अApnaFunda
Menu

BEDMUTHA INDUSTRIES LIMITED (BEDMUTHA)

Non-Energy Minerals · Steel · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.40 / 100
Profitability 38Growth 71Balance sheet 10
Compare withJSW STEELTATA STEELJINDAL STEEL

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹106.43 latest close · −4.6% over the last 90 sessions

₹105₹110₹115Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹105₹110₹115Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹106.43 month-end · −5.3% over 12 months

₹100₹120Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹100₹120Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹106.43 month-end · −29.2% over 3 years

₹100₹200₹300Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹100₹200₹300Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹106.43 month-end · +402.0% since Jan '19

₹0₹100₹200₹300Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹0₹100₹200₹300Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹94.55 to ₹144.00 · 1-year volatility 39.8%

Was the rally earned?

-5%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 36 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 31.6x to 20.6x), which took 42 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +36 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+36 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −42 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−42 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: −5%−5%Share priceNet profit growth: +36 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+36ProfitP/E change: −42 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−42P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: −5%−5%Share price
Net profit growth+36 ptsNet profit rose about 45%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-42 ptsThe P/E fell from 31.6x to 20.6x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-29%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 21 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 37.3x to 20.6x), which took 50 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +21 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+21 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −50 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−50 ptsP/E changeShare price: −29%−29%Share priceNet profit growth: +21 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+21ProfitP/E change: −50 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−50P/EShare price: −29%−29%Share price
Net profit growth+21 ptsNet profit rose about 28%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-50 ptsThe P/E fell from 37.3x to 20.6x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+121%share price, 5 yearsMultiple-driven

Partly.

  • Most of the rise came from investors paying a higher multiple (P/E 0.8x to 20.5x); per-share earnings took off 376 points.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −376 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−376 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +497 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+497 ptsP/E changeShare price: +121%+121%Share priceNet profit growth: −376 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−376ProfitP/E change: +497 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+497P/EShare price: +121%+121%Share price
Net profit growth-376 ptsNet profit fell about 91%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+497 ptsThe P/E rose from 0.8x to 20.5x, which lifts the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with JSW STEEL

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-67.6%not yet recovered
1-year volatility39.8%annualised

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2020202120222023202420252026−67.6% 0%−20%−40%−60%2020202220242026−67.6%
Largest drawdowns

-67.6% (2024-02 peak to 2026-04 low, not yet recovered)

-56.2% (2019-01 peak to 2019-10 low, recovered 2020-12)

-50.7% (2022-04 peak to 2023-03 low, recovered 2023-09)

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

20.6xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history44th percentile
CheapestMedian 21.9xDearest

Usual range 5.2x to 53.3x since 2019-01.

Against Non-Energy Minerals20.6x vs 21.8x
This company
20.6x
Sector median
21.8x

5% below the Non-Energy Minerals median.

1.1x25.8x50.4x75.1xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '261.1x25.8x50.4x75.1xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Non-Energy Minerals is valued

Where does it rank among Non-Energy Minerals peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Non-Energy Minerals peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE60th▼ 13 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin15th▲ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth92nd▲ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth77th▲ 63 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓8thflat vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓85th▼ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓56th▲ 21 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum56th▲ 45 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Non-Energy Minerals sector page Watch it move against Non-Energy Minerals in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~17%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 23.3x, the price would imply about 17.0%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Non-Energy Minerals The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹106.43
P/E
20.6x
ROCE
12.0%
Market Cap
₹343 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹1698 cr
P/S
0.2x
P/B
2.3x
ROE
11.0%
Operating Margin
3.3%
Debt / Equity
1.4x
Promoter Holding
57.1%
12M Momentum
-5.3%

52-week range

₹94.55₹144.00
24% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
39.8%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.41

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
1.4x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
5.00x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

4 of 7checks within range2 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance109%Beyond threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 108.6%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate0%Beyond threshold

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 0.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion6.56xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 6.56x (cash from operations ₹341 cr, net profit ₹52 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow5 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 5. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-8 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 8 days (39 vs 47). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress54% of fixed assetsNear threshold

Capital work-in-progress is 54% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days-22 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by -22 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, institutional and promoter holdings were broadly unchanged.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 5,451 to 6,699 (+23%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters57.0%57.1%0.0 pts
FIIs0.0%0.0%0.0 pts
DIIs———
Public and others43.0%42.9%0.0 pts

Number of shareholders

6,699shareholders+23% since Sep '23
5k6k7k7k Sep '23Mar '24Sep '24Jun '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 5,451
Dec '23: 5,472
Mar '24: 6,173
Jun '24: 6,218
Sep '24: 6,555
Dec '24: 7,241
Jun '25: 7,038
Sep '25: 7,079
Jun '26: 6,699
 5k6k7k7k Sep '23Jun '24Jun '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 5,451
Dec '23: 5,472
Mar '24: 6,173
Jun '24: 6,218
Sep '24: 6,555
Dec '24: 7,241
Jun '25: 7,038
Sep '25: 7,079
Jun '26: 6,699

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+10.1%typical 12-month return vs the marketAbove the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like BEDMUTHA INDUSTRIES LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −17% to +45% vs the market, against −5% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The analogs' median sat above that base rate (gap +14.9%, 80% range +4.0% to +26.9%), but the matches cluster in only 6 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
SARVESHWAR · Jul 2025: −58.1% vs market
ANMOL · Jun 2023: −48.2% vs market
TNPL · Jan 2020: −47.6% vs market
MAHESHWARI · Apr 2023: −47.2% vs market
BSL · Dec 2024: −46.3% vs market
GLOBE · Oct 2024: −39.5% vs market
LAGNAM · Feb 2025: −38.3% vs market
RBS · Oct 2025: −37.6% vs market
STLTECH · Jul 2023: −36.8% vs market
JAYSREETEA · Jul 2021: −36.3% vs market
SHERA · Mar 2025: −27.0% vs market
RAJINDLTD · Oct 2025: −25.1% vs market
BALPHARMA · Nov 2021: −18.0% vs market
GOKUL · Jul 2025: −15.4% vs market
BANSWRAS · Sep 2025: −14.7% vs market
RITCO · Sep 2024: −14.2% vs market
SALONA · Jan 2025: −13.5% vs market
WHEELS · Dec 2022: −5.0% vs market
PARADEEP · Jul 2023: −4.2% vs market
RML · May 2025: −1.7% vs market
SPIC · Jan 2020: −0.9% vs market
MUKANDLTD · Jan 2023: +3.8% vs market
IVP · Nov 2021: +4.0% vs market
NECLIFE · Mar 2020: +5.6% vs market
RANEHOLDIN · Jan 2024: +8.8% vs market
MEGASTAR · Sep 2025: +11.3% vs market
MGEL · Nov 2024: +21.0% vs market
NRAIL · Jul 2025: +23.1% vs market
SALSTEEL · Nov 2022: +23.4% vs market
MANAKALUCO · Jan 2023: +24.8% vs market
CENTEXT · Apr 2023: +27.1% vs market
TBZ · Jan 2024: +31.9% vs market
UGARSUGAR · Dec 2020: +32.5% vs market
JAYBARMARU · Apr 2023: +32.8% vs market
HITECH · May 2022: +37.1% vs market
JKTYRE · Jan 2020: +43.6% vs market
GOODLUCK · Jul 2022: +43.8% vs market
SANGAMIND · May 2020: +45.2% vs market
CORDSCABLE · Oct 2025: +55.2% vs market
PDSL · Jan 2020: +61.7% vs market
ALLCARGO · Jun 2021: +64.5% vs market
PENIND · Jul 2022: +87.2% vs market
PGIL · Apr 2023: +87.9% vs market
PATELENG · Apr 2023: +90.2% vs market
JSL · May 2020: +96.9% vs market
BLKASHYAP · Nov 2022: +105.9% vs market
KAPSTON · Jun 2025: +131.2% vs market
NITINSPIN · Dec 2020: +174.6% vs market
BAHETI · Mar 2024: +190.0% vs market
BODALCHEM · Sep 2025: +219.5% vs market
Similar setups +10.1%All companies −4.8%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 5 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+10.1%
All companies' median
−4.8%
Beat the market
58% vs 45%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 29 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
JAYSREETEA
Process Industries		 Jul 2021 20x7% +134%−8% −36%
RBS
Process Industries		 Oct 2025 19x8% −6%−18% −38%
UGARSUGAR
Process Industries		 Dec 2020 14x11% +29%−8% +33%
WHEELS
Producer Manufacturing		 Dec 2022 18x11% −7%−24% −5%
HITECH
Non-Energy Minerals		 May 2022 25x13% +25%−30% +37%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
SHERA
Producer Manufacturing		 Mar 2025 22x20% +3%−37% −27%
TBZ
Retail Trade		 Jan 2024 22x9% +76%−7% +32%
MANAKALUCO
Non-Energy Minerals		 Jan 2023 19x10% −9%−19% +25%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high and ROCE. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to BEDMUTHA INDUSTRIES LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What changed?

24 events since Oct '19

  1. SepResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  2. SepPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  3. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned positive.
  4. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (53.7x).
  5. AprPriceFell 68% from the Feb 2024 peak to the Apr 2026 low.
  6. DecResultsEPS (TTM) turned negative.
  7. SepResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  8. SepPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
Show 16 earlier events
  1. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  2. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹812 cr.
  3. DecValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (42.8x).
  4. SepPriceRegained the 2022-04 peak, 6 months after the low.
  5. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  6. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  7. MarPriceFell 51% from the Apr 2022 peak to the Mar 2023 low.
  8. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹660 cr.
  9. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the top quartile).
  10. DecResultsEPS (TTM) turned positive.
  11. JunPriceRegained the 2020-12 peak, 3 months after the low.
  12. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the bottom quartile).
  13. JunSharesShare count is up 28.0% over 12 months.
  14. MarPriceFell 28% from the Dec 2020 peak to the Mar 2021 low.
  15. DecPriceRegained the 2019-01 peak, 14 months after the low.
  16. OctPriceFell 56% from the Jan 2019 peak to the Oct 2019 low.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history95 months · 2019-01 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1120.6x₹1698 cr11.0%12.0%1.4x
2026-1020.5x₹1698 cr11.0%12.0%1.4x
2026-0921.3x₹1698 cr11.0%12.0%1.4x
2026-0852.4x₹1467 cr4.3%12.0%1.4x
2026-0754.2x₹1467 cr4.3%12.0%1.4x
2026-0653.7x₹1467 cr4.3%12.0%1.4x
2026-05—₹1313 cr-4.2%17.0%1.5x
2026-04—₹1313 cr-4.2%17.0%1.5x
2026-03—₹1313 cr-4.2%17.0%1.5x
2026-02—₹1230 cr-0.0%17.0%1.5x
2026-01—₹1230 cr-0.0%17.0%1.5x
2025-12—₹1230 cr-0.0%17.0%1.5x
2025-1131.6x₹1117 cr7.9%17.0%1.5x
2025-1036.3x₹1117 cr7.9%17.0%1.5x
2025-0938.1x₹1117 cr7.9%17.0%1.5x
2025-0817.7x₹1049 cr17.1%17.0%1.5x
2025-0718.5x₹1049 cr17.1%17.0%1.5x
2025-0619.7x₹1049 cr17.1%17.0%1.5x
2025-0517.5x₹997 cr24.6%16.0%2.0x
2025-0417.6x₹997 cr24.6%16.0%2.0x
2025-0317.7x₹997 cr24.6%16.0%2.0x
2025-0214.7x₹915 cr28.2%16.0%2.0x
2025-0118.3x₹915 cr28.2%16.0%2.0x
2024-1219.0x₹915 cr28.2%16.0%2.0x
2024-1123.8x₹863 cr22.7%16.0%2.0x
2024-1025.2x₹863 cr22.7%16.0%2.0x
2024-0925.2x₹863 cr22.7%16.0%2.0x
2024-0835.6x₹812 cr17.4%16.0%2.0x
2024-0734.5x₹812 cr17.4%16.0%2.0x
2024-0635.8x₹812 cr17.4%16.0%2.0x
2024-0563.9x₹687 cr13.1%13.0%2.5x
2024-0450.1x₹687 cr13.1%13.0%2.5x
2024-0354.7x₹687 cr13.1%13.0%2.5x
2024-0265.2x₹687 cr13.1%13.0%2.5x
2024-0175.1x₹687 cr13.1%13.0%2.5x
2023-1242.8x₹687 cr13.1%13.0%2.5x
2023-1137.3x₹687 cr13.1%13.0%2.5x
2023-1032.9x₹687 cr13.1%13.0%2.5x
2023-0929.7x₹687 cr13.1%13.0%2.5x
2023-0817.4x₹687 cr13.1%13.0%2.5x
2023-0717.2x₹687 cr13.1%13.0%2.5x
2023-0614.0x₹687 cr13.1%13.0%2.5x
2023-0518.8x₹660 cr10.5%11.0%3.2x
2023-0419.3x₹660 cr10.5%11.0%3.2x
2023-0320.7x₹660 cr10.5%11.0%3.2x
2023-0218.0x₹660 cr10.5%11.0%3.2x
2023-0120.7x₹660 cr10.5%11.0%3.2x
2022-1220.5x₹660 cr10.5%11.0%3.2x
2022-1122.6x₹660 cr10.5%11.0%3.2x
2022-1023.5x₹660 cr10.5%11.0%3.2x
2022-0923.4x₹660 cr10.5%11.0%3.2x
2022-0824.3x₹660 cr10.5%11.0%3.2x
2022-0724.2x₹660 cr10.5%11.0%3.2x
2022-0624.6x₹660 cr10.5%11.0%3.2x
2022-051.3x₹387 cr254.5%71.0%4.0x
2022-041.5x₹387 cr254.5%71.0%4.0x
2022-031.1x₹387 cr254.5%71.0%4.0x
2022-021.2x₹387 cr254.5%71.0%4.0x
2022-011.3x₹387 cr254.5%71.0%4.0x
2021-121.1x₹387 cr254.5%71.0%4.0x
2021-11—₹387 cr254.5%71.0%4.0x
2021-10—₹387 cr254.5%71.0%4.0x
2021-09—₹387 cr254.5%71.0%4.0x
2021-08—₹387 cr254.5%71.0%4.0x
2021-07—₹387 cr254.5%71.0%4.0x
2021-06—₹387 cr254.5%71.0%4.0x
2021-05—₹360 cr—-2.0%—
2021-04—₹360 cr—-2.0%—
2021-03—₹360 cr—-2.0%—
2021-02—₹360 cr—-2.0%—
2021-01—₹360 cr—-2.0%—
2020-12—₹360 cr—-2.0%—
2020-11—₹360 cr—-2.0%—
2020-10—₹360 cr—-2.0%—
2020-09—₹360 cr—-2.0%—
2020-08—₹360 cr—-2.0%—
2020-07—₹360 cr—-2.0%—
2020-06—₹360 cr—-2.0%—
2020-05—₹490 cr—-1.0%—
2020-04—₹490 cr—-1.0%—
2020-03—₹490 cr—-1.0%—
2020-02—₹490 cr—-1.0%—
2020-01—₹490 cr—-1.0%—
2019-12—₹490 cr—-1.0%—
2019-11—₹490 cr—-1.0%—
2019-10—₹490 cr—-1.0%—
2019-09—₹490 cr—-1.0%—
2019-08—₹490 cr—-1.0%—
2019-07—₹490 cr—-1.0%—
2019-06—₹490 cr—-1.0%—
2019-05—₹603 cr—-7.0%—
2019-04—₹603 cr—-7.0%—
2019-03—₹603 cr—-7.0%—
2019-02—₹603 cr—-7.0%—
2019-01—₹603 cr—-7.0%—

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback