अApnaFunda

CHAMAN METALLICS LIMITED (CMNL)

Non-Energy Minerals · Steel · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.40 / 100
Profitability 26Growth 94Balance sheet 1

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹109 latest close · +8.0% over the last 90 sessions

₹100₹110₹120Jun 24Jul 23Aug 18Sep 10Oct 9Nov 9 ₹100₹110₹120Jun 24Aug 31Nov 9

₹109 month-end · −19.6% over 12 months

₹100₹120₹140Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹100₹120₹140Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹109 month-end · +81.4% over 3 years

₹50₹100₹150Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹50₹100₹150Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹109 month-end · +104.5% since Jan '23

₹50₹100₹150Jan '23Oct '23Jul '24May '25Feb '26Nov '26 ₹50₹100₹150Jan '23Dec '24Nov '26

52-week range ₹90.00 to ₹183.90 · 1-year volatility 53.8%

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-48.6%not yet recovered
1-year volatility53.8%annualised

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%202420252026−46.3% 0%−20%−40%202420252026−46.3%
Largest drawdowns

-48.6% (2025-11 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

-41.4% (2024-01 peak to 2024-06 low, recovered 2024-09)

-37.9% (2023-01 peak to 2023-03 low, recovered 2023-06)

Where does it rank among Non-Energy Minerals peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Non-Energy Minerals peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE26th▲ 8 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth99th▲ 84 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth2nd▼ 31 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓1stflat vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓79th▲ 9 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓31st▼ 15 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum38th▼ 54 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Non-Energy Minerals sector page Watch it move against Non-Energy Minerals in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

Trailing earnings per share are negative, so a P/E-based figure does not exist. See the loss-makers list on the Expectations Gap page for a revenue-based version.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Non-Energy Minerals The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹109.00
ROCE
5.0%
Market Cap
₹263 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹541 cr
P/S
0.5x
P/B
2.8x
ROE
-4.4%
Debt / Equity
4.6x
Promoter Holding
73.6%
12M Momentum
-19.6%

52-week range

₹90.00₹183.90
20% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
53.8%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.34

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
0.9x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
0.74x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

3 of 5checks within range1 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tax rate—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Cash conversion0.74xNear threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 0.74x (cash from operations ₹14 cr, net profit ₹19 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow1 of 5 yrsBeyond threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 1. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+2 daysWithin range

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 2 days (6 vs 4). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress0% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 0% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days+22 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by +22 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

What happened next to similar setups

+5.7%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like CHAMAN METALLICS LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −20% to +39% vs the market, against 0% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+6.1%, 80% range −2.5% to +12.2%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
NDLVENTURE · Apr 2022: −70.4% vs market
CLEDUCATE · Oct 2025: −44.9% vs market
ALOKINDS · Jul 2022: −36.4% vs market
WALCHANNAG · Jun 2021: −35.3% vs market
VIPULLTD · Jan 2023: −33.6% vs market
ACL · Jun 2024: −32.8% vs market
CINELINE · Apr 2024: −31.3% vs market
TIPSFILMS · Sep 2025: −25.6% vs market
DCMNVL · Oct 2024: −25.4% vs market
VERANDA · Dec 2024: −25.3% vs market
GLOBALVECT · Apr 2025: −22.9% vs market
SHAH · May 2020: −22.6% vs market
INDSWFTLAB · Nov 2021: −20.8% vs market
MCLEODRUSS · Sep 2021: −16.3% vs market
OMAXE · Feb 2025: −15.0% vs market
GFLLIMITED · May 2023: −12.0% vs market
PNBGILTS · May 2024: −8.1% vs market
NAGAFERT · Jan 2023: −8.0% vs market
SPENCERS · Jan 2021: −6.0% vs market
ASAL · Jan 2020: −4.2% vs market
MUKTAARTS · Aug 2024: −1.4% vs market
ARCHIDPLY · Oct 2025: −0.7% vs market
BRNL · Aug 2023: +1.2% vs market
EMAMIREAL · May 2021: +3.7% vs market
SICALLOG · Sep 2025: +4.7% vs market
JITFINFRA · Feb 2020: +6.8% vs market
VARDMNPOLY · Mar 2022: +7.3% vs market
ZEELEARN · Jan 2024: +7.3% vs market
SALSTEEL · Apr 2020: +12.2% vs market
NETWORK18 · Jan 2020: +14.7% vs market
SAMPANN · Feb 2023: +17.3% vs market
KARMAENG · Sep 2020: +19.9% vs market
ASIANHOTNR · Feb 2023: +20.6% vs market
PFOCUS · Jan 2021: +24.3% vs market
VISACHROME · Aug 2021: +28.9% vs market
RTNINDIA · Jul 2023: +33.1% vs market
RTNPOWER · Sep 2022: +36.7% vs market
ATLANTAA · May 2021: +40.2% vs market
COASTCORP · May 2025: +48.9% vs market
MSPL · May 2020: +51.1% vs market
BOMDYEING · Nov 2022: +65.5% vs market
JAIBALAJI · May 2020: +72.3% vs market
DBREALTY · May 2020: +74.5% vs market
PENINLAND · Jun 2020: +77.9% vs market
BIGBLOC · May 2020: +122.4% vs market
JYOTISTRUC · Oct 2023: +132.9% vs market
DELTAMAGNT · Apr 2021: +166.1% vs market
SPMLINFRA · May 2023: +175.6% vs market
KAMATHOTEL · Jun 2022: +236.8% vs market
BCONCEPTS · Oct 2021: +377.7% vs market
Similar setups +5.7%All companies −0.4%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 6 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+5.7%
All companies' median
−0.4%
Beat the market
56% vs 50%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 38 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
KAMATHOTEL
Consumer Services
Jun 2022 —7% +18%−38% +237%
NETWORK18
Consumer Services
Jan 2020 —-1% −27%−30% +15%
BRNL
Industrial Services
Aug 2023 —-2% −1%−26% +1%
PENINLAND
Finance
Jun 2020 —-16% −25%−33% +78%
EMAMIREAL
Finance
May 2021 —11% +109%−20% +4%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
RTNPOWER
Utilities
Sep 2022 —8% −2%−49% +37%
CINELINE
Consumer Services
Apr 2024 —1% +31%−23% −31%
BOMDYEING
Process Industries
Nov 2022 —6% −2%−40% +66%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/S, ROCE, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: interest cover, 12-month momentum and drawdown from 12-month high. Not used (unavailable for this company): P/E and operating margin. This company is loss-making, so it was only compared with loss-making companies. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to CHAMAN METALLICS LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What changed?

18 events since Mar '23

  1. AugPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the bottom quartile).
  2. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned negative.
  3. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  4. MarPriceFell 49% from the Nov 2025 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  5. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  6. MarPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  7. JanValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (23.9x).
  8. SepPriceRegained the 2024-01 peak, 3 months after the low.
Show 10 earlier events
  1. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  2. JunPriceFell 41% from the Jan 2024 peak to the Jun 2024 low.
  3. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the top quartile).
  4. JunDebtDebt / equity rose above 1.0x (1.44x).
  5. JanPriceRegained the 2023-09 peak, 2 months after the low.
  6. JanDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.29x.
  7. JanSharesShare count is up 200.0% over 12 months.
  8. NovPriceFell 27% from the Sep 2023 peak to the Nov 2023 low.
  9. JunPriceRegained the 2023-01 peak, 3 months after the low.
  10. MarPriceFell 38% from the Jan 2023 peak to the Mar 2023 low.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history47 months · 2023-01 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-11—₹541 cr-4.4%5.0%4.6x
2026-10—₹541 cr-4.4%5.0%4.6x
2026-09—₹541 cr-4.4%5.0%4.6x
2026-08—₹541 cr-4.4%5.0%4.6x
2026-07—₹541 cr-4.4%5.0%4.6x
2026-06—₹541 cr-4.4%5.0%4.6x
2026-0531.2x₹172 cr10.1%4.0%3.6x
2026-0432.2x₹172 cr10.1%4.0%3.6x
2026-0322.3x₹172 cr10.1%4.0%3.6x
2026-0225.7x₹172 cr10.1%4.0%3.6x
2026-0127.9x₹172 cr10.1%4.0%3.6x
2025-1229.3x₹172 cr10.1%4.0%3.6x
2025-1133.5x₹172 cr10.1%4.0%3.6x
2025-1039.5x₹172 cr10.1%4.0%3.6x
2025-0938.7x₹172 cr10.1%4.0%3.6x
2025-0837.0x₹172 cr10.1%4.0%3.6x
2025-0736.7x₹172 cr10.1%4.0%3.6x
2025-0640.7x₹172 cr10.1%4.0%3.6x
2025-0528.1x₹189 cr14.4%11.0%1.4x
2025-0432.1x₹189 cr14.4%11.0%1.4x
2025-0330.8x₹189 cr14.4%11.0%1.4x
2025-0224.1x₹189 cr14.4%11.0%1.4x
2025-0123.9x₹189 cr14.4%11.0%1.4x
2024-1226.1x₹189 cr14.4%11.0%1.4x
2024-1120.5x₹189 cr14.4%11.0%1.4x
2024-1024.6x₹189 cr14.4%11.0%1.4x
2024-0924.3x₹189 cr14.4%11.0%1.4x
2024-0820.6x₹189 cr14.4%11.0%1.4x
2024-0713.1x₹189 cr14.4%11.0%1.4x
2024-0613.5x₹189 cr14.4%11.0%1.4x
2024-059.7x₹228 cr22.1%32.0%0.3x
2024-0412.8x₹228 cr22.1%32.0%0.3x
2024-0311.3x₹228 cr22.1%32.0%0.3x
2024-0214.0x₹228 cr22.1%32.0%0.3x
2024-0115.6x₹228 cr22.1%32.0%0.3x
2023-128.7x₹228 cr22.1%32.0%0.3x
2023-118.5x₹228 cr22.1%32.0%0.3x
2023-109.2x₹228 cr22.1%32.0%0.3x
2023-099.3x₹228 cr22.1%32.0%0.3x
2023-0810.7x₹228 cr22.1%32.0%0.3x
2023-078.9x₹228 cr22.1%32.0%0.3x
2023-069.0x₹228 cr22.1%32.0%0.3x
2023-0512.3x₹185 cr21.1%27.0%0.7x
2023-0410.3x₹185 cr21.1%27.0%0.7x
2023-039.0x₹185 cr21.1%27.0%0.7x
2023-0210.2x₹185 cr21.1%27.0%0.7x
2023-0111.6x₹185 cr21.1%27.0%0.7x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback