अApnaFunda

MANAKSIA ALUMINIUM COMPANY LTD (MANAKALUCO)

Non-Energy Minerals · Other Metals/Minerals · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.31 / 100
Profitability 46Growth 41Balance sheet 7

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹31.13 latest close · −13.5% over the last 90 sessions

₹30₹40Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹30₹40Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹31.13 month-end · +22.8% over 12 months

₹20₹30₹40Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹20₹30₹40Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹31.13 month-end · +28.6% over 3 years

₹20₹30₹40Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹20₹30₹40Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹31.13 month-end · +375.3% since Jan '19

₹0₹20₹40Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹0₹20₹40Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹21.73 to ₹68.12 · 1-year volatility 66.8%

Was the rally earned?

+23%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 26 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 23.9x to 23.2x), which took 3 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +27 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+27 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −3 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−3 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1 ptsShare count changeShare price: +23%+23%Share priceNet profit growth: +27 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+27ProfitP/E change: −3 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−3P/EShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1SharesShare price: +23%+23%Share price
Net profit growth+27 ptsNet profit rose about 27%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-3 ptsThe P/E fell from 23.9x to 23.2x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+29%share price, 3 yearsMultiple-driven

Partly.

  • Most of the rise came from investors paying a higher multiple (P/E 17.9x to 23.2x); per-share earnings took off 1 point.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −3 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−3 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +30 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+30 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +2 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+2 ptsShare count changeShare price: +29%+29%Share priceNet profit growth: −3 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−3ProfitP/E change: +30 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+30P/EShare count change: +2 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+2SharesShare price: +29%+29%Share price
Net profit growth-3 ptsNet profit fell about 3%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+30 ptsThe P/E rose from 17.9x to 23.2x, which lifts the price.
Share count change+2 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with HINDUSTAN ZINC

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-72.9%recovered 2020-06
1-year volatility66.8%annualised

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2020202120222023202420252026−72.4% 0%−20%−40%−60%2020202220242026−72.4%
Largest drawdowns

-72.9% (2019-01 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2020-06)

-66.5% (2026-01 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

-57.9% (2024-01 peak to 2025-03 low, recovered 2026-01)

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

23.2xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history59th percentile
CheapestMedian 19.7xDearest

Usual range 4.1x to 37.2x since 2019-01.

Against Non-Energy Minerals23.2x vs 21.8x
This company
23.2x
Sector median
21.8x

7% above the Non-Energy Minerals median.

2.3x16.6x30.9x45.2xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '262.3x16.6x30.9x45.2xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Non-Energy Minerals is valued

Where does it rank among Non-Energy Minerals peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Non-Energy Minerals peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE47thflat vs a year ago
  • Op. margin45th▲ 11 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth29th▼ 61 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth68th▼ 18 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓6thflat vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓36th▲ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓46th▼ 9 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum82nd▲ 20 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Non-Energy Minerals sector page Watch it move against Non-Energy Minerals in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~20%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 29.4x, the price would imply about 19.5%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Below the ₹1,000 cr market-cap floor used for the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Non-Energy Minerals The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹31.13
P/E
23.2x
ROCE
10.0%
Market Cap
₹204 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹569 cr
P/S
0.4x
P/B
1.4x
ROE
6.1%
Operating Margin
9.6%
Debt / Equity
1.7x
Promoter Holding
74.9%
12M Momentum
22.9%

52-week range

₹21.73₹68.12
20% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
66.8%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.13

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
1.4x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
2.47x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

5 of 7checks within range1 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance9%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 9.0%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate23%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 22.5%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion2.47xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 2.47x (cash from operations ₹47 cr, net profit ₹19 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow1 of 5 yrsBeyond threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 1. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+17 daysNear threshold

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 17 days (55 vs 38). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress18% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 18% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days+6 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by +6 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, promoters added 2.0 pts.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupDec '23Jun '26Change
Promoters72.9%74.9%+2.0 pts
FIIs0.0%0.3%+0.3 pts
DIIs———
Public and others27.1%24.9%-2.3 pts

Number of shareholders

31,222shareholders+2% since Dec '23
28k30k31k33k Dec '23Sep '24Sep '25Mar '26Jun '26
Dec '23: 30,727
Mar '24: 32,808
Sep '24: 29,320
Dec '24: 29,084
Sep '25: 28,374
Dec '25: 28,010
Mar '26: 31,850
Jun '26: 31,222
28k30k31k33k Dec '23Dec '24Mar '26Jun '26
Dec '23: 30,727
Mar '24: 32,808
Sep '24: 29,320
Dec '24: 29,084
Sep '25: 28,374
Dec '25: 28,010
Mar '26: 31,850
Jun '26: 31,222

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−0.8%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like MANAKSIA ALUMINIUM COMPANY LTD today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −28% to +54% vs the market, against −3% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+2.5%, 80% range −7.2% to +11.3%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
KRITI · Dec 2024: −50.4% vs market
ELGIRUBCO · Feb 2025: −46.2% vs market
GLOBE · Aug 2024: −43.4% vs market
TARMAT · Jul 2021: −43.3% vs market
CELEBRITY · Aug 2023: −42.3% vs market
BHARATGEAR · Jul 2023: −40.4% vs market
BSL · Oct 2025: −37.7% vs market
MARALOVER · May 2022: −37.3% vs market
BVCL · Feb 2024: −37.3% vs market
AUTOIND · Jun 2024: −37.2% vs market
GLOBALVECT · Feb 2020: −35.4% vs market
SHIVATEX · Nov 2021: −33.5% vs market
AMDIND · Jun 2023: −29.9% vs market
MAWANASUG · Dec 2022: −23.5% vs market
COASTCORP · Oct 2022: −22.2% vs market
TBZ · Jan 2025: −19.0% vs market
MANOMAY · Sep 2024: −18.4% vs market
MOKSH · Aug 2024: −18.4% vs market
A2ZINFRA · Oct 2025: −13.0% vs market
LAGNAM · Feb 2024: −11.7% vs market
SHREERAMA · Jun 2021: −10.9% vs market
AMBICAAGAR · Dec 2022: −3.9% vs market
RICOAUTO · Sep 2023: −3.4% vs market
INDSWFTLAB · Sep 2023: −1.5% vs market
SALSTEEL · Aug 2023: −0.9% vs market
HISARMETAL · May 2021: −0.7% vs market
PGIL · Feb 2022: +1.0% vs market
RKEC · May 2023: +5.6% vs market
PAVNAIND · Jul 2023: +7.8% vs market
AIROLAM · Jun 2023: +7.9% vs market
NECLIFE · Feb 2021: +11.3% vs market
EMAMIPAP · Oct 2021: +12.8% vs market
ARCHIDPLY · Jul 2024: +14.0% vs market
BEDMUTHA · Oct 2023: +15.2% vs market
CENTEXT · Sep 2021: +27.7% vs market
BANSWRAS · Feb 2022: +32.2% vs market
RAMKY · Sep 2021: +51.6% vs market
NECCLTD · Nov 2020: +55.3% vs market
SARVESHWAR · Nov 2023: +64.4% vs market
GOKEX · Jul 2021: +64.4% vs market
GINNIFILA · Feb 2021: +91.3% vs market
HECPROJECT · Jul 2023: +109.4% vs market
UGARSUGAR · Jun 2022: +112.9% vs market
BAHETI · Jun 2024: +125.1% vs market
GPTINFRA · Mar 2023: +139.1% vs market
PARACABLES · Dec 2021: +141.3% vs market
MANAKCOAT · Mar 2024: +150.8% vs market
PRITIKA · Jun 2024: +176.5% vs market
SANGAMIND · Mar 2021: +181.3% vs market
DPABHUSHAN · Jan 2021: +203.6% vs market
Similar setups −0.8%All companies −3.3%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 9 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−0.8%
All companies' median
−3.3%
Beat the market
48% vs 46%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 35 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
ELGIRUBCO
Producer Manufacturing
Feb 2025 25x6% +3%−57% −46%
GINNIFILA
Process Industries
Feb 2021 24x8% +128%−20% +91%
MANAKCOAT
Non-Energy Minerals
Mar 2024 21x10% +104%−31% +151%
AMDIND
Process Industries
Jun 2023 22x10% +59%−34% −30%
MAWANASUG
Process Industries
Dec 2022 14x10% +26%−43% −24%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
AUTOIND
Producer Manufacturing
Jun 2024 29x13% +80%−22% −37%
SALSTEEL
Non-Energy Minerals
Aug 2023 38x8% +91%−31% −1%
UGARSUGAR
Process Industries
Jun 2022 13x12% +35%−42% +113%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: ROCE, P/S and size. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to MANAKSIA ALUMINIUM COMPANY LTD. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What changed?

30 events since Sep '21

  1. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹564 cr.
  2. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 8% to 4% of profit.
  3. MarPriceFell 66% from the Jan 2026 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  4. JanPriceRegained the 2024-01 peak, 10 months after the low.
  5. JanValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (44.4x).
  6. DecPromoterPromoter holding rose 2.0 pts to 74.9%.
  7. DecPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  8. SepPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
Show 22 earlier events
  1. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  2. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  3. MarResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹490 cr.
  4. MarPriceFell 58% from the Jan 2024 peak to the Mar 2025 low.
  5. DecValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (39.2x).
  6. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  7. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (35.5x).
  8. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  9. JanPriceRegained the 2021-12 peak, 19 months after the low.
  10. JanValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (28.4x).
  11. JanPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  12. NovPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  13. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  14. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  15. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  16. JunDividendStarted paying a dividend (payout 4% of profit).
  17. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned positive.
  18. JunPriceFell 42% from the Dec 2021 peak to the Jun 2022 low.
  19. JunPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the bottom quartile).
  20. DecPriceRegained the 2021-09 peak, 1 month after the low.
  21. NovPriceFell 30% from the Sep 2021 peak to the Nov 2021 low.
  22. SepPriceRegained the 2021-05 peak, 1 month after the low.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history95 months · 2019-01 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1123.2x₹569 cr6.1%10.0%1.7x
2026-1021.3x₹569 cr6.2%10.0%1.7x
2026-0925.6x₹569 cr6.2%10.0%1.7x
2026-0833.5x₹564 cr5.3%10.0%1.7x
2026-0730.6x₹564 cr5.3%10.0%1.7x
2026-0630.7x₹564 cr5.3%10.0%1.7x
2026-0537.4x₹545 cr4.6%11.0%1.8x
2026-0438.5x₹545 cr4.6%11.0%1.8x
2026-0322.4x₹545 cr4.6%11.0%1.8x
2026-0229.1x₹542 cr4.6%11.0%1.8x
2026-0144.4x₹542 cr4.6%11.0%1.8x
2025-1229.8x₹542 cr4.6%11.0%1.8x
2025-1123.9x₹562 cr5.1%11.0%1.8x
2025-1027.3x₹562 cr5.1%11.0%1.8x
2025-0930.2x₹562 cr5.1%11.0%1.8x
2025-0831.7x₹509 cr4.4%11.0%1.8x
2025-0732.5x₹509 cr4.4%11.0%1.8x
2025-0628.4x₹509 cr4.4%11.0%1.8x
2025-0531.5x₹490 cr4.3%10.0%1.3x
2025-0431.8x₹490 cr4.3%10.0%1.3x
2025-0321.4x₹490 cr4.3%10.0%1.3x
2025-0224.0x₹454 cr4.0%10.0%1.3x
2025-0135.6x₹454 cr4.0%10.0%1.3x
2024-1239.2x₹454 cr4.0%10.0%1.3x
2024-1136.1x₹416 cr3.6%10.0%1.3x
2024-1039.2x₹416 cr3.6%10.0%1.3x
2024-0945.2x₹416 cr3.6%10.0%1.3x
2024-0838.6x₹425 cr3.9%10.0%1.3x
2024-0741.2x₹425 cr3.9%10.0%1.3x
2024-0635.5x₹425 cr3.9%10.0%1.3x
2024-0520.1x₹483 cr7.1%10.0%1.1x
2024-0419.7x₹483 cr7.1%10.0%1.1x
2024-0319.5x₹483 cr7.1%10.0%1.1x
2024-0223.5x₹483 cr7.1%10.0%1.1x
2024-0128.4x₹483 cr7.1%10.0%1.1x
2023-1218.0x₹483 cr7.1%10.0%1.1x
2023-1117.9x₹483 cr7.1%10.0%1.1x
2023-1018.8x₹483 cr7.1%10.0%1.1x
2023-0920.9x₹483 cr7.1%10.0%1.1x
2023-0818.5x₹483 cr7.1%10.0%1.1x
2023-0718.8x₹483 cr7.1%10.0%1.1x
2023-0616.5x₹483 cr7.1%10.0%1.1x
2023-0518.5x₹438 cr6.0%10.0%1.1x
2023-0418.4x₹438 cr6.0%10.0%1.1x
2023-0317.9x₹438 cr6.0%10.0%1.1x
2023-0220.9x₹438 cr6.0%10.0%1.1x
2023-0119.4x₹438 cr6.0%10.0%1.1x
2022-1218.9x₹438 cr6.0%10.0%1.1x
2022-1118.2x₹438 cr6.0%10.0%1.1x
2022-1018.8x₹438 cr6.0%10.0%1.1x
2022-0918.6x₹438 cr6.0%10.0%1.1x
2022-0818.4x₹438 cr6.0%10.0%1.1x
2022-0718.1x₹438 cr6.0%10.0%1.1x
2022-0618.5x₹438 cr6.0%10.0%1.1x
2022-05—₹275 cr-2.9%4.0%1.0x
2022-04—₹275 cr-2.9%4.0%1.0x
2022-03—₹275 cr-2.9%4.0%1.0x
2022-02—₹275 cr-2.9%4.0%1.0x
2022-01—₹275 cr-2.9%4.0%1.0x
2021-12—₹275 cr-2.9%4.0%1.0x
2021-11—₹275 cr-2.9%4.0%1.0x
2021-10—₹275 cr-2.9%4.0%1.0x
2021-09—₹275 cr-2.9%4.0%1.0x
2021-08—₹275 cr-2.9%4.0%1.0x
2021-07—₹275 cr-2.9%4.0%1.0x
2021-06—₹275 cr-2.9%4.0%1.0x
2021-0523.5x₹281 cr5.4%10.0%0.7x
2021-0411.7x₹281 cr5.4%10.0%0.7x
2021-039.7x₹281 cr5.4%10.0%0.7x
2021-029.8x₹281 cr5.4%10.0%0.7x
2021-019.9x₹281 cr5.4%10.0%0.7x
2020-129.7x₹281 cr5.4%10.0%0.7x
2020-118.1x₹281 cr5.4%10.0%0.7x
2020-107.7x₹281 cr5.4%10.0%0.7x
2020-098.7x₹281 cr5.4%10.0%0.7x
2020-089.8x₹281 cr5.4%10.0%0.7x
2020-077.8x₹281 cr5.4%10.0%0.7x
2020-0611.0x₹281 cr5.4%10.0%0.7x
2020-054.0x₹276 cr6.5%7.0%0.6x
2020-043.9x₹276 cr6.5%7.0%0.6x
2020-032.3x₹276 cr6.5%7.0%0.6x
2020-023.4x₹276 cr6.5%7.0%0.6x
2020-013.8x₹276 cr6.5%7.0%0.6x
2019-124.1x₹276 cr6.5%7.0%0.6x
2019-113.8x₹276 cr6.5%7.0%0.6x
2019-103.8x₹276 cr6.5%7.0%0.6x
2019-094.4x₹276 cr6.5%7.0%0.6x
2019-084.2x₹276 cr6.5%7.0%0.6x
2019-074.1x₹276 cr6.5%7.0%0.6x
2019-065.4x₹276 cr6.5%7.0%0.6x
2019-0537.6x₹228 cr1.3%5.0%0.9x
2019-0436.3x₹228 cr1.3%5.0%0.9x
2019-0336.3x₹228 cr1.3%5.0%0.9x
2019-0236.3x₹228 cr1.3%5.0%0.9x
2019-0134.5x₹228 cr1.3%5.0%0.9x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback