अApnaFunda

BANKA BIOLOO LIMITED (BANKA)

Industrial Services · Environmental Services · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.29 / 100
Profitability 41Growth 30Balance sheet 16

Passes these screensHigh Momentum

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹87.47 latest close · −5.2% over the last 90 sessions

₹60₹70₹80₹90Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹60₹70₹80₹90Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹87.47 month-end · +17.1% over 12 months

₹40₹60₹80Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹40₹60₹80Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹87.47 month-end · +22.3% over 3 years

₹50₹100₹150Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹50₹100₹150Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹87.47 month-end · +236.4% since Jun '20

₹50₹100₹150Jun '20Sep '21Jan '23Apr '24Aug '25Nov '26 ₹50₹100₹150Jun '20Sep '23Nov '26

52-week range ₹41.00 to ₹96.58 · 1-year volatility 47.1%

Was the rally earned?

+22%share price, 3 yearsMultiple-driven

Partly.

  • Most of the rise came from investors paying a higher multiple (P/E 30.6x to 282.2x); per-share earnings took off 224 points.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −223 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−223 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +246 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+246 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1 ptsShare count changeShare price: +22%+22%Share priceNet profit growth: −223 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−223ProfitP/E change: +246 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+246P/EShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1SharesShare price: +22%+22%Share price
Net profit growth-223 ptsNet profit fell about 87%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+246 ptsThe P/E rose from 30.6x to 282.2x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+26%share price, 5 yearsMultiple-driven

Partly.

  • Most of the rise came from investors paying a higher multiple (P/E 32.5x to 282.2x); per-share earnings took off 217 points.
  • The share count rose 6%.
Net profit growth: −210 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−210 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +243 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+243 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −7 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−7 ptsShare count changeShare price: +26%+26%Share priceNet profit growth: −210 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−210ProfitP/E change: +243 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+243P/EShare count change: −7 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−7SharesShare price: +26%+26%Share price
Net profit growth-210 ptsNet profit fell about 85%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+243 ptsThe P/E rose from 32.5x to 282.2x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-7 ptsShare count rose 6%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 1 year: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with NAMO EWASTE MANAGEMENT

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-74.2%recovered 2024-01
1-year volatility47.1%annualised

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2020202120222023202420252026−73.2% 0%−20%−40%−60%2020202220242026−73.2%
Largest drawdowns

-74.2% (2020-09 peak to 2020-10 low, recovered 2024-01)

-74.1% (2024-02 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

-49.5% (2019-06 peak to 2020-05 low, recovered 2020-09)

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

282.2xP/E todayNear its historic high
Against its own history98th percentile
CheapestMedian 31.9xDearest

Usual range 24.2x to 206.5x since 2020-06.

Against Industrial Services282.2x vs 14.0x
This company
282.2x
Sector median
14.0x

1909% above the Industrial Services median.

4.3x98.2x192.1x285.9xJun '20Oct '21Feb '23Jun '24Oct '25Nov '264.3x98.2x192.1x285.9xJun '20Aug '22Oct '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianIndustrial Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianIndustrial Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianIndustrial Services median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Industrial Services is valued

Where does it rank among Industrial Services peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Industrial Services peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE14th▲ 12 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin69th▲ 54 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth39th▲ 17 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth1st▼ 13 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓14th▼ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓28th▲ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓2nd
  • 12M momentum86th▲ 40 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Industrial Services sector page Watch it move against Industrial Services in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~50%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 282.2x, the price would imply about 50.2%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Industrial Services The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹87.47
P/E
282.2x
ROCE
5.1%
Market Cap
₹96 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹56 cr
P/S
1.7x
P/B
2.4x
ROE
0.9%
Operating Margin
17.2%
Debt / Equity
1.0x
Promoter Holding
52.0%
12M Momentum
17.1%

52-week range

₹41.00₹96.58
84% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
47.1%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.67

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
0.9x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
1.94x
Share count, 1Y
+0.5%

Are profits backed by cash?

2 of 4checks within range2 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tax rate-7%Beyond threshold

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: -7.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Free cash flow1 of 5 yrsBeyond threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 1. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-1 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 1 days (186 vs 187). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress2% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 2% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, promoters trimmed 3.8 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 4,060 to 4,929 (+21%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters55.9%52.0%-3.8 pts
FIIs0.0%0.0%0.0 pts
DIIs———
Public and others44.1%48.0%+3.8 pts

Number of shareholders

4,929shareholders+21% since Sep '23
4k5k6k6k Sep '23Mar '24Sep '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 4,060
Dec '23: 4,448
Mar '24: 6,265
Jun '24: 6,031
Sep '24: 5,711
Mar '25: 6,133
Jun '25: 6,009
Sep '25: 5,637
Dec '25: 5,512
Mar '26: 5,420
Jun '26: 4,929
4k5k6k6k Sep '23Sep '24Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 4,060
Dec '23: 4,448
Mar '24: 6,265
Jun '24: 6,031
Sep '24: 5,711
Mar '25: 6,133
Jun '25: 6,009
Sep '25: 5,637
Dec '25: 5,512
Mar '26: 5,420
Jun '26: 4,929

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−6.1%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like BANKA BIOLOO LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −33% to +48% vs the market, against −5% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−1.6%, 80% range −16.6% to +20.5%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
NDLVENTURE · Aug 2022: −74.5% vs market
LYKALABS · Jan 2025: −54.6% vs market
VIRINCHI · Aug 2025: −51.3% vs market
DECCANCE · Jul 2025: −50.3% vs market
ORIENTLTD · Feb 2020: −45.6% vs market
SURANASOL · Sep 2024: −40.8% vs market
VIPCLOTHNG · Sep 2023: −40.7% vs market
DYNPRO · Nov 2024: −40.3% vs market
EIFFL · Feb 2023: −39.8% vs market
SINTERCOM · Jul 2025: −38.2% vs market
TOKYOPLAST · Jun 2025: −37.1% vs market
ELGIRUBCO · Jul 2021: −34.1% vs market
ALKALI · Jun 2024: −33.5% vs market
KHADIM · Jul 2024: −32.9% vs market
KOKUYOCMLN · Nov 2023: −30.1% vs market
ATULAUTO · Jun 2024: −28.2% vs market
RUCHINFRA · Sep 2023: −28.1% vs market
SHEMAROO · Dec 2022: −25.2% vs market
SOLARA · Jul 2025: −24.1% vs market
DPSCLTD · Sep 2023: −22.2% vs market
CENTUM · Apr 2024: −18.7% vs market
AIROLAM · Sep 2025: −17.4% vs market
KCPSUGIND · Dec 2022: −14.3% vs market
HARRMALAYA · Mar 2025: −13.4% vs market
BIL · Dec 2024: −11.9% vs market
KOTARISUG · Oct 2022: −0.2% vs market
MANGLMCEM · Mar 2024: +1.6% vs market
BYKE · Apr 2024: +3.7% vs market
YUKEN · Aug 2023: +12.6% vs market
SCHAND · Nov 2022: +19.0% vs market
SAMBHAAV · Aug 2024: +20.4% vs market
INDOWIND · Oct 2021: +33.8% vs market
BASML · Dec 2020: +34.4% vs market
APCL · May 2020: +34.6% vs market
VADILALIND · May 2022: +39.1% vs market
YASHO · Jun 2025: +39.9% vs market
HECPROJECT · May 2024: +46.8% vs market
PARIN · Dec 2024: +48.1% vs market
SNOWMAN · Mar 2023: +54.2% vs market
BUTTERFLY · Jan 2021: +58.6% vs market
MURUDCERA · Oct 2022: +61.6% vs market
SANGAMIND · Sep 2021: +67.0% vs market
HPL · Oct 2022: +83.8% vs market
DYNAMATECH · Feb 2023: +88.2% vs market
ONEPOINT · Apr 2023: +105.8% vs market
PREMEXPLN · Aug 2022: +112.7% vs market
TEXRAIL · Jun 2023: +115.8% vs market
KDDL · Aug 2021: +122.7% vs market
BIGBLOC · Dec 2021: +135.4% vs market
ESTER · Apr 2020: +187.8% vs market
Similar setups −6.1%All companies −4.5%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 6 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−6.1%
All companies' median
−4.5%
Beat the market
48% vs 45%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 37 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
EIFFL
Consumer Non-Durables
Feb 2023 271x5% +46%−15% −40%
BYKE
Consumer Services
Apr 2024 130x5% +89%−2% +4%
KOTARISUG
Process Industries
Oct 2022 161x8% +41%−8% 0%
TOKYOPLAST
Producer Manufacturing
Jun 2025 96x5% +17%−11% −37%
DYNPRO
Consumer Non-Durables
Nov 2024 118x5% +57%−8% −40%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
ESTER
Process Industries
Apr 2020 58x7% −3%−26% +188%
CENTUM
Electronic Technology
Apr 2024 266x8% +167%−1% −19%
SNOWMAN
Commercial Services
Mar 2023 320x3% +5%−26% +54%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: ROCE, P/S and 12-month momentum. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to BANKA BIOLOO LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What changed?

29 events since May '20

  1. AugPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Industrial Services on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  2. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned positive.
  3. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (285.9x).
  4. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Industrial Services on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  5. MarPriceFell 74% from the Feb 2024 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  6. MarPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Industrial Services on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  7. JunDebtDebt / equity rose above 1.0x (1.10x).
  8. DecResultsEPS (TTM) turned negative.
Show 21 earlier events
  1. DecPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Industrial Services on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  2. SepResultsEPS (TTM) turned positive.
  3. SepValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (64.3x).
  4. SepPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Industrial Services on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  5. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned negative.
  6. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Industrial Services on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  7. MarPromoterPromoter holding fell 2.7 pts to 53.2%.
  8. JanPriceRegained the 2020-09 peak, 39 months after the low.
  9. DecValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (44.9x).
  10. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  11. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Industrial Services on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  12. JulSharesShare count is up 5.5% over 12 months.
  13. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  14. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Industrial Services on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  15. NovPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Industrial Services on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  16. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Industrial Services on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  17. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 7% to 0% of profit.
  18. JunSharesShare count is up 150.1% over 12 months.
  19. OctPriceFell 74% from the Sep 2020 peak to the Oct 2020 low.
  20. SepPriceRegained the 2019-06 peak, 4 months after the low.
  21. MayPriceFell 50% from the Jun 2019 peak to the May 2020 low.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history78 months · 2020-06 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-11282.2x₹56 cr0.9%5.1%1.0x
2026-10198.3x₹56 cr0.9%5.1%1.0x
2026-09225.8x₹56 cr0.9%5.1%1.0x
2026-08238.1x₹57 cr0.9%5.1%1.0x
2026-07260.6x₹57 cr0.9%5.1%1.0x
2026-06285.9x₹57 cr0.9%5.1%1.0x
2026-05—₹54 cr-9.0%-7.6%1.1x
2026-04—₹54 cr-9.0%-7.6%1.1x
2026-03—₹54 cr-9.0%-7.6%1.1x
2026-02—₹53 cr-13.2%-7.6%1.1x
2026-01—₹53 cr-13.2%-7.6%1.1x
2025-12—₹53 cr-13.2%-7.6%1.1x
2025-11—₹52 cr-29.2%-7.6%1.1x
2025-10—₹52 cr-29.2%-7.6%1.1x
2025-09—₹52 cr-29.2%-7.6%1.1x
2025-08—₹54 cr-28.3%-7.6%1.1x
2025-07—₹54 cr-28.3%-7.6%1.1x
2025-06—₹54 cr-28.3%-7.6%1.1x
2025-05—₹56 cr-19.0%3.4%0.7x
2025-04—₹56 cr-19.0%3.4%0.7x
2025-03—₹56 cr-19.0%3.4%0.7x
2025-02—₹56 cr-13.6%3.4%0.7x
2025-01—₹56 cr-13.6%3.4%0.7x
2024-12—₹56 cr-13.6%3.4%0.7x
2024-1157.6x₹55 cr5.0%3.4%0.7x
2024-1068.1x₹55 cr5.0%3.4%0.7x
2024-0964.3x₹55 cr5.0%3.4%0.7x
2024-08—₹50 cr-1.6%3.4%0.7x
2024-07—₹50 cr-1.6%3.4%0.7x
2024-06—₹50 cr-1.6%3.4%0.7x
2024-0539.4x₹42 cr6.3%9.6%0.4x
2024-0443.2x₹42 cr6.3%9.6%0.4x
2024-0339.9x₹42 cr6.3%9.6%0.4x
2024-0250.6x₹42 cr6.3%9.6%0.4x
2024-0166.2x₹42 cr6.3%9.6%0.4x
2023-1244.9x₹42 cr6.3%9.6%0.4x
2023-1130.6x₹42 cr6.3%9.6%0.4x
2023-1029.5x₹42 cr6.3%9.6%0.4x
2023-0931.2x₹42 cr6.3%9.6%0.4x
2023-0830.1x₹42 cr6.3%9.6%0.4x
2023-0728.7x₹42 cr6.3%9.6%0.4x
2023-0629.1x₹42 cr6.3%9.6%0.4x
2023-0525.3x₹39 cr8.3%10.4%0.5x
2023-0426.9x₹39 cr8.3%10.4%0.5x
2023-0324.3x₹39 cr8.3%10.4%0.5x
2023-0225.9x₹39 cr8.3%10.4%0.5x
2023-0129.4x₹39 cr8.3%10.4%0.5x
2022-1226.0x₹39 cr8.3%10.4%0.5x
2022-1129.3x₹39 cr8.3%10.4%0.5x
2022-1025.4x₹39 cr8.3%10.4%0.5x
2022-0924.1x₹39 cr8.3%10.4%0.5x
2022-0824.6x₹39 cr8.3%10.4%0.5x
2022-0725.5x₹39 cr8.3%10.4%0.5x
2022-0622.3x₹39 cr8.3%10.4%0.5x
2022-0533.9x₹30 cr7.3%8.4%0.4x
2022-0437.5x₹30 cr7.3%8.4%0.4x
2022-0338.2x₹30 cr7.3%8.4%0.4x
2022-0232.1x₹30 cr7.3%8.4%0.4x
2022-0136.4x₹30 cr7.3%8.4%0.4x
2021-1235.0x₹30 cr7.3%8.4%0.4x
2021-1132.5x₹30 cr7.3%8.4%0.4x
2021-1032.9x₹30 cr7.3%8.4%0.4x
2021-0935.4x₹30 cr7.3%8.4%0.4x
2021-0830.2x₹30 cr7.3%8.4%0.4x
2021-0730.3x₹30 cr7.3%8.4%0.4x
2021-0631.6x₹30 cr7.3%8.4%0.4x
2021-05—₹48 cr22.2%—0.4x
2021-04—₹48 cr22.2%—0.4x
2021-03—₹48 cr22.2%—0.4x
2021-02—₹48 cr22.2%—0.4x
2021-01—₹48 cr22.2%—0.4x
2020-12—₹48 cr22.2%—0.4x
2020-11—₹48 cr22.2%—0.4x
2020-10—₹48 cr22.2%—0.4x
2020-09—₹48 cr22.2%—0.4x
2020-086.1x₹48 cr22.2%—0.4x
2020-075.9x₹48 cr22.2%—0.4x
2020-064.3x₹48 cr22.2%—0.4x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback