अApnaFunda
Menu

SAGARDEEP ALLOYS LIMITED (SAGARDEEP)

Non-Energy Minerals · Other Metals/Minerals · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.65 / 100
Profitability 33Growth 94Balance sheet 68
Compare withHINDUSTAN ZINCHINDALCO INDUSTRIESNMDC

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹26.28 latest close · +4.8% over the last 90 sessions

₹22₹24₹26₹28Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹22₹24₹26₹28Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹26.28 month-end · +0.5% over 12 months

₹22₹24₹26₹28Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹22₹24₹26₹28Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹26.28 month-end · −2.1% over 3 years

₹25₹30Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹25₹30Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹26.28 month-end · −56.9% since Jan '19

₹25₹50₹75Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹25₹50₹75Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹20.81 to ₹32.38 · 1-year volatility 38.0%

Was the rally earned?

+1%share price, 1 yearRoughly flat
  • The share price was roughly flat over 1 year (+1%).
  • The share count rose 6%.
Net profit growth: +48 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+48 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −41 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−41 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −6 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−6 ptsShare count changeShare price: +1%+1%Share priceNet profit growth: +48 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+48ProfitP/E change: −41 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−41P/EShare count change: −6 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−6SharesShare price: +1%+1%Share price
Net profit growth+48 ptsNet profit rose about 61%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-41 ptsThe P/E fell from 22.0x to 14.6x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-6 ptsShare count rose 6%, which lowers the price.
-2%share price, 3 yearsRoughly flat
  • The share price was roughly flat over 3 years (-2%).
  • The share count rose 6%.
Net profit growth: +177 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+177 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −173 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−173 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −6 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−6 ptsShare count changeShare price: −2%−2%Share priceNet profit growth: +177 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+177ProfitP/E change: −173 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−173P/EShare count change: −6 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−6SharesShare price: −2%−2%Share price
Net profit growth+177 ptsNet profit rose about 498%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-173 ptsThe P/E fell from 83.9x to 14.6x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-6 ptsShare count rose 6%, which lowers the price.
-6%share price, 5 yearsLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 302 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 350.0x to 14.6x), which took 308 points back.
  • The share count rose 6%.
Net profit growth: +308 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+308 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −308 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−308 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −6 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−6 ptsShare count changeShare price: −6%−6%Share priceNet profit growth: +308 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+308ProfitP/E change: −308 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−308P/EShare count change: −6 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−6SharesShare price: −6%−6%Share price
Net profit growth+308 ptsNet profit rose about 2290%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-308 ptsThe P/E fell from 350.0x to 14.6x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-6 ptsShare count rose 6%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with HINDUSTAN ZINC

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-80.7%not yet recovered
1-year volatility38.0%annualised

Drawdown from peak

0%−25%−50%−75%2020202120222023202420252026−79.2% 0%−25%−50%−75%2020202220242026−79.2%
Largest drawdowns

-80.7% (2020-08 peak to 2023-03 low, not yet recovered)

-65.7% (2019-02 peak to 2019-05 low, recovered 2020-06)

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

14.6xP/E todayNear its historic low
Against its own history2nd percentile
CheapestMedian 73.8xDearest

Usual range 21.0x to 458.6x since 2019-01.

Against Non-Energy Minerals14.6x vs 21.8x
This company
14.6x
Sector median
21.8x

33% below the Non-Energy Minerals median.

8.6x313.2x617.9x922.5xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '268.6x313.2x617.9x922.5xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Non-Energy Minerals is valued

Where does it rank among Non-Energy Minerals peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Non-Energy Minerals peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE55th▲ 20 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin12th▲ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth93rd▲ 13 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth81st▼ 16 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓59th▼ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓76th▼ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓71st▲ 9 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum65thflat vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Non-Energy Minerals sector page Watch it move against Non-Energy Minerals in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~19%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 28.1x, the price would imply about 19.3%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Below the ₹1,000 cr market-cap floor used for the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Non-Energy Minerals The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹26.28
P/E
14.6x
ROCE
11.0%
Market Cap
₹45 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹200 cr
P/S
0.2x
P/B
1.3x
ROE
8.8%
Operating Margin
2.5%
Debt / Equity
0.3x
Promoter Holding
72.7%
12M Momentum
0.5%

52-week range

₹20.81₹32.38
47% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
38.0%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.53

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
5.4x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
0.67x
Share count, 1Y
+6.3%

Are profits backed by cash?

4 of 7checks within range3 near a threshold
Other income reliance18%Near threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 18.3%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate27%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 27.4%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion0.67xNear threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 0.67x (cash from operations ₹4 cr, net profit ₹6 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow3 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 3. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-17 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 17 days (20 vs 37). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress42% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 42% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days0 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by 0 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, promoters trimmed 0.9 pts.
  • The number of shareholders fell from 14,514 to 12,386 (-15%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters73.6%72.7%-0.9 pts
FIIs———
DIIs———
Public and others26.4%27.3%+0.9 pts

Number of shareholders

12,386shareholders-15% since Sep '23
12k13k14k15k Sep '23Jun '25Sep '25Dec '25Mar '26Jun '26
Sep '23: 14,514
Jun '25: 12,618
Sep '25: 12,541
Dec '25: 12,504
Mar '26: 12,368
Jun '26: 12,386
 12k13k14k15k Sep '23Sep '25Mar '26Jun '26
Sep '23: 14,514
Jun '25: 12,618
Sep '25: 12,541
Dec '25: 12,504
Mar '26: 12,368
Jun '26: 12,386

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+5.9%typical 12-month return vs the marketAbove the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like SAGARDEEP ALLOYS LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −17% to +59% vs the market, against 0% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The analogs' median sat above that base rate (gap +6.3%, 80% range +0.1% to +12.1%), but the matches cluster in only 6 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−50%0%+50%+100%
PRUDMOULI · Dec 2024: −71.4% vs market
NIPPOBATRY · Jun 2021: −35.4% vs market
SONAMLTD · Feb 2022: −34.4% vs market
GILLANDERS · Jun 2025: −34.0% vs market
IVP · Apr 2023: −30.9% vs market
JOCIL · Nov 2023: −29.1% vs market
RAJINDLTD · Oct 2025: −25.1% vs market
PRITIKAUTO · Oct 2023: −24.6% vs market
NRAIL · Sep 2022: −20.2% vs market
ASAHISONG · Oct 2022: −18.7% vs market
BANSWRAS · Feb 2023: −18.4% vs market
ASPINWALL · Jun 2025: −18.0% vs market
MOKSH · Jan 2024: −16.9% vs market
JAYSREETEA · Jun 2021: −16.9% vs market
SAKUMA · Jun 2022: −15.5% vs market
MANAKALUCO · Feb 2023: −10.9% vs market
JAYAGROGN · Aug 2025: −9.4% vs market
ANIKINDS · Jun 2022: −6.7% vs market
RUCHIRA · Jun 2022: −3.3% vs market
ARCHIDPLY · Dec 2023: −3.1% vs market
VETO · Sep 2022: +1.7% vs market
AARVI · Aug 2025: +2.6% vs market
SHREYANIND · Apr 2023: +3.6% vs market
SALZERELEC · Jun 2021: +5.5% vs market
NECLIFE · Mar 2020: +5.6% vs market
BVCL · Mar 2021: +6.1% vs market
INCREDIBLE · Sep 2023: +7.9% vs market
ARIES · Nov 2020: +8.0% vs market
NIRAJ · Nov 2023: +8.0% vs market
TBZ · Jul 2023: +10.8% vs market
TOTAL · Jun 2020: +20.4% vs market
ISFT · Jun 2021: +44.6% vs market
BEARDSELL · Jun 2022: +44.6% vs market
CORDSCABLE · Oct 2022: +46.4% vs market
MWL · Nov 2024: +47.4% vs market
AIROLAM · Jul 2021: +53.2% vs market
PASUPTAC · Sep 2025: +58.4% vs market
AAREYDRUGS · Apr 2025: +59.1% vs market
PDMJEPAPER · Oct 2020: +61.8% vs market
LOKESHMACH · Nov 2021: +82.5% vs market
TEXMOPIPES · Oct 2020: +84.8% vs market
UNIVCABLES · Sep 2022: +94.5% vs market
AARON · Jun 2020: +115.4% vs market
KMSUGAR · Jun 2020: +118.7% vs market
KALYANIFRG · Sep 2022: +121.5% vs market
RPPINFRA · Aug 2023: +127.4% vs market
KANANIIND · Jan 2021: +129.7% vs market
TEMBO · Aug 2024: +145.6% vs market
PENIND · Aug 2022: +153.7% vs market
ADSL · Nov 2020: +203.1% vs market
Similar setups +5.9%All companies −0.4%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 9 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+5.9%
All companies' median
−0.4%
Beat the market
60% vs 50%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 31 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
AARVI
Commercial Services		 Aug 2025 19x11% −11%−17% +3%
MOKSH
Consumer Durables		 Jan 2024 23x17% +65%0% −17%
TEXMOPIPES
Producer Manufacturing		 Oct 2020 11x7% +2%−9% +85%
AAREYDRUGS
Health Technology		 Apr 2025 26x6% +3%−27% +59%
TOTAL
Transportation		 Jun 2020 18x9% −26%— +20%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
MWL
Non-Energy Minerals		 Nov 2024 17x14% +49%−11% +47%
AIROLAM
Non-Energy Minerals		 Jul 2021 11x12% +79%−3% +53%
CORDSCABLE
Producer Manufacturing		 Oct 2022 14x13% +31%−2% +46%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, ROCE and interest cover. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to SAGARDEEP ALLOYS LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What changed?

24 events since May '19

  1. SepPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  2. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  3. JunSharesShare count is up 6.2% over 12 months.
  4. MarResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹141 cr.
  5. JanDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.20x.
  6. JunPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the bottom quartile).
  7. JunDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.20x.
  8. MarValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (44.9x).
Show 16 earlier events
  1. DecPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  2. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹100 cr.
  3. JanDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.23x.
  4. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  5. JunDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.23x.
  6. MarPriceFell 81% from the Aug 2020 peak to the Mar 2023 low.
  7. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  8. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  9. DecValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (609.4x).
  10. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹65 cr.
  11. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (698.8x).
  12. JunSharesShare count is up 45.5% over 12 months.
  13. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  14. JunPriceRegained the 2019-02 peak, 13 months after the low.
  15. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  16. MayPriceFell 66% from the Feb 2019 peak to the May 2019 low.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history95 months · 2019-01 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1114.6x₹200 cr8.8%11.0%0.3x
2026-1015.0x₹200 cr8.8%11.0%0.3x
2026-0912.8x₹200 cr8.8%11.0%0.3x
2026-0815.1x₹179 cr7.7%11.0%0.3x
2026-0715.4x₹179 cr7.7%11.0%0.3x
2026-0616.0x₹179 cr7.7%11.0%0.3x
2026-0521.3x₹141 cr6.7%8.0%0.2x
2026-0419.4x₹141 cr6.7%8.0%0.2x
2026-0317.6x₹141 cr6.7%8.0%0.2x
2026-0219.5x₹129 cr6.6%8.0%0.2x
2026-0120.9x₹129 cr6.6%8.0%0.2x
2025-1222.8x₹129 cr6.6%8.0%0.2x
2025-1122.0x₹130 cr6.4%8.0%0.2x
2025-1024.2x₹130 cr6.4%8.0%0.2x
2025-0922.2x₹130 cr6.4%8.0%0.2x
2025-0824.9x₹125 cr6.0%8.0%0.2x
2025-0725.6x₹125 cr6.0%8.0%0.2x
2025-0628.2x₹125 cr6.0%8.0%0.2x
2025-0545.2x₹122 cr3.8%6.0%0.4x
2025-0445.9x₹122 cr3.8%6.0%0.4x
2025-0344.9x₹122 cr3.8%6.0%0.4x
2025-0256.3x₹121 cr3.3%6.0%0.4x
2025-0158.3x₹121 cr3.3%6.0%0.4x
2024-1250.3x₹121 cr3.3%6.0%0.4x
2024-1152.4x₹112 cr3.0%6.0%0.4x
2024-1053.5x₹112 cr3.0%6.0%0.4x
2024-0954.7x₹112 cr3.0%6.0%0.4x
2024-0862.8x₹100 cr2.6%6.0%0.4x
2024-0772.1x₹100 cr2.6%6.0%0.4x
2024-0661.8x₹100 cr2.6%6.0%0.4x
2024-0583.6x₹87 cr2.0%6.0%0.2x
2024-0484.7x₹87 cr2.0%6.0%0.2x
2024-0371.3x₹87 cr2.0%6.0%0.2x
2024-0289.7x₹87 cr2.0%6.0%0.2x
2024-0193.6x₹87 cr2.0%6.0%0.2x
2023-1284.5x₹87 cr2.0%6.0%0.2x
2023-1183.9x₹87 cr2.0%6.0%0.2x
2023-1086.9x₹87 cr2.0%6.0%0.2x
2023-0976.3x₹87 cr2.0%6.0%0.2x
2023-0880.0x₹87 cr2.0%6.0%0.2x
2023-0765.2x₹87 cr2.0%6.0%0.2x
2023-0665.2x₹87 cr2.0%6.0%0.2x
2023-0570.0x₹91 cr1.9%6.0%0.5x
2023-0473.8x₹91 cr1.9%6.0%0.5x
2023-0367.2x₹91 cr1.9%6.0%0.5x
2023-0280.5x₹91 cr1.9%6.0%0.5x
2023-0191.2x₹91 cr1.9%6.0%0.5x
2022-1294.0x₹91 cr1.9%6.0%0.5x
2022-1189.5x₹91 cr1.9%6.0%0.5x
2022-1092.5x₹91 cr1.9%6.0%0.5x
2022-0999.8x₹91 cr1.9%6.0%0.5x
2022-08104.2x₹91 cr1.9%6.0%0.5x
2022-0789.2x₹91 cr1.9%6.0%0.5x
2022-0685.7x₹91 cr1.9%6.0%0.5x
2022-05372.5x₹65 cr0.5%3.0%0.3x
2022-04433.1x₹65 cr0.5%3.0%0.3x
2022-03475.6x₹65 cr0.5%3.0%0.3x
2022-02700.6x₹65 cr0.5%3.0%0.3x
2022-01738.1x₹65 cr0.5%3.0%0.3x
2021-12609.4x₹65 cr0.5%3.0%0.3x
2021-11350.0x₹65 cr0.5%3.0%0.3x
2021-10361.3x₹65 cr0.5%3.0%0.3x
2021-09403.1x₹65 cr0.5%3.0%0.3x
2021-08544.4x₹65 cr0.5%3.0%0.3x
2021-07922.5x₹65 cr0.5%3.0%0.3x
2021-06698.8x₹65 cr0.5%3.0%0.3x
2021-05327.7x₹34 cr0.6%3.0%0.4x
2021-04262.7x₹34 cr0.6%3.0%0.4x
2021-03249.2x₹34 cr0.6%3.0%0.4x
2021-02342.3x₹34 cr0.6%3.0%0.4x
2021-01308.1x₹34 cr0.6%3.0%0.4x
2020-12283.1x₹34 cr0.6%3.0%0.4x
2020-11315.0x₹34 cr0.6%3.0%0.4x
2020-10373.8x₹34 cr0.6%3.0%0.4x
2020-09315.0x₹34 cr0.6%3.0%0.4x
2020-08606.2x₹34 cr0.6%3.0%0.4x
2020-07683.8x₹34 cr0.6%3.0%0.4x
2020-06569.2x₹34 cr0.6%3.0%0.4x
2020-0553.8x₹51 cr4.2%9.0%0.4x
2020-0446.5x₹51 cr4.2%9.0%0.4x
2020-0337.7x₹51 cr4.2%9.0%0.4x
2020-0254.5x₹51 cr4.2%9.0%0.4x
2020-0154.8x₹51 cr4.2%9.0%0.4x
2019-1247.9x₹51 cr4.2%9.0%0.4x
2019-1151.7x₹51 cr4.2%9.0%0.4x
2019-1037.6x₹51 cr4.2%9.0%0.4x
2019-0930.6x₹51 cr4.2%9.0%0.4x
2019-0838.9x₹51 cr4.2%9.0%0.4x
2019-0738.0x₹51 cr4.2%9.0%0.4x
2019-0637.1x₹51 cr4.2%9.0%0.4x
2019-05106.5x₹62 cr1.2%5.0%0.5x
2019-04132.4x₹62 cr1.2%5.0%0.5x
2019-03148.0x₹62 cr1.2%5.0%0.5x
2019-02225.6x₹62 cr1.2%5.0%0.5x
2019-01225.9x₹62 cr1.2%5.0%0.5x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback