अApnaFunda

ATAM VALVES LIMITED (ATAM)

Producer Manufacturing · Industrial Machinery · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.28 / 100
Profitability 27Growth 8Balance sheet 49

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹52.57 latest close · −24.9% over the last 90 sessions

₹50₹60₹70Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹50₹60₹70Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹52.57 month-end · −37.3% over 12 months

₹60₹80Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹60₹80Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹52.57 month-end · −71.6% over 3 years

₹50₹100₹150₹200Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹50₹100₹150₹200Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹52.57 month-end · −76.6% since May '23

₹100₹200May '23Jan '24Oct '24Jun '25Mar '26Nov '26 ₹100₹200May '23Feb '25Nov '26

52-week range ₹48.50 to ₹109.53 · 1-year volatility 47.5%

Was the rally earned?

-37%share price, 1 yearEarnings-driven

Mostly earnings.

  • Per-share earnings took off 103 points, while the multiple moved less (P/E 14.5x to 33.1x).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −103 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−103 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +66 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+66 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: −37%−37%Share priceNet profit growth: −103 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−103ProfitP/E change: +66 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+66P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: −37%−37%Share price
Net profit growth-103 ptsNet profit fell about 72%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+66 ptsThe P/E rose from 14.5x to 33.1x, which lifts the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-72%share price, 3 yearsEarnings-driven

Mostly earnings.

  • Per-share earnings took off 86 points, while the multiple moved less (P/E 25.4x to 33.1x).
  • The share count rose 9%.
Net profit growth: −82 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−82 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +15 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+15 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −5 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−5 ptsShare count changeShare price: −72%−72%Share priceNet profit growth: −82 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−82ProfitP/E change: +15 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+15P/EShare count change: −5 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−5SharesShare price: −72%−72%Share price
Net profit growth-82 ptsNet profit fell about 76%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+15 ptsThe P/E rose from 25.4x to 33.1x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-5 ptsShare count rose 9%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with WELSPUN CORP

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-80.9%not yet recovered
1-year volatility47.5%annualised

Drawdown from peak

0%−25%−50%−75%202420252026−80.3% 0%−25%−50%−75%202420252026−80.3%
Largest drawdowns

-80.9% (2023-05 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

33.1xP/E todayNear its historic high
Against its own history88th percentile
CheapestMedian 24.7xDearest

Usual range 15.3x to 34.9x since 2023-05.

Against Producer Manufacturing33.1x vs 29.6x
This company
33.1x
Sector median
29.6x

12% above the Producer Manufacturing median.

12.5x53.8x95.1x136.4xMay '23Feb '24Nov '24Aug '25May '26Nov '2612.5x53.8x95.1x136.4xMay '23Jul '24Sep '25Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Producer Manufacturing is valued

Where does it rank among Producer Manufacturing peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Producer Manufacturing peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE22nd▼ 45 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin33rd▼ 43 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth4th▼ 59 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth8th▼ 50 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓37th▼ 6 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓3rdflat vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓44th▼ 45 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum13thflat vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Producer Manufacturing sector page Watch it move against Producer Manufacturing in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~9%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 12.8x, the price would imply about 8.9%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Below the ₹1,000 cr market-cap floor used for the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Producer Manufacturing The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹52.57
P/E
33.1x
ROCE
8.5%
Market Cap
₹60 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹47 cr
P/S
1.3x
P/B
1.6x
ROE
4.8%
Operating Margin
8.8%
Debt / Equity
0.4x
Promoter Holding
52.3%
12M Momentum
-37.4%

52-week range

₹48.50₹109.53
7% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
47.5%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.67

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
3.3x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
-0.04x
low
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

5 of 7checks within range1 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance8%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 8.1%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate25%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 25.4%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion-0.04xBeyond threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: -0.04x (cash from operations ₹-0.5 cr, net profit ₹14.5 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow3 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 3. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-8 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 8 days (125 vs 133). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress0% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 0% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days+2 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by +2 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, promoters trimmed 16.0 pts; DIIs added 1.1 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 6,437 to 12,065 (+87%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters68.3%52.3%-16.0 pts
FIIs0.0%0.2%+0.2 pts
DIIs0.0%1.1%+1.1 pts
Public and others31.8%46.5%+14.7 pts

Number of shareholders

12,065shareholders+87% since Sep '23
6k9k11k14k Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 6,437
Dec '23: 9,200
Mar '24: 10,632
Jun '24: 11,121
Sep '24: 13,030
Dec '24: 13,553
Mar '25: 13,389
Jun '25: 13,772
Sep '25: 13,503
Dec '25: 12,964
Mar '26: 12,399
Jun '26: 12,065
6k9k11k14k Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 6,437
Dec '23: 9,200
Mar '24: 10,632
Jun '24: 11,121
Sep '24: 13,030
Dec '24: 13,553
Mar '25: 13,389
Jun '25: 13,772
Sep '25: 13,503
Dec '25: 12,964
Mar '26: 12,399
Jun '26: 12,065

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+5.1%typical 12-month return vs the marketAbove the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like ATAM VALVES LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −17% to +38% vs the market, against −6% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The analogs' median sat above that base rate (gap +11.0%, 80% range +3.6% to +15.0%), but the matches cluster in only 6 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
VINNY · May 2024: −56.6% vs market
MAITREYA · Sep 2025: −50.5% vs market
SUMIT · Oct 2025: −47.8% vs market
BIRLACABLE · Aug 2024: −37.2% vs market
EXXARO · Dec 2023: −35.6% vs market
SHIGAN · Aug 2024: −28.5% vs market
TEXMOPIPES · Dec 2024: −27.2% vs market
SURAJLTD · Oct 2025: −26.2% vs market
LOVABLE · Oct 2024: −25.7% vs market
ALKALI · Feb 2024: −23.1% vs market
BYKE · Jan 2020: −21.1% vs market
OAL · Feb 2024: −18.0% vs market
PREMEXPLN · Jan 2020: −17.2% vs market
COASTCORP · Jul 2023: −14.9% vs market
AHLADA · Sep 2022: −13.1% vs market
LAMBODHARA · Jun 2024: −12.2% vs market
AKASH · Sep 2023: −8.1% vs market
KABRAEXTRU · Jun 2025: −7.3% vs market
GROBTEA · Aug 2022: −3.2% vs market
INDIANCARD · Feb 2024: −1.9% vs market
NIPPOBATRY · Jun 2022: +0.1% vs market
GUJRAFFIA · Mar 2025: +2.3% vs market
RAMASTEEL · Jun 2024: +3.8% vs market
APOLLO · Jun 2021: +3.9% vs market
KRITI · Dec 2022: +4.0% vs market
HPIL · Nov 2023: +6.2% vs market
MEDICAMEQ · Sep 2025: +8.3% vs market
TARMAT · Jul 2022: +8.5% vs market
BANKA · Feb 2022: +9.1% vs market
COUNCODOS · Dec 2023: +9.2% vs market
MEGASTAR · Oct 2024: +11.0% vs market
MAHICKRA · Jun 2024: +21.5% vs market
BANG · Dec 2021: +22.5% vs market
SEMAC · Aug 2021: +22.8% vs market
DMCC · Sep 2024: +24.0% vs market
ARVEE · Jun 2022: +31.9% vs market
SURANASOL · May 2023: +35.4% vs market
MCL · Jul 2024: +38.4% vs market
KALYANIFRG · Sep 2024: +45.8% vs market
SOFTTECH · Mar 2022: +46.8% vs market
ARVSMART · Jun 2021: +50.4% vs market
THEINVEST · Aug 2023: +66.7% vs market
ALANKIT · May 2023: +69.1% vs market
WEIZMANIND · Jun 2022: +81.1% vs market
ZIMLAB · Sep 2025: +93.2% vs market
ZENITHEXPO · Oct 2023: +97.9% vs market
ORIENTBELL · Mar 2020: +109.2% vs market
ORBTEXP · Dec 2021: +117.8% vs market
PANSARI · May 2024: +175.1% vs market
IGPL · Jun 2020: +181.8% vs market
Similar setups +5.1%All companies −5.9%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 4 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+5.1%
All companies' median
−5.9%
Beat the market
60% vs 43%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 32 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
ALKALI
Process Industries
Feb 2024 41x9% +8%−27% −23%
AHLADA
Producer Manufacturing
Sep 2022 24x7% −29%−42% −13%
THEINVEST
Finance
Aug 2023 35x5% −20%−26% +67%
MAHICKRA
Process Industries
Jun 2024 77x6% +21%−34% +22%
BANG
Retail Trade
Dec 2021 35x2% +17%−30% +23%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
COASTCORP
Transportation
Jul 2023 49x5% −12%−35% −15%
SURANASOL
Electronic Technology
May 2023 38x— −11%−30% +35%
MEGASTAR
Process Industries
Oct 2024 55x10% −13%−36% +11%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: interest cover, 12-month momentum and drawdown from 12-month high. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to ATAM VALVES LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What changed?

21 events since Jun '23

  1. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  2. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (32.3x).
  3. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Producer Manufacturing on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  4. MarPriceFell 81% from the May 2023 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  5. MarPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  6. DecResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  7. DecPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  8. NovValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (14.5x).
Show 13 earlier events
  1. SepPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  2. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  3. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on ROCE (from the top quartile).
  4. MayValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (16.9x).
  5. DecPromoterPromoter holding fell 8.9 pts to 52.3% (largest drop since 2024-09).
  6. SepPromoterPromoter holding fell 9.6 pts to 61.2%.
  7. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  8. JunPromoterPromoter holding rose 2.5 pts to 70.8%.
  9. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  10. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  11. MaySharesShare count is up 155.4% over 12 months.
  12. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Producer Manufacturing on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  13. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 60% to 21% of profit.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history43 months · 2023-05 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1133.1x₹47 cr4.8%8.5%0.4x
2026-1035.5x₹47 cr4.8%8.5%0.4x
2026-0935.4x₹47 cr4.8%8.5%0.4x
2026-0826.5x₹47 cr6.4%8.5%0.4x
2026-0730.5x₹47 cr6.4%8.5%0.4x
2026-0632.3x₹47 cr6.4%8.5%0.4x
2026-0522.1x₹49 cr10.1%20.3%0.3x
2026-0421.3x₹49 cr10.1%20.3%0.3x
2026-0315.2x₹49 cr10.1%20.3%0.3x
2026-0212.5x₹56 cr16.0%20.3%0.3x
2026-0114.5x₹56 cr16.0%20.3%0.3x
2025-1216.2x₹56 cr16.0%20.3%0.3x
2025-1114.5x₹61 cr18.1%20.3%0.3x
2025-1017.7x₹61 cr18.1%20.3%0.3x
2025-0915.4x₹61 cr18.1%20.3%0.3x
2025-0816.5x₹60 cr17.3%20.3%0.3x
2025-0718.0x₹60 cr17.3%20.3%0.3x
2025-0619.8x₹60 cr17.3%20.3%0.3x
2025-0516.9x₹63 cr22.1%24.1%0.4x
2025-0416.7x₹63 cr22.1%24.1%0.4x
2025-0313.1x₹63 cr22.1%24.1%0.4x
2025-0216.9x₹58 cr20.2%24.1%0.4x
2025-0123.3x₹58 cr20.2%24.1%0.4x
2024-1224.7x₹58 cr20.2%24.1%0.4x
2024-1127.6x₹54 cr19.1%24.1%0.4x
2024-1024.8x₹54 cr19.1%24.1%0.4x
2024-0929.0x₹54 cr19.1%24.1%0.4x
2024-0830.4x₹53 cr18.8%24.1%0.4x
2024-0735.3x₹53 cr18.8%24.1%0.4x
2024-0637.0x₹53 cr18.8%24.1%0.4x
2024-0528.7x₹49 cr30.7%41.8%0.3x
2024-0426.6x₹49 cr30.7%41.8%0.3x
2024-0323.0x₹49 cr30.7%41.8%0.3x
2024-0223.2x₹49 cr30.7%41.8%0.3x
2024-0127.6x₹49 cr30.7%41.8%0.3x
2023-1229.4x₹49 cr30.7%41.8%0.3x
2023-1125.4x₹49 cr30.7%41.8%0.3x
2023-1022.4x₹49 cr30.7%41.8%0.3x
2023-0924.6x₹49 cr30.7%41.8%0.3x
2023-0825.9x₹49 cr30.7%41.8%0.3x
2023-0728.7x₹49 cr30.7%41.8%0.3x
2023-0630.4x₹49 cr30.7%41.8%0.3x
2023-05136.4x₹20 cr6.4%14.4%0.6x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback