अApnaFunda

YATRA ONLINE LIMITED (YATRA)

Consumer Services · Other Consumer Services · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.71 / 100
Profitability 35Growth 92Balance sheet 86
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.14 / 100
Price 5Earnings 34FII/DII 4

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹76.83 latest close · −34.3% over the last 90 sessions

₹80₹100₹120Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹80₹100₹120Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹76.83 month-end · −55.8% over 12 months

₹100₹150Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹100₹150Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹76.83 month-end · −43.2% over 3 years

₹100₹150Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹100₹150Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹76.83 month-end · −43.9% since Sep '23

₹100₹150Sep '23May '24Dec '24Aug '25Mar '26Nov '26 ₹100₹150Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26

52-week range ₹68.01 to ₹202.00 · 1-year volatility 60.2%

Was the rally earned?

-56%share price, 1 yearEarnings and multiple

Both mattered.

  • Per-share earnings took off 31 points and the multiple took off 25 points (P/E 56.0x to 38.8x).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −30 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−30 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −25 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−25 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: −56%−56%Share priceNet profit growth: −30 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−30ProfitP/E change: −25 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−25P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: −56%−56%Share price
Net profit growth-30 ptsNet profit fell about 36%, which lowers the price.
P/E change-25 ptsThe P/E fell from 56.0x to 38.8x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-43%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 83 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 201.7x to 38.8x), which took 126 points back.
  • The share count rose 31%.
Net profit growth: +104 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+104 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −126 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−126 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −21 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−21 ptsShare count changeShare price: −43%−43%Share priceNet profit growth: +104 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+104ProfitP/E change: −126 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−126P/EShare count change: −21 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−21SharesShare price: −43%−43%Share price
Net profit growth+104 ptsNet profit rose about 288%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-126 ptsThe P/E fell from 201.7x to 38.8x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-21 ptsShare count rose 31%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with SWIGGY

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-64.2%not yet recovered
1-year volatility60.2%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.993-year daily, correlation 0.39
Volume spikes4last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%202420252026−64.2% 0%−20%−40%−60%202420252026−64.2%
Largest drawdowns

-64.2% (2025-11 peak to 2026-10 low, not yet recovered)

-63.4% (2024-01 peak to 2025-03 low, recovered 2025-11)

-16.0% (2023-10 peak to 2023-10 low, recovered 2024-01)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-09-01: 6.4x the 50-day median, price +7.0% that day

2026-08-13: 13.6x the 50-day median, price -2.4% that day

2026-08-12: 8.3x the 50-day median, price +4.1% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

38.8xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history30th percentile
CheapestMedian 49.4xDearest

Usual range 33.7x to 215.4x since 2023-09.

Against Consumer Services38.8x vs 22.4x
This company
38.8x
Sector median
22.4x

73% above the Consumer Services median.

16.8x100.1x183.4x266.7xSep '23May '24Jan '25Sep '25May '26Nov '2616.8x100.1x183.4x266.7xSep '23Oct '24Nov '25Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Services median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Consumer Services is valued

Where does it rank among Consumer Services peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Consumer Services peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE44th▲ 12 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin27th▼ 12 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth57th▼ 38 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth26th
  • Debt/equity ↓63rd▼ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓12th▼ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓26th▲ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum6th▼ 91 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Consumer Services sector page Watch it move against Consumer Services in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~36%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 108.0x, the price would imply about 36.4%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Consumer Services The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹76.83
P/E
38.8x
ROCE
7.0%
Market Cap
₹1205 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹985 cr
P/S
1.2x
P/B
1.5x
ROE
3.7%
Operating Margin
6.6%
Debt / Equity
0.1x
Promoter Holding
62.7%
12M Momentum
-55.8%

52-week range

₹68.01₹202.00
7% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
60.2%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.38

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
3.2x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
-1.96x
low
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

2 of 6checks within range4 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance64%Beyond threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 63.6%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate4%Beyond threshold

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 3.5%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion-1.96xBeyond threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: -1.96x (cash from operations ₹-155 cr, net profit ₹79 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow1 of 5 yrsBeyond threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 1. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-82 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 82 days (194 vs 276). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress8% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 8% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, DIIs trimmed 8.1 pts; FIIs trimmed 4.4 pts; promoters trimmed 1.8 pts.
  • The number of shareholders fell from 57,804 to 49,971 (-14%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters64.5%62.7%-1.8 pts
FIIs9.3%5.0%-4.4 pts
DIIs19.4%11.3%-8.1 pts
Public and others6.8%21.1%+14.3 pts

Number of shareholders

49,971shareholders-14% since Sep '23
31k40k49k58k Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 57,804
Dec '23: 35,524
Mar '24: 30,915
Jun '24: 33,856
Sep '24: 35,253
Dec '24: 38,319
Mar '25: 39,831
Jun '25: 40,125
Sep '25: 46,125
Dec '25: 45,441
Mar '26: 46,825
Jun '26: 49,971
31k40k49k58k Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 57,804
Dec '23: 35,524
Mar '24: 30,915
Jun '24: 33,856
Sep '24: 35,253
Dec '24: 38,319
Mar '25: 39,831
Jun '25: 40,125
Sep '25: 46,125
Dec '25: 45,441
Mar '26: 46,825
Jun '26: 49,971

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−7.1%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like YATRA ONLINE LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −29% to +36% vs the market, against −6% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−1.3%, 80% range −10.6% to +9.3%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
FILATFASH · Jul 2025: −72.0% vs market
SPCENET · Oct 2025: −68.3% vs market
KAMOPAINTS · Oct 2024: −63.4% vs market
SONAMAC · Sep 2025: −59.6% vs market
SEPC · Sep 2025: −58.3% vs market
HILTON · Oct 2025: −55.7% vs market
SALASAR · Sep 2025: −54.3% vs market
PAKKA · Sep 2025: −52.6% vs market
VIKASLIFE · Aug 2024: −50.7% vs market
ONMOBILE · Aug 2024: −35.4% vs market
DYNPRO · Feb 2023: −31.2% vs market
KOKUYOCMLN · Dec 2020: −30.2% vs market
ALANKIT · Jun 2022: −28.9% vs market
ENIL · Jan 2025: −28.8% vs market
ASTRON · Sep 2020: −25.7% vs market
DEN · Apr 2021: −25.6% vs market
JAICORPLTD · Aug 2025: −23.8% vs market
WIPL · Sep 2020: −22.5% vs market
REPRO · Nov 2024: −19.6% vs market
ZEEL · Jul 2024: −15.6% vs market
THEINVEST · Oct 2021: −14.0% vs market
IFGLEXPOR · Dec 2024: −13.0% vs market
STYRENIX · May 2022: −11.9% vs market
ROHLTD · Jun 2020: −7.4% vs market
RICOAUTO · Oct 2020: −7.2% vs market
THEMISMED · Jul 2025: −7.1% vs market
ORIENTCER · Feb 2025: −2.9% vs market
KOTYARK · Aug 2025: +1.5% vs market
APOLLO · Jun 2021: +3.9% vs market
PRECAM · Jun 2024: +5.7% vs market
MEDICAMEQ · Sep 2025: +8.3% vs market
EVERESTIND · Jun 2020: +12.7% vs market
RAMASTEEL · Jul 2024: +13.0% vs market
LOTUSEYE · Jul 2024: +15.3% vs market
OAL · Oct 2023: +21.2% vs market
V2RETAIL · Feb 2020: +26.5% vs market
LOKESHMACH · Mar 2025: +26.9% vs market
DPSCLTD · Nov 2022: +38.4% vs market
DIGISPICE · Jan 2023: +40.1% vs market
SHILPAMED · May 2023: +41.6% vs market
DCAL · Dec 2022: +41.8% vs market
HSCL · Jul 2021: +45.6% vs market
MARINE · Jun 2022: +46.9% vs market
BALAJITELE · Aug 2024: +47.2% vs market
SANGHIIND · Apr 2020: +50.4% vs market
SEAMECLTD · Sep 2023: +54.1% vs market
KRITIKA · Aug 2023: +101.4% vs market
SHAILY · Jul 2023: +119.9% vs market
NGLFINE · Jul 2025: +135.4% vs market
SOMANYCERA · Aug 2020: +173.4% vs market
Similar setups −7.1%All companies −5.8%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 4 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−7.1%
All companies' median
−5.8%
Beat the market
46% vs 44%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 35 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
V2RETAIL
Retail Trade
Feb 2020 19x8% −69%−74% +27%
ONMOBILE
Communications
Aug 2024 60x5% −22%−31% −35%
THEMISMED
Health Technology
Jul 2025 33x10% −57%−64% −7%
DPSCLTD
Utilities
Nov 2022 82x3% −45%−54% +38%
SEAMECLTD
Industrial Services
Sep 2023 49x3% −42%−48% +54%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
KAMOPAINTS
Process Industries
Oct 2024 51x12% −26%−63% −63%
SALASAR
Producer Manufacturing
Sep 2025 59x11% −53%−56% −54%
SOMANYCERA
Producer Manufacturing
Aug 2020 46x7% −44%−48% +173%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, ROCE and P/S. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to YATRA ONLINE LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Process Industries
61%similar
revenuerevenue growth
Distribution Services
59%similar
EPS growthrevenue
APOLLO PIPESAPOLLOPIPE
Producer Manufacturing
58%similar
debt/equityrevenue
Producer Manufacturing
58%similar
revenue growthEPS growth
Health Technology
56%similar
operating marginEPS growth
Consumer Services
32%similar
operating marginROCE
Consumer Services
32%similar
promoter holdingoperating margin
Consumer Services
25%similar
volatilityrevenue

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

29 events since Dec '23

  1. OctPriceFell 64% from the Nov 2025 peak to the Oct 2026 low.
  2. SepResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  3. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Consumer Services on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  4. AugPriceVolume reached 13.6x its 50-day median on 2026-08-13; price -2.4% that day.
  5. AprPriceVolume reached 5.8x its 50-day median on 2026-04-15; price +19.2% that day.
  6. MarValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (26.3x).
  7. FebPriceVolume reached 29.4x its 50-day median on 2026-02-25; price -2.3% that day.
  8. DecInstitutionsFII + DII holding fell 5.6 pts over 2 quarters to 17.5%.
Show 21 earlier events
  1. NovPriceRegained the 2024-01 peak, 8 months after the low.
  2. NovPriceVolume reached 22.4x its 50-day median on 2025-11-12; price +11.9% that day.
  3. AugPriceVolume reached 329.1x its 50-day median on 2025-08-13; price +8.4% that day.
  4. MayPriceVolume reached 5.8x its 50-day median on 2025-05-27; price +9.6% that day.
  5. AprDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.11x.
  6. MarPriceFell 63% from the Jan 2024 peak to the Mar 2025 low.
  7. MarPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Consumer Services on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  8. FebPriceVolume reached 6.9x its 50-day median on 2025-02-11; price -3.8% that day.
  9. DecResultsEPS (TTM) turned positive.
  10. DecPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Consumer Services on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  11. DecPriceVolume reached 14.1x its 50-day median on 2024-12-04; price +4.9% that day.
  12. SepPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Consumer Services on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  13. SepDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.11x.
  14. SepSharesShare count is up 45.5% over 12 months.
  15. SepPriceVolume reached 6.6x its 50-day median on 2024-09-02; price +1.4% that day.
  16. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned negative.
  17. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Consumer Services on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  18. JunDebtDebt / equity fell below 1.0x (0.11x).
  19. JunPriceVolume reached 8.1x its 50-day median on 2024-06-18; price -1.1% that day.
  20. JanPriceVolume reached 12.0x its 50-day median on 2024-01-10; price +8.8% that day.
  21. DecPriceVolume reached 8.0x its 50-day median on 2023-12-26; price +0.9% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history39 months · 2023-09 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1138.8x₹985 cr3.7%7.0%0.1x
2026-1034.6x₹985 cr3.7%7.0%0.1x
2026-0950.4x₹985 cr3.7%7.0%0.1x
2026-0835.7x₹1007 cr5.6%7.0%0.1x
2026-0735.7x₹1007 cr5.6%7.0%0.1x
2026-0637.8x₹1007 cr5.6%7.0%0.1x
2026-0529.2x₹1036 cr6.9%5.0%0.1x
2026-0430.8x₹1036 cr6.9%5.0%0.1x
2026-0326.3x₹1036 cr6.9%5.0%0.1x
2026-0233.5x₹1015 cr7.1%5.0%0.1x
2026-0141.8x₹1015 cr7.1%5.0%0.1x
2025-1249.0x₹1015 cr7.1%5.0%0.1x
2025-1156.0x₹900 cr6.2%5.0%0.1x
2025-1047.2x₹900 cr6.2%5.0%0.1x
2025-0945.0x₹900 cr6.2%5.0%0.1x
2025-0864.6x₹791 cr4.7%5.0%0.1x
2025-0741.6x₹791 cr4.7%5.0%0.1x
2025-0636.5x₹791 cr4.7%5.0%0.1x
2025-0557.8x₹680 cr3.6%4.0%0.1x
2025-0448.1x₹680 cr3.6%4.0%0.1x
2025-0349.4x₹680 cr3.6%4.0%0.1x
2025-0260.5x₹555 cr2.4%4.0%0.1x
2025-0181.8x₹555 cr2.4%4.0%0.1x
2024-1299.8x₹555 cr2.4%4.0%0.1x
2024-11—₹413 cr-0.9%4.0%0.1x
2024-10—₹413 cr-0.9%4.0%0.1x
2024-09—₹413 cr-0.9%4.0%0.1x
2024-08—₹422 cr-0.3%4.0%0.1x
2024-07—₹422 cr-0.3%4.0%0.1x
2024-06—₹422 cr-0.3%4.0%0.1x
2024-05193.8x₹380 cr4.7%14.0%1.1x
2024-04221.9x₹380 cr4.7%14.0%1.1x
2024-03213.5x₹380 cr4.7%14.0%1.1x
2024-02251.5x₹380 cr4.7%14.0%1.1x
2024-01266.7x₹380 cr4.7%14.0%1.1x
2023-12215.8x₹380 cr4.7%14.0%1.1x
2023-11201.7x₹380 cr4.7%14.0%1.1x
2023-10191.0x₹380 cr4.7%14.0%1.1x
2023-09204.3x₹380 cr4.7%14.0%1.1x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback