹2,000Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹585.7 month-end · +881.1% since Jan '19

₹0₹1,000₹2,000Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹0₹1,000₹2,000Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹514.25 to ₹1240.00 · 1-year volatility 46.6%

Was the rally earned?

-47%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 4 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 31.2x to 15.9x), which took 50 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +3 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+3 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −50 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−50 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1 ptsShare count changeShare price: −47%−47%Share priceNet profit growth: +3 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+3ProfitP/E change: −50 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−50P/EShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1SharesShare price: −47%−47%Share price
Net profit growth+3 ptsNet profit rose about 4%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-50 ptsThe P/E fell from 31.2x to 15.9x, which lowers the price.
Share count change+1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-33%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 45 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 41.2x to 15.9x), which took 78 points back.
  • The share count rose 16%.
Net profit growth: +57 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+57 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −78 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−78 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −12 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−12 ptsShare count changeShare price: −33%−33%Share priceNet profit growth: +57 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+57ProfitP/E change: −78 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−78P/EShare count change: −12 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−12SharesShare price: −33%−33%Share price
Net profit growth+57 ptsNet profit rose about 100%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-78 ptsThe P/E fell from 41.2x to 15.9x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-12 ptsShare count rose 16%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-81.0%recovered 2021-04
1-year volatility46.6%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.603-year daily, correlation 0.24
Volume spikes3last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−25%−50%−75%2020202120222023202420252026−78.8% 0%−25%−50%−75%2020202220242026−78.8%
Largest drawdowns

-81.0% (2019-04 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2021-04)

-72.5% (2024-08 peak to 2026-10 low, not yet recovered)

-40.0% (2022-01 peak to 2022-06 low, recovered 2022-09)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-10-29: 6.4x the 50-day median, price +8.4% that day

2026-08-31: 6.8x the 50-day median, price +0.2% that day

2026-07-28: 10.4x the 50-day median, price -12.1% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

15.9xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history51st percentile
CheapestMedian 15.9xDearest

Usual range 3.1x to 52.1x since 2019-01.

Against Technology Services15.9x vs 21.1x
This company
15.9x
Sector median
21.1x

25% below the Technology Services median.

1.7x24.6x47.5x70.5xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '261.7x24.6x47.5x70.5xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianTechnology Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianTechnology Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianTechnology Services median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Technology Services is valued

Where does it rank among Technology Services peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Technology Services peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE52nd▼ 6 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin59th▼ 11 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth56th▼ 25 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth44th▼ 15 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓67th▼ 9 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓33rdflat vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓66th▲ 19 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum16th▼ 16 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Technology Services sector page Watch it move against Technology Services in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~16%annual earnings growth implied by the priceIn line with delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 22.7x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 16.2%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered13.4%/yrEPS, last 10 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap+2.8 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank478thmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

-11%22%55% Jan 2019Nov 2026 -11%22%55% Jan 2019Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x17.7%18.8%19.8%
15x15.2%16.2%17.2%
20x12.0%13.0%14.0%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 16.2%/yr

Looking back

  • Jan 2020Price implied 1%/yr; EPS has since grown 18%/yr (7.0 yrs)
  • Jan 2021Price implied −6%/yr; EPS has since grown 33%/yr (6.0 yrs)

Past comparisons cover only companies listed today (survivorship bias) and say nothing about future outcomes.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Technology Services The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹585.70
P/E
15.9x
ROCE
16.0%
Market Cap
₹3239 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹1433 cr
P/S
2.3x
P/B
1.9x
ROE
11.7%
Operating Margin
17.0%
Debt / Equity
0.0x
Promoter Holding
26.9%
12M Momentum
-46.6%

52-week range

₹514.25₹1240.00
10% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
46.6%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.84

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
21.5x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
0.69x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

4 of 6checks within range2 near a threshold
Other income reliance10%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 10.3%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate15%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 15.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion0.69xNear threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 0.69x (cash from operations ₹377 cr, net profit ₹543 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow3 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 3. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-12 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 12 days (98 vs 110). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress9% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 9% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, FIIs added 11.6 pts; promoters trimmed 3.9 pts; DIIs added 0.9 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 11,830 to 55,618 (+370%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters30.8%26.9%-3.9 pts
FIIs4.4%16.0%+11.6 pts
DIIs0.6%1.5%+0.9 pts
Public and others64.2%55.6%-8.5 pts

Number of shareholders

55,618shareholders+370% since Sep '23
12k26k41k56k Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 11,830
Dec '23: 12,767
Mar '24: 13,473
Jun '24: 19,803
Sep '24: 24,627
Dec '24: 27,222
Mar '25: 31,827
Jun '25: 35,915
Sep '25: 45,242
Dec '25: 49,178
Mar '26: 50,976
Jun '26: 55,618
 12k26k41k56k Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 11,830
Dec '23: 12,767
Mar '24: 13,473
Jun '24: 19,803
Sep '24: 24,627
Dec '24: 27,222
Mar '25: 31,827
Jun '25: 35,915
Sep '25: 45,242
Dec '25: 49,178
Mar '26: 50,976
Jun '26: 55,618

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+15.2%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like AURIONPRO SOLUTIONS LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −28% to +58% vs the market, against −1% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+16.1%, 80% range −9.6% to +26.6%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
HPAL · Nov 2024: −46.8% vs market
RAMCOSYS · Sep 2021: −45.4% vs market
OAL · May 2022: −40.0% vs market
MAHEPC · May 2021: −35.8% vs market
GANESHBE · Jun 2024: −35.0% vs market
SIGACHI · Jul 2025: −34.9% vs market
MOREPENLAB · Jun 2022: −34.5% vs market
GREENPANEL · Jun 2023: −33.0% vs market
CHEMCON · Jul 2023: −31.3% vs market
KRBL · Nov 2023: −31.2% vs market
IPL · Jul 2023: −30.9% vs market
XCHANGING · Nov 2021: −30.0% vs market
NGLFINE · Aug 2024: −28.3% vs market
BBL · Aug 2025: −26.1% vs market
BHAGERIA · Jun 2022: −24.9% vs market
TVTODAY · Feb 2023: −23.5% vs market
GAEL · Jun 2023: −22.0% vs market
BLSE · Feb 2025: −18.8% vs market
APEX · Jan 2021: −14.4% vs market
MOTISONS · Oct 2025: −9.0% vs market
GEOJITFSL · Sep 2025: −2.8% vs market
SAKSOFT · Aug 2024: −1.5% vs market
CYIENT · Oct 2025: +3.2% vs market
VAIBHAVGBL · Nov 2022: +10.9% vs market
BANCOINDIA · Jan 2020: +11.6% vs market
CYBERTECH · Dec 2022: +18.8% vs market
FINCABLES · Jun 2025: +19.1% vs market
GRAPHITE · Sep 2022: +19.1% vs market
TECHNOE · Nov 2021: +20.7% vs market
MAYURUNIQ · Mar 2022: +23.6% vs market
EXCELINDUS · Nov 2021: +31.0% vs market
CONTROLPR · Oct 2021: +35.2% vs market
ZEEL · Aug 2021: +39.7% vs market
AEROENTER · Sep 2025: +40.2% vs market
MPSLTD · Jun 2020: +44.2% vs market
SHARDACROP · Mar 2020: +48.7% vs market
ZENSARTECH · Jun 2020: +53.8% vs market
JUSTDIAL · Sep 2020: +59.0% vs market
INTELLECT · Apr 2023: +63.9% vs market
AKUMS · Oct 2025: +67.8% vs market
KIOCL · Oct 2022: +73.6% vs market
BSOFT · Oct 2022: +84.2% vs market
APCOTEXIND · Jul 2020: +91.5% vs market
MARKSANS · Sep 2025: +94.2% vs market
RATEGAIN · Jul 2025: +98.8% vs market
IFBIND · Mar 2020: +132.1% vs market
ACE · Mar 2020: +150.7% vs market
NEWGEN · Jun 2020: +161.5% vs market
ECLERX · Jun 2020: +165.7% vs market
PRAJIND · Aug 2020: +205.0% vs market
Similar setups +15.2%All companies −0.9%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 5 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+15.2%
All companies' median
−0.9%
Beat the market
56% vs 49%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 33 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
MARKSANS
Health Technology		 Sep 2025 21x20% −45%−53% +94%
MAYURUNIQ
Process Industries		 Mar 2022 18x19% −14%−42% +24%
TECHNOE
Industrial Services		 Nov 2021 15x12% +11%−31% +21%
MOREPENLAB
Health Technology		 Jun 2022 18x23% −39%−46% −35%
INTELLECT
Technology Services		 Apr 2023 17x25% −44%−47% +64%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
RAMCOSYS
Technology Services		 Sep 2021 26x16% +13%−36% −45%
RATEGAIN
Technology Services		 Jul 2025 25x17% −47%−48% +99%
CHEMCON
Process Industries		 Jul 2023 17x15% −20%−43% −31%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, P/S and P/E. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to AURIONPRO SOLUTIONS LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

ADF FOODSADFFOODS
Consumer Non-Durables
65%similar
operating marginvolatility
CAPACITE INFRAPROJECTSCAPACITE
Industrial Services
60%similar
volatilitypromoter holding
NIIT LEARNING SYSTEMSNIITMTS
Commercial Services
59%similar
operating marginpromoter holding
MEDI ASSIST HEALTHCARE SERMEDIASSIST
Finance
57%similar
promoter holdingdebt/equity
VOLTAMP TRANSFORMERSVOLTAMP
Producer Manufacturing
57%similar
promoter holdingEPS growth
MASTEKMASTEK
Technology Services
61%similar
promoter holdingmarket cap
NEWGEN SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIESNEWGEN
Technology Services
61%similar
EPS growthrevenue
INTELLECT DESIGN ARENAINTELLECT
Technology Services
60%similar
ROCEpromoter holding

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Sep '22

  1. OctPriceFell 72% from the Aug 2024 peak to the Oct 2026 low.
  2. OctPriceVolume reached 6.4x its 50-day median on 2026-10-29; price +8.4% that day.
  3. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Technology Services on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  4. JulPriceVolume reached 10.4x its 50-day median on 2026-07-28; price -12.1% that day.
  5. JunPriceVolume reached 18.3x its 50-day median on 2026-06-15; price +9.7% that day.
  6. FebPriceVolume reached 12.0x its 50-day median on 2026-02-18; price +4.9% that day.
  7. DecPriceVolume reached 7.2x its 50-day median on 2025-12-11; price +8.0% that day.
  8. JulSharesShare count is up 116.0% over 12 months.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. JulPriceVolume reached 21.5x its 50-day median on 2025-07-07; price +9.4% that day.
  2. MayPriceVolume reached 8.6x its 50-day median on 2025-05-12; price +1.8% that day.
  3. MarPriceVolume reached 7.5x its 50-day median on 2025-03-27; price +19.8% that day.
  4. SepPromoterPromoter holding fell 3.0 pts to 26.9%.
  5. SepInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 7.5 pts over 1 quarter to 14.5%.
  6. SepPriceVolume reached 7.2x its 50-day median on 2024-09-20; price -3.8% that day.
  7. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹887 cr.
  8. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Technology Services on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  9. JunSharesShare count is up 8.7% over 12 months.
  10. JunPriceVolume reached 9.3x its 50-day median on 2024-06-13; price +4.4% that day.
  11. FebPriceVolume reached 5.1x its 50-day median on 2024-02-12; price -4.8% that day.
  12. SepPriceVolume reached 6.0x its 50-day median on 2023-09-08; price -4.7% that day.
  13. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  14. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Technology Services on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  15. MayPriceRegained the 2022-09 peak, 2 months after the low.
  16. MayPriceVolume reached 36.8x its 50-day median on 2023-05-04; price +12.4% that day.
  17. MarPriceFell 35% from the Sep 2022 peak to the Mar 2023 low.
  18. JanValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (11.4x).
  19. JanDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.15x.
  20. JanPriceVolume reached 5.6x its 50-day median on 2023-01-24; price +1.5% that day.
  21. DecPriceVolume reached 9.5x its 50-day median on 2022-12-08; price +13.6% that day.
  22. SepPriceRegained the 2022-01 peak, 3 months after the low.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history95 months · 2019-01 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1115.9x₹1433 cr11.7%16.0%0.0x
2026-1014.6x₹1433 cr11.9%16.0%0.0x
2026-0916.9x₹1433 cr11.9%16.0%0.0x
2026-0818.7x₹1412 cr12.2%16.0%0.0x
2026-0719.4x₹1412 cr12.2%16.0%0.0x
2026-0622.6x₹1412 cr12.2%16.0%0.0x
2026-0522.2x₹1393 cr13.4%18.0%0.0x
2026-0424.2x₹1393 cr13.4%18.0%0.0x
2026-0320.2x₹1393 cr13.4%18.0%0.0x
2026-0224.1x₹1328 cr13.7%18.0%0.0x
2026-0124.5x₹1328 cr13.7%18.0%0.0x
2025-1228.1x₹1328 cr13.7%18.0%0.0x
2025-1131.2x₹1248 cr13.0%18.0%0.0x
2025-1034.4x₹1248 cr13.0%18.0%0.0x
2025-0932.4x₹1248 cr13.0%18.0%0.0x
2025-0839.3x₹1173 cr12.6%18.0%0.0x
2025-0740.4x₹1173 cr12.6%18.0%0.0x
2025-0642.7x₹1173 cr12.6%18.0%0.0x
2025-0541.4x₹1093 cr19.1%22.0%0.1x
2025-0444.5x₹1093 cr19.1%22.0%0.1x
2025-0350.0x₹1093 cr19.1%22.0%0.1x
2025-0243.8x₹1018 cr18.1%22.0%0.1x
2025-0148.2x₹1018 cr18.1%22.0%0.1x
2024-1255.0x₹1018 cr18.1%22.0%0.1x
2024-1154.7x₹951 cr16.8%22.0%0.1x
2024-1055.5x₹951 cr16.8%22.0%0.1x
2024-0954.9x₹951 cr16.8%22.0%0.1x
2024-0870.5x₹887 cr15.4%22.0%0.1x
2024-0759.3x₹887 cr15.4%22.0%0.1x
2024-0649.7x₹887 cr15.4%22.0%0.1x
2024-0551.3x₹659 cr20.5%25.0%0.2x
2024-0458.6x₹659 cr20.5%25.0%0.2x
2024-0351.5x₹659 cr20.5%25.0%0.2x
2024-0252.3x₹659 cr20.5%25.0%0.2x
2024-0152.6x₹659 cr20.5%25.0%0.2x
2023-1251.0x₹659 cr20.5%25.0%0.2x
2023-1141.2x₹659 cr20.5%25.0%0.2x
2023-1037.5x₹659 cr20.5%25.0%0.2x
2023-0929.0x₹659 cr20.5%25.0%0.2x
2023-0823.8x₹659 cr20.5%25.0%0.2x
2023-0726.2x₹659 cr20.5%25.0%0.2x
2023-0622.9x₹659 cr20.5%25.0%0.2x
2023-0524.6x₹505 cr19.1%22.0%0.2x
2023-0411.7x₹505 cr19.1%22.0%0.2x
2023-039.9x₹505 cr19.1%22.0%0.2x
2023-0211.1x₹505 cr19.1%22.0%0.2x
2023-0111.4x₹505 cr19.1%22.0%0.2x
2022-1211.1x₹505 cr19.1%22.0%0.2x
2022-1111.1x₹505 cr19.1%22.0%0.2x
2022-1012.3x₹505 cr19.1%22.0%0.2x
2022-0914.4x₹505 cr19.1%22.0%0.2x
2022-0810.9x₹505 cr19.1%22.0%0.2x
2022-0710.4x₹505 cr19.1%22.0%0.2x
2022-068.2x₹505 cr19.1%22.0%0.2x
2022-05—₹374 cr-57.0%-8.0%0.4x
2022-04—₹374 cr-57.0%-8.0%0.4x
2022-03—₹374 cr-57.0%-8.0%0.4x
2022-02—₹374 cr-57.0%-8.0%0.4x
2022-01—₹374 cr-57.0%-8.0%0.4x
2021-12—₹374 cr-57.0%-8.0%0.4x
2021-11—₹374 cr-57.0%-8.0%0.4x
2021-10—₹374 cr-57.0%-8.0%0.4x
2021-09—₹374 cr-57.0%-8.0%0.4x
2021-08—₹374 cr-57.0%-8.0%0.4x
2021-07—₹374 cr-57.0%-8.0%0.4x
2021-06—₹374 cr-57.0%-8.0%0.4x
2021-0511.0x₹470 cr5.9%8.0%0.3x
2021-0412.2x₹470 cr5.9%8.0%0.3x
2021-039.8x₹470 cr5.9%8.0%0.3x
2021-025.7x₹470 cr5.9%8.0%0.3x
2021-015.4x₹470 cr5.9%8.0%0.3x
2020-126.6x₹470 cr5.9%8.0%0.3x
2020-115.3x₹470 cr5.9%8.0%0.3x
2020-105.3x₹470 cr5.9%8.0%0.3x
2020-094.8x₹470 cr5.9%8.0%0.3x
2020-084.6x₹470 cr5.9%8.0%0.3x
2020-073.3x₹470 cr5.9%8.0%0.3x
2020-063.8x₹470 cr5.9%8.0%0.3x
2020-051.8x₹522 cr12.2%15.0%0.2x
2020-041.9x₹522 cr12.2%15.0%0.2x
2020-031.7x₹522 cr12.2%15.0%0.2x
2020-021.7x₹522 cr12.2%15.0%0.2x
2020-012.4x₹522 cr12.2%15.0%0.2x
2019-122.4x₹522 cr12.2%15.0%0.2x
2019-112.8x₹522 cr12.2%15.0%0.2x
2019-103.1x₹522 cr12.2%15.0%0.2x
2019-094.4x₹522 cr12.2%15.0%0.2x
2019-083.7x₹522 cr12.2%15.0%0.2x
2019-074.0x₹522 cr12.2%15.0%0.2x
2019-064.6x₹522 cr12.2%15.0%0.2x
2019-053.4x₹418 cr27.8%22.0%0.2x
2019-044.1x₹418 cr27.8%22.0%0.2x
2019-033.4x₹418 cr27.8%22.0%0.2x
2019-022.9x₹418 cr27.8%22.0%0.2x
2019-013.2x₹418 cr27.8%22.0%0.2x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback