SNOWMAN LOGISTICS LIMITED (SNOWMAN): Financials & Fundamentals History

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

3M1Y3YAll

₹34.21 latest close · −9.8% over the last 90 sessions

₹34.21 month-end · −20.7% over 12 months

₹34.21 month-end · −42.1% over 3 years

₹34.21 month-end · +8.9% since Jan '19

52-week range ₹30.50 to ₹53.25 · 1-year volatility 35.7%

Was the rally earned?

1 year3 years

-21%share price, 1 yearEarnings-driven

Mostly earnings.

Per-share earnings took off 15 points, while the multiple moved less (P/E 113.6x to 106.9x).
The share count barely moved.

Net profit growth-16 ptsNet profit fell about 17%, which lowers the price.

P/E change-5 ptsThe P/E fell from 113.6x to 106.9x, which lowers the price.

Share count change+1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.

-42%share price, 3 yearsEarnings-driven

Mostly earnings.

Per-share earnings took off 71 points, while the multiple moved less (P/E 73.9x to 106.9x).
The share count rose 3%.

Net profit growth-68 ptsNet profit fell about 59%, which lowers the price.

P/E change+29 ptsThe P/E rose from 73.9x to 106.9x, which lifts the price.

Share count change-2 ptsShare count rose 3%, which lowers the price.

What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with NBCC (INDIA)

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-66.1%not yet recovered

1-year volatility35.7%annualised

Beta vs sector index1.093-year daily, correlation 0.53

Volume spikes2last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

Largest drawdowns

-66.1% (2024-09 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

-64.5% (2020-12 peak to 2022-06 low, recovered 2024-01)

-43.9% (2020-02 peak to 2020-05 low, recovered 2020-11)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-10-28: 11.1x the 50-day median, price -0.9% that day

2026-08-05: 23x the 50-day median, price +2.9% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

106.9xP/E todayWithin its usual range

Against its own history44th percentile

CheapestMedian 112.2xDearest

Usual range 59.5x to 362.0x since 2019-01.

Against Commercial Services106.9x vs 21.1x

This company

106.9x

Sector median

21.1x

408% above the Commercial Services median.

P/EP/BP/S

P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianCommercial Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianCommercial Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianCommercial Services median

How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Commercial Services is valued

Where does it rank among Commercial Services peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Commercial Services peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

ROCE13thflat vs a year ago
Op. margin61st▲ 7 pts vs a year ago
Revenue growth34th▼ 14 pts vs a year ago
EPS growth29th▲ 10 pts vs a year ago
Debt/equity ↓14th▼ 6 pts vs a year ago
Cash cycle ↓95thflat vs a year ago
P/E ↓8th▲ 5 pts vs a year ago
12M momentum49th▲ 21 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE

Op. margin

Revenue growth

EPS growth

Debt/equity ↓

Cash cycle ↓

P/E ↓

12M momentum

Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26

Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Commercial Services sector page Watch it move against Commercial Services in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~28%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 76.7x, the price would imply about 28.3%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Below the ₹1,000 cr market-cap floor used for the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Commercial Services The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov: ₹34.21
P/E: 106.9x
ROCE: 4.0%
Market Cap: ₹572 cr
Revenue (TTM): ₹619 cr
P/S: 0.9x
P/B: 1.4x
ROE: 1.3%
Operating Margin: 16.1%
Debt / Equity: 0.8x
Promoter Holding: 50.0%
12M Momentum: -20.7%

52-week range

₹30.50₹53.25

16% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility

35.7%

Beta vs sector

1-year daily

1.10

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover

operating profit ÷ interest

1.0x

Cash from profit, 3Y

operating cash flow ÷ net profit

5.00x

Share count, 1Y

unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

4 of 7checks within range2 beyond a threshold

Other income reliance300%Beyond threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 300.0%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate-2%Beyond threshold

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: -1.6%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion11.41xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 11.41x (cash from operations ₹251 cr, net profit ₹22 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow3 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 3. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-9 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 9 days (51 vs 60). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress0% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 0% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days-16 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by -16 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

Over 3 years, promoters added 7.0 pts; FIIs added 0.6 pts.
The number of shareholders fell from 1.1 lakh to 98,402 (-7%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change

Promoters43.0%50.0%+7.0 pts

FIIs2.3%3.0%+0.6 pts

DIIs1.0%0.8%-0.2 pts

Public and others53.7%46.2%-7.5 pts

Number of shareholders

98,402shareholders-7% since Sep '23

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+3.6%typical 12-month return vs the marketAbove the base rate

We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like SNOWMAN LOGISTICS LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −22% to +38% vs the market, against −5% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
The analogs' median sat above that base rate (gap +8.9%, 80% range +0.1% to +15.7%), but the matches cluster in only 6 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 2 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median

+3.6%

All companies' median

−5.3%

Beat the market

54% vs 44%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 32 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

Company	When	P/E	ROCE	12M mom.	Drawdown	Next 12 months
KOTARISUG Process Industries	Oct 2024	183x	8%	+4%	−25%	−40%
DYNPRO Consumer Non-Durables	Sep 2024	102x	5%	+15%	−12%	0%
SUDARSCHEM Process Industries	Sep 2023	74x	6%	+14%	−11%	+61%
MAHLOG Transportation	Feb 2023	190x	6%	−8%	−33%	−23%
KANORICHEM Process Industries	Aug 2022	93x	4%	−3%	−32%	−24%

Show the other 3 matches

Company	When	P/E	ROCE	12M mom.	Drawdown	Next 12 months
BODALCHEM Process Industries	Mar 2025	122x	3%	−21%	−33%	−10%
BIRLACORPN Non-Energy Minerals	May 2024	268x	4%	+26%	−20%	−7%
KOKUYOCMLN Consumer Durables	Oct 2024	113x	9%	+18%	−22%	−41%

How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: drawdown from 12-month high, 12-month momentum and ROCE. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to SNOWMAN LOGISTICS LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

Feature	Weight	Non-financial	Financial
P/E	1	yes	yes
P/S	1	yes	—
P/B	1	—	yes
ROCE	1	yes	—
operating margin	1	yes	—
ROE	1	—	yes
debt/equity	0.75	yes	—
interest cover	0.5	yes	—
revenue growth	0.75	yes	yes
12-month momentum	1	yes	yes
drawdown from 12-month high	0.75	yes	yes
size	0.75	yes	yes
volatility	0.5	yes	yes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

GRPGRPLTD

Producer Manufacturing

64%similar

EPS growthrevenue

STANLEY LIFESTYLESSTANLEY

Consumer Durables

59%similar

P/Eoperating margin

SALASAR TECHNO ENGINEERINGSALASAR

Producer Manufacturing

57%similar

revenue growthEPS growth

SARLA PERFORMANCE FIBERSSARLAPOLY

Process Industries

57%similar

EPS growthP/E

SULA VINEYARDSSULA

Process Industries

57%similar

EPS growthrevenue

TCPL PACKAGINGTCPLPACK

Commercial Services

24%similar

operating margindebt/equity

ONE POINT ONE SOLUTIONSONEPOINT

Commercial Services

19%similar

promoter holdingrevenue

SYNGENE INTERNATIONALSYNGENE

Commercial Services

14%similar

volatilityEPS growth

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Jun '22

2026
OctPriceVolume reached 11.1x its 50-day median on 2026-10-28; price -0.9% that day.
SepPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Commercial Services on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
AugPriceVolume reached 23.0x its 50-day median on 2026-08-05; price +2.9% that day.
AprValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (406.5x).
AprPriceVolume reached 6.6x its 50-day median on 2026-04-10; price +11.0% that day.
MarPriceFell 66% from the Sep 2024 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
2025
NovPriceVolume reached 9.4x its 50-day median on 2025-11-04; price -5.4% that day.
JunPriceVolume reached 9.1x its 50-day median on 2025-06-11; price +6.3% that day.

Show 22 earlier events

2025
MarPromoterPromoter holding rose 2.4 pts to 50.0% (largest rise in the history since 2019-01).
2024
DecPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Commercial Services on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
AugPriceVolume reached 11.5x its 50-day median on 2024-08-08; price +4.8% that day.
JulPriceRegained the 2024-02 peak, 4 months after the low.
JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Commercial Services on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
JunPriceVolume reached 9.5x its 50-day median on 2024-06-28; price +2.4% that day.
MarPriceFell 30% from the Feb 2024 peak to the Mar 2024 low.
FebPriceVolume reached 11.2x its 50-day median on 2024-02-20; price +10.7% that day.
JanPriceRegained the 2020-12 peak, 19 months after the low.
2023
NovPriceVolume reached 18.0x its 50-day median on 2023-11-23; price +8.0% that day.
JulPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Commercial Services on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
JulPriceVolume reached 12.4x its 50-day median on 2023-07-14; price +9.0% that day.
JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹418 cr.
JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Commercial Services on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
JunDividendStarted paying a dividend (payout 94% of profit).
JunPriceVolume reached 29.4x its 50-day median on 2023-06-08; price +5.3% that day.
JanPriceVolume reached 8.1x its 50-day median on 2023-01-24; price +4.3% that day.
2022
DecPriceVolume reached 6.3x its 50-day median on 2022-12-19; price +5.8% that day.
SepPriceVolume reached 29.3x its 50-day median on 2022-09-14; price +14.3% that day.
JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned positive.
JunPriceFell 64% from the Dec 2020 peak to the Jun 2022 low.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history95 months · 2019-01 to 2026-11

Month	P/E	Revenue (TTM)	ROE	ROCE	Debt / Equity
2026-11	106.9x	₹619 cr	1.3%	4.0%	0.8x
2026-10	103.2x	₹619 cr	1.3%	4.0%	0.8x
2026-09	108.3x	₹619 cr	1.3%	4.0%	0.8x
2026-08	186.5x	₹604 cr	0.8%	4.0%	0.8x
2026-07	191.5x	₹604 cr	0.8%	4.0%	0.8x
2026-06	184.6x	₹604 cr	0.8%	4.0%	0.8x
2026-05	371.6x	₹599 cr	0.4%	4.0%	0.8x
2026-04	406.5x	₹599 cr	0.4%	4.0%	0.8x
2026-03	307.0x	₹599 cr	0.4%	4.0%	0.8x
2026-02	232.1x	₹587 cr	0.7%	4.0%	0.8x
2026-01	229.2x	₹587 cr	0.7%	4.0%	0.8x
2025-12	236.2x	₹587 cr	0.7%	4.0%	0.8x
2025-11	113.6x	₹575 cr	1.6%	4.0%	0.8x
2025-10	135.0x	₹575 cr	1.6%	4.0%	0.8x
2025-09	137.2x	₹575 cr	1.6%	4.0%	0.8x
2025-08	148.6x	₹553 cr	1.4%	4.0%	0.8x
2025-07	159.6x	₹553 cr	1.4%	4.0%	0.8x
2025-06	175.9x	₹553 cr	1.4%	4.0%	0.8x
2025-05	244.7x	₹542 cr	1.0%	7.0%	0.7x
2025-04	216.2x	₹542 cr	1.0%	7.0%	0.7x
2025-03	186.5x	₹542 cr	1.0%	7.0%	0.7x
2025-02	87.1x	₹534 cr	2.1%	7.0%	0.7x
2025-01	117.5x	₹534 cr	2.1%	7.0%	0.7x
2024-12	134.3x	₹534 cr	2.1%	7.0%	0.7x
2024-11	110.0x	₹515 cr	2.7%	7.0%	0.7x
2024-10	102.0x	₹515 cr	2.7%	7.0%	0.7x
2024-09	123.5x	₹515 cr	2.7%	7.0%	0.7x
2024-08	108.3x	₹503 cr	3.1%	7.0%	0.7x
2024-07	110.9x	₹503 cr	3.1%	7.0%	0.7x
2024-06	102.4x	₹503 cr	3.1%	7.0%	0.7x
2024-05	76.3x	₹418 cr	3.1%	6.0%	0.6x
2024-04	85.0x	₹418 cr	3.1%	6.0%	0.6x
2024-03	91.6x	₹418 cr	3.1%	6.0%	0.6x
2024-02	95.4x	₹418 cr	3.1%	6.0%	0.6x
2024-01	89.9x	₹418 cr	3.1%	6.0%	0.6x
2023-12	79.4x	₹418 cr	3.1%	6.0%	0.6x
2023-11	73.9x	₹418 cr	3.1%	6.0%	0.6x
2023-10	61.0x	₹418 cr	3.1%	6.0%	0.6x
2023-09	63.1x	₹418 cr	3.1%	6.0%	0.6x
2023-08	68.1x	₹418 cr	3.1%	6.0%	0.6x
2023-07	62.4x	₹418 cr	3.1%	6.0%	0.6x
2023-06	57.3x	₹418 cr	3.1%	6.0%	0.6x
2023-05	375.5x	₹286 cr	0.4%	3.0%	0.6x
2023-04	359.5x	₹286 cr	0.4%	3.0%	0.6x
2023-03	320.0x	₹286 cr	0.4%	3.0%	0.6x
2023-02	338.0x	₹286 cr	0.4%	3.0%	0.6x
2023-01	363.5x	₹286 cr	0.4%	3.0%	0.6x
2022-12	379.0x	₹286 cr	0.4%	3.0%	0.6x
2022-11	372.0x	₹286 cr	0.4%	3.0%	0.6x
2022-10	361.0x	₹286 cr	0.4%	3.0%	0.6x
2022-09	363.0x	₹286 cr	0.4%	3.0%	0.6x
2022-08	349.0x	₹286 cr	0.4%	3.0%	0.6x
2022-07	306.0x	₹286 cr	0.4%	3.0%	0.6x
2022-06	282.5x	₹286 cr	0.4%	3.0%	0.6x
2022-05	—	₹237 cr	0.0%	3.0%	0.5x
2022-04	—	₹237 cr	0.0%	3.0%	0.5x
2022-03	—	₹237 cr	0.0%	3.0%	0.5x
2022-02	—	₹237 cr	0.0%	3.0%	0.5x
2022-01	—	₹237 cr	0.0%	3.0%	0.5x
2021-12	—	₹237 cr	0.0%	3.0%	0.5x
2021-11	—	₹237 cr	0.0%	3.0%	0.5x
2021-10	—	₹237 cr	0.0%	3.0%	0.5x
2021-09	—	₹237 cr	0.0%	3.0%	0.5x
2021-08	—	₹237 cr	0.0%	3.0%	0.5x
2021-07	—	₹237 cr	0.0%	3.0%	0.5x
2021-06	—	₹237 cr	0.0%	3.0%	0.5x
2021-05	—	₹240 cr	-3.6%	2.0%	0.5x
2021-04	—	₹240 cr	-3.6%	2.0%	0.5x
2021-03	—	₹240 cr	-3.6%	2.0%	0.5x
2021-02	—	₹240 cr	-3.6%	2.0%	0.5x
2021-01	—	₹240 cr	-3.6%	2.0%	0.5x
2020-12	—	₹240 cr	-3.6%	2.0%	0.5x
2020-11	—	₹240 cr	-3.6%	2.0%	0.5x
2020-10	—	₹240 cr	-3.6%	2.0%	0.5x
2020-09	—	₹240 cr	-3.6%	2.0%	0.5x
2020-08	—	₹240 cr	-3.6%	2.0%	0.5x
2020-07	—	₹240 cr	-3.6%	2.0%	0.5x
2020-06	—	₹240 cr	-3.6%	2.0%	0.5x
2020-05	44.7x	₹233 cr	2.3%	4.0%	0.2x
2020-04	51.6x	₹233 cr	2.3%	4.0%	0.2x
2020-03	54.4x	₹233 cr	2.3%	4.0%	0.2x
2020-02	74.0x	₹233 cr	2.3%	4.0%	0.2x
2020-01	74.1x	₹233 cr	2.3%	4.0%	0.2x
2019-12	73.4x	₹233 cr	2.3%	4.0%	0.2x
2019-11	65.8x	₹233 cr	2.3%	4.0%	0.2x
2019-10	67.4x	₹233 cr	2.3%	4.0%	0.2x
2019-09	64.2x	₹233 cr	2.3%	4.0%	0.2x
2019-08	48.3x	₹233 cr	2.3%	4.0%	0.2x
2019-07	50.5x	₹233 cr	2.3%	4.0%	0.2x
2019-06	58.0x	₹233 cr	2.3%	4.0%	0.2x
2019-05	—	₹194 cr	-0.8%	1.0%	0.3x
2019-04	—	₹194 cr	-0.8%	1.0%	0.3x
2019-03	—	₹194 cr	-0.8%	1.0%	0.3x
2019-02	—	₹194 cr	-0.8%	1.0%	0.3x
2019-01	—	₹194 cr	-0.8%	1.0%	0.3x

Methodology and data notes