अApnaFunda

RATTANINDIA POWER LIMITED (RTNPOWER)

Utilities · Electric Utilities · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.28 / 100
Profitability 31Growth 6Balance sheet 46
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.39 / 100
Price 12Earnings 44FII/DII 62

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹6.82 latest close · −25.5% over the last 90 sessions

₹6₹7₹8₹9Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹6₹7₹8₹9Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹6.82 month-end · −31.9% over 12 months

₹6₹8₹10Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹6₹8₹10Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹6.82 month-end · −23.4% over 3 years

₹10₹15₹20Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹10₹15₹20Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹6.82 month-end · +89.4% since Jan '19

₹0₹10₹20Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹0₹10₹20Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹5.88 to ₹10.94 · 1-year volatility 33.1%

Was the rally earned?

-32%share price, 1 yearMultiple-driven

Mostly the multiple.

  • Most of the fall came from investors paying a lower multiple (P/E 45.5x to 32.5x); per-share earnings took off 4 points.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −2 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−2 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −28 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−28 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1 ptsShare count changeShare price: −32%−32%Share priceNet profit growth: −2 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−2ProfitP/E change: −28 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−28P/EShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1SharesShare price: −32%−32%Share price
Net profit growth-2 ptsNet profit fell about 3%, which lowers the price.
P/E change-28 ptsThe P/E fell from 45.5x to 32.5x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 3 years and 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with ADANI POWER

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-73.0%recovered 2020-08
1-year volatility33.1%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.813-year daily, correlation 0.45
Volume spikes1last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2020202120222023202420252026−73.0% 0%−20%−40%−60%2020202220242026−73.0%
Largest drawdowns

-73.0% (2019-01 peak to 2019-08 low, recovered 2020-08)

-69.8% (2024-06 peak to 2026-10 low, not yet recovered)

-69.2% (2021-07 peak to 2023-03 low, recovered 2023-11)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-08-31: 11.7x the 50-day median, price -5.7% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

32.5xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history59th percentile
CheapestMedian 30.3xDearest

Usual range 6.1x to 58.4x since 2019-01.

Against Utilities32.5x vs 27.3x
This company
32.5x
Sector median
27.3x

19% above the Utilities median.

1.1x30.8x60.6x90.4xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '261.1x30.8x60.6x90.4xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianUtilities median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianUtilities median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianUtilities median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Utilities is valued

Where does it rank among Utilities peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Utilities peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE25th▼ 16 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin37th▲ 6 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth7thflat vs a year ago
  • EPS growth33rd
  • Debt/equity ↓45th▲ 6 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓8thflat vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓46th▲ 17 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum24th▼ 8 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Utilities sector page Watch it move against Utilities in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~-3%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 3.4x, the price would imply about −3.5%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Utilities The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹6.82
P/E
32.5x
ROCE
6.0%
Market Cap
₹3662 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹2969 cr
P/S
1.2x
P/B
0.8x
ROE
2.4%
Operating Margin
16.0%
Debt / Equity
0.8x
Promoter Holding
44.1%
12M Momentum
-31.9%

52-week range

₹5.88₹10.94
19% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
33.1%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.03

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
1.3x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
0.23x
low
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

2 of 6checks within range4 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance292%Beyond threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 291.9%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate0%Beyond threshold

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 0.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion0.23xBeyond threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 0.23x (cash from operations ₹2,088 cr, net profit ₹9,171 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow5 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 5. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+65 daysBeyond threshold

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 65 days (336 vs 271). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress0% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 0% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, FIIs added 4.8 pts; DIIs trimmed 0.6 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 8.0 lakh to 19.1 lakh (+140%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters44.1%44.1%0.0 pts
FIIs0.5%5.3%+4.8 pts
DIIs7.1%6.6%-0.6 pts
Public and others48.3%44.1%-4.2 pts

Number of shareholders

19.1 lakhshareholders+140% since Sep '23
8.0L12.2L16.5L20.8L Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 8.0 lakh
Dec '23: 10.8 lakh
Mar '24: 13.2 lakh
Jun '24: 20.6 lakh
Sep '24: 19.8 lakh
Dec '24: 19.6 lakh
Mar '25: 19.7 lakh
Jun '25: 20.8 lakh
Sep '25: 20.5 lakh
Dec '25: 19.9 lakh
Mar '26: 19.4 lakh
Jun '26: 19.1 lakh
8.0L12.2L16.5L20.8L Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 8.0 lakh
Dec '23: 10.8 lakh
Mar '24: 13.2 lakh
Jun '24: 20.6 lakh
Sep '24: 19.8 lakh
Dec '24: 19.6 lakh
Mar '25: 19.7 lakh
Jun '25: 20.8 lakh
Sep '25: 20.5 lakh
Dec '25: 19.9 lakh
Mar '26: 19.4 lakh
Jun '26: 19.1 lakh

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+8.9%typical 12-month return vs the marketAbove the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like RATTANINDIA POWER LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −17% to +35% vs the market, against −5% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The analogs' median sat above that base rate (gap +13.8%, 80% range +7.1% to +19.7%), but the matches cluster in only 6 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
STANLEY · Sep 2025: −53.3% vs market
SULA · Oct 2025: −47.3% vs market
DAVANGERE · Aug 2025: −44.5% vs market
BODALCHEM · Aug 2023: −32.8% vs market
RUPA · Nov 2023: −25.1% vs market
KOKUYOCMLN · Oct 2025: −24.1% vs market
IGPL · Sep 2024: −23.9% vs market
SANGHIIND · Jan 2020: −23.1% vs market
WHEELS · Jun 2020: −23.0% vs market
INDIANHUME · Sep 2021: −20.4% vs market
GOCLCORP · Aug 2024: −20.3% vs market
EVEREADY · Apr 2023: −19.3% vs market
SHRIRAMPPS · Aug 2025: −16.5% vs market
LUMAXIND · Jun 2021: −16.3% vs market
HIKAL · Aug 2024: −16.0% vs market
CHEMPLASTS · Jan 2024: −11.0% vs market
TATACHEM · Sep 2024: −8.6% vs market
GODREJIND · Apr 2022: −7.3% vs market
TRIDENT · Mar 2025: −4.7% vs market
DMCC · Oct 2024: +1.7% vs market
HLEGLAS · Mar 2025: +3.0% vs market
SAGCEM · Jun 2022: +3.6% vs market
ALICON · Sep 2025: +3.9% vs market
APOLLOTYRE · Sep 2020: +5.4% vs market
SHK · Jun 2023: +8.1% vs market
BALRAMCHIN · Dec 2023: +9.8% vs market
STEELXIND · Aug 2025: +12.5% vs market
INDIACEM · Jun 2022: +12.9% vs market
HUHTAMAKI · Jul 2022: +17.6% vs market
NRBBEARING · Sep 2020: +18.1% vs market
BIRLACORPN · Jun 2022: +18.6% vs market
IRB · Jul 2021: +20.8% vs market
RKFORGE · Oct 2025: +25.9% vs market
AARTIIND · Sep 2025: +26.2% vs market
MANGLMCEM · Jul 2025: +27.1% vs market
ASTERDM · Dec 2021: +28.2% vs market
WELSPUNLIV · Jan 2020: +29.0% vs market
COSMOFIRST · Aug 2024: +37.5% vs market
PRSMJOHNSN · Dec 2022: +38.7% vs market
KEC · Aug 2022: +50.8% vs market
BRIGADE · Sep 2020: +53.8% vs market
ISGEC · Dec 2022: +61.4% vs market
DYNAMATECH · Aug 2020: +73.0% vs market
MBAPL · Nov 2024: +73.1% vs market
MMFL · Aug 2020: +73.7% vs market
SUDARSCHEM · Nov 2023: +80.8% vs market
KCP · Jun 2020: +84.1% vs market
CIEINDIA · Feb 2022: +120.3% vs market
SOBHA · Mar 2023: +126.4% vs market
JINDWORLD · Jun 2021: +261.7% vs market
Similar setups +8.9%All companies −4.9%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 3 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+8.9%
All companies' median
−4.9%
Beat the market
62% vs 45%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 30 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
WHEELS
Producer Manufacturing
Jun 2020 22x8% −46%−46% −23%
KCP
Producer Manufacturing
Jun 2020 23x6% −43%−44% +84%
HIKAL
Health Technology
Aug 2024 58x8% +11%−10% −16%
MANGLMCEM
Non-Energy Minerals
Jul 2025 43x10% −27%−32% +27%
MBAPL
Process Industries
Nov 2024 67x12% −14%−30% +73%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
ISGEC
Industrial Services
Dec 2022 32x8% −21%−31% +61%
GODREJIND
Process Industries
Apr 2022 50x5% −4%−24% −7%
SAGCEM
Non-Energy Minerals
Jun 2022 29x8% −22%−44% +4%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high and P/S. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to RATTANINDIA POWER LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Non-Energy Minerals
66%similar
revenue growthdebt/equity
AARTI DRUGSAARTIDRUGS
Health Technology
63%similar
revenuerevenue growth
Process Industries
60%similar
promoter holdingrevenue growth
JK PAPERJKPAPER
Process Industries
59%similar
ROCEoperating margin
BATA INDIABATAINDIA
Consumer Non-Durables
58%similar
debt/equityrevenue
TORRENT POWERTORNTPOWER
Utilities
38%similar
debt/equityvolatility
TATA POWER COTATAPOWER
Utilities
36%similar
P/Epromoter holding
Utilities
35%similar
ROCEdebt/equity

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Jul '21

  1. OctPriceFell 70% from the Jun 2024 peak to the Oct 2026 low.
  2. SepPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Utilities on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  3. AugPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Utilities on ROCE (from the bottom quartile).
  4. AugPriceVolume reached 11.7x its 50-day median on 2026-08-31; price -5.7% that day.
  5. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (90.4x).
  6. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Utilities on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  7. MarPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Utilities on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  8. DecPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Utilities on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
Show 22 earlier events
  1. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Utilities on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  2. JulPriceVolume reached 18.0x its 50-day median on 2025-07-07; price +7.9% that day.
  3. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Utilities on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  4. JunPriceVolume reached 42.3x its 50-day median on 2025-06-11; price +6.6% that day.
  5. OctPriceVolume reached 6.8x its 50-day median on 2024-10-03; price +4.9% that day.
  6. SepPriceVolume reached 5.1x its 50-day median on 2024-09-20; price -3.3% that day.
  7. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned positive.
  8. MayPriceRegained the 2024-02 peak, 2 months after the low.
  9. MayPriceVolume reached 29.6x its 50-day median on 2024-05-21; price -5.1% that day.
  10. AprPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Utilities on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  11. MarPriceFell 34% from the Feb 2024 peak to the Mar 2024 low.
  12. NovPriceRegained the 2021-07 peak, 8 months after the low.
  13. JulPriceVolume reached 12.0x its 50-day median on 2023-07-03; price +9.3% that day.
  14. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Utilities on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  15. JunPriceVolume reached 61.1x its 50-day median on 2023-06-27; price -9.8% that day.
  16. MarPriceFell 69% from the Jul 2021 peak to the Mar 2023 low.
  17. SepPriceVolume reached 7.9x its 50-day median on 2022-09-09; price +1.0% that day.
  18. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹3,260 cr.
  19. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Utilities on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  20. AprPriceVolume reached 5.5x its 50-day median on 2022-04-07; price -3.1% that day.
  21. DecPriceVolume reached 10.8x its 50-day median on 2021-12-17; price -3.4% that day.
  22. JulSharesShare count is up 8.7% over 12 months.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history95 months · 2019-01 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1132.5x₹2969 cr2.4%6.0%0.8x
2026-1030.3x₹2969 cr2.4%6.0%0.8x
2026-0932.8x₹2969 cr2.4%6.0%0.8x
2026-0875.0x₹2992 cr1.1%6.0%0.8x
2026-0787.1x₹2992 cr1.1%6.0%0.8x
2026-0690.4x₹2992 cr1.1%6.0%0.8x
2026-0539.4x₹3140 cr2.9%9.0%0.8x
2026-0440.5x₹3140 cr2.9%9.0%0.8x
2026-0330.2x₹3140 cr2.9%9.0%0.8x
2026-0251.8x₹3145 cr1.9%9.0%0.8x
2026-0153.2x₹3145 cr1.9%9.0%0.8x
2025-1259.0x₹3145 cr1.9%9.0%0.8x
2025-1145.5x₹3173 cr2.5%9.0%0.8x
2025-1049.6x₹3173 cr2.5%9.0%0.8x
2025-0951.0x₹3173 cr2.5%9.0%0.8x
2025-0830.0x₹3283 cr4.8%9.0%0.8x
2025-0731.1x₹3283 cr4.8%9.0%0.8x
2025-0637.9x₹3283 cr4.8%9.0%0.8x
2025-05—₹3261 cr246.6%8.0%0.8x
2025-04—₹3261 cr246.6%8.0%0.8x
2025-03—₹3261 cr246.6%8.0%0.8x
2025-02—₹3334 cr233.1%8.0%0.8x
2025-01—₹3334 cr233.1%8.0%0.8x
2024-12—₹3334 cr233.1%8.0%0.8x
2024-11—₹3448 cr218.6%8.0%0.8x
2024-10—₹3448 cr218.6%8.0%0.8x
2024-09—₹3448 cr218.6%8.0%0.8x
2024-08—₹3364 cr203.9%8.0%0.8x
2024-071.1x₹3364 cr203.9%8.0%0.8x
2024-061.1x₹3364 cr203.9%8.0%0.8x
2024-05—₹3231 cr—9.0%—
2024-04—₹3231 cr—9.0%—
2024-03—₹3231 cr—9.0%—
2024-02—₹3231 cr—9.0%—
2024-01—₹3231 cr—9.0%—
2023-12—₹3231 cr—9.0%—
2023-11—₹3231 cr—9.0%—
2023-10—₹3231 cr—9.0%—
2023-09—₹3231 cr—9.0%—
2023-08—₹3231 cr—9.0%—
2023-07—₹3231 cr—9.0%—
2023-06—₹3231 cr—9.0%—
2023-05—₹3260 cr—8.0%—
2023-04—₹3260 cr—8.0%—
2023-03—₹3260 cr—8.0%—
2023-02—₹3260 cr—8.0%—
2023-01—₹3260 cr—8.0%—
2022-12—₹3260 cr—8.0%—
2022-11—₹3260 cr—8.0%—
2022-10—₹3260 cr—8.0%—
2022-09—₹3260 cr—8.0%—
2022-08—₹3260 cr—8.0%—
2022-07—₹3260 cr—8.0%—
2022-06—₹3260 cr—8.0%—
2022-05—₹1560 cr—11.0%—
2022-04—₹1560 cr—11.0%—
2022-03—₹1560 cr—11.0%—
2022-02—₹1560 cr—11.0%—
2022-01—₹1560 cr—11.0%—
2021-12—₹1560 cr—11.0%—
2021-11—₹1560 cr—11.0%—
2021-10—₹1560 cr—11.0%—
2021-09—₹1560 cr—11.0%—
2021-08—₹1560 cr—11.0%—
2021-07—₹1560 cr—11.0%—
2021-06—₹1560 cr—11.0%—
2021-0510.8x₹1774 cr38.4%2.0%29.1x
2021-048.2x₹1774 cr38.4%2.0%29.1x
2021-037.7x₹1774 cr38.4%2.0%29.1x
2021-028.5x₹1774 cr38.4%2.0%29.1x
2021-019.5x₹1774 cr38.4%2.0%29.1x
2020-127.1x₹1774 cr38.4%2.0%29.1x
2020-115.9x₹1774 cr38.4%2.0%29.1x
2020-106.1x₹1774 cr38.4%2.0%29.1x
2020-097.7x₹1774 cr38.4%2.0%29.1x
2020-089.5x₹1774 cr38.4%2.0%29.1x
2020-076.4x₹1774 cr38.4%2.0%29.1x
2020-067.6x₹1774 cr38.4%2.0%29.1x
2020-05—₹1924 cr—2.0%—
2020-04—₹1924 cr—2.0%—
2020-03—₹1924 cr—2.0%—
2020-02—₹1924 cr—2.0%—
2020-01—₹1924 cr—2.0%—
2019-12—₹1924 cr—2.0%—
2019-11—₹1924 cr—2.0%—
2019-10—₹1924 cr—2.0%—
2019-09—₹1924 cr—2.0%—
2019-08—₹1924 cr—2.0%—
2019-07—₹1924 cr—2.0%—
2019-06—₹1924 cr—2.0%—
2019-05—₹2054 cr-66.6%2.0%5.9x
2019-04—₹2054 cr-66.6%2.0%5.9x
2019-03—₹2054 cr-66.6%2.0%5.9x
2019-02—₹2054 cr-66.6%2.0%5.9x
2019-01—₹2054 cr-66.6%2.0%5.9x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback