अApnaFunda
Menu

BARAK VALLEY CEMENTS LIMITED (BVCL)

Non-Energy Minerals · Construction Materials · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.45 / 100
Profitability 36Growth 30Balance sheet 70
Compare withULTRATECH CEMENTGRASIM INDUSTRIESAMBUJA CEMENTS

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹36.45 latest close · −20.7% over the last 90 sessions

₹35₹40₹45Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹35₹40₹45Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹36.45 month-end · −16.5% over 12 months

₹35₹40₹45Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹35₹40₹45Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹36.45 month-end · −25.9% over 3 years

₹40₹60Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹40₹60Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹36.45 month-end · +127.8% since Feb '19

₹20₹40₹60Feb '19Sep '20Mar '22Oct '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹20₹40₹60Feb '19Jan '23Nov '26

52-week range ₹31.20 to ₹54.90 · 1-year volatility 47.5%

Was the rally earned?

-17%share price, 1 yearEarnings-driven

Mostly earnings.

  • Per-share earnings took off 46 points, while the multiple moved less (P/E 29.1x to 40.1x).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −46 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−46 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +29 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+29 ptsP/E changeShare price: −16%−16%Share priceNet profit growth: −46 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−46ProfitP/E change: +29 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+29P/EShare price: −16%−16%Share price
Net profit growth-46 ptsNet profit fell about 39%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+29 ptsThe P/E rose from 29.1x to 40.1x, which lifts the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-26%share price, 3 yearsEarnings-driven

Mostly earnings.

  • Per-share earnings took off 82 points, while the multiple moved less (P/E 20.8x to 40.1x).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −81 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−81 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +56 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+56 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1 ptsShare count changeShare price: −26%−26%Share priceNet profit growth: −81 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−81ProfitP/E change: +56 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+56P/EShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1SharesShare price: −26%−26%Share price
Net profit growth-81 ptsNet profit fell about 61%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+56 ptsThe P/E rose from 20.8x to 40.1x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+87%share price, 5 yearsMultiple-driven

Partly.

  • Most of the rise came from investors paying a higher multiple (P/E 18.3x to 40.1x); per-share earnings took off 21 points.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −21 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−21 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +109 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+109 ptsP/E changeShare price: +87%+87%Share priceNet profit growth: −21 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−21ProfitP/E change: +109 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+109P/EShare price: +87%+87%Share price
Net profit growth-21 ptsNet profit fell about 14%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+109 ptsThe P/E rose from 18.3x to 40.1x, which lifts the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with ULTRATECH CEMENT

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-59.9%recovered 2021-01
1-year volatility47.5%annualised

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2020202120222023202420252026−58.1% 0%−20%−40%−60%2020202220242026−58.1%
Largest drawdowns

-59.9% (2019-05 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2021-01)

-58.0% (2024-02 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

-36.3% (2021-08 peak to 2021-12 low, recovered 2022-08)

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

40.0xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history79th percentile
CheapestMedian 21.9xDearest

Usual range 6.1x to 81.3x since 2019-02.

Against Non-Energy Minerals40.0x vs 21.8x
This company
40.0x
Sector median
21.8x

84% above the Non-Energy Minerals median.

4.7x118.1x231.5x344.9xFeb '19Sep '20Apr '22Nov '23Jun '25Nov '264.7x118.1x231.5x344.9xFeb '19Sep '21Apr '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Non-Energy Minerals is valued

Where does it rank among Non-Energy Minerals peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Non-Energy Minerals peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE22nd▼ 19 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin49th▲ 19 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth29th▲ 13 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth16thflat vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓60th▲ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓55th▲ 20 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓25th▼ 17 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum46th▲ 7 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Non-Energy Minerals sector page Watch it move against Non-Energy Minerals in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~21%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 33.7x, the price would imply about 21.4%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Non-Energy Minerals The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹36.45
P/E
40.1x
ROCE
4.0%
Market Cap
₹81 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹216 cr
P/S
0.4x
P/B
0.6x
ROE
1.6%
Operating Margin
10.0%
Debt / Equity
0.2x
Promoter Holding
52.7%
12M Momentum
-16.5%

52-week range

₹31.20₹54.90
22% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
47.5%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.81

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
2.0x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
2.92x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

4 of 7checks within range3 near a threshold
Other income reliance30%Near threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 30.2%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate43%Near threshold

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 43.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion2.92xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 2.92x (cash from operations ₹35 cr, net profit ₹12 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow5 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 5. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+15 daysNear threshold

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 15 days (42 vs 27). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress2% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 2% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days-4 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by -4 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, promoters trimmed 2.6 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 8,494 to 10,714 (+26%) between Dec 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupDec '23Jun '26Change
Promoters55.3%52.7%-2.6 pts
FIIs———
DIIs———
Public and others44.7%47.3%+2.6 pts

Number of shareholders

10,714shareholders+26% since Dec '23
8k10k11k12k Dec '23Jun '24Dec '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 8,494
Mar '24: 9,057
Jun '24: 9,408
Sep '24: 10,173
Dec '24: 10,353
Mar '25: 10,428
Jun '25: 10,524
Sep '25: 11,683
Dec '25: 11,244
Mar '26: 10,941
Jun '26: 10,714
 8k10k11k12k Dec '23Dec '24Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 8,494
Mar '24: 9,057
Jun '24: 9,408
Sep '24: 10,173
Dec '24: 10,353
Mar '25: 10,428
Jun '25: 10,524
Sep '25: 11,683
Dec '25: 11,244
Mar '26: 10,941
Jun '26: 10,714

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−0.5%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like BARAK VALLEY CEMENTS LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −25% to +33% vs the market, against −5% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+4.3%, 80% range −7.4% to +6.0%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
MITTAL · Jul 2025: −49.8% vs market
AKG · Jul 2023: −46.8% vs market
UFO · Sep 2024: −43.3% vs market
GENUSPAPER · Nov 2024: −38.2% vs market
DUCON · Feb 2024: −37.6% vs market
TOTAL · May 2025: −37.6% vs market
AROGRANITE · Nov 2024: −37.2% vs market
ASAHISONG · Feb 2025: −33.7% vs market
KOTHARIPRO · Mar 2023: −32.1% vs market
AHLADA · Nov 2023: −31.8% vs market
EMMBI · Oct 2025: −31.5% vs market
KANORICHEM · Apr 2023: −29.5% vs market
NAHARINDUS · Aug 2024: −25.8% vs market
LAMBODHARA · Nov 2024: −24.0% vs market
GRPLTD · Oct 2020: −22.1% vs market
HILTON · May 2020: −21.5% vs market
APOLSINHOT · Jul 2025: −17.7% vs market
TEXMOPIPES · Jun 2024: −15.9% vs market
EXXARO · Oct 2025: −12.3% vs market
HPIL · Oct 2023: −11.3% vs market
SUNDRMBRAK · May 2021: −10.8% vs market
NAHARPOLY · Nov 2024: −9.9% vs market
SUPERHOUSE · Oct 2025: −7.9% vs market
MIRZAINT · Feb 2025: −3.4% vs market
AAREYDRUGS · Aug 2023: −0.6% vs market
AJOONI · Apr 2024: −0.4% vs market
MANORG · Oct 2024: +1.5% vs market
KCPSUGIND · May 2023: +2.5% vs market
SAGARDEEP · May 2024: +2.8% vs market
NECLIFE · Dec 2022: +3.1% vs market
RKDL · Aug 2020: +7.7% vs market
ISFT · Jul 2020: +7.8% vs market
SHEMAROO · Jul 2022: +8.5% vs market
ORIENTCER · Oct 2025: +12.2% vs market
NIPPOBATRY · May 2023: +15.8% vs market
VASCONEQ · Apr 2020: +22.1% vs market
BEARDSELL · Feb 2021: +32.4% vs market
MEGASTAR · Apr 2025: +33.6% vs market
HPL · Mar 2022: +39.5% vs market
ALKALI · Dec 2020: +42.8% vs market
RUCHIRA · Sep 2021: +46.8% vs market
KALYANIFRG · Oct 2024: +48.1% vs market
INCREDIBLE · Feb 2023: +48.4% vs market
SCHAND · Jun 2022: +48.9% vs market
EVERESTIND · Jan 2021: +59.2% vs market
SOMICONVEY · Dec 2022: +70.0% vs market
PIONEEREMB · May 2020: +75.4% vs market
SHIVAMILLS · Mar 2021: +93.9% vs market
BIRLACABLE · Oct 2025: +110.1% vs market
ORIENTBELL · Sep 2020: +118.6% vs market
Similar setups −0.5%All companies −4.8%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 2 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−0.5%
All companies' median
−4.8%
Beat the market
48% vs 45%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 37 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
RUCHIRA
Process Industries		 Sep 2021 41x4% +77%−15% +47%
SHIVAMILLS
Process Industries		 Mar 2021 32x6% +94%−14% +94%
INCREDIBLE
Non-Energy Minerals		 Feb 2023 27x7% −9%−30% +48%
RKDL
Consumer Non-Durables		 Aug 2020 34x1% +5%−21% +8%
HILTON
Producer Manufacturing		 May 2020 17x5% −47%−52% −22%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
SAGARDEEP
Non-Energy Minerals		 May 2024 84x6% +27%−27% +3%
SUNDRMBRAK
Producer Manufacturing		 May 2021 55x5% +104%−8% −11%
VASCONEQ
Industrial Services		 Apr 2020 21x3% −44%−55% +22%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, interest cover and drawdown from 12-month high. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to BARAK VALLEY CEMENTS LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What changed?

26 events since Jun '19

  1. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (315.8x).
  2. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  3. MarPriceFell 58% from the Feb 2024 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  4. MarPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  5. DecPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  6. SepPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  7. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  8. MarPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
Show 18 earlier events
  1. DecResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  2. DecPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  3. SepPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  4. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  5. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  6. NovPriceRegained the 2023-04 peak, 4 months after the low.
  7. JulPriceFell 25% from the Apr 2023 peak to the Jul 2023 low.
  8. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned positive.
  9. JunPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the bottom quartile).
  10. AugPriceRegained the 2021-08 peak, 8 months after the low.
  11. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned negative.
  12. DecPriceFell 36% from the Aug 2021 peak to the Dec 2021 low.
  13. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  14. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  15. JanPriceRegained the 2019-05 peak, 10 months after the low.
  16. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹162 cr.
  17. MarPriceFell 60% from the May 2019 peak to the Mar 2020 low.
  18. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned positive.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history94 months · 2019-02 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1140.1x₹216 cr1.6%4.0%0.2x
2026-1039.6x₹216 cr1.6%4.0%0.2x
2026-0947.3x₹216 cr1.6%4.0%0.2x
2026-08344.9x₹212 cr0.2%4.0%0.2x
2026-07316.9x₹212 cr0.2%4.0%0.2x
2026-06315.8x₹212 cr0.2%4.0%0.2x
2026-05—₹210 cr0.0%9.0%0.3x
2026-04—₹210 cr0.0%9.0%0.3x
2026-03—₹210 cr0.0%9.0%0.3x
2026-0225.4x₹218 cr2.9%9.0%0.3x
2026-0127.7x₹218 cr2.9%9.0%0.3x
2025-1225.7x₹218 cr2.9%9.0%0.3x
2025-1129.1x₹212 cr2.7%9.0%0.3x
2025-1031.4x₹212 cr2.7%9.0%0.3x
2025-0932.4x₹212 cr2.7%9.0%0.3x
2025-0817.6x₹208 cr4.3%9.0%0.3x
2025-0718.2x₹208 cr4.3%9.0%0.3x
2025-0616.3x₹208 cr4.3%9.0%0.3x
2025-0530.8x₹219 cr2.3%12.0%0.4x
2025-0429.6x₹219 cr2.3%12.0%0.4x
2025-0328.6x₹219 cr2.3%12.0%0.4x
2025-0220.8x₹223 cr3.2%12.0%0.4x
2025-0126.3x₹223 cr3.2%12.0%0.4x
2024-1226.6x₹223 cr3.2%12.0%0.4x
2024-1116.2x₹232 cr6.2%12.0%0.4x
2024-1017.3x₹232 cr6.2%12.0%0.4x
2024-0918.0x₹232 cr6.2%12.0%0.4x
2024-0819.8x₹234 cr6.2%12.0%0.4x
2024-0721.4x₹234 cr6.2%12.0%0.4x
2024-0619.9x₹234 cr6.2%12.0%0.4x
2024-0521.9x₹183 cr4.6%10.0%0.5x
2024-0423.6x₹183 cr4.6%10.0%0.5x
2024-0323.2x₹183 cr4.6%10.0%0.5x
2024-0225.5x₹183 cr4.6%10.0%0.5x
2024-0125.1x₹183 cr4.6%10.0%0.5x
2023-1221.7x₹183 cr4.6%10.0%0.5x
2023-1120.8x₹183 cr4.6%10.0%0.5x
2023-1016.0x₹183 cr4.6%10.0%0.5x
2023-0916.6x₹183 cr4.6%10.0%0.5x
2023-0815.5x₹183 cr4.6%10.0%0.5x
2023-0714.4x₹183 cr4.6%10.0%0.5x
2023-0614.7x₹183 cr4.6%10.0%0.5x
2023-05—₹176 cr-4.8%8.0%0.7x
2023-04—₹176 cr-4.8%8.0%0.7x
2023-03—₹176 cr-4.8%8.0%0.7x
2023-02—₹176 cr-4.8%8.0%0.7x
2023-01—₹176 cr-4.8%8.0%0.7x
2022-12—₹176 cr-4.8%8.0%0.7x
2022-11—₹176 cr-4.8%8.0%0.7x
2022-10—₹176 cr-4.8%8.0%0.7x
2022-09—₹176 cr-4.8%8.0%0.7x
2022-08—₹176 cr-4.8%8.0%0.7x
2022-07—₹176 cr-4.8%8.0%0.7x
2022-06—₹176 cr-4.8%8.0%0.7x
2022-0522.5x₹147 cr2.0%6.0%1.0x
2022-0421.2x₹147 cr2.0%6.0%1.0x
2022-0321.7x₹147 cr2.0%6.0%1.0x
2022-0220.9x₹147 cr2.0%6.0%1.0x
2022-0122.1x₹147 cr2.0%6.0%1.0x
2021-1219.3x₹147 cr2.0%6.0%1.0x
2021-1118.3x₹147 cr2.0%6.0%1.0x
2021-1020.3x₹147 cr2.0%6.0%1.0x
2021-0923.3x₹147 cr2.0%6.0%1.0x
2021-0822.3x₹147 cr2.0%6.0%1.0x
2021-0721.7x₹147 cr2.0%6.0%1.0x
2021-0621.7x₹147 cr2.0%6.0%1.0x
2021-058.4x₹162 cr5.4%6.0%0.9x
2021-046.6x₹162 cr5.4%6.0%0.9x
2021-036.4x₹162 cr5.4%6.0%0.9x
2021-026.2x₹162 cr5.4%6.0%0.9x
2021-016.0x₹162 cr5.4%6.0%0.9x
2020-125.9x₹162 cr5.4%6.0%0.9x
2020-115.3x₹162 cr5.4%6.0%0.9x
2020-104.9x₹162 cr5.4%6.0%0.9x
2020-095.0x₹162 cr5.4%6.0%0.9x
2020-085.8x₹162 cr5.4%6.0%0.9x
2020-074.7x₹162 cr5.4%6.0%0.9x
2020-065.1x₹162 cr5.4%6.0%0.9x
2020-0572.3x₹148 cr0.3%6.0%0.9x
2020-0468.3x₹148 cr0.3%6.0%0.9x
2020-0350.3x₹148 cr0.3%6.0%0.9x
2020-0277.7x₹148 cr0.3%6.0%0.9x
2020-0181.7x₹148 cr0.3%6.0%0.9x
2019-1283.3x₹148 cr0.3%6.0%0.9x
2019-1177.0x₹148 cr0.3%6.0%0.9x
2019-1070.0x₹148 cr0.3%6.0%0.9x
2019-0980.7x₹148 cr0.3%6.0%0.9x
2019-0895.7x₹148 cr0.3%6.0%0.9x
2019-0798.0x₹148 cr0.3%6.0%0.9x
2019-06102.0x₹148 cr0.3%6.0%0.9x
2019-05—₹157 cr-2.1%5.0%1.0x
2019-04—₹157 cr-2.1%5.0%1.0x
2019-03—₹157 cr-2.1%5.0%1.0x
2019-02—₹157 cr-2.1%5.0%1.0x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback