VILAS TRANSCORE LIMITED (VILAS): Financials & Fundamentals History

Share Price

₹337.65

P/E

20.9x

ROCE

16.0%

Market Cap

₹826 cr

Revenue (TTM)

₹461 cr

P/S

1.8x

P/B

2.5x

ROE

12.1%

Debt / Equity

0.1x

Promoter Holding

73.1%

12M Momentum

-26.3%

P/E vs its own history3rd percentilesince Jun '24

P/E vs Producer Manufacturing0.7xthe sector median

52-week range

₹313.25₹495.00

13% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility

54.1%

Beta vs sector

1-year daily

1.07

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover

operating profit ÷ interest

27.0x

Cash from profit, 3Y

operating cash flow ÷ net profit

0.05x

low

Share count, 1Y

unchanged

Was the rally earned?

-26%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

Per-share earnings added 12 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 32.5x to 20.9x), which took 38 points back.
The share count barely moved.

Net profit growth+13 ptsNet profit rose about 16%, which lifts the price.

P/E change-38 ptsThe P/E fell from 32.5x to 20.9x, which lowers the price.

Share count change-1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.

What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 3 years and 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

20.9xP/E todayNear its historic low

Against its own history3rd percentileMedian 30.5x; usual range 22.8x to 38.6x since 2024-06.

Against Producer Manufacturing20.9x vs 28.5xBelow the Producer Manufacturing median.

P/EP/BP/S

P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dashed line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Producer Manufacturing is valued

What is the price implying?

~20%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 31.0x, the price would imply about 20.4%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Below the ₹1,000 cr market-cap floor used for the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Producer Manufacturing The market-wide Expectations lists

What changed?

Oct '26P/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (20.9x).
Sep '26Fell 50% from the Jun 2025 peak to the Sep 2026 low.
Sep '26Volume reached 12.3x its 50-day median on 2026-09-22; price +14.0% that day.
Jun '26Revenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹461 cr.
Jun '26P/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (23.0x).
May '26Volume reached 13.3x its 50-day median on 2026-05-12; price -9.4% that day.
Feb '26Volume reached 7.5x its 50-day median on 2026-02-09; price +3.1% that day.
Nov '25Volume reached 6.6x its 50-day median on 2025-11-14; price +6.4% that day.

Show 10 earlier events

Aug '25Slipped to the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on ROCE (from the top quartile).
Jun '25Revenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹353 cr.
Jun '25Regained the 2024-11 peak, 2 months after the low.
Jun '25Moved into the top quartile of Producer Manufacturing on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
Jun '25Share count is up 33.3% over 12 months.
May '25Volume reached 10.2x its 50-day median on 2025-05-22; price +20.0% that day.
Apr '25Fell 45% from the Nov 2024 peak to the Apr 2025 low.
Dec '24FII + DII holding fell 5.8 pts over 1 quarter to 4.7%.
Nov '24Regained the 2024-07 peak, 1 month after the low.
Oct '24Fell 28% from the Jul 2024 peak to the Oct 2024 low.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Are profits backed by cash?

4 of 6 checks are within range, 1 near a threshold, 1 beyond a threshold.
Tap a check to see how it is measured.

Other income reliance13%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 13.5%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Cash conversion0.05xBeyond threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 0.05x (cash from operations ₹5 cr, net profit ₹97 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow3 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 3. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+7 daysWithin range

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 7 days (61 vs 54). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress30% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 30% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days-15 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by -15 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

Over 2 years, FIIs trimmed 2.9 pts; DIIs trimmed 2.3 pts.
The number of shareholders rose from 3,073 to 4,254 (+38%) between Jun 2024 and Mar 2026.

Holdings, Mar '26

How each group changed

GroupJun '24Mar '26Change

Promoters73.2%73.1%0.0 pts

FIIs5.0%2.1%-2.9 pts

DIIs5.5%3.2%-2.3 pts

Public and others16.4%21.6%+5.2 pts

Number of shareholders

4,254shareholders+38% since Jun '24

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-49.8%not yet recovered

1-year volatility54.1%annualised

Beta vs sector index1.153-year daily, correlation 0.42

Volume spikes2last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Monthly share price

Last 90 trading days

Drawdown from peak

Largest drawdowns

-49.8% (2025-06 peak to 2026-09 low, not yet recovered)

-44.6% (2024-11 peak to 2025-04 low, recovered 2025-06)

-28.3% (2024-07 peak to 2024-10 low, recovered 2024-11)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-09-22: 12.3x the 50-day median, price +14.0% that day

2026-09-18: 6.4x the 50-day median, price +12.3% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Where does it rank among Producer Manufacturing peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Producer Manufacturing peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

ROCE

Revenue growth

EPS growth

Debt/equity ↓

Cash cycle ↓

P/E ↓

12M momentum

Nov '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Oct '26

Lower rank Higher rank

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Producer Manufacturing sector page Watch it move against Producer Manufacturing in the Observatory

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Company	Sector	Similarity	Closest on
REMUS PHARMACEUTICALS (REMUS)	Health Technology	71%	ROCE, market cap
ORBIT EXPORTS (ORBTEXP)	Process Industries	66%	volatility, ROCE
EXCELSOFT TECHNOLOGIES (EXCELSOFT)	Technology Services	46%	market cap, volatility
IFB AGRO INDUSTRIES (IFBAGRO)	Consumer Non-Durables	45%	debt/equity, market cap
SOUTH WEST PINNACLE EXPL (SOUTHWEST)	Energy Minerals	45%	volatility, revenue
DANISH POWER (DANISH)	Producer Manufacturing	51%	promoter holding, revenue
KANPUR PLASTIPACK (KANPRPLA)	Producer Manufacturing	50%	ROCE, market cap
EURO PRATIK SALES (EUROPRATIK)	Producer Manufacturing	42%	P/E, promoter holding

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What happened next to similar setups

−8.3%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate

We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like VILAS TRANSCORE LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −31% to +28% vs the market, against −3% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
The gap against the base rate (−5.3%, 80% range −17.1% to +9.2%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 2 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median

−8.3%

All companies' median

−3.0%

Beat the market

48% vs 47%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 36 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

Company	When	P/E	ROCE	12M mom.	Drawdown	Next 12 months
AVTNPL Consumer Non-Durables	Mar 2021	20x	15%	+90%	−15%	+135%
NGLFINE Health Technology	Jun 2024	35x	20%	+25%	−13%	−54%
CONFIPET Retail Trade	Feb 2023	19x	17%	−11%	−29%	+20%
VIMTALABS Commercial Services	Apr 2022	36x	14%	+36%	−20%	+12%
WINDLAS Health Technology	Oct 2025	30x	17%	−15%	−17%	+4%

Show the other 3 matches

Company	When	P/E	ROCE	12M mom.	Drawdown	Next 12 months
SHREEPUSHK Process Industries	Dec 2021	23x	10%	+53%	−19%	−15%
INSECTICID Process Industries	Jun 2020	11x	14%	−31%	−34%	+1%
BANCOINDIA Producer Manufacturing	Mar 2020	7x	17%	−58%	−59%	+20%

How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: drawdown from 12-month high, 12-month momentum and P/E. Not used (unavailable for this company): operating margin. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to VILAS TRANSCORE LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-10-30. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

Feature	Weight	Non-financial	Financial
P/E	1	yes	yes
P/S	1	yes	—
P/B	1	—	yes
ROCE	1	yes	—
operating margin	1	yes	—
ROE	1	—	yes
debt/equity	0.75	yes	—
interest cover	0.5	yes	—
revenue growth	0.75	yes	yes
12-month momentum	1	yes	yes
drawdown from 12-month high	0.75	yes	yes
size	0.75	yes	yes
volatility	0.5	yes	yes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
Pools: non-financial: 97,430 company-months from 2000 companies; financial: 5,632 company-months from 106 companies. 2240 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Monthly history (29 months)

Month	P/E	Revenue (TTM)	ROE	ROCE	Debt / Equity
2026-10	20.9x	₹461 cr	12.1%	16.0%	0.1x
2026-09	24.7x	₹461 cr	12.2%	16.0%	0.1x
2026-08	22.2x	₹461 cr	12.2%	16.0%	0.1x
2026-07	21.6x	₹461 cr	12.2%	16.0%	0.1x
2026-06	23.0x	₹461 cr	12.2%	16.0%	0.1x
2026-05	25.5x	₹353 cr	11.8%	22.0%	0.0x
2026-04	30.5x	₹353 cr	11.8%	22.0%	0.0x
2026-03	24.0x	₹353 cr	11.8%	22.0%	0.0x
2026-02	27.8x	₹353 cr	11.8%	22.0%	0.0x
2026-01	23.0x	₹353 cr	11.8%	22.0%	0.0x
2025-12	28.0x	₹353 cr	11.8%	22.0%	0.0x
2025-11	28.5x	₹353 cr	11.8%	22.0%	0.0x
2025-10	32.5x	₹353 cr	11.8%	22.0%	0.0x
2025-09	36.0x	₹353 cr	11.8%	22.0%	0.0x
2025-08	36.9x	₹353 cr	11.8%	22.0%	0.0x
2025-07	38.8x	₹353 cr	11.8%	22.0%	0.0x
2025-06	40.6x	₹353 cr	11.8%	22.0%	0.0x
2025-05	38.6x	₹310 cr	14.5%	21.0%	0.0x
2025-04	27.4x	₹310 cr	14.5%	21.0%	0.0x
2025-03	25.2x	₹310 cr	14.5%	21.0%	0.0x
2025-02	26.0x	₹310 cr	14.5%	21.0%	0.0x
2025-01	32.4x	₹310 cr	14.5%	21.0%	0.0x
2024-12	36.8x	₹310 cr	14.5%	21.0%	0.0x
2024-11	38.6x	₹310 cr	14.5%	21.0%	0.0x
2024-10	35.1x	₹310 cr	14.5%	21.0%	0.0x
2024-09	31.3x	₹310 cr	14.5%	21.0%	0.0x
2024-08	31.3x	₹310 cr	14.5%	21.0%	0.0x
2024-07	36.4x	₹310 cr	14.5%	21.0%	0.0x
2024-06	39.6x	₹310 cr	14.5%	21.0%	0.0x

Methodology and data notes