अApnaFunda

NANDAN DENIM LIMITED (NDL)

Process Industries · Textiles · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.56 / 100
Profitability 24Growth 65Balance sheet 81

Passes these screensCash RichValue Pick

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹2.56 latest close · +5.3% over the last 90 sessions

₹2₹3₹3₹3Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹2₹3₹3₹3Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹2.56 month-end · −17.7% over 12 months

₹2₹3₹3Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹2₹3₹3Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹2.56 month-end · −15.0% over 3 years

₹2₹4₹6Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹2₹4₹6Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹2.56 month-end · +32.6% since Jan '19

₹0₹2₹4₹6Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹0₹2₹4₹6Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹1.80 to ₹3.34 · 1-year volatility 47.1%

Was the rally earned?

-18%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 0 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 12.0x to 9.8x), which took 18 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−1 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −18 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−18 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1 ptsShare count changeShare price: −18%−18%Share priceNet profit growth: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−1ProfitP/E change: −18 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−18P/EShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1SharesShare price: −18%−18%Share price
Net profit growth-1 ptsNet profit fell about 1%, which lowers the price.
P/E change-18 ptsThe P/E fell from 12.0x to 9.8x, which lowers the price.
Share count change+1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-15%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 335 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 433.8x to 9.8x), which took 349 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +335 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+335 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −349 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−349 ptsP/E changeShare price: −15%−15%Share priceNet profit growth: +335 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+335ProfitP/E change: −349 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−349P/EShare price: −15%−15%Share price
Net profit growth+335 ptsNet profit rose about 3649%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-349 ptsThe P/E fell from 433.8x to 9.8x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with VARDHMAN TEXTILES LIMTED

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-79.1%recovered 2021-07
1-year volatility47.1%annualised

Drawdown from peak

0%−25%−50%−75%2020202120222023202420252026−78.2% 0%−25%−50%−75%2020202220242026−78.2%
Largest drawdowns

-79.1% (2019-01 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2021-07)

-77.5% (2022-04 peak to 2023-03 low, recovered 2024-09)

-74.5% (2024-09 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

9.8xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history58th percentile
CheapestMedian 8.8xDearest

Usual range 4.5x to 14.6x since 2019-01.

Against Process Industries9.8x vs 18.1x
This company
9.8x
Sector median
18.1x

46% below the Process Industries median.

3.3x13.1x22.9x32.7xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '263.3x13.1x22.9x32.7xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Process Industries is valued

Where does it rank among Process Industries peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Process Industries peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE31st▼ 8 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin17thflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth3rd▼ 95 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth39th▲ 12 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓69th▲ 20 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓82ndflat vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓78thflat vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum36th▲ 16 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Process Industries sector page Watch it move against Process Industries in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~8%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 10.1x, the price would imply about 7.7%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Below the ₹1,000 cr market-cap floor used for the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Process Industries The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹2.56
P/E
9.8x
ROCE
7.0%
Market Cap
₹369 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹2447 cr
P/S
0.2x
P/B
0.6x
ROE
5.8%
Operating Margin
3.9%
Debt / Equity
0.2x
Promoter Holding
51.0%
12M Momentum
-17.7%

52-week range

₹1.80₹3.34
49% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
47.1%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.29

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
3.3x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
4.23x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

6 of 7checks within range1 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance38%Beyond threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 37.8%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate26%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 25.5%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion4.23xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 4.23x (cash from operations ₹469 cr, net profit ₹111 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow5 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 5. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-16 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 16 days (48 vs 64). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress0% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 0% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days-17 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by -17 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, promoters trimmed 13.9 pts; DIIs added 1.3 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 36,889 to 1.8 lakh (+398%) between Dec 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupDec '23Jun '26Change
Promoters64.9%51.0%-13.9 pts
FIIs0.3%0.6%+0.3 pts
DIIs0.0%1.3%+1.3 pts
Public and others34.8%47.0%+12.3 pts

Number of shareholders

1.8 lakhshareholders+398% since Dec '23
36k87k1.4L1.9L Dec '23Jun '24Dec '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 36,889
Mar '24: 35,585
Jun '24: 72,148
Sep '24: 96,003
Dec '24: 1.4 lakh
Mar '25: 1.7 lakh
Jun '25: 1.8 lakh
Sep '25: 1.9 lakh
Dec '25: 1.9 lakh
Jun '26: 1.8 lakh
36k87k1.4L1.9L Dec '23Sep '24Jun '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 36,889
Mar '24: 35,585
Jun '24: 72,148
Sep '24: 96,003
Dec '24: 1.4 lakh
Mar '25: 1.7 lakh
Jun '25: 1.8 lakh
Sep '25: 1.9 lakh
Dec '25: 1.9 lakh
Jun '26: 1.8 lakh

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−11.1%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like NANDAN DENIM LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −23% to +19% vs the market, against −10% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−1.5%, 80% range −7.2% to +4.0%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−50%0%+50%+100%
ACCURACY · Feb 2025: −48.0% vs market
GLOBE · Oct 2024: −39.5% vs market
SUTLEJTEX · Feb 2024: −37.1% vs market
NAHARSPING · Feb 2024: −36.8% vs market
TEXMOPIPES · Jul 2025: −33.1% vs market
RSWM · Jan 2024: −32.2% vs market
NFL · Aug 2025: −32.1% vs market
QUESS · Dec 2024: −29.5% vs market
ELECTHERM · Sep 2020: −28.4% vs market
INCREDIBLE · Aug 2025: −26.9% vs market
PCJEWELLER · Jan 2021: −25.9% vs market
TRIGYN · Aug 2025: −24.0% vs market
BODALCHEM · Mar 2024: −23.3% vs market
IVP · Feb 2025: −21.9% vs market
NAHARINDUS · Nov 2023: −19.9% vs market
JAYAGROGN · Oct 2024: −19.8% vs market
MADRASFERT · Feb 2025: −19.1% vs market
PATINTLOG · Jul 2025: −19.1% vs market
DVL · Jan 2020: −17.5% vs market
GILLANDERS · May 2023: −16.1% vs market
NCLIND · Dec 2023: −16.1% vs market
SUPERHOUSE · May 2025: −15.7% vs market
AAREYDRUGS · Jul 2023: −13.3% vs market
GHCLTEXTIL · Feb 2025: −13.2% vs market
VENKEYS · May 2025: −12.1% vs market
BANSWRAS · Jul 2024: −10.1% vs market
DCMNVL · Feb 2024: −9.7% vs market
IGPL · May 2025: −9.6% vs market
TBZ · Mar 2022: −5.8% vs market
AARVI · Aug 2024: −3.2% vs market
NIRAJ · Aug 2024: −1.8% vs market
BVCL · Aug 2025: +1.7% vs market
TNPETRO · Jul 2024: +3.6% vs market
RGL · Sep 2024: +3.7% vs market
3IINFOLTD · Sep 2025: +3.8% vs market
ZUARI · Jun 2025: +6.8% vs market
PASUPTAC · Feb 2025: +12.9% vs market
SAKUMA · Dec 2020: +21.3% vs market
HPL · Feb 2021: +22.0% vs market
KNAGRI · Jun 2024: +23.0% vs market
KOTHARIPRO · Jun 2024: +27.5% vs market
INDIAGLYCO · Feb 2024: +28.0% vs market
GANDHAR · Jul 2025: +29.5% vs market
MUNJALAU · Apr 2023: +32.6% vs market
SAHYADRI · Aug 2025: +39.6% vs market
MANINDS · Jun 2020: +44.7% vs market
ANIKINDS · Nov 2021: +78.1% vs market
SHREYANIND · May 2022: +101.6% vs market
UNIVCABLES · Apr 2022: +142.7% vs market
RPTECH · Oct 2025: +152.9% vs market
Similar setups −11.1%All companies −9.6%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 3 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−11.1%
All companies' median
−9.6%
Beat the market
38% vs 39%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 31 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
NAHARSPING
Process Industries
Feb 2024 10x7% +48%−10% −37%
NAHARINDUS
Process Industries
Nov 2023 7x8% +18%−11% −20%
INCREDIBLE
Non-Energy Minerals
Aug 2025 15x10% −16%−21% −27%
JAYAGROGN
Process Industries
Oct 2024 15x12% +32%−17% −20%
TEXMOPIPES
Producer Manufacturing
Jul 2025 9x9% −19%−25% −33%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
MUNJALAU
Producer Manufacturing
Apr 2023 16x11% −6%−22% +33%
KNAGRI
Process Industries
Jun 2024 14x13% +46%−4% +23%
KOTHARIPRO
Distribution Services
Jun 2024 12x3% +33%−23% +28%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: operating margin, 12-month momentum and ROCE. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to NANDAN DENIM LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What changed?

28 events since Jun '19

  1. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  2. JunPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Process Industries on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  3. JunDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.18x.
  4. MarPriceFell 74% from the Sep 2024 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  5. MarPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Process Industries on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  6. SepPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Process Industries on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  7. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (16.7x).
  8. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
Show 20 earlier events
  1. DecPromoterPromoter holding fell 7.5 pts to 51.0%.
  2. DecPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Process Industries on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  3. SepPromoterPromoter holding fell 6.4 pts to 58.5%.
  4. SepResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹2,177 cr.
  5. SepPriceRegained the 2022-04 peak, 18 months after the low.
  6. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned positive.
  7. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (15.0x).
  8. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the bottom quartile).
  9. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned negative.
  10. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  11. JunDebtDebt / equity fell below 1.0x (0.86x).
  12. MarPriceFell 78% from the Apr 2022 peak to the Mar 2023 low.
  13. FebValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (3.9x).
  14. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned positive.
  15. JunPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the bottom quartile).
  16. JulPriceRegained the 2019-01 peak, 16 months after the low.
  17. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned negative.
  18. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 11% to 0% of profit.
  19. MarPriceFell 79% from the Jan 2019 peak to the Mar 2020 low.
  20. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history95 months · 2019-01 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-119.8x₹2447 cr5.8%7.0%0.2x
2026-109.5x₹2447 cr5.7%7.0%0.2x
2026-0910.0x₹2447 cr5.7%7.0%0.2x
2026-0811.8x₹2873 cr5.1%7.0%0.2x
2026-079.8x₹2873 cr5.1%7.0%0.2x
2026-0610.0x₹2873 cr5.1%7.0%0.2x
2026-0510.9x₹3382 cr5.5%9.0%0.4x
2026-0411.6x₹3382 cr5.5%9.0%0.4x
2026-037.7x₹3382 cr5.5%9.0%0.4x
2026-029.9x₹3808 cr6.1%9.0%0.4x
2026-0110.4x₹3808 cr6.1%9.0%0.4x
2025-1210.9x₹3808 cr6.1%9.0%0.4x
2025-1112.0x₹3873 cr6.1%9.0%0.4x
2025-1012.7x₹3873 cr6.1%9.0%0.4x
2025-0912.8x₹3873 cr6.1%9.0%0.4x
2025-0814.4x₹3547 cr5.5%9.0%0.4x
2025-0715.7x₹3547 cr5.5%9.0%0.4x
2025-0616.7x₹3547 cr5.5%9.0%0.4x
2025-0511.5x₹3077 cr8.5%11.0%0.6x
2025-0410.4x₹3077 cr8.5%11.0%0.6x
2025-0310.0x₹3077 cr8.5%11.0%0.6x
2025-028.8x₹2613 cr8.7%11.0%0.6x
2025-0111.8x₹2613 cr8.7%11.0%0.6x
2024-1213.4x₹2613 cr8.7%11.0%0.6x
2024-1113.7x₹2177 cr8.5%11.0%0.6x
2024-1016.1x₹2177 cr8.5%11.0%0.6x
2024-0918.5x₹2177 cr8.5%11.0%0.6x
2024-0814.5x₹2009 cr7.7%11.0%0.6x
2024-0716.3x₹2009 cr7.7%11.0%0.6x
2024-0615.0x₹2009 cr7.7%11.0%0.6x
2024-05—₹2027 cr0.2%5.0%0.9x
2024-04—₹2027 cr0.2%5.0%0.9x
2024-03—₹2027 cr0.2%5.0%0.9x
2024-02—₹2027 cr0.2%5.0%0.9x
2024-01—₹2027 cr0.2%5.0%0.9x
2023-12—₹2027 cr0.2%5.0%0.9x
2023-11—₹2027 cr0.2%5.0%0.9x
2023-10—₹2027 cr0.2%5.0%0.9x
2023-09—₹2027 cr0.2%5.0%0.9x
2023-08—₹2027 cr0.2%5.0%0.9x
2023-07—₹2027 cr0.2%5.0%0.9x
2023-06—₹2027 cr0.2%5.0%0.9x
2023-054.5x₹2176 cr12.6%13.0%1.0x
2023-044.6x₹2176 cr12.6%13.0%1.0x
2023-033.3x₹2176 cr12.6%13.0%1.0x
2023-023.9x₹2176 cr12.6%13.0%1.0x
2023-014.9x₹2176 cr12.6%13.0%1.0x
2022-125.5x₹2176 cr12.6%13.0%1.0x
2022-115.9x₹2176 cr12.6%13.0%1.0x
2022-105.9x₹2176 cr12.6%13.0%1.0x
2022-096.3x₹2176 cr12.6%13.0%1.0x
2022-086.2x₹2176 cr12.6%13.0%1.0x
2022-075.7x₹2176 cr12.6%13.0%1.0x
2022-066.6x₹2176 cr12.6%13.0%1.0x
2022-05—₹1090 cr-4.0%3.0%1.2x
2022-04—₹1090 cr-4.0%3.0%1.2x
2022-03—₹1090 cr-4.0%3.0%1.2x
2022-02—₹1090 cr-4.0%3.0%1.2x
2022-01—₹1090 cr-4.0%3.0%1.2x
2021-12—₹1090 cr-4.0%3.0%1.2x
2021-11—₹1090 cr-4.0%3.0%1.2x
2021-10—₹1090 cr-4.0%3.0%1.2x
2021-09—₹1090 cr-4.0%3.0%1.2x
2021-08—₹1090 cr-4.0%3.0%1.2x
2021-07—₹1090 cr-4.0%3.0%1.2x
2021-06—₹1090 cr-4.0%3.0%1.2x
2021-05—₹1524 cr-0.2%4.0%1.1x
2021-04—₹1524 cr-0.2%4.0%1.1x
2021-03—₹1524 cr-0.2%4.0%1.1x
2021-02—₹1524 cr-0.2%4.0%1.1x
2021-01—₹1524 cr-0.2%4.0%1.1x
2020-12—₹1524 cr-0.2%4.0%1.1x
2020-11—₹1524 cr-0.2%4.0%1.1x
2020-10—₹1524 cr-0.2%4.0%1.1x
2020-09—₹1524 cr-0.2%4.0%1.1x
2020-08—₹1524 cr-0.2%4.0%1.1x
2020-07—₹1524 cr-0.2%4.0%1.1x
2020-06—₹1524 cr-0.2%4.0%1.1x
2020-053.3x₹1456 cr4.3%5.0%1.2x
2020-043.7x₹1456 cr4.3%5.0%1.2x
2020-033.3x₹1456 cr4.3%5.0%1.2x
2020-024.5x₹1456 cr4.3%5.0%1.2x
2020-016.9x₹1456 cr4.3%5.0%1.2x
2019-126.7x₹1456 cr4.3%5.0%1.2x
2019-116.2x₹1456 cr4.3%5.0%1.2x
2019-107.5x₹1456 cr4.3%5.0%1.2x
2019-098.0x₹1456 cr4.3%5.0%1.2x
2019-086.3x₹1456 cr4.3%5.0%1.2x
2019-076.1x₹1456 cr4.3%5.0%1.2x
2019-068.8x₹1456 cr4.3%5.0%1.2x
2019-054.9x₹1589 cr9.7%11.0%1.4x
2019-044.9x₹1589 cr9.7%11.0%1.4x
2019-035.6x₹1589 cr9.7%11.0%1.4x
2019-024.8x₹1589 cr9.7%11.0%1.4x
2019-016.0x₹1589 cr9.7%11.0%1.4x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback