अApnaFunda

JUBILANT INGREVIA LIMITED (JUBLINGREA)

Process Industries · Chemicals: Major Diversified · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.56 / 100
Profitability 59Growth 38Balance sheet 71
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.53 / 100
Price 13Earnings 54FII/DII 92

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹587.65 latest close · −13.4% over the last 90 sessions

₹600₹700Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹600₹700Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹587.65 month-end · −17.0% over 12 months

₹600₹700Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹600₹700Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹587.65 month-end · +36.5% over 3 years

₹400₹600₹800Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹400₹600₹800Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹587.65 month-end · +126.3% since Mar '21

₹400₹600₹800Mar '21May '22Jun '23Aug '24Sep '25Nov '26 ₹400₹600₹800Mar '21Jan '24Nov '26

52-week range ₹537.30 to ₹795.00 · 1-year volatility 36.6%

Was the rally earned?

-17%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 10 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 40.6x to 30.3x), which took 27 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +10 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+10 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −27 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−27 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: −17%−17%Share priceNet profit growth: +10 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+10ProfitP/E change: −27 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−27P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: −17%−17%Share price
Net profit growth+10 ptsNet profit rose about 11%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-27 ptsThe P/E fell from 40.6x to 30.3x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+37%share price, 3 yearsMultiple-driven

Partly.

  • Most of the rise came from investors paying a higher multiple (P/E 22.3x to 30.3x); per-share earnings added 0 points.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).0 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +36 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+36 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: +37%+37%Share priceNet profit growth: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).0ProfitP/E change: +36 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+36P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: +37%+37%Share price
Net profit growth0 ptsNet profit was little changed.
P/E change+36 ptsThe P/E rose from 22.3x to 30.3x, which lifts the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+7%share price, 5 yearsLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 179 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 161.8x to 30.3x), which took 173 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +180 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+180 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −173 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−173 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1 ptsShare count changeShare price: +7%+7%Share priceNet profit growth: +180 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+180ProfitP/E change: −173 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−173P/EShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1SharesShare price: +7%+7%Share price
Net profit growth+180 ptsNet profit rose about 471%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-173 ptsThe P/E fell from 161.8x to 30.3x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with AETHER INDUSTRIES

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-55.7%recovered 2024-10
1-year volatility36.6%annualised
Beta vs sector index1.213-year daily, correlation 0.50
Volume spikes4last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%20222023202420252026−55.6% 0%−20%−40%−60%202220242026−55.6%
Largest drawdowns

-55.7% (2021-10 peak to 2023-03 low, recovered 2024-10)

-37.0% (2025-01 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

-19.8% (2024-10 peak to 2024-10 low, recovered 2024-12)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-10-29: 5x the 50-day median, price -4.3% that day

2026-10-28: 9.8x the 50-day median, price -6.1% that day

2026-10-27: 12.7x the 50-day median, price +4.3% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

30.3xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history39th percentile
CheapestMedian 38.7xDearest

Usual range 16.8x to 157.7x since 2021-03.

Against Process Industries30.3x vs 18.1x
This company
30.3x
Sector median
18.1x

68% above the Process Industries median.

12.0x81.9x151.8x221.6xMar '21May '22Jul '23Sep '24Nov '25Nov '2612.0x81.9x151.8x221.6xMar '21Feb '23Jan '25Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Process Industries is valued

Where does it rank among Process Industries peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Process Industries peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE49thflat vs a year ago
  • Op. margin68th▼ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth58th▲ 18 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth52nd▼ 31 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓60thflat vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓77th▲ 10 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓27th▲ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum37th▼ 33 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Process Industries sector page Watch it move against Process Industries in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~19%annual earnings growth implied by the priceAbove delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 31.2x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 18.9%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered−5.3%/yrEPS, last 6 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap+24.2 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank91stmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

-5%21%46% Jun 2021Nov 2026 -5%21%46% Jun 2021Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x20.3%21.3%22.4%
15x17.8%18.9%20.0%
20x14.7%15.8%16.8%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 18.9%/yr

Looking back

  • Jan 2022Price implied 42%/yr; EPS has since grown 39%/yr (5.0 yrs)

Past comparisons cover only companies listed today (survivorship bias) and say nothing about future outcomes.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Process Industries The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹587.65
P/E
30.3x
ROCE
11.0%
Market Cap
₹9367 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹4651 cr
P/S
2.0x
P/B
3.0x
ROE
9.9%
Operating Margin
15.0%
Debt / Equity
0.3x
Promoter Holding
45.2%
12M Momentum
-17.0%

52-week range

₹537.30₹795.00
20% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
36.6%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.40

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
8.8x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
2.05x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

5 of 7checks within range2 near a threshold
Other income reliance6%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 6.3%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate26%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 26.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion2.05xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 2.05x (cash from operations ₹1,462 cr, net profit ₹712 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow3 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 3. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+15 daysNear threshold

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 15 days (65 vs 50). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress5% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 5% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days+19 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by +19 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, DIIs added 15.8 pts; promoters trimmed 6.2 pts.
  • The number of shareholders fell from 1.7 lakh to 1.1 lakh (-36%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters51.5%45.2%-6.3 pts
FIIs6.3%6.5%+0.2 pts
DIIs9.2%25.0%+15.8 pts
Public and others32.2%22.3%-9.9 pts

Number of shareholders

1.1 lakhshareholders-36% since Sep '23
1.1L1.3L1.5L1.7L Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 1.7 lakh
Dec '23: 1.6 lakh
Mar '24: 1.5 lakh
Jun '24: 1.4 lakh
Sep '24: 1.3 lakh
Dec '24: 1.2 lakh
Mar '25: 1.2 lakh
Jun '25: 1.2 lakh
Sep '25: 1.3 lakh
Dec '25: 1.2 lakh
Mar '26: 1.1 lakh
Jun '26: 1.1 lakh
1.1L1.3L1.5L1.7L Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 1.7 lakh
Dec '23: 1.6 lakh
Mar '24: 1.5 lakh
Jun '24: 1.4 lakh
Sep '24: 1.3 lakh
Dec '24: 1.2 lakh
Mar '25: 1.2 lakh
Jun '25: 1.2 lakh
Sep '25: 1.3 lakh
Dec '25: 1.2 lakh
Mar '26: 1.1 lakh
Jun '26: 1.1 lakh

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−2.1%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like JUBILANT INGREVIA LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −20% to +21% vs the market, against −4% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+1.8%, 80% range −4.4% to +5.2%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−50%0%+50%+100%
GREENPANEL · Jul 2025: −37.7% vs market
DALBHARAT · Nov 2023: −36.5% vs market
HERITGFOOD · Feb 2020: −35.7% vs market
VTL · Mar 2022: −29.1% vs market
SHRIPISTON · Jun 2021: −27.7% vs market
AARTIIND · May 2024: −27.0% vs market
GODREJAGRO · May 2022: −26.7% vs market
FINPIPE · Aug 2024: −26.3% vs market
TATACHEM · May 2023: −26.1% vs market
AARTIDRUGS · Jun 2023: −26.0% vs market
NILKAMAL · Nov 2021: −25.9% vs market
CROMPTON · Sep 2024: −24.2% vs market
TRIDENT · Jul 2025: −20.2% vs market
SHK · Mar 2020: −18.5% vs market
RHIM · Sep 2025: −13.2% vs market
SUBROS · May 2021: −12.7% vs market
HUHTAMAKI · Jun 2020: −11.7% vs market
BOROLTD · Oct 2025: −11.6% vs market
JUBLPHARMA · Oct 2025: −11.3% vs market
APLLTD · Sep 2025: −8.9% vs market
CEATLTD · Aug 2020: −8.6% vs market
EPL · Dec 2022: −6.8% vs market
GRAPHITE · Jun 2023: −4.3% vs market
BAJAJELEC · Feb 2022: −3.9% vs market
SUPRAJIT · Sep 2024: −3.3% vs market
ENDURANCE · Feb 2024: −0.9% vs market
APOLLOTYRE · Jan 2020: −0.8% vs market
GRANULES · Dec 2022: +0.1% vs market
SHALBY · Sep 2024: +2.3% vs market
SOMANYCERA · Jul 2022: +3.3% vs market
EXIDEIND · Sep 2025: +5.0% vs market
CYIENT · Mar 2022: +13.0% vs market
FORTIS · Aug 2023: +13.0% vs market
BANARISUG · Feb 2022: +16.9% vs market
GAEL · Feb 2020: +17.5% vs market
GREENLAM · Feb 2023: +18.7% vs market
HARSHA · Sep 2025: +19.4% vs market
CIEINDIA · Oct 2020: +21.2% vs market
MAHSEAMLES · Dec 2021: +22.7% vs market
STARCEMENT · Oct 2024: +24.3% vs market
ARTEMISMED · Oct 2025: +25.2% vs market
HFCL · Sep 2023: +32.5% vs market
MINDACORP · Feb 2023: +46.0% vs market
NRBBEARING · Jun 2025: +46.5% vs market
BEML · Dec 2022: +51.7% vs market
IPCALAB · Oct 2025: +60.3% vs market
CENTURYPLY · Jun 2020: +109.6% vs market
BECTORFOOD · Sep 2022: +147.8% vs market
SANSERA · Aug 2025: +193.7% vs market
FLUOROCHEM · Mar 2021: +286.0% vs market
Similar setups −2.1%All companies −3.9%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 4 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−2.1%
All companies' median
−3.9%
Beat the market
46% vs 46%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 33 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
APLLTD
Health Technology
Sep 2025 29x13% −25%−28% −9%
HARSHA
Producer Manufacturing
Sep 2025 39x12% −22%−28% +19%
TRIDENT
Process Industries
Jul 2025 41x9% −24%−27% −20%
BAJAJELEC
Consumer Durables
Feb 2022 46x12% +20%−25% −4%
MINDACORP
Producer Manufacturing
Feb 2023 24x12% −3%−29% +46%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
SHK
Process Industries
Mar 2020 12x12% −50%−53% −19%
HUHTAMAKI
Process Industries
Jun 2020 18x— −21%−31% −12%
SANSERA
Producer Manufacturing
Aug 2025 34x14% −16%−26% +194%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, P/S and drawdown from 12-month high. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to JUBILANT INGREVIA LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

AARTI DRUGSAARTIDRUGS
Health Technology
74%similar
revenue growthoperating margin
Producer Manufacturing
69%similar
ROCEdebt/equity
CYIENTCYIENT
Technology Services
63%similar
P/Evolatility
DALMIA BHARATDALBHARAT
Non-Energy Minerals
63%similar
P/EEPS growth
Producer Manufacturing
62%similar
promoter holdingEPS growth
Process Industries
72%similar
ROCEdebt/equity
ARVINDARVIND
Process Industries
68%similar
EPS growthP/E
JK PAPERJKPAPER
Process Industries
64%similar
operating marginvolatility

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Jun '22

  1. OctPriceVolume reached 12.7x its 50-day median on 2026-10-27; price +4.3% that day.
  2. JulPriceVolume reached 16.3x its 50-day median on 2026-07-22; price -2.6% that day.
  3. AprPriceVolume reached 18.6x its 50-day median on 2026-04-22; price +6.1% that day.
  4. MarPriceFell 37% from the Jan 2025 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  5. MarPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Process Industries on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  6. FebPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  7. JanPriceVolume reached 13.3x its 50-day median on 2026-01-05; price +3.4% that day.
  8. OctPriceVolume reached 41.8x its 50-day median on 2025-10-13; price +8.5% that day.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. SepPromoterPromoter holding fell 6.2 pts to 45.2%.
  2. SepInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 5.9 pts over 2 quarters to 28.8%.
  3. SepPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Process Industries on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  4. SepPriceVolume reached 9.5x its 50-day median on 2025-09-19; price -5.0% that day.
  5. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  6. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  7. JunPriceVolume reached 106.6x its 50-day median on 2025-06-13; price +16.4% that day.
  8. DecPriceVolume reached 13.7x its 50-day median on 2024-12-11; price +8.2% that day.
  9. OctPriceRegained the 2021-10 peak, 19 months after the low.
  10. JulPriceVolume reached 46.1x its 50-day median on 2024-07-09; price +11.1% that day.
  11. JunInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 4.7 pts over 2 quarters to 20.2%.
  12. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  13. AprPriceVolume reached 32.0x its 50-day median on 2024-04-10; price +10.6% that day.
  14. FebPriceVolume reached 30.8x its 50-day median on 2024-02-12; price +12.1% that day.
  15. AugPriceVolume reached 8.5x its 50-day median on 2023-08-23; price +7.7% that day.
  16. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  17. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the top quartile).
  18. AprPriceVolume reached 6.1x its 50-day median on 2023-04-10; price +4.4% that day.
  19. MarPriceFell 56% from the Oct 2021 peak to the Mar 2023 low.
  20. MarPriceVolume reached 5.9x its 50-day median on 2023-03-29; price +0.3% that day.
  21. JulPriceVolume reached 8.7x its 50-day median on 2022-07-19; price +4.0% that day.
  22. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹4,949 cr.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history69 months · 2021-03 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1130.3x₹4651 cr9.9%11.0%0.3x
2026-1028.8x₹4651 cr9.9%11.0%0.3x
2026-0933.7x₹4651 cr9.9%11.0%0.3x
2026-0838.7x₹4389 cr8.9%11.0%0.3x
2026-0742.2x₹4389 cr8.9%11.0%0.3x
2026-0634.9x₹4389 cr8.9%11.0%0.3x
2026-0538.8x₹4261 cr9.1%11.0%0.3x
2026-0442.8x₹4261 cr9.1%11.0%0.3x
2026-0332.6x₹4261 cr9.1%11.0%0.3x
2026-0232.4x₹4267 cr9.8%11.0%0.3x
2026-0135.1x₹4267 cr9.8%11.0%0.3x
2025-1238.9x₹4267 cr9.8%11.0%0.3x
2025-1140.6x₹4191 cr9.5%11.0%0.3x
2025-1039.6x₹4191 cr9.5%11.0%0.3x
2025-0936.7x₹4191 cr9.5%11.0%0.3x
2025-0846.0x₹4177 cr8.6%11.0%0.3x
2025-0749.6x₹4177 cr8.6%11.0%0.3x
2025-0648.4x₹4177 cr8.6%11.0%0.3x
2025-0554.2x₹4200 cr7.5%10.0%0.3x
2025-0449.6x₹4200 cr7.5%10.0%0.3x
2025-0350.1x₹4200 cr7.5%10.0%0.3x
2025-0255.9x₹4109 cr6.4%10.0%0.3x
2025-0163.2x₹4109 cr6.4%10.0%0.3x
2024-1274.7x₹4109 cr6.4%10.0%0.3x
2024-1171.8x₹4084 cr6.4%10.0%0.3x
2024-1065.6x₹4084 cr6.4%10.0%0.3x
2024-0971.0x₹4084 cr6.4%10.0%0.3x
2024-0857.2x₹4136 cr6.7%10.0%0.3x
2024-0752.7x₹4136 cr6.7%10.0%0.3x
2024-0645.2x₹4136 cr6.7%10.0%0.3x
2024-0525.9x₹4773 cr11.6%16.0%0.2x
2024-0428.6x₹4773 cr11.6%16.0%0.2x
2024-0323.4x₹4773 cr11.6%16.0%0.2x
2024-0225.0x₹4773 cr11.6%16.0%0.2x
2024-0122.7x₹4773 cr11.6%16.0%0.2x
2023-1226.3x₹4773 cr11.6%16.0%0.2x
2023-1122.3x₹4773 cr11.6%16.0%0.2x
2023-1021.7x₹4773 cr11.6%16.0%0.2x
2023-0924.8x₹4773 cr11.6%16.0%0.2x
2023-0826.7x₹4773 cr11.6%16.0%0.2x
2023-0721.5x₹4773 cr11.6%16.0%0.2x
2023-0622.1x₹4773 cr11.6%16.0%0.2x
2023-0513.1x₹4949 cr19.6%29.0%0.1x
2023-0414.1x₹4949 cr19.6%29.0%0.1x
2023-0312.0x₹4949 cr19.6%29.0%0.1x
2023-0214.9x₹4949 cr19.6%29.0%0.1x
2023-0116.4x₹4949 cr19.6%29.0%0.1x
2022-1217.7x₹4949 cr19.6%29.0%0.1x
2022-1118.0x₹4949 cr19.6%29.0%0.1x
2022-1017.2x₹4949 cr19.6%29.0%0.1x
2022-0917.2x₹4949 cr19.6%29.0%0.1x
2022-0815.7x₹4949 cr19.6%29.0%0.1x
2022-0717.7x₹4949 cr19.6%29.0%0.1x
2022-0616.2x₹4949 cr19.6%29.0%0.1x
2022-05148.4x₹684 cr2.8%8.0%0.3x
2022-04147.6x₹684 cr2.8%8.0%0.3x
2022-03131.9x₹684 cr2.8%8.0%0.3x
2022-02146.0x₹684 cr2.8%8.0%0.3x
2022-01167.8x₹684 cr2.8%8.0%0.3x
2021-12168.2x₹684 cr2.8%8.0%0.3x
2021-11161.8x₹684 cr2.8%8.0%0.3x
2021-10196.3x₹684 cr2.8%8.0%0.3x
2021-09221.6x₹684 cr2.8%8.0%0.3x
2021-08218.6x₹684 cr2.8%8.0%0.3x
2021-07174.0x₹684 cr2.8%8.0%0.3x
2021-06153.5x₹684 cr2.8%8.0%0.3x
2021-05—₹0 cr-338.7%—0.0x
2021-04—₹0 cr-338.7%—0.0x
2021-03—₹0 cr-338.7%—0.0x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback