अApnaFunda

ASIAN ENERGY SERVICES LTD (ASIANENE)

Energy Minerals · Oil & Gas Production · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.69 / 100
Profitability 43Growth 100Balance sheet 63
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.46 / 100
Price 63Earnings 47FII/DII 26

Passes these screensHigh MomentumDebt-light & profitable

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹398 latest close · +19.7% over the last 90 sessions

₹300₹400₹500Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹300₹400₹500Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹398 month-end · +34.8% over 12 months

₹300₹400Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹300₹400Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹398 month-end · +91.4% over 3 years

₹200₹300₹400Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹200₹300₹400Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹398 month-end · +194.2% since Dec '21

₹200₹400Dec '21Dec '22Dec '23Nov '24Nov '25Nov '26 ₹200₹400Dec '21Jun '24Nov '26

52-week range ₹230.00 to ₹565.70 · 1-year volatility 51.2%

Was the rally earned?

+35%share price, 1 yearEarnings-driven

Mostly yes.

  • Per-share earnings added 25 points to the rise, while the multiple moved less (P/E 29.0x to 31.5x).
  • The share count rose 9%.
Net profit growth: +35 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+35 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +10 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+10 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −10 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−10 ptsShare count changeShare price: +35%+35%Share priceNet profit growth: +35 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+35ProfitP/E change: +10 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+10P/EShare count change: −10 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−10SharesShare price: +35%+35%Share price
Net profit growth+35 ptsNet profit rose about 35%, which lifts the price.
P/E change+10 ptsThe P/E rose from 29.0x to 31.5x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-10 ptsShare count rose 9%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 3 years and 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with ANTELOPUS SELAN ENERGY

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-67.3%recovered 2023-09
1-year volatility51.2%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.583-year daily, correlation 0.22
Volume spikes4last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2023202420252026−65.3% 0%−20%−40%−60%20242026−65.3%
Largest drawdowns

-67.3% (2022-01 peak to 2023-02 low, recovered 2023-09)

-50.0% (2024-08 peak to 2025-03 low, recovered 2026-08)

-28.6% (2024-01 peak to 2024-03 low, recovered 2024-07)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-09-08: 5.1x the 50-day median, price +8.2% that day

2026-08-19: 5.4x the 50-day median, price +3.4% that day

2026-08-18: 13.4x the 50-day median, price +8.9% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

31.5xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history50th percentile
CheapestMedian 31.8xDearest

Usual range 7.2x to 44.8x since 2021-12.

Against Energy Minerals31.5x vs 12.7x
This company
31.5x
Sector median
12.7x

149% above the Energy Minerals median.

5.4x25.5x45.6x65.7xDec '21Dec '22Dec '23Dec '24Dec '25Nov '265.4x25.5x45.6x65.7xDec '21Aug '23Apr '25Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianEnergy Minerals median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianEnergy Minerals median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianEnergy Minerals median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Energy Minerals is valued

Where does it rank among Energy Minerals peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Energy Minerals peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE48th▼ 18 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin38th▼ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth96th▼ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth62nd▼ 28 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓50th▼ 33 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓23rd▲ 6 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓12th▼ 12 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum88th▲ 45 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Energy Minerals sector page Watch it move against Energy Minerals in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~33%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 82.3x, the price would imply about 32.8%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Energy Minerals The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹398.00
P/E
31.5x
ROCE
16.0%
Market Cap
₹1955 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹946 cr
P/S
2.1x
P/B
4.0x
ROE
12.5%
Operating Margin
8.0%
Debt / Equity
0.3x
Promoter Holding
56.1%
12M Momentum
34.8%

52-week range

₹230.00₹565.70
50% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
51.2%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.61

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
7.0x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
-0.20x
low
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

3 of 6checks within range2 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance5%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 5.1%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate27%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 27.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion-0.20xBeyond threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: -0.20x (cash from operations ₹-24 cr, net profit ₹120 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow1 of 5 yrsBeyond threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 1. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-16 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 16 days (160 vs 176). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress40% of fixed assetsNear threshold

Capital work-in-progress is 40% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, promoters trimmed 6.9 pts; FIIs added 1.3 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 17,460 to 23,990 (+37%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters63.1%56.1%-6.9 pts
FIIs0.1%1.4%+1.3 pts
DIIs0.0%0.3%+0.3 pts
Public and others35.9%42.2%+6.3 pts

Number of shareholders

23,990shareholders+37% since Sep '23
17k19k22k24k Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 17,460
Dec '23: 16,647
Mar '24: 16,524
Jun '24: 18,818
Sep '24: 18,997
Dec '24: 20,658
Mar '25: 20,912
Jun '25: 21,701
Sep '25: 21,769
Dec '25: 20,738
Mar '26: 20,289
Jun '26: 23,990
17k19k22k24k Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 17,460
Dec '23: 16,647
Mar '24: 16,524
Jun '24: 18,818
Sep '24: 18,997
Dec '24: 20,658
Mar '25: 20,912
Jun '25: 21,701
Sep '25: 21,769
Dec '25: 20,738
Mar '26: 20,289
Jun '26: 23,990

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+2.8%typical 12-month return vs the marketAbove the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like ASIAN ENERGY SERVICES LTD today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −30% to +34% vs the market, against −4% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The analogs' median sat above that base rate (gap +6.5%, 80% range +0.5% to +18.5%), but the matches cluster in only 6 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
GIRIRAJ · Sep 2025: −84.1% vs market
SOLARA · Jun 2021: −79.1% vs market
SMSPHARMA · Jun 2021: −53.0% vs market
EKC · May 2022: −48.9% vs market
ZAGGLE · Mar 2025: −46.7% vs market
ANNAPURNA · Jan 2025: −46.6% vs market
FSL · Aug 2021: −44.7% vs market
HIKAL · Oct 2021: −44.7% vs market
TEXRAIL · Oct 2024: −40.2% vs market
BBL · Jul 2024: −37.1% vs market
PARACABLES · Jan 2024: −36.8% vs market
POKARNA · Jul 2022: −35.8% vs market
CONFIPET · Jun 2023: −30.5% vs market
REFEX · Aug 2025: −28.4% vs market
ORBTEXP · May 2023: −24.8% vs market
OPTIEMUS · Feb 2025: −20.5% vs market
THOMASCOTT · Sep 2025: −19.4% vs market
THOMASCOOK · Aug 2024: −16.2% vs market
STEELCAS · May 2023: −7.8% vs market
TPLPLASTEH · May 2024: −7.4% vs market
AMBER · Apr 2021: −3.2% vs market
NILAINFRA · Jun 2024: −1.0% vs market
MARINE · Mar 2025: −0.7% vs market
THEMISMED · Nov 2021: −0.1% vs market
DMCC · Sep 2025: +1.4% vs market
SDBL · Apr 2024: +4.1% vs market
ORIENTHOT · Jun 2023: +5.7% vs market
STERTOOLS · Sep 2023: +5.9% vs market
NACLIND · Feb 2022: +13.7% vs market
KDDL · Feb 2024: +18.0% vs market
AVTNPL · Dec 2020: +18.1% vs market
SALASAR · Jul 2023: +23.2% vs market
NDRAUTO · Oct 2024: +25.0% vs market
CANTABIL · Jan 2020: +26.2% vs market
KKCL · Feb 2023: +27.1% vs market
ASTRAMICRO · Oct 2020: +28.3% vs market
VADILALIND · Mar 2023: +33.1% vs market
KRISHANA · Jul 2022: +33.9% vs market
KINGFA · Nov 2022: +44.8% vs market
VIMTALABS · Jun 2021: +46.5% vs market
TI · Dec 2023: +49.1% vs market
KABRAEXTRU · Jul 2021: +55.4% vs market
HSCL · Oct 2023: +72.3% vs market
INFOBEAN · Oct 2020: +79.0% vs market
AEGISLOG · Jun 2023: +85.6% vs market
TDPOWERSYS · Feb 2022: +94.2% vs market
BUTTERFLY · Aug 2021: +95.8% vs market
MANINFRA · Jun 2021: +97.2% vs market
GLOBUSSPR · Feb 2021: +237.4% vs market
MBAPL · Sep 2021: +354.8% vs market
Similar setups +2.8%All companies −3.7%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 2 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+2.8%
All companies' median
−3.7%
Beat the market
52% vs 46%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 36 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
EKC
Producer Manufacturing
May 2022 23x16% +77%−35% −49%
SDBL
Consumer Non-Durables
Apr 2024 41x16% +89%−17% +4%
KRISHANA
Process Industries
Jul 2022 28x20% +94%−23% +34%
STERTOOLS
Producer Manufacturing
Sep 2023 28x13% +80%−16% +6%
GLOBUSSPR
Consumer Non-Durables
Feb 2021 20x14% +203%−14% +237%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
NDRAUTO
Producer Manufacturing
Oct 2024 43x19% +136%−24% +25%
REFEX
Energy Minerals
Aug 2025 29x23% +18%−36% −28%
GIRIRAJ
Industrial Services
Sep 2025 50x20% −2%−25% −84%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: drawdown from 12-month high, ROCE and P/S. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to ASIAN ENERGY SERVICES LTD. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Producer Manufacturing
71%similar
market cappromoter holding
JNK INDIAJNKINDIA
Producer Manufacturing
64%similar
revenuemarket cap
Producer Manufacturing
64%similar
P/Emarket cap
Industrial Services
64%similar
volatilitypromoter holding
Non-Energy Minerals
63%similar
volatilityrevenue
Energy Minerals
41%similar
promoter holdingvolatility
Energy Minerals
24%similar
debt/equityvolatility
Energy Minerals
12%similar
market caprevenue

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Jun '24

  1. OctPriceFell 28% from the Sep 2026 peak to the Oct 2026 low.
  2. SepPromoterPromoter holding fell 4.6 pts to 56.1% (largest drop in the history since 2019-01).
  3. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  4. AugPriceRegained the 2024-08 peak, 17 months after the low.
  5. AugPriceVolume reached 13.4x its 50-day median on 2026-08-18; price +8.9% that day.
  6. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  7. MayPriceVolume reached 48.1x its 50-day median on 2026-05-20; price +10.9% that day.
  8. MarResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. MarPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  2. JanPriceVolume reached 36.4x its 50-day median on 2026-01-09; price +3.4% that day.
  3. DecResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  4. DecPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  5. NovPriceVolume reached 5.9x its 50-day median on 2025-11-04; price +3.3% that day.
  6. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  7. JulSharesShare count is up 9.8% over 12 months.
  8. JulPriceVolume reached 56.1x its 50-day median on 2025-07-28; price +7.0% that day.
  9. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹465 cr.
  10. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  11. JunDividendStarted paying a dividend (payout 11% of profit).
  12. MayPriceVolume reached 5.2x its 50-day median on 2025-05-14; price +6.0% that day.
  13. MarPriceFell 50% from the Aug 2024 peak to the Mar 2025 low.
  14. JanPriceVolume reached 9.0x its 50-day median on 2025-01-06; price +1.2% that day.
  15. DecPromoterPromoter holding rose 2.4 pts to 61.0%.
  16. DecPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  17. DecPriceVolume reached 14.9x its 50-day median on 2024-12-11; price +11.7% that day.
  18. AugPriceVolume reached 7.7x its 50-day median on 2024-08-23; price +10.0% that day.
  19. JulPriceRegained the 2024-01 peak, 4 months after the low.
  20. JunPromoterPromoter holding fell 2.9 pts to 58.5%.
  21. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned positive.
  22. JunPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the bottom quartile).

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history60 months · 2021-12 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1131.5x₹946 cr12.5%16.0%0.3x
2026-1032.5x₹946 cr12.1%16.0%0.3x
2026-0937.4x₹946 cr12.1%16.0%0.3x
2026-0841.4x₹790 cr10.7%16.0%0.3x
2026-0735.0x₹790 cr10.7%16.0%0.3x
2026-0631.5x₹790 cr10.7%16.0%0.3x
2026-0538.4x₹667 cr10.8%16.0%0.1x
2026-0434.1x₹667 cr10.8%16.0%0.1x
2026-0325.6x₹667 cr10.8%16.0%0.1x
2026-0240.2x₹524 cr8.3%16.0%0.1x
2026-0135.3x₹524 cr8.3%16.0%0.1x
2025-1239.0x₹524 cr8.3%16.0%0.1x
2025-1129.0x₹520 cr11.5%16.0%0.1x
2025-1032.8x₹520 cr11.5%16.0%0.1x
2025-0932.2x₹520 cr11.5%16.0%0.1x
2025-0839.1x₹465 cr10.5%16.0%0.1x
2025-0737.3x₹465 cr10.5%16.0%0.1x
2025-0631.5x₹465 cr10.5%16.0%0.1x
2025-0538.3x₹369 cr12.2%13.0%0.1x
2025-0434.9x₹369 cr12.2%13.0%0.1x
2025-0333.8x₹369 cr12.2%13.0%0.1x
2025-0226.5x₹372 cr14.0%13.0%0.1x
2025-0133.0x₹372 cr14.0%13.0%0.1x
2024-1239.7x₹372 cr14.0%13.0%0.1x
2024-1144.5x₹319 cr11.2%13.0%0.1x
2024-1045.5x₹319 cr11.2%13.0%0.1x
2024-0947.6x₹319 cr11.2%13.0%0.1x
2024-0865.7x₹305 cr9.4%13.0%0.1x
2024-0753.2x₹305 cr9.4%13.0%0.1x
2024-0649.6x₹305 cr9.4%13.0%0.1x
2024-05—₹110 cr-22.0%-15.0%0.1x
2024-04—₹110 cr-22.0%-15.0%0.1x
2024-03—₹110 cr-22.0%-15.0%0.1x
2024-02—₹110 cr-22.0%-15.0%0.1x
2024-01—₹110 cr-22.0%-15.0%0.1x
2023-12—₹110 cr-22.0%-15.0%0.1x
2023-11—₹110 cr-22.0%-15.0%0.1x
2023-10—₹110 cr-22.0%-15.0%0.1x
2023-09—₹110 cr-22.0%-15.0%0.1x
2023-08—₹110 cr-22.0%-15.0%0.1x
2023-07—₹110 cr-22.0%-15.0%0.1x
2023-06—₹110 cr-22.0%-15.0%0.1x
2023-0510.1x₹260 cr16.1%18.0%0.0x
2023-049.5x₹260 cr16.1%18.0%0.0x
2023-0310.8x₹260 cr16.1%18.0%0.0x
2023-025.4x₹260 cr16.1%18.0%0.0x
2023-016.9x₹260 cr16.1%18.0%0.0x
2022-127.2x₹260 cr16.1%18.0%0.0x
2022-117.3x₹260 cr16.1%18.0%0.0x
2022-107.2x₹260 cr16.1%18.0%0.0x
2022-097.1x₹260 cr16.1%18.0%0.0x
2022-088.1x₹260 cr16.1%18.0%0.0x
2022-078.5x₹260 cr16.1%18.0%0.0x
2022-068.7x₹260 cr16.1%18.0%0.0x
2022-0515.6x₹229 cr11.3%19.0%0.0x
2022-0418.7x₹229 cr11.3%19.0%0.0x
2022-0319.3x₹229 cr11.3%19.0%0.0x
2022-0220.5x₹229 cr11.3%19.0%0.0x
2022-0125.7x₹229 cr11.3%19.0%0.0x
2021-1222.8x₹229 cr11.3%19.0%0.0x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback