अApnaFunda
Menu

SANSERA ENGINEERING LIMITED (SANSERA)

Producer Manufacturing · Auto Parts: OEM · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.70 / 100
Profitability 67Growth 71Balance sheet 71
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.57 / 100
Price 92Earnings 71FII/DII 7

Passes these screensHigh MomentumNear 52-week high

Compare withSAMVARDHANA MOTHERSON INTBOSCHCUMMINS INDIA

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹4,653.4 latest close · +43.1% over the last 90 sessions

₹3,000₹3,500₹4,000₹4,500Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹3,000₹3,500₹4,000₹4,500Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹4,653.4 month-end · +166.0% over 12 months

₹2,000₹3,000₹4,000Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹2,000₹3,000₹4,000Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹4,653.4 month-end · +454.0% over 3 years

₹2,000₹4,000Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹2,000₹4,000Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹4,653.4 month-end · +477.3% since Sep '21

₹2,000₹4,000Sep '21Sep '22Oct '23Oct '24Nov '25Nov '26 ₹2,000₹4,000Sep '21Apr '24Nov '26

52-week range ₹1488.00 to ₹4743.50 · 1-year volatility 43.1%

Was the rally earned?

+166%share price, 1 yearEarnings and multiple

Both mattered.

  • Per-share earnings added 66 points and the multiple added 100 points (P/E 46.0x to 83.2x).
  • The share count rose 3%.
Net profit growth: +71 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+71 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +100 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+100 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −5 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−5 ptsShare count changeShare price: +166%+166%Share priceNet profit growth: +71 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+71ProfitP/E change: +100 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+100P/EShare count change: −5 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−5SharesShare price: +166%+166%Share price
Net profit growth+71 ptsNet profit rose about 52%, which lifts the price.
P/E change+100 ptsThe P/E rose from 46.0x to 83.2x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-5 ptsShare count rose 3%, which lowers the price.
+454%share price, 3 yearsEarnings and multiple

Both mattered.

  • Per-share earnings added 187 points and the multiple added 267 points (P/E 30.4x to 83.2x).
  • The share count rose 17%.
Net profit growth: +228 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+228 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +267 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+267 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −40 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−40 ptsShare count changeShare price: +454%+454%Share priceNet profit growth: +228 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+228ProfitP/E change: +267 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+267P/EShare count change: −40 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−40SharesShare price: +454%+454%Share price
Net profit growth+228 ptsNet profit rose about 136%, which lifts the price.
P/E change+267 ptsThe P/E rose from 30.4x to 83.2x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-40 ptsShare count rose 17%, which lowers the price.
+493%share price, 5 yearsEarnings and multiple

Both mattered.

  • Per-share earnings added 246 points and the multiple added 247 points (P/E 34.1x to 83.2x).
  • The share count rose 31%.
Net profit growth: +320 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+320 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +247 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+247 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −74 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−74 ptsShare count changeShare price: +493%+493%Share priceNet profit growth: +320 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+320ProfitP/E change: +247 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+247P/EShare count change: −74 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−74SharesShare price: +493%+493%Share price
Net profit growth+320 ptsNet profit rose about 217%, which lifts the price.
P/E change+247 ptsThe P/E rose from 34.1x to 83.2x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-74 ptsShare count rose 31%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with SAMVARDHANA MOTHERSON INT

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-40.2%recovered 2025-11
1-year volatility43.1%annualised
Beta vs sector index1.053-year daily, correlation 0.59
Volume spikes1last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−10%−20%−30%20222023202420252026−36.9% 0%−10%−20%−30%202220242026−36.9%
Largest drawdowns

-40.2% (2024-09 peak to 2025-04 low, recovered 2025-11)

-33.8% (2021-11 peak to 2022-03 low, recovered 2023-06)

-17.0% (2026-02 peak to 2026-03 low, recovered 2026-04)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-09-29: 5x the 50-day median, price -2.1% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

83.2xP/E todayNear its historic high
Against its own history100th percentile
CheapestMedian 35.0xDearest

Usual range 29.2x to 61.0x since 2021-09.

Against Producer Manufacturing83.2x vs 29.6x
This company
83.2x
Sector median
29.6x

181% above the Producer Manufacturing median.

24.9x44.3x63.7x83.2xSep '21Oct '22Nov '23Dec '24Jan '26Nov '2624.9x44.3x63.7x83.2xSep '21Jun '23Mar '25Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Producer Manufacturing is valued

Where does it rank among Producer Manufacturing peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Producer Manufacturing peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE50th▲ 8 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin85th▲ 7 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth72nd▲ 32 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth77th▲ 22 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓55th▼ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓55thflat vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓10th▼ 24 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum99th▲ 22 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Producer Manufacturing sector page Watch it move against Producer Manufacturing in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~40%annual earnings growth implied by the priceAbove delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 143.8x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 40.0%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered14.3%/yrEPS, last 8 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap+25.7 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank82ndmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

0%20%40% Sep 2021Nov 2026 0%20%40% Sep 2021Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x41.9%43.1%44.4%
15x38.8%40.0%41.3%
20x34.9%36.1%37.4%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 40.0%/yr

Looking back

  • Jan 2022Price implied 23%/yr; EPS has since grown 17%/yr (5.0 yrs)

Past comparisons cover only companies listed today (survivorship bias) and say nothing about future outcomes.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Producer Manufacturing The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹4653.40
P/E
83.2x
ROCE
15.0%
Market Cap
₹29043 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹3753 cr
P/S
7.7x
P/B
9.4x
ROE
11.3%
Operating Margin
19.0%
Debt / Equity
0.2x
Promoter Holding
29.2%
12M Momentum
166.1%

52-week range

₹1488.00₹4743.50
97% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
43.1%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.26

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
12.9x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
1.55x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

6 of 7checks within range1 near a threshold
Other income reliance7%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 6.9%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate27%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 26.5%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion1.55xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 1.55x (cash from operations ₹1,138 cr, net profit ₹732 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow2 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 2. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+5 daysWithin range

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 5 days (65 vs 60). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress10% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 10% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days+29 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by +29 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, FIIs trimmed 7.5 pts; promoters trimmed 6.0 pts; DIIs added 5.9 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 71,930 to 1.0 lakh (+45%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters35.2%29.2%-6.0 pts
FIIs29.0%21.5%-7.5 pts
DIIs25.1%31.0%+5.9 pts
Public and others10.7%18.2%+7.5 pts

Number of shareholders

1.0 lakhshareholders+45% since Sep '23
69k81k93k1.0L Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 71,930
Dec '23: 74,344
Mar '24: 75,212
Jun '24: 72,028
Sep '24: 69,225
Dec '24: 79,726
Mar '25: 76,609
Jun '25: 78,921
Sep '25: 77,136
Dec '25: 77,445
Mar '26: 94,980
Jun '26: 1.0 lakh
 69k81k93k1.0L Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 71,930
Dec '23: 74,344
Mar '24: 75,212
Jun '24: 72,028
Sep '24: 69,225
Dec '24: 79,726
Mar '25: 76,609
Jun '25: 78,921
Sep '25: 77,136
Dec '25: 77,445
Mar '26: 94,980
Jun '26: 1.0 lakh

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+2.2%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like SANSERA ENGINEERING LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −23% to +22% vs the market, against −3% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+5.3%, 80% range −4.2% to +11.4%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
TARIL · Dec 2024: −52.6% vs market
ORCHPHARMA · Nov 2024: −52.2% vs market
GRANULES · Oct 2020: −49.4% vs market
FSL · Feb 2025: −46.7% vs market
ANUP · Nov 2024: −40.5% vs market
THERMAX · May 2024: −40.4% vs market
ANANTRAJ · Dec 2024: −39.4% vs market
APLLTD · May 2020: −37.3% vs market
HSCL · Sep 2024: −27.8% vs market
RALLIS · Jun 2020: −27.0% vs market
AURIONPRO · Aug 2024: −25.6% vs market
COFORGE · Jun 2025: −24.0% vs market
GALLANTT · Jul 2025: −23.9% vs market
FORTIS · Sep 2025: −21.0% vs market
TRENT · Feb 2020: −19.4% vs market
BORORENEW · Nov 2021: −15.5% vs market
EPL · Mar 2020: −15.3% vs market
FLUOROCHEM · Jun 2022: −12.0% vs market
ELGIEQUIP · Aug 2022: −10.3% vs market
GREENPANEL · Oct 2021: −7.0% vs market
SUZLON · Jul 2024: −5.7% vs market
IPCALAB · Feb 2020: −0.2% vs market
BALAMINES · Apr 2021: +0.9% vs market
LAURUSLABS · Oct 2020: +1.1% vs market
PRINCEPIPE · Apr 2021: +1.6% vs market
HBLENGINE · Jan 2024: +2.8% vs market
APLAPOLLO · Mar 2021: +5.7% vs market
ASTEC · May 2020: +7.1% vs market
SRF · Apr 2020: +8.3% vs market
KPITTECH · Dec 2021: +10.8% vs market
ABDL · Oct 2025: +11.5% vs market
BALKRISIND · May 2020: +17.1% vs market
SHAILY · Mar 2025: +17.2% vs market
CARTRADE · Jul 2025: +18.1% vs market
TATACONSUM · Apr 2020: +19.2% vs market
BECTORFOOD · Oct 2023: +21.1% vs market
JBCHEPHARM · May 2020: +21.7% vs market
MASTEK · May 2021: +22.3% vs market
BLS · Nov 2022: +24.2% vs market
ASTRAL · Mar 2020: +27.7% vs market
RADICO · Aug 2025: +46.0% vs market
KAYNES · Feb 2024: +46.2% vs market
AMBER · Mar 2020: +49.9% vs market
POWERINDIA · Jun 2024: +51.8% vs market
NEULANDLAB · Feb 2024: +54.4% vs market
SAREGAMA · May 2021: +54.6% vs market
ACUTAAS · Feb 2025: +68.7% vs market
NEWGEN · Dec 2023: +85.3% vs market
POLYMED · May 2020: +100.0% vs market
MTARTECH · Oct 2025: +183.6% vs market
Similar setups +2.2%All companies −3.1%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 1 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+2.2%
All companies' median
−3.1%
Beat the market
56% vs 47%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 33 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
ACUTAAS
Process Industries		 Feb 2025 91x16% +95%−17% +69%
SHAILY
Process Industries		 Mar 2025 100x14% +245%−5% +17%
EPL
Process Industries		 Mar 2020 25x17% +33%−19% −15%
IPCALAB
Health Technology		 Feb 2020 39x16% +68%−7% 0%
TARIL
Producer Manufacturing		 Dec 2024 138x15% +393%−2% −53%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
KPITTECH
Technology Services		 Dec 2021 115x14% +332%0% +11%
LAURUSLABS
Health Technology		 Oct 2020 67x14% +332%−6% +1%
APLLTD
Health Technology		 May 2020 28x23% +68%−3% −37%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: P/S, drawdown from 12-month high and P/E. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 5 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to SANSERA ENGINEERING LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

SHILPA MEDICARESHILPAMED
Health Technology
67%similar
revenue growthvolatility
ASTRA MICROWAVE PRODUCTSASTRAMICRO
Electronic Technology
66%similar
operating marginP/E
GLOBAL HEALTHMEDANTA
Health Services
63%similar
market cappromoter holding
NAVIN FLUORINE INTERNATIONAL LNAVINFLUOR
Process Industries
63%similar
EPS growthrevenue
SYRMA SGS TECHNOLOGY LIMITESYRMA
Electronic Technology
62%similar
market capP/E
SONA BLW PRECISION FORGINGSSONACOMS
Producer Manufacturing
64%similar
P/Epromoter holding
SPR AUTO TECHNOLOGIESSHRIPISTON
Producer Manufacturing
56%similar
EPS growthoperating margin
KEI INDUSTRIESKEI
Producer Manufacturing
55%similar
EPS growthmarket cap

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Jun '23

  1. SepInstitutionsFII + DII holding fell 3.1 pts over 2 quarters to 52.6%.
  2. SepPriceVolume reached 5.0x its 50-day median on 2026-09-29; price -2.1% that day.
  3. AugPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  4. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  5. MayPriceVolume reached 15.0x its 50-day median on 2026-05-21; price +14.8% that day.
  6. FebPriceVolume reached 11.1x its 50-day median on 2026-02-10; price +6.4% that day.
  7. JanDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.15x.
  8. NovPriceRegained the 2024-09 peak, 7 months after the low.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. NovValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (46.0x).
  2. NovPriceVolume reached 6.0x its 50-day median on 2025-11-13; price +0.1% that day.
  3. SepPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  4. SepPriceVolume reached 13.4x its 50-day median on 2025-09-17; price +5.5% that day.
  5. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  6. JunDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.15x.
  7. JunSharesShare count is up 9.1% over 12 months.
  8. AprPriceFell 40% from the Sep 2024 peak to the Apr 2025 low.
  9. MarPromoterPromoter holding fell 4.5 pts to 30.3% (largest drop in the history since 2019-01).
  10. MarInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 7.8 pts over 2 quarters to 58.1%.
  11. NovPriceVolume reached 7.2x its 50-day median on 2024-11-25; price +7.6% that day.
  12. SepPriceVolume reached 9.1x its 50-day median on 2024-09-20; price +4.6% that day.
  13. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹2,812 cr.
  14. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  15. JunPriceVolume reached 13.5x its 50-day median on 2024-06-19; price +5.0% that day.
  16. MarInstitutionsFII + DII holding fell 3.2 pts over 1 quarter to 51.0%.
  17. DecValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (36.9x).
  18. NovPriceVolume reached 6.4x its 50-day median on 2023-11-01; price -1.5% that day.
  19. OctSharesShare count is up 10.0% over 12 months.
  20. AugPriceVolume reached 6.4x its 50-day median on 2023-08-03; price -0.7% that day.
  21. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹2,338 cr.
  22. JunPriceRegained the 2021-11 peak, 15 months after the low.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history63 months · 2021-09 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1183.2x₹3753 cr11.3%15.0%0.2x
2026-1073.5x₹3753 cr11.3%15.0%0.2x
2026-0981.1x₹3753 cr11.3%15.0%0.2x
2026-0877.1x₹3498 cr10.6%15.0%0.2x
2026-0764.2x₹3498 cr10.6%15.0%0.2x
2026-0661.3x₹3498 cr10.6%15.0%0.2x
2026-0567.8x₹3281 cr9.5%14.0%0.1x
2026-0459.5x₹3281 cr9.5%14.0%0.1x
2026-0349.1x₹3281 cr9.5%14.0%0.1x
2026-0258.3x₹3101 cr9.1%14.0%0.1x
2026-0143.2x₹3101 cr9.1%14.0%0.1x
2025-1241.8x₹3101 cr9.1%14.0%0.1x
2025-1146.0x₹3039 cr8.4%14.0%0.1x
2025-1039.8x₹3039 cr8.4%14.0%0.1x
2025-0936.1x₹3039 cr8.4%14.0%0.1x
2025-0834.2x₹3017 cr7.9%14.0%0.1x
2025-0736.0x₹3017 cr7.9%14.0%0.1x
2025-0637.2x₹3017 cr7.9%14.0%0.1x
2025-0537.7x₹2981 cr15.1%16.0%0.7x
2025-0430.0x₹2981 cr15.1%16.0%0.7x
2025-0333.7x₹2981 cr15.1%16.0%0.7x
2025-0231.0x₹2966 cr14.5%16.0%0.7x
2025-0135.0x₹2966 cr14.5%16.0%0.7x
2024-1241.3x₹2966 cr14.5%16.0%0.7x
2024-1144.7x₹2896 cr14.2%16.0%0.7x
2024-1042.8x₹2896 cr14.2%16.0%0.7x
2024-0947.0x₹2896 cr14.2%16.0%0.7x
2024-0843.3x₹2812 cr13.9%16.0%0.7x
2024-0740.8x₹2812 cr13.9%16.0%0.7x
2024-0637.2x₹2812 cr13.9%16.0%0.7x
2024-0538.0x₹2338 cr12.7%14.0%0.7x
2024-0437.5x₹2338 cr12.7%14.0%0.7x
2024-0336.9x₹2338 cr12.7%14.0%0.7x
2024-0237.2x₹2338 cr12.7%14.0%0.7x
2024-0136.9x₹2338 cr12.7%14.0%0.7x
2023-1236.9x₹2338 cr12.7%14.0%0.7x
2023-1130.4x₹2338 cr12.7%14.0%0.7x
2023-1031.0x₹2338 cr12.7%14.0%0.7x
2023-0934.1x₹2338 cr12.7%14.0%0.7x
2023-0834.5x₹2338 cr12.7%14.0%0.7x
2023-0734.6x₹2338 cr12.7%14.0%0.7x
2023-0631.5x₹2338 cr12.7%14.0%0.7x
2023-0531.5x₹1989 cr12.9%14.0%0.7x
2023-0429.6x₹1989 cr12.9%14.0%0.7x
2023-0329.9x₹1989 cr12.9%14.0%0.7x
2023-0229.1x₹1989 cr12.9%14.0%0.7x
2023-0130.1x₹1989 cr12.9%14.0%0.7x
2022-1229.8x₹1989 cr12.9%14.0%0.7x
2022-1131.3x₹1989 cr12.9%14.0%0.7x
2022-1028.9x₹1989 cr12.9%14.0%0.7x
2022-0928.2x₹1989 cr12.9%14.0%0.7x
2022-0829.0x₹1989 cr12.9%14.0%0.7x
2022-0728.6x₹1989 cr12.9%14.0%0.7x
2022-0626.5x₹1989 cr12.9%14.0%0.7x
2022-0530.0x₹1549 cr12.5%13.0%0.7x
2022-0434.5x₹1549 cr12.5%13.0%0.7x
2022-0329.2x₹1549 cr12.5%13.0%0.7x
2022-0228.6x₹1549 cr12.5%13.0%0.7x
2022-0132.4x₹1549 cr12.5%13.0%0.7x
2021-1233.7x₹1549 cr12.5%13.0%0.7x
2021-1134.1x₹1549 cr12.5%13.0%0.7x
2021-1030.7x₹1549 cr12.5%13.0%0.7x
2021-0935.0x₹1549 cr12.5%13.0%0.7x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback