अApnaFunda
Menu

SUNDARAM BRAKE LININGS LIMITED (SUNDRMBRAK)

Producer Manufacturing · Auto Parts: OEM · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.23 / 100
Profitability 10Growth 14Balance sheet 44

Passes these screensCash Rich

Compare withSAMVARDHANA MOTHERSON INTBOSCHCUMMINS INDIA

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹633 latest close · −22.5% over the last 90 sessions

₹600₹700₹800₹900Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹600₹700₹800₹900Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹633 month-end · −14.5% over 12 months

₹600₹800Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹600₹800Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹633 month-end · +1.4% over 3 years

₹500₹1,000Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹500₹1,000Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹633 month-end · +83.5% since Jan '19

₹500₹1,000Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹500₹1,000Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹460.00 to ₹920.00 · 1-year volatility 44.5%

Was the rally earned?

-15%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 12 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 92.5x to 69.3x), which took 27 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +12 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+12 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −27 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−27 ptsP/E changeShare price: −14%−14%Share priceNet profit growth: +12 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+12ProfitP/E change: −27 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−27P/EShare price: −14%−14%Share price
Net profit growth+12 ptsNet profit rose about 14%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-27 ptsThe P/E fell from 92.5x to 69.3x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+78%share price, 5 yearsMultiple-driven

Partly.

  • Most of the rise came from investors paying a higher multiple (P/E 23.3x to 69.3x); per-share earnings took off 69 points.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −69 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−69 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +148 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+148 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: +78%+78%Share priceNet profit growth: −69 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−69ProfitP/E change: +148 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+148P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: +78%+78%Share price
Net profit growth-69 ptsNet profit fell about 40%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+148 ptsThe P/E rose from 23.3x to 69.3x, which lifts the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 3 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with SAMVARDHANA MOTHERSON INT

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-65.2%not yet recovered
1-year volatility44.5%annualised

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2020202120222023202420252026−62.9% 0%−20%−40%−60%2020202220242026−62.9%
Largest drawdowns

-65.2% (2024-12 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

-61.0% (2019-01 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2021-06)

-41.2% (2021-07 peak to 2023-03 low, recovered 2023-08)

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

69.3xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history73rd percentile
CheapestMedian 44.1xDearest

Usual range 14.6x to 1594.6x since 2019-01.

Against Producer Manufacturing69.3x vs 29.6x
This company
69.3x
Sector median
29.6x

134% above the Producer Manufacturing median.

8.9x619.7x1230.5x1841.3xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '268.9x619.7x1230.5x1841.3xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Producer Manufacturing is valued

Where does it rank among Producer Manufacturing peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Producer Manufacturing peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE11th▼ 9 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin8thflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth11th▼ 29 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth54th▲ 41 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓34th▲ 6 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓56th▼ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓13th▲ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum38th▼ 20 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Producer Manufacturing sector page Watch it move against Producer Manufacturing in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~35%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 95.7x, the price would imply about 34.5%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Below the ₹1,000 cr market-cap floor used for the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Producer Manufacturing The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹633.00
P/E
69.3x
ROCE
5.0%
Market Cap
₹249 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹344 cr
P/S
0.7x
P/B
2.4x
ROE
3.5%
Operating Margin
2.3%
Debt / Equity
0.5x
Promoter Holding
63.9%
12M Momentum
-14.5%

52-week range

₹460.00₹920.00
38% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
44.5%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.83

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
2.5x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
2.00x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

4 of 7checks within range1 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance101%Beyond threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 100.7%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate7%Near threshold

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 7.3%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion2.00xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 2.00x (cash from operations ₹36 cr, net profit ₹18 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow2 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 2. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+5 daysWithin range

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 5 days (77 vs 72). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress1% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 1% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days-6 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by -6 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, promoters trimmed 1.6 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 7,790 to 8,403 (+8%) between Dec 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupDec '23Jun '26Change
Promoters65.5%63.9%-1.6 pts
FIIs0.0%0.0%0.0 pts
DIIs———
Public and others34.5%36.1%+1.6 pts

Number of shareholders

8,403shareholders+8% since Dec '23
8k8k8k9k Dec '23Sep '24Mar '25Sep '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 7,790
Jun '24: 7,976
Sep '24: 8,039
Dec '24: 8,612
Mar '25: 8,393
Jun '25: 8,480
Sep '25: 8,773
Dec '25: 8,624
Jun '26: 8,403
 8k8k8k9k Dec '23Dec '24Sep '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 7,790
Jun '24: 7,976
Sep '24: 8,039
Dec '24: 8,612
Mar '25: 8,393
Jun '25: 8,480
Sep '25: 8,773
Dec '25: 8,624
Jun '26: 8,403

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+0.9%typical 12-month return vs the marketAbove the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like SUNDARAM BRAKE LININGS LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −25% to +33% vs the market, against −6% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The analogs' median sat above that base rate (gap +6.5%, 80% range 0% to +10.3%), but the matches cluster in only 6 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
EVERESTIND · Jun 2024: −53.4% vs market
NECLIFE · Dec 2024: −52.8% vs market
EXXARO · Jul 2023: −46.5% vs market
RUSHIL · Sep 2025: −44.0% vs market
ENIL · Sep 2025: −40.2% vs market
PARAGMILK · Jul 2021: −38.7% vs market
DUCON · Feb 2024: −37.6% vs market
ZENITHSTL · Aug 2025: −35.1% vs market
BLKASHYAP · Jul 2025: −34.6% vs market
ORIENTLTD · Mar 2020: −28.8% vs market
COASTCORP · Jan 2024: −27.2% vs market
KOKUYOCMLN · May 2024: −27.0% vs market
ALKALI · Jul 2024: −25.5% vs market
MANALIPETC · Feb 2025: −23.4% vs market
PPAP · May 2022: −22.8% vs market
APOLSINHOT · Jul 2025: −17.7% vs market
KAKATCEM · Mar 2022: −9.7% vs market
KANPRPLA · Dec 2023: −9.5% vs market
APEX · Jul 2024: −6.3% vs market
DCAL · May 2023: −5.4% vs market
BODALCHEM · Jul 2024: −4.0% vs market
VASCONEQ · Feb 2020: −3.7% vs market
KOTARISUG · May 2023: −3.5% vs market
NECCLTD · Jan 2023: −2.8% vs market
DPSCLTD · Mar 2023: +0.1% vs market
THEINVEST · Feb 2024: +1.6% vs market
KCPSUGIND · May 2023: +2.5% vs market
DYNPRO · Jul 2024: +2.5% vs market
HPIL · Apr 2025: +3.2% vs market
ISFT · Jul 2020: +7.8% vs market
SHEMAROO · Jul 2022: +8.5% vs market
TOKYOPLAST · Jul 2024: +9.5% vs market
KHADIM · Dec 2022: +17.9% vs market
RUCHIRA · Jul 2021: +19.9% vs market
MAHICKRA · Dec 2024: +24.5% vs market
SHANKARA · Oct 2021: +25.5% vs market
MCL · Aug 2024: +32.1% vs market
MEGASTAR · Apr 2025: +33.6% vs market
ORIENTBELL · Sep 2025: +37.9% vs market
STYRENIX · Apr 2023: +41.3% vs market
SCHAND · Jun 2022: +48.9% vs market
PENIND · Dec 2021: +52.3% vs market
NIPPOBATRY · Dec 2022: +53.6% vs market
SURANASOL · Oct 2023: +65.6% vs market
DREDGECORP · May 2023: +97.4% vs market
ARTEMISMED · Oct 2021: +101.3% vs market
BIRLACABLE · Oct 2025: +110.1% vs market
SANGAMIND · Jun 2021: +157.6% vs market
TEXRAIL · Mar 2023: +161.3% vs market
HPL · Aug 2022: +181.9% vs market
Similar setups +0.9%All companies −5.6%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 5 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+0.9%
All companies' median
−5.6%
Beat the market
52% vs 44%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 33 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
KCPSUGIND
Process Industries		 May 2023 75x4% +3%−26% +3%
ARTEMISMED
Health Services		 Oct 2021 70x4% +108%−17% +101%
ISFT
Retail Trade		 Jul 2020 47x2% −16%−37% +8%
EXXARO
Producer Manufacturing		 Jul 2023 72x6% +12%−18% −47%
HPIL
Process Industries		 Apr 2025 84x7% −21%−34% +3%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
BIRLACABLE
Producer Manufacturing		 Oct 2025 78x5% −29%−33% +110%
DYNPRO
Consumer Non-Durables		 Jul 2024 126x5% +27%−7% +3%
KOTARISUG
Process Industries		 May 2023 139x8% +6%−23% −4%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: ROCE, 12-month momentum and interest cover. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to SUNDARAM BRAKE LININGS LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What changed?

30 events since Jun '19

  1. SepResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  2. SepPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  3. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned positive.
  4. JunPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  5. MarPriceFell 65% from the Dec 2024 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  6. DecResultsEPS (TTM) turned negative.
  7. SepResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹361 cr.
  8. MarPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Producer Manufacturing on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
Show 22 earlier events
  1. DecPriceRegained the 2024-09 peak, 1 month after the low.
  2. NovPriceFell 37% from the Sep 2024 peak to the Nov 2024 low.
  3. AugPriceRegained the 2024-05 peak, 2 months after the low.
  4. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned positive.
  5. JunPriceFell 26% from the May 2024 peak to the Jun 2024 low.
  6. JunPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on ROCE (from the bottom quartile).
  7. JunDividendStarted paying a dividend (payout 8% of profit).
  8. AugPriceRegained the 2021-07 peak, 5 months after the low.
  9. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned negative.
  10. AprValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (1642.0x).
  11. MarPriceFell 41% from the Jul 2021 peak to the Mar 2023 low.
  12. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  13. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (1589.7x).
  14. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  15. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  16. JunPriceRegained the 2019-01 peak, 15 months after the low.
  17. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Producer Manufacturing on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  18. JanValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (53.9x).
  19. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  20. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  21. MarPriceFell 61% from the Jan 2019 peak to the Mar 2020 low.
  22. JunPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on ROCE (from the bottom quartile).

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history95 months · 2019-01 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1169.3x₹344 cr3.5%5.0%0.5x
2026-1069.0x₹344 cr3.5%5.0%0.5x
2026-0974.0x₹344 cr3.5%5.0%0.5x
2026-08117.4x₹345 cr2.5%5.0%0.5x
2026-07116.9x₹345 cr2.5%5.0%0.5x
2026-06126.0x₹345 cr2.5%5.0%0.5x
2026-05—₹351 cr-3.6%8.0%0.6x
2026-04—₹351 cr-3.6%8.0%0.6x
2026-03—₹351 cr-3.6%8.0%0.6x
2026-02—₹355 cr-1.5%8.0%0.6x
2026-01—₹355 cr-1.5%8.0%0.6x
2025-12—₹355 cr-1.5%8.0%0.6x
2025-1192.5x₹361 cr3.2%8.0%0.6x
2025-1097.9x₹361 cr3.2%8.0%0.6x
2025-0994.7x₹361 cr3.2%8.0%0.6x
2025-0859.1x₹352 cr5.2%8.0%0.6x
2025-0765.5x₹352 cr5.2%8.0%0.6x
2025-0660.9x₹352 cr5.2%8.0%0.6x
2025-0575.4x₹344 cr4.7%11.0%0.5x
2025-0468.1x₹344 cr4.7%11.0%0.5x
2025-0365.2x₹344 cr4.7%11.0%0.5x
2025-0247.7x₹341 cr7.1%11.0%0.5x
2025-0163.2x₹341 cr7.1%11.0%0.5x
2024-1277.5x₹341 cr7.1%11.0%0.5x
2024-1140.3x₹343 cr8.5%11.0%0.5x
2024-1039.0x₹343 cr8.5%11.0%0.5x
2024-0948.5x₹343 cr8.5%11.0%0.5x
2024-0844.1x₹352 cr10.6%11.0%0.5x
2024-0731.5x₹352 cr10.6%11.0%0.5x
2024-0630.1x₹352 cr10.6%11.0%0.5x
2024-05—₹355 cr-5.9%-1.0%0.6x
2024-04—₹355 cr-5.9%-1.0%0.6x
2024-03—₹355 cr-5.9%-1.0%0.6x
2024-02—₹355 cr-5.9%-1.0%0.6x
2024-01—₹355 cr-5.9%-1.0%0.6x
2023-12—₹355 cr-5.9%-1.0%0.6x
2023-11—₹355 cr-5.9%-1.0%0.6x
2023-10—₹355 cr-5.9%-1.0%0.6x
2023-09—₹355 cr-5.9%-1.0%0.6x
2023-08—₹355 cr-5.9%-1.0%0.6x
2023-07—₹355 cr-5.9%-1.0%0.6x
2023-06—₹355 cr-5.9%-1.0%0.6x
2023-051624.8x₹295 cr0.1%0.0%0.5x
2023-041642.0x₹295 cr0.1%0.0%0.5x
2023-031416.0x₹295 cr0.1%0.0%0.5x
2023-021473.8x₹295 cr0.1%0.0%0.5x
2023-011602.0x₹295 cr0.1%0.0%0.5x
2022-121626.8x₹295 cr0.1%0.0%0.5x
2022-111582.3x₹295 cr0.1%0.0%0.5x
2022-101726.3x₹295 cr0.1%0.0%0.5x
2022-091723.5x₹295 cr0.1%0.0%0.5x
2022-081841.3x₹295 cr0.1%0.0%0.5x
2022-071716.5x₹295 cr0.1%0.0%0.5x
2022-061589.8x₹295 cr0.1%0.0%0.5x
2022-0522.2x₹237 cr6.7%3.0%0.3x
2022-0423.8x₹237 cr6.7%3.0%0.3x
2022-0322.4x₹237 cr6.7%3.0%0.3x
2022-0223.6x₹237 cr6.7%3.0%0.3x
2022-0127.1x₹237 cr6.7%3.0%0.3x
2021-1224.4x₹237 cr6.7%3.0%0.3x
2021-1123.3x₹237 cr6.7%3.0%0.3x
2021-1026.1x₹237 cr6.7%3.0%0.3x
2021-0926.1x₹237 cr6.7%3.0%0.3x
2021-0826.7x₹237 cr6.7%3.0%0.3x
2021-0730.3x₹237 cr6.7%3.0%0.3x
2021-0628.3x₹237 cr6.7%3.0%0.3x
2021-0554.9x₹258 cr3.0%5.0%0.3x
2021-0451.8x₹258 cr3.0%5.0%0.3x
2021-0354.9x₹258 cr3.0%5.0%0.3x
2021-0255.6x₹258 cr3.0%5.0%0.3x
2021-0153.9x₹258 cr3.0%5.0%0.3x
2020-1248.1x₹258 cr3.0%5.0%0.3x
2020-1147.2x₹258 cr3.0%5.0%0.3x
2020-1034.3x₹258 cr3.0%5.0%0.3x
2020-0935.9x₹258 cr3.0%5.0%0.3x
2020-0838.3x₹258 cr3.0%5.0%0.3x
2020-0734.7x₹258 cr3.0%5.0%0.3x
2020-0634.2x₹258 cr3.0%5.0%0.3x
2020-059.6x₹286 cr8.5%8.0%0.4x
2020-049.8x₹286 cr8.5%8.0%0.4x
2020-038.9x₹286 cr8.5%8.0%0.4x
2020-0214.7x₹286 cr8.5%8.0%0.4x
2020-0117.5x₹286 cr8.5%8.0%0.4x
2019-1217.5x₹286 cr8.5%8.0%0.4x
2019-1113.2x₹286 cr8.5%8.0%0.4x
2019-1014.5x₹286 cr8.5%8.0%0.4x
2019-0914.0x₹286 cr8.5%8.0%0.4x
2019-0813.4x₹286 cr8.5%8.0%0.4x
2019-0714.3x₹286 cr8.5%8.0%0.4x
2019-0617.3x₹286 cr8.5%8.0%0.4x
2019-0537.6x₹247 cr5.0%6.0%0.4x
2019-0431.4x₹247 cr5.0%6.0%0.4x
2019-0333.7x₹247 cr5.0%6.0%0.4x
2019-0231.7x₹247 cr5.0%6.0%0.4x
2019-0136.1x₹247 cr5.0%6.0%0.4x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback