अApnaFunda

MOKSH ORNAMENTS LIMITED (MOKSH)

Consumer Durables · Other Consumer Specialties · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.53 / 100
Profitability 24Growth 59Balance sheet 77

Passes these screensValue Pick

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹8.69 latest close · −27.0% over the last 90 sessions

₹8₹10₹12Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹8₹10₹12Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹8.69 month-end · −40.1% over 12 months

₹8₹10₹12₹14Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹8₹10₹12₹14Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹8.69 month-end · −30.8% over 3 years

₹10₹15₹20Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹10₹15₹20Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹8.69 month-end · −23.0% since May '21

₹10₹20₹30₹40May '21Jun '22Jul '23Sep '24Oct '25Nov '26 ₹10₹20₹30₹40May '21Feb '24Nov '26

52-week range ₹8.05 to ₹16.65 · 1-year volatility 42.2%

Was the rally earned?

-40%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 11 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 14.1x to 7.3x), which took 51 points back.
  • The share count rose 6%.
Net profit growth: +16 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+16 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −51 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−51 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −4 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−4 ptsShare count changeShare price: −40%−40%Share priceNet profit growth: +16 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+16ProfitP/E change: −51 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−51P/EShare count change: −4 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−4SharesShare price: −40%−40%Share price
Net profit growth+16 ptsNet profit rose about 22%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-51 ptsThe P/E fell from 14.1x to 7.3x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-4 ptsShare count rose 6%, which lowers the price.
-31%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 43 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 17.7x to 7.3x), which took 74 points back.
  • The share count rose 4%.
Net profit growth: +47 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+47 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −74 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−74 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −4 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−4 ptsShare count changeShare price: −31%−31%Share priceNet profit growth: +47 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+47ProfitP/E change: −74 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−74P/EShare count change: −4 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−4SharesShare price: −31%−31%Share price
Net profit growth+47 ptsNet profit rose about 75%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-74 ptsThe P/E fell from 17.7x to 7.3x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-4 ptsShare count rose 4%, which lowers the price.
-75%share price, 5 yearsLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 33 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 52.7x to 7.3x), which took 107 points back.
  • The share count fell 4%.
Net profit growth: +31 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+31 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −107 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−107 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +3 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+3 ptsShare count changeShare price: −75%−75%Share priceNet profit growth: +31 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+31ProfitP/E change: −107 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−107P/EShare count change: +3 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+3SharesShare price: −75%−75%Share price
Net profit growth+31 ptsNet profit rose about 75%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-107 ptsThe P/E fell from 52.7x to 7.3x, which lowers the price.
Share count change+3 ptsShare count fell 4%, which lifts the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with TITAN COMPANY

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-83.7%not yet recovered
1-year volatility42.2%annualised

Drawdown from peak

0%−25%−50%−75%20222023202420252026−83.7% 0%−25%−50%−75%202220242026−83.7%
Largest drawdowns

-83.7% (2022-01 peak to 2023-03 low, not yet recovered)

-34.6% (2021-10 peak to 2021-10 low, recovered 2021-12)

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

7.3xP/E todayNear its historic low
Against its own history3rd percentile
CheapestMedian 17.7xDearest

Usual range 10.9x to 34.5x since 2021-05.

Against Consumer Durables7.3x vs 25.5x
This company
7.3x
Sector median
25.5x

71% below the Consumer Durables median.

7.1x24.8x42.6x60.3xMay '21Jul '22Sep '23Nov '24Jan '26Nov '267.1x24.8x42.6x60.3xMay '21Mar '23Jan '25Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Durables median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Durables median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Durables median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Consumer Durables is valued

Where does it rank among Consumer Durables peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Consumer Durables peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE32nd▼ 13 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin18th▲ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth75th▼ 9 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth46th▼ 30 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓62nd▲ 10 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓67th▼ 10 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓98th▲ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum14th▼ 34 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Consumer Durables sector page Watch it move against Consumer Durables in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~4%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 7.3x, the price would imply about 4.2%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Below the ₹1,000 cr market-cap floor used for the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Consumer Durables The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹8.69
P/E
7.3x
ROCE
11.0%
Market Cap
₹77 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹796 cr
P/S
0.1x
P/B
0.6x
ROE
8.1%
Operating Margin
1.9%
Debt / Equity
0.2x
Promoter Holding
40.1%
12M Momentum
-40.1%

52-week range

₹8.05₹16.65
7% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
42.2%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.50

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
4.9x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
-1.71x
low
Share count, 1Y
+5.9%

Are profits backed by cash?

1 of 5checks within range2 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance20%Near threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 19.9%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate25%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 25.2%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion-1.71xBeyond threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: -1.71x (cash from operations ₹-41 cr, net profit ₹24 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow1 of 5 yrsBeyond threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 1. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+25 daysNear threshold

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 25 days (49 vs 24). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, promoters trimmed 15.0 pts; FIIs added 4.7 pts.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters55.1%40.1%-15.0 pts
FIIs0.0%4.7%+4.7 pts
DIIs0.0%0.1%+0.1 pts
Public and others44.9%55.2%+10.4 pts

Number of shareholders

35,104shareholders+5% since Sep '23
33k36k38k40k Sep '23Jun '24Dec '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 33,468
Mar '24: 39,491
Jun '24: 37,296
Sep '24: 37,675
Dec '24: 37,857
Mar '25: 40,149
Jun '25: 39,513
Sep '25: 38,810
Dec '25: 37,079
Jun '26: 35,104
33k36k38k40k Sep '23Sep '24Jun '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 33,468
Mar '24: 39,491
Jun '24: 37,296
Sep '24: 37,675
Dec '24: 37,857
Mar '25: 40,149
Jun '25: 39,513
Sep '25: 38,810
Dec '25: 37,079
Jun '26: 35,104

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+3.7%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like MOKSH ORNAMENTS LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −24% to +43% vs the market, against −5% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+8.2%, 80% range −0.7% to +18.5%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
SHANKARA · Sep 2024: −59.3% vs market
DBOL · Feb 2024: −52.1% vs market
SWASTIK · May 2024: −51.3% vs market
ANMOL · Jun 2024: −50.9% vs market
TOTAL · Jul 2025: −37.1% vs market
VINDHYATEL · Feb 2025: −34.2% vs market
RANASUG · Jan 2024: −32.0% vs market
RCDL · Dec 2024: −30.6% vs market
GRAPHISAD · Sep 2025: −30.4% vs market
TRIGYN · Mar 2024: −30.0% vs market
BASML · May 2023: −27.3% vs market
SAHYADRI · Aug 2024: −26.8% vs market
SUPERHOUSE · Feb 2024: −24.7% vs market
JOCIL · Apr 2024: −21.4% vs market
NDL · Oct 2025: −20.9% vs market
SUTLEJTEX · Mar 2023: −16.4% vs market
TNPETRO · Apr 2024: −15.7% vs market
LIBAS · Aug 2025: −15.6% vs market
PIONEEREMB · Mar 2023: −9.2% vs market
ASHALOG · Aug 2025: −6.5% vs market
PATINTLOG · Sep 2021: −5.2% vs market
ISFT · Sep 2025: −3.2% vs market
GINNIFILA · Jan 2023: −2.9% vs market
JAYAGROGN · Mar 2023: −1.4% vs market
MANINDS · Apr 2022: +3.7% vs market
PRECISION · Dec 2023: +3.7% vs market
IVP · May 2024: +3.8% vs market
CORDSCABLE · Feb 2021: +6.2% vs market
KANPRPLA · Nov 2022: +12.8% vs market
TEXMOPIPES · Mar 2023: +17.0% vs market
AAREYDRUGS · Mar 2023: +22.4% vs market
QUESS · Aug 2023: +24.4% vs market
SHAHALLOYS · Apr 2020: +25.2% vs market
ARCHIDPLY · Sep 2023: +26.5% vs market
CLEDUCATE · May 2020: +30.7% vs market
IPHL · Sep 2025: +31.6% vs market
NRAIL · Mar 2023: +42.7% vs market
AARVI · Jul 2025: +42.9% vs market
MWL · Jul 2024: +46.2% vs market
KNAGRI · Apr 2024: +60.0% vs market
JAIBALAJI · Jun 2022: +62.3% vs market
MANAKALUCO · Feb 2020: +68.2% vs market
MHHL · Oct 2021: +69.6% vs market
PENIND · Mar 2021: +71.6% vs market
UMAEXPORTS · Aug 2023: +87.9% vs market
AGARIND · May 2020: +136.6% vs market
AXISCADES · Mar 2021: +156.8% vs market
RPTECH · Jul 2025: +175.9% vs market
GALLANTT · May 2023: +244.0% vs market
MIRZAINT · Apr 2021: +276.4% vs market
Similar setups +3.7%All companies −4.5%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 5 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+3.7%
All companies' median
−4.5%
Beat the market
52% vs 45%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 32 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
TOTAL
Transportation
Jul 2025 13x11% −36%−36% −37%
AAREYDRUGS
Health Technology
Mar 2023 9x10% −42%−49% +22%
IPHL
Process Industries
Sep 2025 15x9% −49%−55% +32%
NDL
Process Industries
Oct 2025 13x9% −43%−48% −21%
KNAGRI
Process Industries
Apr 2024 12x16% 0%−22% +60%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
PIONEEREMB
Consumer Non-Durables
Mar 2023 7x12% −42%−52% −9%
JAIBALAJI
Non-Energy Minerals
Jun 2022 9x9% −28%−43% +62%
TEXMOPIPES
Producer Manufacturing
Mar 2023 9x11% −42%−49% +17%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, P/E and interest cover. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to MOKSH ORNAMENTS LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What changed?

28 events since Jun '21

  1. JulSharesShare count is up 5.9% over 12 months.
  2. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹679 cr.
  3. MarPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Consumer Durables on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  4. JanDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.29x.
  5. DecPromoterPromoter holding rose 3.2 pts to 40.1%.
  6. DecValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (13.3x).
  7. DecPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Consumer Durables on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  8. JunPromoterPromoter holding fell 18.3 pts to 36.9%.
Show 20 earlier events
  1. JunInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 6.8 pts over 1 quarter to 6.8%.
  2. JunValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (14.1x).
  3. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Consumer Durables on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  4. JunDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.29x.
  5. JunSharesShare count is up 54.5% over 12 months.
  6. FebValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (14.5x).
  7. DecPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Consumer Durables on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  8. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹449 cr.
  9. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  10. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 10% to 0% of profit.
  11. MayValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (15.1x).
  12. MarPriceFell 84% from the Jan 2022 peak to the Mar 2023 low.
  13. JanDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.09x.
  14. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  15. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Consumer Durables on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  16. JunDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.09x.
  17. JunDividendStarted paying a dividend (payout 10% of profit).
  18. DecPriceRegained the 2021-10 peak, 2 months after the low.
  19. OctPriceFell 35% from the Oct 2021 peak to the Oct 2021 low.
  20. JunDebtDebt / equity fell below 1.0x (0.88x).

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history67 months · 2021-05 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-117.3x₹796 cr8.1%11.0%0.2x
2026-107.1x₹796 cr8.2%11.0%0.2x
2026-098.0x₹796 cr8.2%11.0%0.2x
2026-089.3x₹679 cr7.6%11.0%0.2x
2026-078.9x₹679 cr7.6%11.0%0.2x
2026-0610.8x₹679 cr7.6%11.0%0.2x
2026-0510.9x₹585 cr8.4%13.0%0.3x
2026-0412.6x₹585 cr8.4%13.0%0.3x
2026-038.0x₹585 cr8.4%13.0%0.3x
2026-0211.8x₹587 cr8.1%13.0%0.3x
2026-0113.0x₹587 cr8.1%13.0%0.3x
2025-1213.3x₹587 cr8.1%13.0%0.3x
2025-1114.1x₹594 cr7.8%13.0%0.3x
2025-1013.5x₹594 cr7.8%13.0%0.3x
2025-0913.7x₹594 cr7.8%13.0%0.3x
2025-0813.6x₹580 cr7.6%13.0%0.3x
2025-0713.6x₹580 cr7.6%13.0%0.3x
2025-0614.1x₹580 cr7.6%13.0%0.3x
2025-0515.0x₹518 cr14.8%15.0%0.9x
2025-0413.9x₹518 cr14.8%15.0%0.9x
2025-0313.2x₹518 cr14.8%15.0%0.9x
2025-0214.5x₹486 cr13.0%15.0%0.9x
2025-0116.7x₹486 cr13.0%15.0%0.9x
2024-1222.7x₹486 cr13.0%15.0%0.9x
2024-1120.3x₹454 cr12.0%15.0%0.9x
2024-1020.2x₹454 cr12.0%15.0%0.9x
2024-0921.7x₹454 cr12.0%15.0%0.9x
2024-0824.7x₹449 cr10.8%15.0%0.9x
2024-0721.0x₹449 cr10.8%15.0%0.9x
2024-0618.1x₹449 cr10.8%15.0%0.9x
2024-0518.5x₹447 cr11.8%17.0%0.5x
2024-0420.5x₹447 cr11.8%17.0%0.5x
2024-0321.1x₹447 cr11.8%17.0%0.5x
2024-0229.2x₹447 cr11.8%17.0%0.5x
2024-0123.1x₹447 cr11.8%17.0%0.5x
2023-1217.3x₹447 cr11.8%17.0%0.5x
2023-1117.7x₹447 cr11.8%17.0%0.5x
2023-1018.4x₹447 cr11.8%17.0%0.5x
2023-0920.2x₹447 cr11.8%17.0%0.5x
2023-0816.1x₹447 cr11.8%17.0%0.5x
2023-0715.9x₹447 cr11.8%17.0%0.5x
2023-0613.7x₹447 cr11.8%17.0%0.5x
2023-0515.1x₹324 cr11.1%13.0%0.1x
2023-0414.9x₹324 cr11.1%13.0%0.1x
2023-0313.2x₹324 cr11.1%13.0%0.1x
2023-0215.8x₹324 cr11.1%13.0%0.1x
2023-0116.8x₹324 cr11.1%13.0%0.1x
2022-1217.7x₹324 cr11.1%13.0%0.1x
2022-1117.0x₹324 cr11.1%13.0%0.1x
2022-1020.7x₹324 cr11.1%13.0%0.1x
2022-0920.9x₹324 cr11.1%13.0%0.1x
2022-0821.6x₹324 cr11.1%13.0%0.1x
2022-0726.8x₹324 cr11.1%13.0%0.1x
2022-0629.1x₹324 cr11.1%13.0%0.1x
2022-0520.0x₹337 cr14.6%13.0%0.9x
2022-0430.7x₹337 cr14.6%13.0%0.9x
2022-0319.8x₹337 cr14.6%13.0%0.9x
2022-0223.7x₹337 cr14.6%13.0%0.9x
2022-0148.7x₹337 cr14.6%13.0%0.9x
2021-1260.3x₹337 cr14.6%13.0%0.9x
2021-1152.7x₹337 cr14.6%13.0%0.9x
2021-1047.1x₹337 cr14.6%13.0%0.9x
2021-0954.1x₹337 cr14.6%13.0%0.9x
2021-0845.8x₹337 cr14.6%13.0%0.9x
2021-0740.1x₹337 cr14.6%13.0%0.9x
2021-0626.2x₹337 cr14.6%13.0%0.9x
2021-0518.2x₹344 cr13.9%12.0%1.7x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback