अApnaFunda

MARKSANS PHARMA LIMITED (MARKSANS)

Health Technology · Pharmaceuticals: Major · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.78 / 100
Profitability 73Growth 75Balance sheet 87
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.58 / 100
Price 86Earnings 71FII/DII 17

Passes these screensCash RichDebt-light & profitableLittle growth priced inConsistent compounders

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹308.75 latest close · +16.8% over the last 90 sessions

₹250₹300₹350Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹250₹300₹350Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹308.75 month-end · +64.3% over 12 months

₹150₹200₹250₹300Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹150₹200₹250₹300Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹308.75 month-end · +85.6% over 3 years

₹200₹300Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹200₹300Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹308.75 month-end · +1108.4% since Jan '19

₹0₹100₹200₹300Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹0₹100₹200₹300Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹155.00 to ₹350.95 · 1-year volatility 43.4%

Was the rally earned?

+64%share price, 1 yearEarnings-driven

Mostly yes.

  • Per-share earnings added 50 points to the rise, while the multiple moved less (P/E 24.3x to 27.1x).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +50 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+50 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +14 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+14 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1 ptsShare count changeShare price: +64%+64%Share priceNet profit growth: +50 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+50ProfitP/E change: +14 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+14P/EShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1SharesShare price: +64%+64%Share price
Net profit growth+50 ptsNet profit rose about 47%, which lifts the price.
P/E change+14 ptsThe P/E rose from 24.3x to 27.1x, which lifts the price.
Share count change+1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+86%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 92 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 28.3x to 27.1x), which took 6 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +93 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+93 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −6 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−6 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1 ptsShare count changeShare price: +86%+86%Share priceNet profit growth: +93 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+93ProfitP/E change: −6 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−6P/EShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1SharesShare price: +86%+86%Share price
Net profit growth+93 ptsNet profit rose about 95%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-6 ptsThe P/E fell from 28.3x to 27.1x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+448%share price, 5 yearsEarnings and multiple

Both mattered.

  • Per-share earnings added 180 points and the multiple added 268 points (P/E 9.8x to 27.1x).
  • The share count rose 9%.
Net profit growth: +203 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+203 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +268 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+268 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −23 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−23 ptsShare count changeShare price: +448%+448%Share priceNet profit growth: +203 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+203ProfitP/E change: +268 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+268P/EShare count change: −23 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−23SharesShare price: +448%+448%Share price
Net profit growth+203 ptsNet profit rose about 117%, which lifts the price.
P/E change+268 ptsThe P/E rose from 9.8x to 27.1x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-23 ptsShare count rose 9%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-62.9%recovered 2020-06
1-year volatility43.4%annualised
Beta vs sector index1.603-year daily, correlation 0.49
Volume spikes4last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2020202120222023202420252026−58.3% 0%−20%−40%−60%2020202220242026−58.3%
Largest drawdowns

-62.9% (2019-01 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2020-06)

-58.3% (2021-06 peak to 2022-06 low, recovered 2023-06)

-55.6% (2024-12 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-08-17: 7.8x the 50-day median, price -0.5% that day

2026-08-14: 12.6x the 50-day median, price +9.8% that day

2026-08-13: 6.7x the 50-day median, price -2.9% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

27.1xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history75th percentile
CheapestMedian 19.2xDearest

Usual range 9.0x to 31.2x since 2019-01.

Against Health Technology27.1x vs 37.0x
This company
27.1x
Sector median
37.0x

27% below the Health Technology median.

7.3x20.4x33.4x46.5xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '267.3x20.4x33.4x46.5xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianHealth Technology median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianHealth Technology median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianHealth Technology median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Health Technology is valued

Where does it rank among Health Technology peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Health Technology peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE69th▼ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin77th▲ 30 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth70th▼ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth78th▲ 30 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓66th▲ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓19thflat vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓66thflat vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum85th▲ 73 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Health Technology sector page Watch it move against Health Technology in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~25%annual earnings growth implied by the priceBelow delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 44.9x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 24.5%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered34.6%/yrEPS, last 10 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap−10.1 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank706thmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

0%17%35% Jan 2019Nov 2026 0%17%35% Jan 2019Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x26.1%27.2%28.4%
15x23.4%24.5%25.6%
20x20.0%21.0%22.1%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 24.5%/yr

Looking back

  • Jan 2020Price implied 9%/yr; EPS has since grown 25%/yr (7.0 yrs)
  • Jan 2021Price implied 21%/yr; EPS has since grown 21%/yr (6.0 yrs)
  • Jan 2022Price implied 17%/yr; EPS has since grown 10%/yr (5.0 yrs)

Past comparisons cover only companies listed today (survivorship bias) and say nothing about future outcomes.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Health Technology The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹308.75
P/E
27.1x
ROCE
19.0%
Market Cap
₹14001 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹3171 cr
P/S
4.4x
P/B
4.6x
ROE
17.1%
Operating Margin
25.0%
Debt / Equity
0.1x
Promoter Holding
43.9%
12M Momentum
64.3%

52-week range

₹155.00₹350.95
78% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
43.4%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.54

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
28.6x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
0.80x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

7 of 7checks within rangeAll clear
Other income reliance15%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 14.8%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate25%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 24.5%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion0.80xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 0.80x (cash from operations ₹895 cr, net profit ₹1,118 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow5 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 5. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+4 daysWithin range

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 4 days (80 vs 76). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress6% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 6% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days+2 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by +2 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, FIIs added 2.4 pts; DIIs added 2.2 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 2.1 lakh to 2.5 lakh (+19%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters43.9%43.9%0.0 pts
FIIs15.1%17.5%+2.4 pts
DIIs4.0%6.2%+2.2 pts
Public and others37.1%32.5%-4.6 pts

Number of shareholders

2.5 lakhshareholders+19% since Sep '23
2.1L2.3L2.5L2.7L Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 2.1 lakh
Dec '23: 2.4 lakh
Mar '24: 2.5 lakh
Jun '24: 2.4 lakh
Sep '24: 2.5 lakh
Dec '24: 2.6 lakh
Mar '25: 2.6 lakh
Jun '25: 2.6 lakh
Sep '25: 2.7 lakh
Dec '25: 2.6 lakh
Mar '26: 2.5 lakh
Jun '26: 2.5 lakh
2.1L2.3L2.5L2.7L Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 2.1 lakh
Dec '23: 2.4 lakh
Mar '24: 2.5 lakh
Jun '24: 2.4 lakh
Sep '24: 2.5 lakh
Dec '24: 2.6 lakh
Mar '25: 2.6 lakh
Jun '25: 2.6 lakh
Sep '25: 2.7 lakh
Dec '25: 2.6 lakh
Mar '26: 2.5 lakh
Jun '26: 2.5 lakh

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+3.0%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like MARKSANS PHARMA LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −13% to +27% vs the market, against −3% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+5.9%, 80% range −3.9% to +10.0%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−50%0%+50%+100%
PIXTRANS · Dec 2024: −46.5% vs market
RALLIS · Aug 2020: −39.7% vs market
MIDHANI · Jul 2020: −39.4% vs market
INTELLECT · Mar 2024: −39.0% vs market
DOLLAR · Jan 2022: −35.4% vs market
INNOVACAP · Jan 2025: −34.8% vs market
RSYSTEMS · Sep 2023: −34.5% vs market
GARFIBRES · Apr 2025: −33.1% vs market
AARTIPHARM · Jul 2025: −30.5% vs market
ADFFOODS · Feb 2025: −29.2% vs market
USHAMART · Jul 2023: −23.7% vs market
EIHOTEL · Dec 2024: −16.9% vs market
SHRIPISTON · Apr 2024: −13.6% vs market
CYIENT · May 2021: −12.0% vs market
BSOFT · Jun 2021: −11.6% vs market
ECLERX · Jul 2021: −10.0% vs market
FINPIPE · Mar 2020: −9.9% vs market
KPRMILL · Feb 2022: −8.1% vs market
CAPLIPOINT · May 2025: −8.0% vs market
KKCL · Jun 2023: −7.6% vs market
MOLDTKPAC · Aug 2022: −7.4% vs market
EPL · Jun 2020: −4.8% vs market
ZENSARTECH · Feb 2021: −2.3% vs market
KIRLOSBROS · May 2024: +0.3% vs market
CARBORUNIV · Sep 2021: +0.7% vs market
OAL · Oct 2020: +5.4% vs market
RADICO · May 2020: +6.1% vs market
JYOTHYLAB · Sep 2023: +6.6% vs market
RHIM · Mar 2022: +8.3% vs market
RAILTEL · Nov 2023: +9.2% vs market
TI · Jan 2025: +10.8% vs market
TEGA · Jun 2023: +15.1% vs market
ELECON · Dec 2023: +16.4% vs market
HSCL · Jul 2024: +17.0% vs market
BALKRISIND · Apr 2020: +18.5% vs market
PRINCEPIPE · Mar 2021: +23.0% vs market
ESCORTS · Feb 2020: +23.4% vs market
THYROCARE · Apr 2025: +28.2% vs market
ANUP · Aug 2023: +34.8% vs market
RATNAMANI · Dec 2022: +35.4% vs market
JBCHEPHARM · Feb 2020: +52.6% vs market
NEWGEN · Jul 2023: +63.7% vs market
KEI · Jul 2022: +71.1% vs market
PERSISTENT · Apr 2021: +71.4% vs market
SJS · Aug 2025: +78.4% vs market
NEULANDLAB · Mar 2024: +84.3% vs market
GODFRYPHLP · May 2024: +113.3% vs market
MASTEK · Aug 2020: +138.7% vs market
ACE · Apr 2023: +146.3% vs market
VAIBHAVGBL · Mar 2020: +177.2% vs market
Similar setups +3.0%All companies −2.9%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 4 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+3.0%
All companies' median
−2.9%
Beat the market
54% vs 47%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 39 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
ECLERX
Commercial Services
Jul 2021 28x24% +368%0% −10%
BSOFT
Technology Services
Jun 2021 35x22% +347%−2% −12%
ELECON
Producer Manufacturing
Dec 2023 44x25% +154%−3% +16%
USHAMART
Producer Manufacturing
Jul 2023 29x21% +133%0% −24%
GODFRYPHLP
Consumer Non-Durables
May 2024 29x22% +123%−7% +113%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
AARTIPHARM
Health Technology
Jul 2025 30x17% +44%−6% −31%
NEWGEN
Technology Services
Jul 2023 34x24% +130%0% +64%
KPRMILL
Consumer Non-Durables
Feb 2022 42x25% +241%−17% −8%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: revenue growth, drawdown from 12-month high and P/S. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to MARKSANS PHARMA LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Commercial Services
69%similar
market caprevenue growth
Technology Services
65%similar
revenuevolatility
Technology Services
65%similar
market capP/E
ANANT RAJANANTRAJ
Consumer Durables
63%similar
debt/equityP/E
NRB BEARINGSNRBBEARING
Producer Manufacturing
62%similar
volatilitypromoter holding
Health Technology
61%similar
debt/equityrevenue
NATCO PHARMANATCOPHARM
Health Technology
60%similar
operating marginrevenue
Health Technology
55%similar
promoter holdingoperating margin

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Jun '23

  1. SepInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 9.6 pts over 2 quarters to 23.7%.
  2. SepPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Health Technology on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  3. AugValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (34.8x).
  4. AugPriceVolume reached 29.7x its 50-day median on 2026-08-12; price +12.1% that day.
  5. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  6. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Health Technology on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  7. MayPriceVolume reached 44.3x its 50-day median on 2026-05-26; price +15.7% that day.
  8. MarResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. MarPriceFell 56% from the Dec 2024 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  2. FebPriceVolume reached 5.6x its 50-day median on 2026-02-03; price +9.4% that day.
  3. DecInstitutionsFII + DII holding fell 4.5 pts over 2 quarters to 22.2%.
  4. DecPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Health Technology on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  5. OctPriceVolume reached 8.1x its 50-day median on 2025-10-10; price +7.2% that day.
  6. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Health Technology on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  7. AugPriceVolume reached 13.2x its 50-day median on 2025-08-12; price -11.1% that day.
  8. MayValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (32.2x).
  9. MarPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Health Technology on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  10. DecInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 4.7 pts over 2 quarters to 25.4%.
  11. DecPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Health Technology on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  12. SepPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Health Technology on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  13. JulPriceVolume reached 14.2x its 50-day median on 2024-07-05; price +13.2% that day.
  14. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹2,177 cr.
  15. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Health Technology on ROCE (from the top quartile).
  16. AprValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (28.2x).
  17. AprPriceVolume reached 16.4x its 50-day median on 2024-04-16; price +13.4% that day.
  18. JanPriceVolume reached 5.7x its 50-day median on 2024-01-03; price +6.1% that day.
  19. NovValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (28.3x).
  20. NovPriceVolume reached 13.4x its 50-day median on 2023-11-09; price +6.5% that day.
  21. JulPriceVolume reached 9.1x its 50-day median on 2023-07-12; price +8.7% that day.
  22. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history60 months · 2021-12 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1127.1x₹3171 cr17.1%19.0%0.1x
2026-1026.8x₹3171 cr17.2%19.0%0.1x
2026-0928.2x₹3171 cr17.2%19.0%0.1x
2026-0834.8x₹2950 cr13.9%19.0%0.1x
2026-0728.0x₹2950 cr13.9%19.0%0.1x
2026-0629.6x₹2950 cr13.9%19.0%0.1x
2026-0530.9x₹2802 cr14.7%20.0%0.1x
2026-0423.2x₹2802 cr14.7%20.0%0.1x
2026-0319.7x₹2802 cr14.7%20.0%0.1x
2026-0222.4x₹2730 cr14.3%20.0%0.1x
2026-0121.1x₹2730 cr14.3%20.0%0.1x
2025-1223.2x₹2730 cr14.3%20.0%0.1x
2025-1124.3x₹2652 cr14.3%20.0%0.1x
2025-1023.6x₹2652 cr14.3%20.0%0.1x
2025-0921.4x₹2652 cr14.3%20.0%0.1x
2025-0820.1x₹2623 cr15.5%20.0%0.1x
2025-0727.1x₹2623 cr15.5%20.0%0.1x
2025-0631.1x₹2623 cr15.5%20.0%0.1x
2025-0532.2x₹2475 cr17.9%21.0%0.1x
2025-0427.0x₹2475 cr17.9%21.0%0.1x
2025-0327.4x₹2475 cr17.9%21.0%0.1x
2025-0226.7x₹2379 cr16.9%21.0%0.1x
2025-0131.5x₹2379 cr16.9%21.0%0.1x
2024-1238.7x₹2379 cr16.9%21.0%0.1x
2024-1146.5x₹2268 cr16.2%21.0%0.1x
2024-1039.3x₹2268 cr16.2%21.0%0.1x
2024-0940.4x₹2268 cr16.2%21.0%0.1x
2024-0834.6x₹2177 cr15.3%21.0%0.1x
2024-0730.4x₹2177 cr15.3%21.0%0.1x
2024-0622.9x₹2177 cr15.3%21.0%0.1x
2024-0525.3x₹1852 cr15.2%22.0%0.1x
2024-0428.2x₹1852 cr15.2%22.0%0.1x
2024-0325.8x₹1852 cr15.2%22.0%0.1x
2024-0225.9x₹1852 cr15.2%22.0%0.1x
2024-0126.4x₹1852 cr15.2%22.0%0.1x
2023-1227.4x₹1852 cr15.2%22.0%0.1x
2023-1128.3x₹1852 cr15.2%22.0%0.1x
2023-1018.0x₹1852 cr15.2%22.0%0.1x
2023-0918.7x₹1852 cr15.2%22.0%0.1x
2023-0819.2x₹1852 cr15.2%22.0%0.1x
2023-0720.2x₹1852 cr15.2%22.0%0.1x
2023-0615.5x₹1852 cr15.2%22.0%0.1x
2023-0518.9x₹1491 cr15.6%23.0%0.1x
2023-0417.9x₹1491 cr15.6%23.0%0.1x
2023-0315.6x₹1491 cr15.6%23.0%0.1x
2023-0215.0x₹1491 cr15.6%23.0%0.1x
2023-0114.2x₹1491 cr15.6%23.0%0.1x
2022-1212.9x₹1491 cr15.6%23.0%0.1x
2022-1112.8x₹1491 cr15.6%23.0%0.1x
2022-1010.9x₹1491 cr15.6%23.0%0.1x
2022-0910.3x₹1491 cr15.6%23.0%0.1x
2022-0811.6x₹1491 cr15.6%23.0%0.1x
2022-0710.8x₹1491 cr15.6%23.0%0.1x
2022-069.7x₹1491 cr15.6%23.0%0.1x
2022-058.1x₹1376 cr26.9%38.0%0.0x
2022-049.3x₹1376 cr26.9%38.0%0.0x
2022-037.9x₹1376 cr26.9%38.0%0.0x
2022-028.2x₹1376 cr26.9%38.0%0.0x
2022-019.7x₹1376 cr26.9%38.0%0.0x
2021-1210.4x₹1376 cr26.9%38.0%0.0x

Older months are in the live observatory.

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback